Advocate KK Ramani explained, to a packed audience, the pitfalls of overlooking flaws in...
Just a fraction of the 500,000 people expected to enrol in Obamacare via the new health exchanges have done so, according to media reports anticipating the official numbers. But there’s more to the story
This week, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is expected to announce the long-awaited enrollment numbers for the first month of the health insurance marketplaces. And from all reports, they’re going to be low.
“Another way to look at the Healthcare.gov enrollments is that 50,000 enrollments over 36 states over 31 days is less than 50 enrollments per day per state,” health-care consultant Robert Laszewski wrote in an email to reporters.
The Washington Post reported this morning that the number is actually around 40,000.
That appears to be far lower than the administration’s early estimate that 500,000 people would sign up for coverage in October, the first month the marketplaces were open.
Other recent stories offer variations on that theme. Oregon has not signed up any people in its exchange. Delaware has only four. And Washington, D.C., has five. There are surely more applications in the pipeline, but these early numbers are anemic.
So how big a failure is this?
To those convinced the law will fail, it’s a disaster. The glitches that have plagued Healthcare.gov have not been solved, and the clock is ticking toward Dec. 15, the last day that consumers can sign up for insurance plans that begin on Jan. 1.
If the problems continue and only the most motivated – i.e., the sickest and oldest – sign up for coverage, insurers will be hit with big losses and will have to dramatically increase rates for 2015, the beginning of a death spiral, the critics reason.
To those convinced the law ultimately will succeed, the number means little. The problems with the website have masked demand. And the experience of Massachusetts and Medicare’s Part D prescription drug benefit demonstrate that the vast majority of people sign up closer to the deadline. In this case, the final deadline is March 31, the day the 2014 open enrollment season closes.
Four things to look out for when the numbers are announced:
Consider those being dropped by their insurers, not just those signing up.
The Congressional Budget Office has set the bar in terms of predictions — estimating that 7 million people will sign up for coverage on the exchanges in 2014 (6 million with subsidies; 1 million without). But the CBO also seems to estimate that the number of people in the “nongroup” market, which includes individual policies, will decrease by a net of 2 million next year. It’s clear now that many more people than that are being dropped by their insurance companies, which are citing provisions of the Affordable Care Act.
The administration has changed its definition of enrollees.
According to Sarah Kliff at the Washington Post, the administration’s figures will include not only those who have paid their first month’s premium payment but also those who selected a plan on the exchange, but who haven’t yet paid. It’s unclear how many in the second group ultimately will pay up. One would assume officials would have to drop them from the count if they don’t.
The age mix of enrollees matters almost as much as the total number.
The new insurance system relies on young, healthy consumers to help share the risk with older, sicker ones. That will help keep costs in check. If that doesn’t happen and the group skews older and sicker, it may mean that the premiums won’t be enough to cover medical costs. Annie Lowrey wrote in the New York Times: “Getting ‘young invincibles,’ as insurers sometimes call them, to sign up for insurance is an uphill climb. Even with the public campaigns, only about one in four 19- to 29-year-olds is even aware of the exchanges where they might buy affordable insurance, and the ignorance is especially acute among the uninsured, according to a survey this year by the Commonwealth Fund, a nonprofit research group.”
Some state exchanges have had much more success than Healthcare.gov.
Kentucky has received praise across the country for doing what the federal government has been unable to: Create a functioning website. As of Nov. 8, more than 33,000 had enrolled in Medicaid and 7,000 had enrolled in a qualified health plan, according to kynect, the state’s marketplace. Jeffrey Young at the Huffington Post writes, “Obamacare's fate in these states is just as uncertain as at the federal level, yet success there is crucial if the law is to take hold and thrive. Grass-roots, state-run success stories could inspire others to do more to help the law in the future, while failures could further undermine support for the entire endeavor.”
With the resignation of Paras Ajmera, the country’s largest commodity exchange would be controlled by people who are not promoters
Paras Ajmera, the lone nominee director from Financial Technologies India Ltd (FTIL), on the board of Multi Commodity Exchange of India Ltd (MCX) has resigned. FTIL is the main promoter of MCX. This leaves complete control of the country's largest commodity exchange in the hands of people who are non-promoters.
The resignation comes amid the continuing Rs5,600 crore payment crisis at the FTIL-promoted National Spot Exchange Ltd (NSEL).
In a regulatory filing, MCX said, “FTIL has withdrawn the nomination of Paras Ajmera, shareholder director, from the board of MCX with effect from close of business hours on 12 November 2013 consequent to his resignation from MCX board.”
FTIL may nominate another person on MCX board, however this cannot be confirmed.
On 31st October, Jignesh Shah, the promoter of MCX resigned as non-executive chairman of the commodity exchange. This followed the notice issued by Forward Markets Commission (FMC) to Shah questioning his ‘fit and proper’ status.
As reported by Moneylife, following the resignations of Shah and Ajmera, the country's largest commodity exchange would be now run by all nominated directors. This not only raises a big question over the future of MCX but also makes foreign investors to re-consider their decision to stay invested. After all, who would be interested, if there is nobody to grow the company?
While commodities market regulator FMC has appointed six directors, the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD) has nominated one director on the MCX board of 11 members. There are three representatives from banks as shareholder director on MCX board. This includes KN Raghunathan (general manager for treasury at Union Bank of India), Sanjaya Agarwal (general manager for treasury and investment at Bank of Baroda) and P Paramasivam (general manager at Corporation Bank).
At present, RM Premkumar, nominated by the commodity market regulator is the chairman of MCX.
For the September quarter, MCX reported 67% decline in its net profit at Rs27.04 crore against Rs81.40 crore in the year-ago period.
The performance of MCX has been hit badly due to the imposition of commodity transaction tax (CTT) since July and also because of the recent payment crisis at NSEL.
MCX closed Wednesday flat at Rs432.7 on the BSE, while the 30-share benchmark ended marginally down at 20,194.