The company, which is hoping to launch the indices by September this year, said the indices will be the barometer for measurement of the real estate sector performance and will also enable trade on the exchange
Mumbai: New Delhi-based research firm PE Analytics has drawn up plans to launch its Real Estate Price Index in partnership with a leading commodity exchange, reports PTI.
PE Analytics owns and operates PropEquity, an online subscription-based real estate data and analytics portal covering over 27,000 projects of 5,100 developers across 40 cities in India. The data and analytics enable clients to spot market trends and maximise risk-adjusted returns.
“We are launching the first residential and commercial indices based on transaction prices in partnership with the leading commodity exchange shortly after a nod from the government," PE Analytics CEO Samir Jasuja told PTI here.
These indices will be based on the actual transaction and registration values prevailing in various micro-markets for the residential and commercial asset classes.
PropEquity is collaborating with India’s banking and finance regulatory body and the country’s largest commodity exchange to develop housing starts and realty indices.
The indices will be the barometer for measurement of the real estate sector performance and will also enable trade on the exchange. The company is looking at September 2011 to go live with this product offering, Mr Jasuja said.
PropEquity has created products that are unique in the Indian context and which have been validated through the market and with marquee customers, he said.
With future plans already underway, Mr Jasuja envisions PropEquity as a pan-Asia product and intends to raise a second round of funding for the company in 2011.
PropEquity has 120 employees, which will grow to over 200 in the coming year. A Nasdaq listing is planned within three years, Mr Jasuja said.
The company’s One Click Report is a first of its kind product in India bringing transparency to an otherwise opaque real estate industry. This product empowers the end consumer to make informed decisions regarding investments in real estate, he said.
“The consumer can take decisions with confidence since we give him real time information backed by research and analytics conducted by a full-fledged intelligence centre. Our detailed and extensive research pans over 27,000 projects spread over 40 cities and tracks over 5100 developers in India. The company offers customised reports for a holistic solution depending on consumer needs.”
Commenting on future plan, Mr Jasuja said the company’s vision is to create an information service enterprise through continuous innovation and integration of real time data, analytics and cutting edge technology to achieve higher transparency for participants and beneficiaries of the realty sector.
Total sales of vehicles across categories registered a growth of 22.80% to 13,38,564 units in April as against 10,90,041 units in the same month last year, according to the figures released by the Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers
New Delhi: Domestic passenger car sales jumped by 13.18% to 1,62,825 units in April from 1,43,862 units in the same month last year, reports PTI.
According to the figures released by the Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers (SIAM) today, motorcycle sales in the country during the month grew by 23.39% to 8,09,565 units from 6,56,096 units in the corresponding month last year.
Total two-wheeler sales last month increased by 26.44% to 10,43,970 units from 8,25,632 units in April, 2010.
Sales of commercial vehicles jumped by 8.22% to 53,202 units from 49,162 units in the year-ago period, SIAM said.
Total sales of vehicles across categories registered a growth of 22.80% to 13,38,564 units in April as against 10,90,041 units in the same month last year, it added.
The scandalous ganging up of some SEBI members to protect CB Bhave and NSDL—reported extensively only in Moneylife and conveniently glossed over by all mainline media—is coming back to haunt SEBI
There were two major developments over the weekend, which underline the murky and the capricious nature of capital market regulation (Mirror, mirror on the wall…) over the past three years that we have been highlighting.
Moneylife has been the only publication to point out that the spate of eulogies about CB Bhave’s tenure as chairman of the Securities & Exchange Board of India (SEBI) while the mainline media's coverage like,“best SEBI chairman” and “the best three years of SEBI ever”, were motivated and highly misplaced.
Strangely, with Mr Bhave gone and with a new chairman at the SEBI, the mainline media is now quietly changing its tune.
Moneylife has long pointed out how the government had appointed CB Bhave as chairman when there was pending litigation between SEBI and the National Securities Depository Ltd (NSDL), which he founded and headed for over a decade. The SEBI action against NSDL was based on an independent inspection ordered by the regulator into the systems, processes and the multiple initial public offering (IPO) applications scam that went unnoticed by both depositories, indicating serious flaws in their operations.
For the record, the inspection report showed that the systems in the Central Depository Service Ltd (CDSL) were far worse than that in NSDL.
The Finance Ministry came up with a dubious strategy to “ring-fence” Mr Bhave as SEBI chairman from the NSDL-SEBI litigation by appointing a two-member bench of the SEBI board to investigate the allegations afresh. It comprised Dr Mohan Gopal, who headed the National Judicial Academy and RBI's former deputy governor V Leeladhar.
However, it was soon clear that the ‘ring-fence’ was a sham and SEBI moved rapidly to eliminate all traces of the IPO scam, paving the way for whitewashing NSDL and exonerating Mr Bhave. Almost everyone accused was cleared through consent orders. The most outrageous was the one-line order closing the case against CDSL, with no attempt to ensure that it has cleaned up its act.
While Mr Bhave recused himself from these meetings and decisions, SEBI’s whole-time members acted for him with strong support from Dr KP Krishnan, then Joint Secretary, Capital Markets. However, the Finance Ministry’s plan (formulated by Dr KP Krishnan, under finance minister P Chidambaram) received a big jolt when the Mohan Gopal-Leeladhar bench upheld many of the charges against NSDL instead of dismissing them.
Immediately thereafter, SEBI with the support of the finance ministry launched a series of actions to bury the report, then discredit and humiliate Dr Mohan Gopal and finally throw out the orders of the bench by declaring them ‘non est’. Mohandas Pai, then with Infosys Ltd, and the only private-sector employee to grace the board of a regulator, lent his muscle at that stage.
A Chartered Accountant who moved to oversee human resources in Infosys, Mr Pai doubled up as a legal expert and chaired a crucial SEBI board meeting which declared the Pai–Leeladhar orders ‘non est’, or not existing in the eyes of the law.
Even the RBI deputy governor Usha Thorat and other government nominees chose to play along, rather than raise questions.
The issue was taken to court by an NGO, leading to the Supreme Court hearing the case more sympathetically after Mr Bhave’s term as SEBI chairman had ended. On 8th May, Manoj Mitta of the Times of India, who had first reported how SEBI has buried the orders of the Mohan Gopal-Leeladhar bench reported that SEBI had now filed an affidavit (after its quick board meeting on 26th April 2011) in the Supreme Court (on 5th May) saying it would "reconsider" the very (two) orders it had declared as "non-est" (invalid) in November 2009 when Mr Bhave was chairman. The SEBI board’s U-turn happened after the Supreme Court pulled up the regulator for preventing the orders against NSDL from coming into effect and asking it to "pass an appropriate resolution and place it before this court for further consideration".
With intriguing coincidence, in the run-up to this affidavit, several publications (Mint, Times of India and The Economic Times, among others) started a loud drumbeat on how Mr Bhave was unfairly denied an extension to his three-year tenure. Each report conveniently ignored the dubious goings-on during his tenure to bury the investigation and orders against NSDL.
For the record, however, NSDL is a fairly well-run organisation, which has an unclear regulatory structure that Moneylife alone has pointed out so far. This could pose serious issues in the future, but engages neither the regulator nor the media.
Unfortunately, a headstrong Mr Bhave took the attitude that NSDL is a perfect institution and cannot be criticised for any failing. This attitude led to a rash of dubious actions, where he ended up twisting all systems and processes to justify his stand.
On 8th May, PTI reported how RTI (right to information) activist Subash C Agarwal had obtained a letter written by Dr Mohan Gopal on 24th December 2010 to the Prime Minister, where it said that SEBI had “abused” its power to protect Mr Bhave from an independent inquiry into NSDL’s role in the IPO scam.
The PM’s inaction (the letter was forwarded to the finance ministry), is yet another example in the long lost of wrongdoing that the Prime Minister condoned with his silence and inaction. In fact, neither the PM nor the Finance Ministry looked into any of the dozens of capricious and motivated decisions of SEBI that were reported by Moneylife over the past two years.
To recap the various issues leading to the current, here is the report of a two-member bench of the SEBI board, whose findings were declared void. This was part of a series of dubious decisions that Moneylife has reported earlier.
1. Appointment of CB Bhave as SEBI chairman when there were SEBI investigations pending against the organisation he previously headed.
2. The assumption, implicit in this decision that NSDL was not even guilty of minor transgressions or carelessness.
3. Attempt to artificially "ring-fence" Mr Bhave from NSDL-related issues.
4. Appointment of a two-member board committee (comprising Dr Mohan Gopal and RBI's former deputy governor V Leeladhar) to decide NSDL-related issues.
5. The mistake in assuming that NSDL will get a clean chit from the bench.
6. The attempt to bury the Gopal-Leeladhar report for several months.
7. Making the report public only after a public interest litigation was filed in the Andhra Pradesh High Court.
8. Exoneration of the rival CDSL through a one-line order, although charges against it were far more serious.
9. And finally, the controversial board meeting which exonerated NSDL and refused to consider a contrary legal opinion by no less than Supreme Court's former chief justice JS Verma.
Unfortunately for SEBI, a Delhi-based NGO called Manav Adhikar filed a special leave petition before the Supreme Court, which led to a direction by the apex court (on 28 March 2011) to reconsider its decision.
You may also want to read...