Stocks
Petition filed against SEBI in NSDL row

No matter how hard Securities Exchange Board of India (SEBI) chairman C B Bhave tries to dust the ashes of the 2005 IPO scam under the carpet, it comes right back to haunt him. An aggrieved investor, V Narayan Reddy, has filed a writ petition in the Andhra Pradesh High Court, questioning the market regulator’s action of withholding a final order passed by its two-member committee with respect to the role of National Securities Depository Ltd (NSDL) in the IPO scam. He alleges that SEBI is not inclined to publish the order to prevent adverse consequences for Mr Bhave, as he was the chairman and managing director of NSDL when the scam occurred.
 
The final order was passed on 4 December 2008 by a two-member committee comprising independent directors of SEBI Board, Dr Mohan Gopal and V Leeladhar. The committee was specifically tasked with disposing the ongoing quasi-judicial proceedings against NSDL. The PIL came up before a bench comprising Chief Justice Anil Dave and C V Nagarjuna Reddy. The court has issued a notice to the regulator and posted the matter for hearing on 13 October 2009.
 
The petitioner also submitted that in addition to the failure of NSDL, there was also a failure of SEBI to protect the interest of the investors and regulate the depository system. He claims that SEBI has ulterior motives in not publishing the final order. It is his belief that apart from indicting NSDL, the order also indicts SEBI for its failure to regulate depositories and that it has also given directions to SEBI to conduct an investigation of individuals at NSDL who were responsible for this scam. He opines that SEBI’s reluctance to release the order also stems from its efforts to protect then NSDL chairman CB Bhave. To avoid conflict of interest, Mr Bhave has since recused himself from the ongoing proceedings with regard to role of NSDL in the IPO scam.

Instead of complying with the order, the SEBI Board by a resolution dated 13 April2009, decided to withhold publication of the order on the ground that it was examining whether SEBI has the power to review the said order. Even after ten months of passing of the final order, SEBI is yet to release the order or take any steps to comply with the directions given in the said order.
 
Subsequent to the scam coming to light in 2005, SEBI had conducted an investigation into the role of NSDL in the said scam. Pursuant to the investigation, SEBI issued an interim order that found several failures on the part of NSDL to detect and prevent the scam. It was found that numerous benami accounts had been opened with NSDL and CSDL between 2003 and 2005, with the aim of cornering shares reserved for retail investors. Both these depositories were aware that dummy accounts were being opened, but failed to prevent the scam. In view of these grave lapses, the interim order had directed a revamping of NSDL management. NSDL, however, challenged the validity of this order before the Special Appellate Tribunal (SAT), but did not press the appeal because of a statement from SEBI’s counsel that the observations made in the interim order are “prima facie observations” and are subject to a final order passed by SEBI. The two-member committee of SEBI, after hearing the arguments of NSDL and SEBI, passed a series of final orders on 4.12.2008 with respect to the role of NSDL in the IPO scam.
 
The petitioner has requested the bench to consider the action of SEBI in not publishing the final order as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional and ultra-vires of the provisions of the SEBI Act and Depositories Act. He has also requested the court to direct SEBI to publish the suppressed committee report and take appropriate action as per the direction given by the two-member committee to prevent the fraud and abuse of the depository system.
 

User

Crude Oil to Natural Gas Ratio

In the Moneylife issue dated 24 September 2009, we had written about crude oil to natural gas ratio hitting its highest level indicating that oil is vastly expensive relative to natural gas. The conclusion was that either natural gas would go up sharply or oil would fall. Since then, natural gas has shot up 62%, while oil has been weak. Natural gas prices surged mainly because gas supply was expected to be in line with demand, resulting from the brisk pullback in US drilling activity. The number of rigs drilling for natural gas in the US has decreased 56% since last year.
 

User

SFIO to be armed with powers to interrogate, seize papers: Govt
The Indian government is likely to arm the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO), an investigating wing of the Corporate Affairs Ministry, with powers to interrogate and seize documents among others, following the complaints that it faced problems in probing the multi-crore Satyam accounting fraud, reports PTI.
 
The move comes amid requests from the SFIO functionaries who wanted requisite powers to call for documents and question people to effectively probe grave corporate frauds.
 
The new Company Bill, 2009, which is currently being looked into by a Parliamentary Standing Committee, is expected to provide statutory status and powers to the SFIO like any other investigating agency.
 
Speaking to PTI, Corporate Affairs Minister Salman Khurshid, said, "SFIO requires some more teeth, some more investigation powers to be given to them and other powers that go with investigations."
 
Pointing out that the SFIO would be given statutory and legal powers in line with the Vepa Kamesan Committee report, the minister said, "The biggest problem with us is that we can neither do requisition nor could we keep the records."
 
"We certainly could not interrogate. We certainly could not investigate. That is the problem...I think that (committee recommendations) would be taken care of in the bill.”
 
Admitting that SFIO's expertise was stretched to the last limit during the Satyam probe, Khurshid said lack of manpower was a "handicap" at the beginning of the probe.
 
The SFIO had already submitted a 14,000-page report to the government on the Satyam fraud and is currently probing the issues concerning siphoning off of funds by Satyam promoters including its founder chairman B Ramalinga Raju.
 
"Lack of manpower has not affected Satyam investigations so much but lack of manpower has caused consequential problems because everything was concentrated on Satyam. It was an important case for the country and for us.”
 
"Therefore we have to put every resource that was available to SFIO essentially towards looking after Satyam. We had to station people in Hyderabad. We had to look at various leads available. The personnel issue is largely taken care of and resolved," he said.
 

User

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
  Loading...
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email

BUY NOW

The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)