Moneylife » Life » Public Interest » Mumbai most expensive city for night charges in hotel: Study
Mumbai most expensive city for night charges in hotel: Study
According to the findings of a study, Mumbai is the most expensive city in India at Rs13,017 per night for an individual tourist which includes an accommodation, pre-meal drink, dinner and taxi ride
Chennai: Mumbai continues to be the most expensive city in India closely followed by Delhi and Chennai in terms of night charges in hotels, according to a study conducted by TripIndex of leading online travel portal, TripAdvisor, reports PTI.
According to the findings, Mumbai is the most expensive city in India at Rs13,017 per night for an individual tourist which includes an accommodation, pre-meal drink, dinner and taxi ride, said TripAdvisor (India) country manager Nikhil Ganju.
According to him, the same fare at Delhi costs Rs12,978 while in Chennai it stood at Rs12,530.
With a difference of less than Rs160, cost of a night in Delhi compares to a night in Cape Town, while a night in Chennai and Kolkata works out as much as in Macau (China) and Warsaw (Poland), respectively, he told reporters.
The TripIndex helps travellers to decide on their preferred destination with a quick and useful reference, he said.
Observing that investments of $40 million is spent on online portals, he said only 16% of it was spent on travel websites.
“There is enough headroom for us (to make additional revenues). Through these initiatives, people will find it easier to decide on their destination...,” he said.
The findings also revealed that taxis fare in Chennai is the most expensive at Rs201 for a journey, while the same is Rs100 in Pune.
Besides, he said that South India leads as the most expensive region on average cost of Rs8,537.5 (per day) closely followed by West at Rs8,186.16, East Rs6,344.75 and Rs5,335.22 in the northern region, the study said.
Hotel room prices are also higher in South India at Rs6,567.63 followed by West at Rs6,109.67, East Rs4,774.2 and North at Rs4,169, the study said.
More in Moneylife
Is the interest in Gold ETFs waning? +3983 views
TODAY'S TOP STORIES
Post your Comment
| Alert me when new comment is posted on this article | |
| Please read our Moderation Policy and Terms of Use before posting | |
VIDEOS
Keep your Money Safe: Avoid money traps and MLM
LATEST COMMENT
Will the author respond to this post? IF CAN?! For ML, yes talk!
Can the author question Warren B..
Vinay Joshi
MORE
Additional Home Secretary on the edge to complete probe into tampering of 26/11 call log records
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Take advantage of all our features and functionality exclusively designed for Moneylife.in members. Registration gives you easy access to - Moneylife Newsletters - Exclusive News - Special Features - Membership to Moneylife Foundation - Other Value adds And the registration to this website is completely free. Go ahead and submit this form to create your new profile. |
Tell us about yourself
I have read and agreed to the Terms & Conditions | |||||||||||||||||||
- Phaneesh Murthy: Let off by Infosys, sacked by iGate over sexual harassment charges
- Is the interest in Gold ETFs waning?
- OMCs to stop LPG deliveries to houses with multiple-connections from 1st June
- BSE to shift 29 scrips to T group category for failure to comply with demat norms
- Sun TV Networks announces 11% jump in its net profit
- S&P cautions India of rating downgrade; retains negative outlook
- ITC net profit up 19.4%, aided by non-cigarette and agri-business segments
- COMPAT orders cement cos to pay 10% of the Rs6,307 crore penalty
- Vikram Pandit to buy stake in JM Financial, to head its proposed banking arm
- MMM India, another MLM taking people for “double-your-money” ride
- RBI tells HDFC Bank not to make up its own KYC verification rules
- Why I-T returns of Pawar, Jindal and Gandhi are exempted from RTI?
- The draconian LBT: Local Body Tax explained
- How much longer can the FM, RBI ignore HSBC in India?
- Aadhaar: Private ownership of UID data- Part I
- Aadhaar: Who owns the UID database? –Part II
- Did HSBC Bank resort to toxic churning and illegitimate transactions to earn commissions?
- PNB Metlife refunds Rs25,000 to the correct policyholder: another Moneylife victory
- Goa’s Advocate General is the highest paid across the country, reveals RTI
- The draconian LBT: Local Body Tax explained
- Mass mis-selling: 59,000 investors in Kolhapur are alleged to have lost money in LIC ULIPs
- Sensex Rally: Winners and Losers as the index challenges the high of 2010
- Vinod Rai demits office: A CAG that India will miss
- Additional Home Secretary on the edge to complete probe into tampering of 26/11 call log records
- Phaneesh Murthy: Let off by Infosys, sacked by iGate over sexual harassment charges
- Do FIIs buy high and sell low–III? Panic-selling during declines
- Sunlight: The ‘be all and end all’ of human health
What's your say?
| Yes | |||||||
| No | |||||||
| Can't Say | |||||||
|
What you said
Thanks for casting your votes! View Previous Polls
Join 22, 000 Others
Membership Benefits
- Daily & Weekly newsletters
- Access to www.moneylife.in to comment, create alerts
- Your own profile in Moneylife.in
- All special mailers
- Basic membership to MSSN, our new initiative
- Free ebooks
- Invitation to events
- Invitation to round-table meets
- Access to Insurance helpline
- Access to counselling sessions
- Access to Reading room in Mumbai
| Name: |
|
| Email: |
|
| Phone: |
|
| Catagory | |
| Message: |
|
| Enter Code: |
|






























Comment
Sudhir Jatar 1 year ago
It is not confined to disconnection when we default. In every walk of life these modern day Maharajahs behave as if they own India. They follow no rule or law. They break traffic rules, made unauthorised constructions, encroach on public and forest land. You name it and you will find these Maharajahs leading.
And the present day judicial system helps them. Even Sharad Pawar followed by Ratanakar Gaikwad (CIC of Maharashtra) have publicly stated that citizens should approach the courts against them because they know that there will be no decision surely not in their life time and not perhaps in another life time.
No, they have done nothing to reform the judicial system in 65 years!!