Bonds, Currencies & Commodities
NSEL halts trading in e-series contracts as well

E-series contributed about 40% of NSEL’s turnover of Rs18,315-crore in June

National Spot Exchange Ltd (NSEL) on Tuesday stopped trading in the last available e-series contracts of items like gold and silver on its bourse, in anticipation of the government’s order banning trade of these products.


The development has led to a complete halt of operation on NSEL platform as the exchange on 31st July had suspended trading of all contracts other than e-series contracts.


NSEL offers e-series contracts in gold, silver, copper, zinc, lead, nickel and platinum. Under e-series contracts, retail investors can buy and sell commodities in demat form.


E-series contributed about 40% of NSEL’s Rs18,315-crore total turnover in June.


“We have not yet received Government order, but as abundant precaution, we will not commence trading in e-series at 10am,” NSEL said on its website.


The exchange said, “It will check with the authorities to find out the facts. In any case we will fully comply with the government order.”


A company spokesperson said the entire trade is suspended on NSEL today.


E-series contracts is a unique market segment, which functions like the cash segment in equities, but offers commodities in the demat form in smaller denominations.


The clearing and settlement, pay-in and pay-out mechanism on the NSEL is based on T+2 (settlement in 2 days) cycle.


NSEL is currently grappling with the problem of payment settlement of an estimated Rs 6,000 crore to the investors after the suspension of trade.


EPFO rebuts finance ministry claims over returns from NPS

EPFO disagrees with finance ministry's proposal to encourage its subscribers to shift to NPS and claims its own EPS provide better returns than the new pension system

Rebutting the claims of finance ministry over the new pension system (NPS), retirement fund body Employees' Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) has said NPS does not provide better returns than its employees’ pension scheme-1995 (EPS).


EPFO also said it disagrees with finance ministry's proposal to encourage its subscribers to shift to NPS. 


In response to a letter written by financial services secretary to labour secretary, the EPFO said, "If we take return of EPS as indicative return on the fund managed under EPS, then the annualised return between May 2009 to May 2013 will be 10.47%, which on the face of it, is higher than the return declared by NPS in its scheme for the central government."


Finance Ministry has written to the Labour Ministry saying that "The subscribers (of EPS) may be given an option to either remain with EPS or join NPS with the same contribution."


The ministry argued that NPS, which is self-sustaining pension system, could be a good substitute for EPS and would be beneficial for subscribers as they would get decent returns and adequate pension wealth.


Moreover, the Finance Ministry said, "The government would be free from any open ended and financially unsustainable liability of EPS..."


Disagreeing with the contention of the Finance Ministry, EPFO said that EPS scheme provides social security for lower income group people in their old age. In addition, it also provides pension to widow, children and dependents in case of death of the subscriber.


Under the EPS scheme, many interim benefits are provided. Subscribers can withdraw their contribution towards pension while withdrawing his or her EPF money. There is a lock in period of 15 years in NPS.


Moreover EPS subscribers get bonus of two years on completion of 20 years of service and there is provision of commutation or part withdrawal also. That is not available in NPS.


EPS's corpus size stood at Rs1.83 lakh crore while the same under NPS was at Rs29,852 crore as on March 2013.


EPFO has a subscriber base of over five crore and manages PF corpus of Rs3.7 lakh crore excluding the pension fund of Rs1.83 lakh crore.




3 years ago

NPS, in effect is a non-starter and is trying to pollute existing social security systems in its anxiety to remain at centre stage. If some proof is needed, please refer to the Business Standard interview(August 18) in which PFRDA Chairman has asserted that ‘NPS is designed to offer pension to every worker.’ Perhaps, the questions posed by Sreelatha Menon in the interview were more informative than the evasive and vague answers given by the PFRDA Chairman. His counter to the first question, ‘How can I have a view contradictory to what he (FM) says?’ set the tone and content of his defence of NPS.

Though government and to some extent the media have been marketing NPS as a solution for social security problems of future ‘senior citizens’ of India, it is common knowledge that the scheme was introduced through back-door to get over the impossible task of starting to make provision for an estimated pension liability of nearly 4 lakh crore rupees when 6th Pay Commission was finalizing its report in 2006.

Other than the new central government employees who joined service from January 1, 2004 and others (state government and PSU employees) for whom NPS was made compulsory, effective various dates thereafter whose contribution adds up to about 85% of the Rs35,000 crore corpus mentioned by PFRDA Chairman, the receipt from the 90 per cent workforce outside the organized sector so far is admittedly too low at Rs5,000 crore.

Now, the effort will be to swallow EPFO and other organizations or departments which are otherwise doing well. It is time for a mid-term review of the whole concept of NPS.

BHEL June quarter results were a shocker, says Nomura

This is just the start of a bad earnings cycle for BHEL- execution problems are expected to continue, if not escalate, while competitive pressures and lower utilisation will impact margins further, over the coming years-Nomura

State-run BHEL’s June quarter results were shocking-24% year-on-year (yoy) decline in revenues clearly highlights the extremely challenging state of power sector, says Nomura Financial Advisory and Securities (India) Pvt Ltd. According to a Nomura research note, BHEL’s EBITDA plunged 68% yoy, while profit after tax (PAT) declined 49%, finding some support from higher other income. Reported order inflow of Rs14.7 billion was also negligible in the context of full year expectation of Rs300-350 billion. The details of the quarterly results are given below:

According to Nomura, this is just the start of a bad earnings cycle for BHEL, as execution problems are expected to continue if not escalate further (especially in the current liquidity tightening scenario), while competitive pressures and lower utilisation will have further impact on margins over the coming years.


Hence, Nomura has made a ‘Reduce’ recommendation for the BHEL share with a target price of Rs185.


On the long term forecast for BHEL, Nomura points out:

(a) Commodity price declines could be a key upside risk, as nearly 50% of the order book is on fixed-price contracts;

(b) Significant developments in new coal sourcing, whether domestically or through imports, could drive new power capex, thus benefitting BHEL. 


Even as demand for power is unlikely to slow, Nomura expects actual capacity to be constrained by land and fuel availability and environmental clearances. Meanwhile, new concerns on execution emerge, as order book credibility for the sector is in question now.


We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

To continue

Sign Up or Sign In


To continue

Sign Up or Sign In



The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)