Mutual Funds
MF distributors allowed to use BSE infrastructure

For an individual, BSE has set minimum tangible assets worth Rs1 lakh. Also, it  would charge a one-time fee of Rs15,000 for membership

Following directives from market regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), the BSE on Tuesday allowed mutual fund (MF) distributors to use its infrastructure for purchase and redemption of mutual fund units directly from asset management companies (AMCs) on behalf of their clients.


In a circular, BSE said that an entity seeking to register itself as MF distributor on its mutual fund platform in a move to use the Exchange’s infrastructure is required to have a networth of at least Rs1 lakh on the basis of audited balance sheet of the latest financial year.


For an individual, the exchange has set minimum tangible assets worth Rs1 lakh. Also, the exchange would charge a one-time fee of Rs15,000 for membership. MF distributors would not handle payout and pay-in of funds as well as units on behalf of investor.


“The pay-in will be directly received by recognised Clearing Corporation and payout will be directly made to investor’s account.


“In the same manner, units shall be credited and debited directly from the demat account of the investors by the Clearing Corporation,” BSE said.


Earlier this month, SEBI had cleared the proposal to allow MF distributors to use the infrastructure of recognised exchanges for purchase and redemption of mutual fund units directly from AMCs on behalf of their clients. This would be in addition to the existing channels of MF distribution.


The move is aimed at leveraging the stock exchange platform, which would eventually help MF distributors to improve their reach.


This facility would be available only for a MF distributor registered with Association of Mutual Funds in India (AMFI) and those who have been permitted by the stock exchange concerned would be eligible for this purpose.


The stock exchange would grant permission on a request made by a AMFI-registered MF distributor on the basis of criteria, including fee and code of conduct, among others, as laid down by it.


Loss of Privacy
I had requested my accounts statement from Axis Bank to be emailed to me. I was horrified to find that the email was sent to an incorrect email id. I subsequently, checked the ‘My Profiles’ page and was surprised to see that there is no email id registered with them. 
What is even more surprising is that I have recently received emails from the official email id of the relationship manager at Axis Bank. Since the mail was sent to me from his official email id, it is presumed that as he represents Axis Bank, the Bank knows my correct email id for banking purposes and there can be no excuse for not having the correct email id (this was being given as the reason by Axis Bank’s phone banking team). 
My correct email id is [email protected] The incorrect email id that the email was sent to was [email protected] The difference is in the ‘r’ between sameer and ranade in the email id. The problem, as per the Bank, is that the system does not integrate the Bank’s branches with telebanking.
Subsequently, I called up Axis Bank telebanking about this. To my surprise, the person at the Bank suddenly developed a loss of connectivity and could not hear me. I called up again and spoke to the supervisor, who had absolutely no problems in the entire conversation. But the supervisor had a problem acknowledging the fact there is a lapse on the part of Axis Bank.
I called up the Ombudsman and the person appeared to simply assign very low importance to the issue. Instead, the person asked me what I would like the Ombudsman to do and asked me to get in touch with the Bank. Only if the Bank did not respond, I was asked to get back to the Ombudsman in a month’s time.
I emailed Axis Bank and was told that they would respond in a couple of days. 
In the mean time, the relationship manager reverted to me and accepted that the error was at the Bank’s end at the time of filling up the details. 
After 12 days, I received a call from the Bank and was told that my email id was updated. When asked about the action on the more serious issue, they had no idea and I was told they would get back in a couple of days.
I recently received a call from the relationship manager and was told that no account statement was emailed from the system to any email since their internal system checks have only authorised sending statements by post. So, in effect, even if my email id was correct, I would have been trying like a fool to repeatedly ask for a statement and the system would keep prompting me that the mail has been sent to whatever the registered email id would have been.
Sameer Ranade, by email
Mr Ranade has raised an important issue which Moneylife is pursuing at various levels. We have also forwarded Mr Ranade’s complaint to Axis Bank which has told us that it is in touch with him. — Editor
Future of LIC & its Agents 
Thank you Moneylife; your team is doing a good job in raising issues that affect the general investor in India. The write-ups make complete sense and I partially agree with the fact that LIC (Life Insurance Corporation of India) agents do mis-selling at the time of plan closures. However, I am also an agent for more than two decades. I wish to explain why LIC agents suddenly become aggressive. If you carefully look at LIC’s agency force, you will notice that most of the agents are pure salesmen. A majority of them are undergraduates or graduates, at the most. They do not understand much about what is going on in the financial market and how it will affect their business.
Since 2005 or 2006, the top management of LIC has become unethically aggressive. Every top-ranking official wants to show growth in the number of policies and premium, in order to please his superiors. 
As an LIC agent, I have attended many agents’ meetings where the branch managers, marketing managers and even senior divisional managers misguide the agency force into hard-selling or unethical selling at the time of plan closures. We have witnessed it during the ULIP euphoria. Top-ranking managers would visit branches like financial gurus confidently forecasting that the Sensex will attain 50,000 points. They would claim that LIC, being a dominant player in the stock market, the NAVs of its ULIP plans will zoom beyond anyone’s expectations. They used to distribute pamphlets, brochures and colourful charts to prove their point. Fake news of agents mobilising crores of rupees in remote places in India was deliberately spread, in order to motivate other agents to sell ULIP plans. Special competitions were launched with attractive prizes to lure agents into selling ULIPs. Many agents succumbed to false propaganda and, today, they have lost their credibility in the market as the NAVs of all ULIPs are faring badly.
Now, we are facing the second phase of this madness. Senior managers are quoting the chairman declaring that the entire Corporation will retire on 30th September and will begin afresh on 1st October. They are tweaking the quote to explain to agents that from 1st October, LIC policies will become unattractive, as it will be loaded with service tax which a customer will not be in a mood to pay. Secondly, they are scaring the agents saying that popular plans will be withdrawn and commissions will be slashed drastically. In such a scenario, how do you expect the otherwise uninformed or misinformed agency janata to react? They will slog as if these are their last few days on the planet earth. Competitions are being floated with cash prizes up to even Rs50,000 on single-premium policies. Earlier, only agents and development officers were paid incentives. But, since 2006, even branch managers and marketing managers are given incentives in the form of expensive gifts like LED TVs, holiday trips, smart phones, laptops, gift coupons, home appliances, etc. These managers try to make the most of it, by using unethical sales practices and misguiding agents and policyholders, as their posting in a particular office is for a maximum period of three years, after which they are transferred to some other place. This is precisely what happened during the ULIP euphoria. The managers who promised us the moon are nowhere in sight today. They just grabbed all the gifts and vanished to some other city. It is we, the agents, who are bearing the brunt of policyholders’ wrath. LIC is not what it used to be up to the 1990s. Earlier, the top bosses were visionaries, who carefully crafted LIC’s growth story. With just a Rs5-crore grant from the central government in 1956, they carefully built a multi-lakh crore financial giant with a formidable sales force of about a million agents. But, today, the picture is exactly the opposite. Scams and corruption have become common. If LIC is not brought back on track soon, it may be forced to go the UTI way. If reputed teams like Moneylife can keep a check on financial institutions, I am sure it will do a lot of good for the common man.
Samira Patel, by email
Advice to Investors

This is with regard to “Grossly Underperforming Star Performers” by Jason Monteiro. What is your advice to investors who are holding HDFC Top 200 or HDFC Top Equity schemes? These two schemes were also featured in equity schemes for ‘any season’ in the

18 October 2012 issue of Moneylife.

Mohana Ganesh


Very informative

This is with regard to “What causes obesity and bulimia?” by Prof Dr Hegde. I find all your articles very informative. They give a whole new perspective on medicine and health. They are like fresh air in the midst of manipulative, harmful, loaded information coming from the media. Please keep writing.

Jagbir Singh


No Clue?

This is with regard to “NSEL fallout: ICAI begins probing Financial Technologies, NSEL issues.” Delightful! The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India still has no clue about what is to be done. Seems to be infested with morons at all ends.

R Balakrishnan


Not Charitable Institutions!

This is with regard to “RBI says no zero percent interest scheme for buying consumer goods.” Festive season shoppers and credit card users know this. After all, no financial institution (FI) will offer 0% EMI (equated monthly instalment) and not earn anything for the service. FIs are shrewd businesses and not charitable institutions. This move by RBI will force them to re-phrase their schemes; and, perhaps, make the charges more transparent and easy to compute.

Ramesh Iyer


Good Observations

This is with regard to “Repo rate hike cannot act as an effective measure in taming inflation” by Vivek Sharma. Good observations, but is likely to fall on deaf ears. Such increases have only put a brake on growth without doing anything for inflation, caused by high oil prices and high fiscal deficit due to populist policies. This has, in turn, stoked inflation by pumping liquidity into rural areas. RBI should have learnt from the lack of correlation between the interest rate and inflation rate by this time. Unfortunately, old habits die hard and RBI continues to flog a dead horse.



Call the Bluff!

This is with regard to “RBI’s New Financial Inclusion Committee: Rife with conflicts of interests” by Ramesh S Arunanchalam. This article is very pertinent. It is important that we call the bluff. First of all, the committee is not even needed. Secondly, why fill it with people from commercial microfinance alone? Where are the representatives of cooperatives and cooperative banks? And could the country not field people who don’t have conflict of interest? Or maybe this is an exercise in promoting vested interests?

Smita Premchander


SC says co-operative societies don't fall within the ambit of RTI Act

Mere supervision or regulation of a body by government would not make that body a public authority, the apex court ruled

The Supreme Court while quashing a circular by Kerala government ruled that co-operative societies do not fall within the ambit of Right to Information (RTI). The Kerala government circular was issued to bring all such societies within the scope of the RTI Act.


A bench of justices KS Radhakrishnan and AK Sikri said mere supervision or regulation of a body by government would not make that body a public authority and quashed the Kerala High Court's order holding the circular valid.


"Societies are, of course, subject to the control of the statutory authorities like Registrar, Joint Registrar and the Government. But cannot be said that the state exercises any direct or indirect control over the affairs of the society which is deep and all pervasive," the bench said


"Supervisory or general regulation under the statute over the co-operative societies, which are body corporate does not render activities of the body so regulated as subject to such control of the State so as to bring it within the meaning of the State or instrumentality of the State," it added.


The state government had informed the Registrar of Co-operative Societies in May 2006 that all institutions formed by laws made by State Legislature is a public authority and, therefore, all co-operative institutions coming under the administrative control of the Registrar of Co-operative Societies are also public authorities.


Quashing the state government's decision, the bench said that power exercised by the Registrar over the societies is merely supervisory and regulatory.


"The mere supervision or regulation as such by a statute or otherwise of a body would not make that body a public authority within the meaning of Section 2(h)(d)(i) of the Act. In other words just like a body owned or body substantially financed by the appropriate government, the control of the body by the appropriate government would also be substantial and not merely supervisory or regulatory," the bench added.



Surendera Bhanot

4 years ago

This Judgement will kill thousands of the appeals pending in the various information commissions. Can anyone quote the citation of this judgement or give a link to download the same.

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

To continue

Sign Up or Sign In


To continue

Sign Up or Sign In



The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)