Alternative Investment
NRIs from UAE prefer Mumbai for property investment

According to a survey report, owing to the scarcity of fresh land available for construction, Navi Mumbai and other planned townships have effectively evolved as an alternative to Mumbai city

 

Despite high property prices, India's commercial capital Mumbai has once again emerged as the most popular and attractive property investment hotspot among the United Arab Emirates (UAE)-based Indians.

 

As many as 35% UAE-based Indian expats voted for the city as their favourite property destination in India, in a recently conducted survey.

 

In the report, published by Sumansa Exhibitions, who also organise the Indian Property Show to be held in Dubai in December, Bangalore grabbed the 2nd spot with 24.13% votes going for it as the most favourite city for NRI property investments.

 

Bangalore catches the fancy of NRI investors due to its multi-directional growth in recent years plus potential of giving significant return on investment.

 

"The real estate in India continues to attract investors as the sector presents huge investment opportunities for individuals. In earlier times, most of the people purchased property for their own use but now it has also became an investment option for life time," said Sunil Jaiswal, President, Sumansa Exhibitions.

 

Known for its up-market locations and nodes of premium residential colonies, Mumbai stands aloft as one of the most preferred destinations for habitation in India.

 

"However, owing to the scarcity of fresh land available for construction, Navi Mumbai and other planned townships have effectively evolved as an alternative to Mumbai city," Jaiswal said.

 

"Bangalore is one of the upcoming residential and commercial markets in India. It has seen multi-directional growth in recent years. Those planning to invest in Bangalore, this might be the perfect time," Jaiswal said.

 

Bangalore being a hub of information technology has been attracting real estate investors over the years, he said.

 

About 22,300 NRIs across UAE participated in the survey, which was conducted to understand the reason of buying property in India, preferred cities for investments, type of property, time frame, budget and finances planned.

 

Indian cities are also in the top 25 real estate destinations in the Asia Pacific region for real estate investment destinations.

 

Mumbai and Bangalore are on the 20th and 23rd positions respectively, on the list of investment destinations covered by the 'Emerging Trends in Real Estate Asia Pacific 2014' and published jointly by the Urban Land Institute (ULI) and PricewaterhouseCoopers.

User

Del Monte '10 Grapefruit' Claim is the Pits

Product labelling claims 64-ounce container has 10 grapefruit but our citrus test revealed only four would fit

 

Ten is a nice round number. It’s a decade, a bill, a strike in bowling, and the best place to start a countdown. Make no bones about it, we like 10.


We also like fruit. Del Monte sells fruit and makes the labeling claim that there are 10 grapefruit in its 64-ounce container of Sun Fresh Red Grapefruit. That’s a grapefruit for every 6.4 ounces but more importantly it’s 10(!), our darling digit. There is one problem, though: The 10 grapefruit claim is misleading — at best. In fact, if we were to put it on an accuracy scale of 1 to 10, we’d have to give it a 4.


TINA.org took a trip to the store this week in an effort to follow up on a tip about the issue from a reader. We checked out with the 64-ounce Del Monte container and 10 grapefruit.
 

Back at the office, we emptied out the contents of the jar and got to work peeling and segmenting the individual grapefruit, which we then dropped into the empty Del Monte container. After packing down the flesh of the fourth fruit, we could add no more. Six unpeeled grapefruit stood idly by.


The results of our citrus test closely mirrored those of a reader who said the Del Monte container could only hold five grapefruit when she put it to the test.


“Stating with emphasis and even highlighting the ‘Contains 10 Grapefruit!’ definitely seems to me to be false and misleading,” the reader wrote in an email. “I should have been getting one jar free with each one that I purchased.”
 

 

While the pieces of grapefruit we deposited into the empty container were less meaty (but larger) than the “dismembraned” Del Monte pieces we took out, the original Del Monte jar held at least a couple cups of water with the grapefruit pieces. So the area gained by the larger “membraned” slices we put in was in effect offset by the removal of the liquid.


The reader said she bought Del Monte because she considered 10 grapefruit for the cost a “fair price.” Indeed, at the Connecticut grocery store where we made our purchases, the big container went for $7.99 while the loose grapefruit cost $1 each. Presumably, that’s a savings of a couple bucks — a nice markdown for one item on a grocery list.


But employ our citrus test and the savings turn into a loss.


Click here for more of our coverage on fruit-related products.

 

Courtesy: TruthInAdvertising.org

User

Scoring the Latest Tobacco Bond Bailout: Investors $10, Taxpayers $1

Chautauqua County, New York helped a bondholder get nearly $6 million for bottom-of-the-barrel debt – the bondholder let the county keep $600,000

 

In our story last month about a tobacco bond bailout by New York's Niagara County, we noted that another county, Chautauqua, also had a deal in the works involving its distressed bonds.


Now the deal is done, and it seems Chautauqua fared even worse than its nearby upstate neighbor.


Oppenheimer Funds, the New York mutual fund manager, got $5.9 million to cash out of a speculative Chautauqua tobacco bond issue it had recently valued at only about a fourth of that amount. The firm declined to comment on the deal.


County taxpayers got $600,000, or about one-tenth of Oppenheimer's take. Just the fees necessary to get the deal done – $1.2 million paid to lawyers, bankers and others – were more than double Chautauqua's take.


"It is rare to see the issuer getting so little compared to the cost of issuance," said Matt Fabian, managing director at Municipal Market Advisors, a Massachusetts-based research firm.


In Niagara's recent tobacco bond bailout, the county got to keep about $2 million, a little less than a third of Oppenheimer's take of about $6.9 million. As with the Chautauqua deal, that was about four times value Oppenheimer reported on its books, according to mutual fund data provider Morningstar.


What's going on?


As we've reported previously, it all started with a massive legal settlement in 1998 under which big tobacco companies agreed to pay billions of dollars in compensation to states and U.S. territories like Puerto Rico for the health care costs of smoking. New York and California also shared the proceeds with county governments and some cities.


The money is paid out in yearly increments, but to get cash up front, many of these governments turned to Wall Street. They created special tobacco corporations and sold bonds to investors like Oppenheimer, agreeing to repay the debts exclusively with the tobacco income.


Years later, many of those bonds are headed for default. That's in part because less money is coming in under the legal settlement than expected, and also because some of the riskiest bonds – called capital appreciation bonds, or CABs ­– are piling up so much interest that they may never repay. As long as they remain outstanding, tobacco money coming in goes to investors and not the governments.


That was Chautauqua's situation.


The county of 133,000 participated in a 2005 CAB issue alongside 23 other New York counties. These CABs collectively obligated the counties' tobacco corporations to pay back nearly $6.8 billion. The debt was so big that Chautauqua said it might never see its tobacco money flow back to taxpayers.


Had Chautauqua never issued tobacco bonds, the county would have collected about $2.5 million this year from the settlement for its own uses. That might have come in handy now as the county is looking to close a $6 million budget deficit beginning in 2016.


County officials say the $600,000 received from the restructuring deal, which closed Nov. 6, will help fund a new facility for storing and maintaining highway equipment, such as snow plows. The county said it also benefits by avoiding the "likelihood of default."

 

The CABs the county bought out in the deal would have required a gargantuan $373.5 million payment on June 1, 2060.


The tradeoff is more debt today. The transaction refinances $27.5 million of senior tobacco bonds at a lower interest rate, but it increases the amount borrowed to $34.8 million. Most of the increase in principal went to buy out Oppenheimer, which still holds two additional sets of Chautauqua CABs.


Once Chautauqua's remaining tobacco debts get repaid, it can again start collecting settlement money for taxpayers' benefit.


"Eventually, there will be some residual proceeds from this refinance that will come back to the county," Chautauqua County Executive Vincent Horrigan said in an interview.
"It's quite a ways off," he added.


Under the deal, the remaining CABs would be repaid in 2049.


With dozens of other governments sitting on these distressed tobacco debts, Fabian said he expects more will follow the same path.


"The Wall Street way," he said, "is to keep doing something until it doesn't work anymore."

 

Courtesy: ProPublica.org

User

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
  Loading...
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email

BUY NOW

The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)