Nokia patched up its ailing basic phones offering on Tuesday with two models offering access to games, applications and the Internet, hoping to regain its footing in emerging markets.
The Republicans claim that Mitt Romney created more jobs during his governorship in Massachusetts than Obama has done in all of the US during his presidency. Romney realizes that unemployment is President Obama’s Achilles heel. Question is can Obama do an FDR?
Saying “It’s still about the economy, and, we are not stupid” in New Hampshire after a victory in five states including New York with which Mitt Romney became the Republican challenger to President Obama as Newt Gingrich dropped out, the governor threw the gauntlet to the President. But he may have put it over broadly because while the main issue of the election actually may be the economy, it is more precisely unemployment. Over 13 million Americans are out of jobs with more than 4 million of them not having employment for a period of more than one year (which means that their chance for getting employed becomes minimum), an employment rate of over 8.2%, 3% higher than the post-war average and as the New Yorker puts it, “the percentage of working Americans is as low as it has been in almost thirty years”.
The economic recovery has now lasted nearly three years, but for millions of American it seems as if it has not yet begun. And the situation is not pretty. The unemployment rates in groups such as college graduates may be even higher. And that creates an excellent opportunity for Mitt Romney who was a successful businessman and the Governor of Massachusetts because no president has won a re-election (since arguably America’s greatest president) Franklin Delano Roosevelt with an unemployment rate of more than 8%. And for that we have to go back all the way to the 1940s, a period less than five years after the Great Depression, with a comparable unemployment rate. Romney’s record as the President of Bain Capital, a highly successful private firm equity, should stand him in good stead; after all venture capital firms are built to nurture businesses and that should translate into employment.
But Mitt Romney has come in for withering criticism during the Republican primaries for being a “Vulture Capitalist” rather than a “Venture Capitalist” and President Obama has picked up where the Republicans left off with a series of blistering advertisement this week making Mitt Romney’s record as the President of Bain Capital as the focus of his attack.
In the Republican primaries it was blunted by a huge money advantage that Gov Mitt Romney had. He does not have a similar money advantage over President Obama. However, the President may well find that attacking private equity is a little disingenuous in America because private equity is at the heart of capitalism and it is the basic tenet of survival of the fittest. What private equity tries to do is to buy firms or invest in them, nurture them, turn them around and sell them for a profit. As can he imagined, this works sometimes and at other times it does not work but that is the way the cookie crumbles. The Obama Ad shows workers complaining that their steel mill was taken from health to bankruptcy, they were laid off, and despite that Bain Capital made a profit. Gov Romney immediately fired back with an ad about another steel mill which no one was willing to touch which Bain Capital bought a stake and turned around and now is a prosperous steel mill with over 6000 workers.
The early sparring on the issue of employment is an understanding on both sides that there is a risk for President Obama on the employment issue and a potential advantage to Gov Romney. Both sides are trying to define the other before the voters make up their mind. The centrality of the issue for Gov Romney can all be seen by his reluctance to take his eye off the ball as far as unemployment goes.
When President Obama made his announcement about his support for gay marriage Mitt Romney’s response was unusually low-key—he just reacted and moved on. He did not want it to detract from the main issue and that is employment. Similarly when President Obama spoke to the students at Bernard College about the gender gap and the Republicans role in it, Mitt Romney gently reminded them as to how difficult the employment market was for recent graduates. It is also interesting that it is Gov Romney’s record at Bain Capital which has come under the fire rather than his record as the Governor of Massachusetts.
The competing narrative about his record as Governor goes like this. The Democrats say that for employment numbers Mitt Romney took Massachusetts from No.36 when he was governor to No. 47 when he left governorship. The Republicans, on the other hand, claim that he created more jobs during his governorship in Massachusetts than President Obama has done in all of the United States during his presidency. Which narrative is correct? One can only guess.
So the battle lines are drawn. Mitt Romney realizes that unemployment is President Obama’s Achilles heel. Question is can Obama do an FDR?
(Harsh Desai has done his BA in Political Science from St Xavier's College & Elphinstone College, Bombay and has done his Master's in Law from Columbia University in the city of New York. He is a practicing advocate at the Bombay High Court.)
According to Libra India, the petitioner NGO, the land allotment to Suzlon was in violation of various acts pertaining to land allotment and valuable pastureland meant for animal grazing which cannot be given away to private companies
The Supreme Court has sought the Rajasthan government’s stand on a plea challenging the alleged allotment of pastureland, suitable for grazing of livestock, in Jaisalmer to Suzlon India for generating power through windmills.
A bench of justices Deepak Verma and SJ Mukhopadhyay also sought the state government’s reply, while also issuing notices to firms, Suzlon India and Wish Wind Infrastructures, on a plea seeking quashing of the land allotment on the ground that it is pastureland and cannot be used for industrial purposes.
The court order came on a petition by Libra India, a non-government organisation (NGO) challenging the allotment of land by the state government.
The NGO has come to the apex court against a Rajasthan High Court order, which had dismissed its plea against the land allotment and had also imposed a cost of Rs25,000 on it.
The high court had refused to interfere with the government’s decision after it was told that it is not grassland.
The petitioner alleged the land allotment was in utter violation of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, Revenue Act, Panchayati Raj Act and other acts pertaining to land allotment and valuable pastureland meant for animal grazing cannot be given away to private companies.
Last year in December, the Rajasthan High Court while admitting the petition filed by Libra India, had issued notices to revenue department, district collector, Rajasthan Renewable Energy Corp (RREC) and the windmill companies with regard to the allotment of the common land, better known as 'charagah' land for establishing windmills in the district and had stayed the setting up of the windmills on this land.
However, the revenue department and the district collector told the HC that the land was referred as pasture land by mistake and they are rectifying the mistake through correspondence with the state government.