The 134th seminar of Moneylife Foundation and the 9th on the Right to Information (RTI) Act focussed on the understanding of the key provisions of the RTI Act and how to file effective applications with important dos and don’ts to ensure your queries are answered
Moneylife Foundation has conducted a series of events and workshops in the past to empower its members to use the RTI (Right to Information) Act effectively. Each of the events has received a tremendous response. Shailesh Gandhi, a former Central Information Commissioner (CIC), who has conducted a workshop for Moneylife Foundation in the past, (Read here: How to use the RTI Effectively: RTI may get choked, says CIC) will be conducting a series of workshop for Moneylife Foundation Members. Today was the first such programme. This being structured for beginners, received a huge response and the Moneylife Knowledge centre was packed to capacity.
Mr Gandhi gave the participants the overview of the RTI Act, how it originated and where it can be used. He took the members through the important sections of the RTI Act in detail. Transparency is what is lacking in today’s system said Mr Gandhi, and it’s in our hands to pull information and point out misappropriations, because without good governance we cannot function. With regard to the kind of information that can be sought, Mr Gandhi emphasised that all information that is available as a record in any tangible form can be provided. Therefore before filing an application individuals should review if the information they are seeking will be available as a record. As far as seeking information is considered, only citizens of India can apply under the RTI Act. However, in certain states this section is misused as the information officers as they ask for proof of citizenship which is hard to provide as very few individuals have passports, etc, and the application is rejected.
“No one talks about the suo moto disclosures of Section 4,” say Mr Gandhi. Section 4 of the RTI Act speaks about the computerisation of information, sadly as this is not a rule not as many public offices are following it. Mr Gandhi laments that this section will remain a dream unless we the citizens demand that public offices should put up information in computerised form.
The only sections under which the information sought can be refused are Section 8 and Section 9 of the RTI Act, explained Mr Gandhi. The RTI Act lists special instances where the authorities are exempt from disclosing information. Section 8 of the Act for the exemption from disclosure of information is used as a lame excuse not to provide information. There have been many examples where the citizen has got the information he or she asked for, which has been earlier denied to him by the Public Information Officer (PIO) or Appellate Authority, under the pretext of Section 8. For, when the citizen pursued the matter by appealing to the Central or State Information Commissioner, he or she invariably received the information. In other cases, the Information Commissioner also denied the information, so the citizen appealed to the high court and won the case, as the judge directed the information commission to provide information. Mr Gandhi explained this section in detail and offered advice how one can phrase their queries in such a way that the information cannot be rejected under this section.
Mr Gandhi elaborated on Section 8 (1) j, under which a number of cases are rejected. This states that personal information which has no relationship to any public activity will not be given. However, this is for personal information of individuals and information pertaining to institutions and corporations cannot be refused. Here is where Mr Gandhi mentioned that income tax paid by individuals should be disclosed. By doing this it would take us one more step closer to transparency and transparency would help change the country.
Mr Gandhi also explained to the audience the section on complaints and second appeals and how should one go about it. A few pointers that Mr Gandhi gave to the members of Moneylife Foundation are:
The next session on RTI is for advanced RTI users. This session is for those who have already filed multiple RTI applications and need to understand how to navigate the appeals process all the way to the CIC hearings.
For more information on RTI workshops, click here.
While BJP MP Ram Jethmalani directly asked party president Gadkari to quit post, Mahesh Jethmalani, in a single sentence letter said the allegations about Gadkari and his Purti group are affecting party image
New Delhi/Mumbai: Pressure mounted on Nitin Gadkari, the president of Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) to quit the post in the wake of allegations of financial wrong doings against him with senior lawyer Mahesh Jethmalani on Monday resigning from the party's National Executive saying the issue was affecting its image, reports PTI.
"I do not deem it morally and intellectually appropriate to continue to serve on the party's national executive as long as you are the president," Jethmalani said in a terse single-sentence letter to Gadkari.
Mahesh's decision came nearly a fortnight after his father and BJP's Rajya Sabha MP Ram Jethmalani asked Gadkari to quit the post and not to seek a second term in office in the wake of allegations against him.
Gadkari is in the line of Opposition fire following media reports about dubious funding of his company Purti Sugar and Power Ltd. Party leaders have maintained that Gadkari himself has offered to face any probe in the allegations but murmurs within are said to have forced him to cancel electioneering in Himachal Pradesh last week.
Talking to reporters in Delhi, Mahesh said he has not got a clear answer to his satisfaction on the allegations against Gadkari.
"Since my personal conscience was not satisfied I have chosen to resign from the national executive. I will continue to serve the party," he said.
Asked if he had written to Gadkari seeking his clarifications on the issue relating to his company, Mahesh said 'no'. "But based on his defences that are in public domain, I have made my personal analysis."
To a question whether the allegations against Gadkari has affected the party's image, he said, "Yes. I feel that it's affecting the party's and we are delaying it (a decision). I would like to say this party leadership, that this issue should be resolved as soon as possible."
Reacting to the development, BJP spokesman Rajiv Pratap Rudy expressed unhappiness over Mahesh making the letter public acknowledging that it would cause much damage to the party.
Asked if Jethmalani had taken this step to build pressure on Gadkari to quit, Rudy said, "There is no question of any pressure." He maintained that the allegations against Gadkari have already been debated inside the party.
Media investigations have claimed that several shell companies (inactive business entities floated for financial manoeuvres) were floated to pump finances for Purti. Addresses of several of the directors of these companies furnished to the Registrar of Companies were allegedly found to be fake.
Both Income Tax and Registrars of Companies have launched investigations.
Ram Jethmalani had also attacked Gadkari about a fortnight ago, saying he should quit in the interest of the party and his own.
"In the interest of the party, in his own interest, he should get out of the fray now and he must give the position to somebody who inspires greater confidence. He should not aspire for a second term," Ram Jethmalani had said.
Maintaining that Gadkari's continuance weakened the party's position, Jethmalani said, "Obviously, there is suspicion about his integrity and in the interest of the party and his own interest he must get out of this position.
"It weakens the party position. In the coming elections we are fighting against corruption and we have to have a man of absolute impeccable integrity," he had said.
Gadkari denied he had said Vivekananda and the underworld don had the same IQ level and insisted his views had been presented in a wrong manner by the media
New Delhi/Bhopal: Nitin Gadkari, the president of Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) landed in a controversy over drawing a comparison between the intelligence quotient (IQ) level of Swami Vivekanand and fugitive don Dawood Ibhrahim in remarks which drew fire from the Congress, reports PTI.
Attempting to douse the controversy, Gadkari on Monday denied he had said Vivekananda and the underworld don had the same IQ level and insisted his views had been presented in a wrong manner by the media.
"I have only said if someone utilises his brain in a good way, he is Vivekanand and if he does not, he is evil. There is no comparison and whatever I have said was presented in a wrong way, which is not right," he told reporters in Delhi.
Congress while slamming Gadkari for his remark said it demonstrated BJP's 'level of thinking and mentality' and demanded an apology.
Speaking at an award ceremony in Bhopal yesterday, Gadkari said the IQ level of Vivekanand and Dawood could have been the same, but the spiritual leader had used it for nation building while the underworld don for pursuing crime.
"In psychology, we measure IQ level of people...But it depends from person to person, in which area they use their intelligence," he said.
"As per psychology if we can compare the IQ level of Swami Vivekanand and that of Dawood Ibrahim, then it could have been the same. But Vivekanand used it in nation building, brotherhood and spiritualism while Dawood used that in excelling in crime world," Gadkari said.
Information and Broadcasting minister and Congress leader Manish Tewari said Gadkari's speech is "yet another manifestation of their culture and mentality."
"How can anyone compare one of India's foremost thought leaders with a criminal or with somebody who has clearly dubious and notorious records," he asked.
Tewari said a "mere clarification" would not suffice and the BJP should "apologise" to the people of this country, and specifically to the thinking people and the leaders of future.
Congress leader Digvijay Singh, who has been targeting the BJP chief over his business links, took to Twitter to target Gadkari. "In a function in Bhopal Gadkari said 'IQ of Swami Vivekanand and Dawood Ibrahim was same'. Any comment from (Narendra) Modi and his fans?" Singh tweeted.