Regulations
Many Beneficiaries of SEBI’s Forced Delisting of Companies
The Securities & Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has finally got around to announcing plans to force over 4,200 companies to delist from the bourses. These are companies whose shares have been suspended for over seven years by the two national exchanges (1,200 companies), or those which were exclusively listed on de-notified regional exchanges (3,000 companies). According to SEBI, the companies will have to offer an exit option to investors this fiscal. 
 
The exit will be at a fair value which will be determined by a third-party valuer appointed by the bourses. Promoters, who do not cooperate with the regulator or fail to provide an exit option to investors, could face the prospect of being barred from raising funds from the capital market or from taking up board positions.
 
What the SEBI chairman did not mention at the press conference where this was announced is that the MS Sahoo committee, set up under SEBI’s own whole-time director had recommended action against promoters, directors and compliance officers of 2,048 companies for failing to comply with listing agreements way back in 2010, but no action was initiated. 
 
While SEBI’s decision is laudable, everything depends on implementation. If managed well, the number of companies listed on our bourses will drop sharply from around 8,000-odd companies (as of March 2015). In all likelihood, SEBI’s plan to act on this issue has been prompted by a special leave petition filed by the Midas Touch Investors Association (MTIA) in the Supreme Court which would have come up for hearing some time soon. Let’s look at how the decision will benefit various stakeholders.
 
Retail investors have been angry about trading of several stocks being suspended for years on end for non-compliance with listing norms. Investors who have dematerialised shares end up paying demat charges every year for shares that have no market. Although SEBI says re-materialisation (conversion of electronic shares back to a paper certificate) of shares is an option, the high cost makes it a meaningless alternative. Virendra Jain, founder of MTIA, points to the plight of companies listed on regional bourses. He says, de-recognised bourses were asked submit details of companies listed exclusively on them to SEBI, but it did not initiate any follow-up action, although only 500 companies have got re-listed on the national exchanges under a SEBI plan. Further, in his reckoning, a whopping Rs58,000 crore is blocked in just 1,450 companies that have been suspended for over seven years only by the BSE (Bombay Stock Exchange) and the NSE (National Stock Exchange). On including companies listed on regional bourses that are either defunct or denotified, the amount blocked would go as high as Rs1.5 lakh crore, he says.  
 
India’s oldest bourse, the BSE has long been complaining about the onerous burden it faces due to the legacy listing of over 5,500 companies. The listing fees in these cases is a pittance compared to the responsibility of monitoring compliance with the listing agreement which has increased manifold in the past two decades. On the other hand, the NSE started operations with a selected group of companies and, even today, it has only 1,696 companies listed on it. The BSE will be a big beneficiary of the move to weed out 4,200 listed stocks and probably make it more attractive investment as it prepares to go public this year. 
 
SEBI itself has been facing flak from a Supreme Court-appointed committee for its failure to stop rampant price manipulation in little-known, penny stocks, for tax avoidance. SEBI chairman, UK Sinha, is quoted in the media as saying that this move will help the regulator “get rid of many shell companies which were being used by promoters and market operators to manipulate stocks. It will help ease the regulatory burden.” While reducing the number of listed companies will, indeed, improve regulatory oversight, it is not clear how actively traded or manipulated companies can be considered shell companies if they are fully compliant with listing norms, disclosures and fees. Neither SEBI nor the bourses show any interest in rampant price manipulation and money laundering that is routine in Indian bourses. Moneylife has been writing about one such case in each issue for the past several years. It remains to be seen how the threat of punitive action actually plays out and whether companies opt to pay investors and exit price and delist shares or comply with the rules and resume trading. 

User

COMMENTS

Vaibhav Dhoka

11 months ago

SEBI should issue timetable about same and monitor same,otherwise issue will be dumped below carpet.

jaideep shirali

11 months ago

I feel that between them, the regulators seem to be destroying the very markets they are supposed to monitor. The FD market has been hit by administrative fiat, as companies that would possibly have not defaulted, were hit by an asset liability mismatch plus liquidity problems and defaulted, even when the same companies rolled over FDs in earlier years without problems. If SEBI implements this compulsory delisting, it will destroy the equity markets. Investors know that a small percentage of companies would have been hit by genuine business problems, the majority of promoters would get away by quoting valuations that possibly would not even touch the face value of the shares. It would leave investors wondering whether they should invest in equities at all, if the regulator takes the attitude of eliminating the malady, rather than finding ways to treat it. Sadly, both the debt and equity markets, which need more attention, are neglected, with attention diverted to peripheral issues. This attitude would drive investors back to deposits, an investment that lags inflation. For entrepreneurs, this would mean the so called Make in India is just a pipe dream, as they would neither find equity investors, nor the NPA scarred bankers, ready to fund their businesses.

manoharlalsharma

11 months ago

Many Beneficiaries of SEBI’s Forced Delisting of Companies/instead of d'list it should be TRADED / AUCTIONED/TAKOVERS or MERGED with powerful compnise so to protect interest of lacs of investors.

Vaibhav Dhoka

11 months ago

One does not understand why SEBI is not initiating or afraid of taking action or prosecute non complying directors.Or is regulator Hand in Glove with defaulters.

sankaran

11 months ago

In our country there are laws for each and everything.But where is the rule of law?!!

saji cherian

11 months ago

Leave alone little known companies, there are several instances of companies promoted by well regarded promoters leaving shareholders in the lurch. . For instance, AKG ACOUSTICS LTD. , promoted by Philips India Ltd., was delisted without informing the shareholders.

saji cherian

11 months ago

Leave alone little known companies, there are several instances of companies promoted by well regarded promoters leaving shareholders in the lurch. . For instance, AKG ACOUSTICS LTD. , promoted by Philips India Ltd., was delisted without informing the shareholders.

Best & Worst Mutual Fund Schemes

The best# three and the worst three schemes over the past three years ranked by their...

Premium Content
Monthly Digital Access

Subscribe

Already A Subscriber?
Login
Yearly Digital+Print Access

Subscribe

Moneylife Magazine Subscriber or MSSN member?
Login

Yearly Subscriber Login

Enter the mail id that you want to use & click on Go. We will send you a link to your email for verficiation
Pulse Beat
Let Your Baby Cry for Better Sleep
 
Michael Gradisar, PhD, associate professor in the School of Psychology at Flinders University (Australia), and colleagues recently published their findings in the journal Paediatrics about the problem of children waking up several times at night and crying to attract attention making mothers sleep-deprived. This study has shown that letting the baby cry without touching the baby makes the baby sleep longer and lets the mother also sleep. If the baby cries before bedtime, it is good. 
 
The study also showed that it is not dangerous to let the baby cry for a long time. It is a different story if the baby is sick and needs attention. Often, the baby gets used to more attention if it cries. But it soon learns to stop crying if it comes to know that no one cares!
 
Is Unhappy Marriage Good for Health?
 
Anew study suggests that the link between a person’s health and the quality of his/her marriage may be less straightforward than we assume. It finds that, compared with happily married peers, men in unhappy marriages are less likely to develop diabetes, and if they do, it arises later and is better managed! This completely overturns the prevailing wisdom. This study was led by Professor Hui Liu, an associate professor in sociology at Michigan State University in East Lansing, and is published in the Journals of Gerontology: Social Sciences
 
Professor Liu claims that: “The study challenges the traditional assumption that negative marital quality is always detrimental to health. It also encourages family scholars to distinguish different sources and types of marital quality. Sometimes, nagging is caring.” Maybe diabetes needs constant monitoring and a nagging spouse might be an asset for better control. The nagging spouse might disrupt the marriage though! 
 
Polypharmacy for the Elderly
 
Defined as more than five drugs at a given time polypharmacy is very common for the elderly. Some 28% of hospital admissions in old age are due to the fallout of polypharmacy where some drug might not be needed or some of them might interact among themselves creating adverse drug reactions. Polypharmacy is the fifth leading cause of death in the US. Sometimes, patients might fail to follow the doctors’ instructions when they are dealing with many drugs.
 
Even doctors, working in silos, could be at fault. Dr Dima Qato  feels that: “Patients may be prescribed medications from multiple prescribers, especially if they suffer from multiple chronic conditions, for example, rheumatoid arthritis, heart disease, and diabetes. Some, or all, of their doctors may not be aware of all the medications prescribed or used. For this reason, patients should tell all their doctors, especially their primary care physician, all the medications and supplements they use, even if they weren’t prescribed by them.” In the US, people aged 65-69 years take an average of around 14 prescription drugs, rising to 18 by the time they are 80-84 years old. Older people can also be more susceptible because their bodies and needs may change more quickly, over time. As they become frailer, doses and treatments can affect them differently. Those with dementia can become confused or forgetful.
 
Cancer Killers
 
Graviola fruit extract (sour sop or lakshmana phala/ hanuman phala) is well known for its medicinal values providing a lot of health benefits. It is a 100% natural herbal remedy as an immunity booster, provides nutritional support and is a good for alternate cancer treatment. I wonder if it could prevent cancer, if taken regularly for breakfast. Ripe banana with dark spots on its skin is again a very powerful immunity booster. It could also be a good cancer treatment additive. 

User

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
  Loading...
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email

BUY NOW

The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)