Consumer Issues
NCDRC raps StanChart for spoiling customer's credit record
The National Consumer Commission upheld the decision of the State Commission asking Standard Chartered Bank to pay a compensation of Rs2 lakh for negligence and reporting the customer as a defaulter to CIBIL
 
The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC), while holding Standard Chartered Bank (StanChart) guilty for spoiling one of its customers’ credit record, asked the lender to pay Rs2 lakh as compensation. 
 
"It is not disputed that the complainant made full payment of transactions carried out through credit card and opposite party (OP-StanChart) issued full and final settlement account on 25 October 2002. It is also not disputed that OP by mistake/ negligence has shown name of complainant in Credit Information Bureau (India) Ltd (CIBIL) defaults on account of which, complainant’s application for education loan of Rs4 lakh from State Bank of India was rejected," said Justice KS Chaudhari, presiding member in the order.
 
The case related with Vadodara-based Hanumesh Bandurao Kulkarni, who despite paying all his dues while closing a credit card with StanChart, was shown as defaulter in CIBIL report. This defaulter remark prohibited him from obtaining a loan of Rs4 lakh for his daughter's education. 
 
On 5 September 2001, StanChart issued a credit card to Kulkarni, who used it only twice for withdrawing Rs4,000 and Rs3,100 on 15 September 2001. Kulkarni paid Rs500 on 17 February 2002 and Rs2000 on 15 April 2002 against the withdrawals. Citing defective services from the lender, Kulkarni then decided to close the credit card.
 
On 2 October 2002, he paid Rs7,000 to StanChart against full and final settlement for his credit card. StanChart, on 25 October 2002 issued a full and final settlement account statement and closed Kulkarni's credit card from that date. 
 
Later in 2013 or after 11 years from closing the StanChart credit card, Kulkarni applied with SBI for an education loan of Rs4 lakh for is daughter's higher studies. However, SBI rejected his application on 31 July 2013 with a remark "CIBIL defaults, file rejected'. 
 
On enquiry, Kulkarni found that StanChart has mentioned his name as 'defaulter' in the records of CIBIL. The amount mentioned in the credit report was Rs2.95 lakh as on 1 August 2013, which increased by around Rs20,000 to Rs3.15 lakh on 14 November 2013.
 
Kulkarni wrote several letters to StanChart for rectification of the error but the Bank did not take any care. He then approached the Banking Ombudsman at Ahmedabad. While admitting the facts, StanChart on 23 December 2013 assured the Ombudsman that it will remove Kulkarni's name from the CIBIL records within 10 days. However, the Bank failed to do so. It also failed to issue no dues certificate to Kulkarni, as agreed before the Ombudsman.
 
Kulkarni, citing service deficiency on the part of StanChart, then filed complaint before the District Consumer Forum. The Bank did not appear before the Forum. The Forum then issued an ex-parte order asking StanChart to remove Kulkarni's name as defaulter from CIBIL records, issue a no dues certificate and pay a compensation of Rs1 lakh. It also asked StanChart to pay Rs50,000 in the State Consumer Welfare Fund.
 
Not satisfied with the compensation, Kulkarni then approached the State Commission. While partly allowing the petition, the Gujarat State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, enhanced the compensation to Rs2 lakh. This led Kulkarni to approach the NCDRC.
 
In his petition, Kulkarni contended that since his loan proposal was rejected, he was forced to obtain a loan of Rs70,000 from other financial institutions at an in interest of 23% per annum, by pledging gold ornaments worth Rs2 lakh. 
 
"Even if it is taken a true fact, (the) complainant (Kulkarni) was paying Rs700 per month higher to the financial institution against the interest payable to SBI at a rate of 11% to 12%p.a. Complainant has already been awarded compensation of Rs2 lakh by which he can very well pay full loan of Rs70,000 obtained from financial institution and still he would be saving Rs1.30 lakh," the NCDRC said in its order
 
(Ref: NCDRC Revision Petition No.2601 of 2015)

User

SEBI restrains Pawan Bansal from associating himself with an intermediary for stocks
Pawan Bansal and Altius Finserv Private Limited do not comply with the eligibility criteria of being a 'fit and proper person' in accordance with the Merchant Bankers Regulations read with the Intermediaries Regulations, according to a SEBI Order
 
Pawan Bansal, managing director and key management person of Altius Finserv, is restrained from associating himself  with any intermediary (or holding any controlling shareholding in any intermediary) till he is freed by the Competent Court, of the charges alleged in the FIR (FIR no. RC-AC1-2014-A0005) registered against him, by the CBI (Central Bureau of Investigation) on 1 August 2014, according to a SEBI Order. SEBI (Securities and Exchange Board of India) is the market regulator.
 
SEBI shall not consider any application of Altius Finserv Private Limited, for a Certificate of Registration to act as an intermediary in any capacity, until he is freed by the Competent Court, according to the SEBI Order.
 
The SEBI Order observed that Pawan Bansal and Altius Finserv Private Limited do not comply with the eligibility criteria of being a 'fit and proper person' in accordance with the Merchant Bankers Regulations read with the Intermediaries Regulations.  Altius Finserv Private Limited has failed to comply with the provisions of Clause 28 of the Code of Conduct contained in Schedule III read with Regulation 13 of the Merchant Bankers Regulations.

User

SEBI directs Roofers Infra-Projects not to mobilise funds from investors
The company was engaged in fund mobilising activity through the issue of Non-Convertible Redeemable Debentures to more than 49 persons without complying with the relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and provisions of the SEBI (Issue and Listing of Debt Securities) Regulations, 2008, according to a SEBI Order
 
In an interim order-cum-show cause notice, market regulator SEBI (Securities and Exchange Board of India) directed Roofers Infra-Projects not mobilise funds from investors. Further, the company, its promoters/ directors are prohibited from issuing prospectus or any offer document or issue advertisement for soliciting money from the public for the issue of securities, till further orders.
 
The company and its promoters/ directors have further been directed not to dispose of any of the properties or alienate or encumber any of the assets of the Company without prior permission from SEBI. They are not to divert any funds raised from the public, which are kept in bank accounts and in the custody of the company, according to the SEBI Order.
 
The Debenture Trustees, viz. Roofers Debenture Trust (represented by its Trustees, viz. Kanai Lal Bhattacharya and Biman Kumar Tat) and Diamond Debenture Trust (represented by its Trustee, viz. Biman Kumar Tat) are prohibited from continuing with the present assignment as debenture trustees in respect of the Offer of Non-Convertible Secured Redeemable Debentures of the company and also from taking up any new assignment or involvement in any new issue of debentures, according to the SEBI Order.
 
All directors, promoters and the company itself are prohibited from accessing the securities market, the SEBI Order ruled.
 
The company was engaged in fund mobilising activity through the issue of Non-Convertible Redeemable Debentures to more than 49 persons without complying with the relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and provisions of the SEBI (Issue and Listing of Debt Securities) Regulations, 2008, the SEBI Order pointed out.

User

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
  Loading...
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email

BUY NOW

The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)