Massive trading in penny stock Cals Refineries

Unknown Cals Refineries is attracting millions of trades but no scrutiny

Cals Refineries, a penny stock (Rs 0.33), is a ferociously-traded company about which very little is known. However, the very fact that more than 40 million shares are traded in this stock daily (2-week average) even when its market cap is little more than Rs2.6 billion warrants a closer look at what’s going on here. The plot is quite thick — with rumours (and no evidence) that the promoters of Cals (Spice Energy) are the same as Spice Jet and the fact that it is building a 5mtpa refinery at Haldia (nowhere near completion from its own updates).

The BSE website reveals that the 52-week high of this stock is Rs0.89 on 11 September 2009 and its low was Rs0.27 on 24 May 2010. It has a good delivery ratio of 64%. On 17 May 2010, the company put out a notice on the BSE with ‘disclosures required under Clause 41(IV) (e) of the Listing Agreement for the Quarter ended March 31, 2010’. It revealed that it had raised about Rs8 billion in December 2007 through GDRs and has used its money for ‘the project’ — setting up a 5mtpa refinery at Haldia, which it expects to start in the last quarter of FY12.

After that relatively fresh piece of disclosure, it’s quite a shock to see the company’s dismal filing of quarterly and annual numbers. It has not filed quarterly numbers since June 2008 (sales Rs0.27 million and loss at Rs0.22 million, the same numbers for FY09, no disclosures since then). After the dismally dated financial filings, the relatively updated shareholding pattern (March 2010) reveals that the promoter group holds less than a percent. However, FIIs hold 6% (P-notes, Mauritius, Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch, Taib Securities). “Shares Underlying Outstanding DRs as % of Total No. of Shares is 55%.”

Internet message boards and forums around this company are very active (a true understatement) and range from outright attempts to lure more investors into this share to half-hearted attempts to console shareholders who have bought at higher prices possibly by trapped shareholders themselves. Most hopes are centred around the promoter company coming out with some fantastic announcement that is going to save all the trapped investors and make the speculators rich.

Now comes the most interesting part. The promoter company, which is called Spice Energy Group, has a logo that looks suspiciously like the Spice Jet logo, leading a lot of people to believe that it is the same group — the message boards of course actively contribute to this belief. I have found no evidence to indicate this is so. While the SpiceJet logo has dots, the Spice Energy logo has swishy lines — although the colours are startlingly similar. A deliberate attempt at association? Possibly.

SpiceJet was promoted by Ajay Singh and the Kansagra family. There is nothing linking these promoter to Cals except, again, ubiquitous comments on message boards, and some random documents floating around on the net saying that Bhupendra Kansagra was on the board of Cals (again, although possible, I have found no evidence).

There is a Hindu Business Line article dated 30 January 2010 in which DS Sunderajan, CFO of Spice Energy, claimed that the promoters of Spice — Sanjiv Malhotra, Ravi Chilukuri (CEO) and Gagan Rastogi and their families — actually controlled as much as 75% of the paid-up equity capital in Cals by subscribing to the GDRs. The article says that Cals was trying to get $250 million in foreign funding and an equal amount of domestic funds to achieve the financial closure of its proposed $1.1-billion refinery project at Haldia before March. In the article, Mr Sunderajan said that BNP was trying to tie up foreign funding for them while SBI Caps was looking at the domestic side. Some websites say that Sanjiv Malhotra is a former co-promoter of SpiceJet, but then again, no credible source.

There has been lots of regulatory action around this stock, although never directly on the company. The latest one, 1st July, was that Dr KM Abraham, whole-time member, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) passed an order confirming the order against Chimming Trading Company Limited in the matter of alleged manipulative trading by certain connected entities in the scrips of Cals Refineries Limited and others. In June 2009, SEBI had barred 26 entities from dealing in the capital markets for acting as conduits for Ketan Parekh and executing synchronised deals in five scrips over a period of 26 months from January 2007 to February 2009 — one of the scrips in which the deals were done was Cals Refineries.

After all that cyber-snooping, I think it is safe to assume that there is something truly fishy about this company and all the trading that seems to be happening around its stock. I have not found a single piece of evidence suggesting that the fortunes of this company are going to turn around or found any evidence that it is anywhere near completing this refinery project. Investors, if you are smart, stay away.



shushli tiwari

3 months ago

A global relief rally in equities on the outcome of first round of French election and the surge in institutional flows that followed, besides a slew of healthy corporate earnings swayed market sentiment, as the domestic stock indices climbed up to 2 per cent this past week. Equity tips

Ashish Tripathi

5 years ago

Cals refineries is a fraud company. Promoters have duped investors by offloading GDRs at huge premium. No operations for the past 5 years and execution to take more than 3 years from inception date. Banned by SEBI from accessing capital

Stock Explain

6 years ago

Given below is a link that carries an updated, comprehensive, and impartial analysis of the latest situation at Cals Refineries:


6 years ago

i am azam qasmi

please e mail new

Stock Explain

6 years ago

Here is an updated analysis on Cals Refineries:


7 years ago

CAPACITY OF REFINERY = 4.8 MMTPA (Million Metric Tonnes Per Annum)= 100000 Barrels Per Day (Approximately) = 36500000 Barrels Per Annum

Kartik Rajani

7 years ago

Cals Refineries is planning to raise more funds by tying up with Kharafi Group. The details are availabe with the BSE website. Pl check & confirm.

Ajay Sharma

7 years ago

Any Update(s) on ur earlier comments? Mr. Munira Dongre

Ajay Sharma

7 years ago

Any update(s) on ur earlier comment's.

Harshal Patwa

7 years ago

India's Cals Refineries to get Kuwaiti funding (Fri Nov 26, 2010)

Kharafi Group will invest $150 million in a 100,000 barrels per day (bpd) coastal refinery being built by Cals Refineries Ltd (CALS.BO: Quote), the Indian company said on Friday, the first such investment by a Kuwaiti firm.

The financing could finally allow Cals Refineries to push ahead with long-delayed plans to build the plant. Shares in the company were up over 7 percent on the Bombay stock exchange.

Kuwaiti family conglomerate Kharafi Group is likely to get an equity stake with investment, a source with direct knowledge of the company's operations told Reuters.

The refinery could cost as much as 50 billion rupees ($1.10 billion) and the company is looking at raising further funds, the source said.

Cals Refineries, which has a market value of about $100 million, said in a stock exchange filing the deal with Al Qebla Al Watya, the investment arm of Kharfi, was signed on Thursday and is subject to statutory government and regulatory approvals.

Cals Refineries bought an existing refinery from German firm Bayernoil and planned to reconstruct it on the coast at Haldia in India's West Bengal state.

It has repeatedly delayed the start up of the plant due to financial constraints.

The latest timeframe for the plant's start-up was given in September by the company, when it told the stock market it expected commissioning in the Jan-March 2012 quarter, a delay of about 2 years from the initial estimates.

In 2008, Ravi Chilukuri, who heads Spice Energy which owns Cals Refineries, said oil major BP had agreed to supply full fuel requirements of the plant for about 10 years and agreed to buy 65 percent of throughput at market prices.

Cals Refineries also has a product supply agreement with Indian state-refiner Bharat Petroleum Corp (BPCL.BO: Quote).


Things are Changing !
This is the Right time to invest !


7 years ago

This is the most immature writing I ever seen from any magazine... there are some of the facts which are misleading.... From the content we can make out that its written with negative bias. Its open ended writing, shows immaturity.

rajeev gera

7 years ago

please open my dmat trading account


7 years ago

यह एक ऐसी स्क्रिप है शेयर ट्रेडिंग के लिये जिसमें पता नहीं कितने इन्‍वेस्‍टर बेवकूफ बनते हैं लेकिन यह तय है कि ब्रोकर ही मात्र करोड़पति और/या अरबपति बन रहे हैं
छोटे इन्‍वेस्‍टर्स को तो इस स्क्रिप से दूर ही रहना चाहिये, यह कहना ज्‍यादा मुनासिब होगा कि इसे देखना/सुनना भी पाप मानना चाहिये
छोटे इन्‍वेस्‍टरों के लिये टीप है कि -
इस स्क्रिप पर ब्रोकर्स पांच पैसे प्रति शेयर ब्रोकरेज चार्ज करते हैं और इस ब्रोकरेज के उपर सर्विस टैक्‍स भी भारी मात्रा में ही चार्ज हो जाती है साथ ही अन्‍य टैक्‍सेस मिलाकर, इस काल्‍स रिफाइनरीजृ का प्रति शेयर अपने अपने मूल कीमत से बहुत ही मंहगा पड़ता है
सिर्फ खरीदी पर ही नहीं बेचते समय भी यह समस्‍त चार्जेस पुनः लगते है
और इस स्‍क्रिप का भविष्‍य फिलहाल दूरगामी तौर पर कुछ भी द्रष्टिगत नहीं है
अलर्ट रहें छोटे इन्‍वेस्‍टर्स और मेरी सलाह है कि इससे दूरी बनाये रखें



In Reply to Ramesh 7 years ago

मैनें 25 अगस्‍त 2009 को 'मोतीलाल ओसवाल सिक्‍युरिटीज्र लिमिटेड' के माध्‍यम से 8275 शेयर्स काल्‍स रिफाइनरी के खरीदे हैं जिसका ब्‍यौरा निम्‍नानुसार है -
8275 Shares @ 0.60 = 4965.00
Brokarage 8275x0.05 = 413.75
Service Tax 413.75x12.3% = 42.63
Other Charges = 6.68
Total Contract Note Value = 5428.06
On the basis of Contract Note -
Per Share Value 5428.06/8275_SH = 0.66
अर्थात 60 पैसे के प्रति शेयर पर 10 टके की कुल चार्जेस और लगभग साढ्रे आठ टके की ब्रोकरेज
वर्तमान मुल्‍य 34/35 पैसे प्रति शेयर है
वर्तमान भाव में बेचने पर भी ब्रोकरेज व सर्विस टैक्‍स वही ही लगेगी अन्‍य चार्जेस में नगण्‍य सा ही अंतर आयेगा
याने कि यदि 34 पैसे के भाव पर बेचते हैं तो यथार्थ में इससे शेयर 28 पैसे ही वसुल होंगे
गणना करें कि यह काल्‍स रिफाइनरी किस प्रकार फायदेमंद है

Stock follower

7 years ago

I do not think the magazine team of Moneylife should restrict itself to only "Cyber snooping". If you call yourself research magazine and have the resources, why not to call up the management of company and talk to them? Y not get the answers to all your questions? Is it because you just want to fill up some space in magazine and site? You could have done that very easily but does not seems to be even interested in it. You are talking about everythin that we can also find on internet by googling ..then Y do we need moneylife? expectations from publications like moneylife are at different levels which this article completely falis to meet up.

pradeep kumar lohani

7 years ago

Cals refineries should comeforward with new plans. ONGC is having so much need of such refineries and to backload crude from GGS to refineries. Cals. should take oppertunity to tender in ONGC and get profited as other subsidiaries like petronet or mrpl and many others are growing.

SEBI takeover panel submits report; rewrites entire takeover code

The committee under the chairmanship of C Achuthan has finalised the draft regulations, recommending sweeping changes to the takeover code

After lengthy deliberation, the Committee constituted by the government to look into the regulations governing takeovers and acquisitions, has finalised and submitted the draft report to the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI). Undertaking a comprehensive review of the existing law governing substantial acquisition of shares and takeovers, the Committee has rewritten the regulations for the same.

The trigger point for mandatory open offer has been raised from 15% to 25% of the voting capital of a listed company. While no change has been recommended in the annual creeping acquisition limit of 5%, the committee has recommended that creeping acquisitions be permitted only to acquirers who already hold more than 25% of the voting capital, provided the aggregate post-acquisition shareholding does not exceed the maximum permissible non-public shareholding.

In another substantial move, in case of voluntary open offers, the committee has recommended hiking the open offer size to 100% of the equity, i.e., for all the shares held by all the other shareholders of the target company. This would ensure equality of opportunity and fair treatment of all shareholders, big and small. The current regulations mandate a minimum offer size of only 20%.

However, as an exception to the 100% offer rule, the committee has stated that a voluntary open offer can be made for the acquisition of shares representing at least 10% but shall not exceed such number of shares which will take the holding of the acquirer beyond the maximum permissible non-public shareholding under the listing agreement.

As regards the pricing of the open offer, the committee has recommended that the price should be the highest of the following four parameters:

  • " The negotiated price under the agreement that attracted the open offer;
  • " Volume-weighted average price paid by the acquirer in the preceding 52 weeks;
  • " Highest price paid by the acquirer during the preceding 26 weeks;
  • " Sixty trading day volume weighted average market price.

The Committee has also proposed that the timeline for completion of open offers be brought down from the current 95 days to 57 days. The committee has also brought in clarity on the valuation in case offer price is being paid through shares.

To ensure that the shares given in consideration for the open offer are indeed liquid and an acceptable replacement for cash, eligibility conditions have been stipulated. Also, while SEBI would continue to have the power to grant exemption from making an open offer, the requirement of making a reference to the takeover panel has now been left to the discretion of SEBI.

As regards competing offers, the committee has recommended certain changes such as increasing the period for making the competing bid, prohibiting acquirers from being represented in the board of the target company, and permitting any competing acquirer to negotiate and acquire the shares tendered to the other competing acquirer, at the same price that was offered by him to the public.

Commenting on the panel\'s objectives while framing the revised guidelines, Mr Achuthan said, "We have tried to ensure that everybody\'s interest is taken care of - from the acquirer to the target and the minority shareholders. We also aim to bring in more transparency in the process."

The panel report would now be put up on the website of the market regulator for public comments, SEBI Chairman CB Bhave said.


Bond issues and trading volumes zoom in the first quarter of the current fiscal

The first quarter of this fiscal witnessed Rs1.93 lakh crore worth of trading, up 174% from the Rs70,868 crore seen in the year-ago period

During the first quarter of this fiscal (April-June 2010), companies raised as much as Rs61,344 crore via corporate bonds, up 33% from the Rs46,287 crore raised during the same period last year, according to data available with the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI). There were 389 bond issues in the first quarter of the current fiscal, up 95% compared to the first quarter of the last fiscal. The number of bond issues was 200 between April-June 2009. There's a similar increase in the trading volumes too. The first quarter of this fiscal witnessed Rs1.93 lakh crore worth of trading, up 174% from the Rs70,868 crore seen last year in the same period.

"You typically tend to see issuance in the first quarter, as entities plan their financial year targets. Also, since the expectations were of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) hiking interest rates in its July policy, issuers have looked to raise money before the eventuality. Another big factor, which is true at most times, is the appetite for supply. The first half was a good period for medium to long tenor bonds - as yields fell during this period and appetite for bonds increased," said Arvind Chari, senior fund manager, Fixed Income, Quantum Mutual Fund.
On 2 July 2010, the banking regulator hiked the repo and the reverse repo rates by 25 basis points to curb spiralling inflation. A FICCI report released today expects another 25 basis points hike in the repo and reverse repo rates by the RBI. "A majority of the participating economists in a FICCI Economists' Poll anticipated a hike of 25 basis points in both repo and reverse repo rates by the RBI at the forthcoming monetary policy review on 27 July 2010," states the FICCI release.

In the financial year 2008-2009, Rs1.73 lakh crore was mopped up by firms which increased to Rs2.12 lakh crore in FY09-10, a jump of 23%. These bonds are issued by companies listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange and the National Stock Exchange (NSE).

During the fiscal year 2007-2008, companies raked in Rs1.18 lakh crore by making 744 bond issues. The next fiscal saw a jump of 46% in the money raised via such bonds at Rs1.73 lakh crore. From 744 bond issues in FY07-08, the figure jumped to 1,041 in FY08-09.

"The Foreign Institutional Investor (FII) inflow also has been substantial. FIIs have invested close to $1.4 billion in Indian debt during this period (the first quarter of the current fiscal) and it is safe to assume that a major chunk of it was in corporate bonds. Secondary market volumes are also a corollary of the general appetite and primary market issuance. Also, mutual funds and insurance companies along with FIIs now actively trade in corporate bonds - leading to rise in market volumes," added Mr Chari.

"Mutual funds have put in a lot of money during this period. MFs bought short-term bonds. Companies are also going ahead with their capital expansion plans. There was also a fear of rate hike by the RBI," said Ganti Murthy, head-fixed income, Peerless Mutual Fund.

Most corporate bonds are privately placed among banks, financial institutions, mutual funds and other large investors in the Indian primary market. According to the BSE, more than 90% of the total funds mobilised through corporate debt securities was through the private placement route in the financial year 2002.




4 years ago

Being in the industry for more than 10 years, we have been involved in Trading and supplying a wide range of Engineering Machines and Tools.

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

To continue

Sign Up or Sign In


To continue

Sign Up or Sign In



The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)