Companies & Sectors
More States are buying power from power exchanges

Purchasing from power exchanges has become more popular with States like Punjab and Uttar Pradesh purchasing huge volumes through this mode

Over the past one year, more and more States have been coming on the exchange to purchase power. According to Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC)'s latest market monitoring report, four new States and one new Union Territory have come on the trading platforms post May 2009.

There were 18 States purchasing power on the power exchanges for May 2010 against the 11 States in May 2009. Punjab, Uttar Pradesh, Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya and Union Territory Daman & Diu are the new regional players.

Out of these four States, Punjab and Uttar Pradesh have purchased significant volumes in May 2010. For May 2010, Punjab has purchased 29.84 million units (MUs) through power exchanges, which is around 4.45% of the total power purchased by all States through this mode. Uttar Pradesh has purchased 8.60% of the total volume or 57.64 million units in the same period.

According to sources, individual sources and independent units have contributed majorly to Punjab' high purchase volumes, whereas Uttar Pradesh's total purchase is through State electricity utilities. Arunachal Pradesh's purchase volumes are a mix of purchase by the State electricity utility and individual industries.

In May 2009, the total volume of electricity purchased by all States put together was 341.70 MUs. In May 2010, the total volume purchased by the States stood at 670.39 MUs, with around 18 purchasing States.

In May 2009, Rajasthan (34.83%), Haryana (26.25%), Maharashtra (16.78%), Tamil Nadu (12.51%) and Andhra Pradesh (4.18%) were the top five States purchasing power from the exchange. According to the latest (May 2010) data, Uttar Pradesh is a new addition to these top five States, with Andhra Pradesh dropping to the 8th position.

This increase in the number of new States purchasing power from the exchange is also reflected in the total percentage of volumes purchased by the top five States. In May 2010, the top five States purchased around 80.24% of the total purchase volume of all States, 14% less than 94.55% in May 2009.

User

Money Chain

Multi-level-marketing chains are duping gullible people by collecting thousands of crores of...

Premium Content
Monthly Digital Access

Subscribe

Already A Subscriber?
Login
Yearly Digital+Print Access

Subscribe

Moneylife Magazine Subscriber or MSSN member?
Login

Yearly Subscriber Login

Enter the mail id that you want to use & click on Go. We will send you a link to your email for verficiation
Will mediclaim lapse into a ‘premium caste’ system?

Insurers will start measures such as differential pricing of insurance products on the basis of hospital categories, sooner than later

Public sector insurers are toying with the idea of launching a separate cashless 'Platinum' policy for high-end hospitals in order to retain affluent customers by continuing for them cashless policies at hospitals outside the Preferred Provider Network (PPN).

This plan is fraught with difficulty because the premium is bound to be significantly higher. Industry sources say that the premium for such a 'Platinum' policy can be 50% higher than existing premium. According to M Ramadoss, CMD of The New India Assurance Co Ltd, "Lack of quality hospital supply does make it difficult to negotiate with corporate hospitals.

They need to give us discounts on volume of business. If we are unable to convince high-end corporate hospitals to join PPN, PSU insurers will be forced to come up with a separate plan for cashless facilities at high-end hospitals. The premium for this 'Platinum' policy will be higher, but we have not finalised it. It is at the drawing board stage. We have solidarity from private insurers too. They are also suffering due to erratic charges from some hospitals."

According to Sudhir Sarnobat, co-founder and director (operations) of www.medimanage.com, "This is an improper way to deal with this issue. By creating a product for treatment at these hospitals at extra premium, the insurers are contradicting their earlier stand that the hospitals are overcharging. It looks like the insurers were under-pricing. Also, if insurers have stopped cashless facilities by making statements like the hospitals are inflating bills, is this not a way to legitimise the so-called wrong practices of big hospitals? The question remains about the current policyholders. If any member has a complex disease which can be treated at one of these top hospitals only, how can he get the cashless facility for the same? Any efficient network of hospitals will need all kinds of hospitals i.e. primary, secondary and tertiary care hospitals. By removing a particular type of hospital, the insurers are denying the cashless facility to a particular class of patients which is nothing but discrimination."

Insurers will start measures such as differential pricing of insurance products on the basis of hospital categories. The insurers and the healthcare industry also agreed for gradation of hospitals for the purpose of mediclaim facilities. According to an industry source who attended the CII meeting, "The hospitals would be graded in three categories - A, B and C - on the basis of infrastructure facilities and specialities.''

It is a fact that all PSU insurers are suffering losses in mediclaim policies. New India Assurance is running losses of 20% excluding administrative costs for health insurance. The losses are over 40% when administrative and other costs are included. For the same set of hospitals, the private sector insurers have managed to keep their head above the water till now. Private insurers have also become wiser after they failed to rein in losses to the tune of crores of rupees allegedly due to fraudulent methods adopted by some hospitals and TPAs. The PSU insurers are restricting cashless facilities to hospitals in the PPN. Please see our article on PPN (http://www.moneylife.in/article/8/7387.html) and related article (http://www.moneylife.in/article//7411.html).

At the same time, private insurers are calling potential customers and boasting continuation of cashless facility. It is possible that they too will move to PPN because the underlying causes remain similar for all insurers.

Mr Ramadoss said, "We are trying to get as many hospitals on PPN. We are open to talks with all hospitals and share how we arrived at costing of procedures for different grades of hospitals. Contrary to belief that hospitals are trying to get out of PPN, more hospitals are coming on board. Some of them are prevented from talking with us by different associations, but have indicated willingness to talk in the near future. It's an uphill task, but we are determined to make PPN successful." According to Mr Sarnobat, "Private insurers like Bajaj Allianz have their own network. ICICI Lombard has 470 hospitals in India where they drive business even though they allow cashless facilities in more than 3,500 locations till now.

They are able to get good discounts at 470 hospitals as well as have a better control on the claims process. The trend is for creating centres of excellence and to drive business to specific hospitals based on the type of procedure to be done and proximity to policyholder. In the future, they may increase premium if the policyholder wants flexibility of cashless facilities in 3,500 locations and keep the same premium if the policyholder accepts only 470 hospitals for cashless facility. The PSU and private insurers will be at parity in the future."

Healthcare insurance cost has turned into a massive black hole in the US. It has prompted president Obama to come up with an ambitious healthcare reform plan. India is still considered a hot spot for medical tourism. The costs are sky-rocketing and high-end hospitals may soon be unaffordable for Indians. Mr Sarnobat added, "Healthcare insurance cost in the next three years is going to go up. There is a definite upward trend. Insurers are looking for break-even, but they also need to make profits. The costs for land, medical equipment and manpower of high calibre are only increasing. Land is expensive in big cities, there is a need for latest imported equipment that is expensive and medical manpower costs are also fairly expensive. The cost for a coronary artery bypass in India is $6000 while in the US it is $45,000. The gap is reducing and in the future there may be only 60% gap. Unfortunately, there is scope for further increase of procedure costs in India."

Insurance products with respect to different hospital categories will come in sooner than later.

User

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
  Loading...
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email

BUY NOW

The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)