Citizens' Issues
Public Interest Exclusive
MCA to set up inter-ministerial group to curb misleading ads

The ministry of consumer affairs has said that it will soon set up an inter-ministerial group to tackle misleading ads. The group will have the powers take suo moto action against errant advertisements and also to withdraw them

The menace of misleading advertisements such as tall claims made by beauty and financial products, using fake testimonies, pictures in ads related to educational and real estate, have come under the government’s scanner. The ministry of consumer affairs has said that it will soon set up an inter-ministerial group to tackle such ads. This group will take suo moto action against errant advertisements and will also have the power to withdraw them.

Rajiv Agarwal, secretary, Department of Consumer Affairs-Foods and Public Distribution said that, “We may have an inter-ministerial group which will take up fit and proper cases, where the government will be the complainant. We may have an investigative agency like MRTPC (Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission). We need to take steps to investigate unfair trade practises and misleading advertisements.” Mr Agarwal was speaking at a seminar on “Impact of Misleading Advertisements on Consumers.

Last year, in September, the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) had directed the Department of Consumer Affairs to prepare a draft regulation to keep a check on misleading advertisements. Following, the three ministries—information and broadcasting, consumer affairs and health—were coordinating to formulate a regulatory mechanism.

Mr Agarwal said that the group will have the power to order the withdrawal of an ad and it will then go to a consumer court. Currently, Section 2 (r) of the Consumer Protection Act provides a comprehensive definition of unfair trade practice, while Section 14 deals with the directions that the court can order on such practices. However, consumer courts have no power and cannot deal with misleading advertisements like the MRTPC.

Speaking at the same seminar, Prof KV Thomas, minister of consumer affairs, food & public distribution, said that, “the consumer courts neither have the power nor the infrastructure to investigate, suo moto into misleading advertisement nor take up such cases on their own, as done by the MRTP Commission. Nor do they have an investigative wing like the office of the DG (Investigation and Registration) under the MRTP Act.”

He added, “The consumer courts can only adjudicate over complaints filed before them. However, the consumer courts can issue interim orders stopping such advertisements pending disposal of the case. They can give directions to the advertiser to discontinue such advertisements and not to repeat it. They can award compensation for any loss or suffering caused on account of such unfair trade practices, they can also award punitive damages and costs of litigation.”
Mr Agrawal also said that the government is very keen on the concept of “corrective advertisement” as there were already provisions for it. It only needs to be more active as it will act as a deterrent for advertisers indulging in making misleading ads.

In India, the advertising industry is represented by the Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI). The self-voluntary body insists that its independent review committee effectively acts against fake and misleading advertisements. However, ASCI can only act on specific complaints; it cannot initiate suo moto action or impose penalties.




4 years ago

Curious: Is it ok to call something Taaza milk when it was packed months ago? How about Real juice when the actual juice content is low, with plenty of sugar and flavor added? How about 'nature identical flavor' meaning artificial i.e. chemicals used to mimic a flavor? How about packaging on which it is hard to find the date and weight? How is something called whole wheat when whole wheat is only a small part of the flour used? How about what is passed off as chocolate when it has next to no cocoa content?


4 years ago

Constituting a committee is the safest way of sitting over such important matters for ages, ever rathetr!
Any way, what about banning the "use of child labour" in ads.?

Vijay Trimbak Gokhale

4 years ago

Recently I had a very pleasant experience with the working of Advertising standards Council of India with it's efiicient, time bound and above all transparent grivence redressal process. The entire process/procedure is described on it's website and is followed in terms of letters and spirit. I had complained aginst misleading statements in AMFI's booklets published to propagate mutual Funds. The complaint was considered in a defined manner. It was upheld. That reminded me of Mr. C.K. Prahlad's (noted mangement expert) statement that people really do not mind if the verdict is against them if they realise that process for redressal was just, fair and transparent. It must be contrasted with other regulators like SEBI,IRDA and to some extent RBI who frown upon citizens who diligently bring irregularities to their attention and instead of looking into it in a dispassionate manner become hostile to such citizens. There is no point saying that they should intrpspect.



In Reply to Vijay Trimbak Gokhale 4 years ago

Dear Vijay Trimbak Gokhale ji, your feedback on ASCI highly appreciated, and on that basis, I've filed a complaint as follows, and look forward to their response and progress.

""Ingredients/contents are often written in extremely small font on packaging and are close to illegible. Packaging is certainly a part of advertising. I would like to complain about this and request that you please ensure that the same information as provided on the packaging is also available on the web-sites of the products being advertised/sold in India - and also in a larger font size sent by post, if requested by a consumer.""

Humbly submitted/VM

Vijay Trimbak Gokhale

In Reply to malq 4 years ago

I would suugest that you should bring out a specific case with all possible evidence in support and request ASCI to take view in that specific case and also issue general guidelines,if not already issued. In case they are already issued they may be brought again to the attention of member advertisers of ASCI.

TRAI puts ceiling on SMS, calls rates for TV and radio shows

TRAI said that the charges for such SMS or calls should not be more than four times of the applicable local charges. Consumer organisations have welcomed the move but feel that the rates should be reduced further

The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) has ordered telecom service providers to put a ceiling on the premium rate services such as SMS and calls made to participate in TV or radio programmes. The sector regulator said that the charges for such SMS or calls should not be more than four times of the applicable local charges. Consumer organisations have welcomed the move but feel that the rates should be reduced more. 

Premium services are those which offer some form of content. It includes helpline services, voting, ring tones, gaming, participating in TV and radio shows, especially reality shows.

Anil Prakashan, president, Telecom Users Group, told Moneylife that, “It is a good decision. Earlier it was totally unregulated. At least there are some restrictions now. However, we still feel it’s high. For service providers it is a clear mode of revenue, hence the charges are high. Charges for such SMS and calls should be on par with the regular charges. Most of such shows entice people to participate.”

According to TRAI, unlike other premium rate services where the value of the content is substantial, the content element involved in the calls and SMS made for participating in competitions and voting, is minimal.

The telecom regulator also observed that service providers generally charge Rs2-Rs5 per minute for  each  call made  and  each  SMS  sent  to  participate  in  the  contest,  voting, survey and competitions. It held that while it  is  the subscriber’s choice to make or not  to make  such  calls/SMS,  an  unreasonably  high  price  results  in  undue gain to  the  service providers at  the  cost  of  the  customer.  

TRAI in its order stated that the present practice premium rate services are priced uniformly for subscribers of all plans, irrespective of the rates available in the tariff plan. There is no relation between the rates available in the tariff plan and those charged for such service. Hence it decided to put a cap on such calls and SMSes.

“The whole idea of such shows is money making. However, the restrictions that have been put are welcomed. Charging substantially high rates is clearly unethical. The revenue is often shared by the telecom players with third parties like the campaigner or the advertiser. But the cost is borne by the consumer,” says Hemant Upadhyay, advisor-IT & telecom of Consumer VOICE, an online magazine on consumer awareness.

Even TRAI stated that the revenue generated through the premium rate services is  shared  between  the  telecom  access  provider  and  the  content  service providers. It also clarified that it “does not intend  to restrict  the  growth  of  services  involving  content  nor  curb  the  revenue streams available for the service providers.”

The issue of higher charges of SMS and calls to participate in TV or radio show was also raised by the information and broadcasting ministry.  The ministry, in November last year, acting on complaints received from the viewers that quiz based television shows are charging hefty call and SMS rates to respond to their questions, issued an advisory to the Indian Broadcasting Foundation and the News Broadcasters Associations to come out with a specific guidelines for regulating such quiz shows and ensure transparency in them. As per the mandate, all the TV channels have to display the rate of these calls and SMS.

Randhir Verma, president, Chandigarh Telecom District Telephone Subscribers Association feels that, “Consumer education is required. They should clearly know what are the charges of such services and how are they calculated. It will help subscribers to make better choice. Awareness through the medium of advertisement, seminars is essential. Last year, TRAI has spent nothing on consumer advertisement.”


Mahindra Holidays and Resorts Q4 net profit down 7.34% at Rs37.22 crore

Mahindra Holidays and Resorts’ MD Rajiv Sawhney said: “In the same quarter of previous year, we had very large number of corporate bookings, which is a high margin business, as compared to the fourth quarter of 2011-12”

New Delhi: Mahindra Holidays and Resorts India reported 7.34% decline in its net for the fourth quarter ended 31 March 2012, at Rs37.22 crore, against Rs40.17 crore in the same period of previous fiscal, reports PTI.

 The company’s net sales for the quarter, however, increased 12.77% to Rs173.46 crore, as against Rs153.81 crore in the fourth quarter of 2010-11.

Commenting on the reasons for decline in net profit for the quarter, company’s MD Rajiv Sawhney said: “In the same quarter of previous year, we had very large number of corporate bookings, which is a high margin business, as compared to the fourth quarter of 2011-12.”

 The company’s net profit for the full year ended 31 March 2012 increased 1.82% to Rs104.64 crore, as against Rs102.76 crore in the year ago period.

Its net sales grew 17.79% to Rs573.82 crore in 2011-12, compared to Rs487.12 crore in the previous fiscal.

During the 2011-12, the company added properties at 10 new locations including Sikkim, Mussorie, Mahabaleshwar, Kumarakom, Jaisalmer, Kanatal, Goa and Rishikesh.

“In the last one year we have expanded very aggressively and will continue to do so going ahead,” Mr Sawhney said.

During the year, it strengthened customer-centric efforts and launched an online booking facility on its website.

“Within a very short period of time, 13% of all bookings are now being done online,” he said.

 A part of $14.4 billion Mahindra Group, the company operates in the leisure hospitality segment with a network of 42 resorts across India through vacation ownership memberships.

While Club Mahindra is the flagship brand, the other brands offered by the company are Zest Breaks, Club Mahindra Fundays, Mahindra HomeStays and Mahindra Travel.

The company’s board of directors have recommended dividend of Rs4 per equity share of Rs10 each.

In morning trade, Mahindra Holidays and Resorts was trading at around Rs293 per share on the Bombay Stock Exchange, 0.05% down from the previous close.


We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

To continue

Sign Up or Sign In


To continue

Sign Up or Sign In



The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)