List revamped

With the earnings season in full swing, our list has undergone several...

Premium Content
Monthly Digital Access

Subscribe

Already A Subscriber?
Login
Yearly Digital+Print Access

Subscribe

Moneylife Magazine Subscriber or MSSN member?
Login

Yearly Subscriber Login

Enter the mail id that you want to use & click on Go. We will send you a link to your email for verficiation
Nestle India posts 20.8% increase in net profit

Nestle India has posted impressive net profit for the December quarter but the Europe horsemeat fiasco could affect its Indian operations or the brand image could take a beating. Not surprisingly, the fiasco found no mention in the Edelweiss’ analyst report

Nestle India has performed decently for the December 2012 quarter. According to a report by Edelweiss, net sales grew 10% year-on-year (y-o-y) while profit after tax (PAT) grew at an impressive 20.8% y-o-y to Rs278.90 crore. Edelweiss, however, has rated the company as a HOLD (i.e. it expects the scrip to appreciate up to 15% in the next one year) and believes its value is Rs5,050 per share, but at the same time tagged it as a “Sector Performer” (i.e. it expects Nestle India’s returns to match the overall consumer goods sector in the next 12 months). The results were aided by prudent cost management, higher sales and superior product mix and decline in tax rate.
 

A Moneylife analysis showed that Nestle India has been performing steadily despite difficult times. Its net sales growth for the December quarter (10%) is on par with its three quarter y-o-y average growth rates of 10%. Its operating profit is better, which grew at 28% y-o-y when compared to the three quarter average of 19%. Its return on networth is astoundingly high at 84% which speaks volumes of its brand image and fundamentals. This is why its valuation is at a premium, with its market capitalisation over 20 times its operating profit. But there’s more to this that most Indian investors are probably not aware of.
 

While the results were good, what is surprising is that there is no mention of the horsemeat fiasco in the Edelweiss analyst report. Nestle has been in the news, in Europe, for all the wrong reasons. Apparently, it was discovered that two of its pasta products, in Italy and Spain, contained traces of horsemeat. The latest debacle that has been raging much of Europe that horsemeat has been found in packaged foods, originated from Britain and Ireland. While it may not concern Nestle’s products sold in India (or the Indian subsidiary for that matter), the fact that it concerns the overall Nestle brand image and management, which has taken a big hit now. Indian retail investors ought to be informed this much at least. It has already removed the pasta products from the shelves in Italy and Spain, after DNA tests confirmed traces of horsemeat. It is quite possible that this fiasco is in the minds of the consumers and it may affect Nestle’s demand in general. This isn’t the first time Nestle has been embroiled in controversy. Earlier, Nestle’s milk product had melamine in Chinese-made milk and infants had died because of it.
 

Going forward, according to the Edelweiss report, Nestle plans to launch oats under the Maggi brand as a ‘healthy’ extension of its noodle segment. Consumers, however, should be aware of health effects of noodle and soup products which are not really ‘healthy’. We had written in detail over here: Shocking! All instant noodle brands are fooling you on nutrition, health
 

Some of the highlights of the quarter were the inauguration of its R&D centre in India at Manesar, Harayana. The report said, “This shows increased commitment to India by Nestle SA and the company’s confidence in tapping the India market’s humungous consumer base.” Nestle also acquired 26% stake in Agro and Allied Activities, a milk collection business in western India.
 

Edelweiss remains optimistic on Nestle despite tagging it a HOLD. The report said, “Nestle remains the best play in the packaged food category in India. We expect new product launches to drive consumer enthusiasm and sustain growth momentum.” It will be interesting how Nestle’s global management handles the crisis.
 

Check other company reports here.

User

SC constitutes special team to examine contents of Radia tapes

The government had recorded 180 days of Radia's conversations—first from 20 August 2008 onwards for 60 days and then from 19th October for another 60 days. Later, on 11May 2009, her phone was again put on surveillance for another 60 days following a fresh order given on 8th May

The Supreme Court on Thursday constituted a six-member special team comprising five from the CBI and one from the Income Tax department to examine the contents of tapped telephonic conversations of corporate lobbyist Niira Radia with politicians, corporate honchos and others.

 

A bench comprising justices GS Singhvi and SJ Mukhopadhaya said the working of the team will be supervised by two officers of the CBI who will report to Superintendent of Police, CBI dealing with the 2G matter.

 

The bench said that the overall supervision will be under the Deputy Inspector General, CBI who is looking after the case.

 

The bench said that the team shall submit its report in four months. The apex court on 13th February had sought names of officials of CBI, IT department and the Enforcement Directorate for setting up of a team to enquire into the tapped telephonic conversations of Radia with others to ascertain element of criminality.

 

The court had earlier said that it had gone through some of the tapped conversations and some of them were ‘innocuous’ and hence, the voluminous transcripts were needed to be ‘scrutinised’ to find out elements of ‘criminality’ in them.

 

It had also made clear that the scrutiny would be limited to those conversations which pertain to criminal element and relating to interest of justice.

 

Earlier, senior advocate Harish Salve, appearing for Ratan Tata, had submitted that “utmost secrecy” be maintained in the scrutiny of transcripts.

 

He was referring to various conversations that took place between Tata and Radia which are allegedly personal in nature.

 

“There are some conversations in public domain and those are hardly personal in nature. They relate to illegality and shed significant light on how government decisions are being influenced and how institutions run in the country,” Prashant Bhushan, appearing for Centre for Public Interest Litigation, had said.

 

Excerpts from the tapes earlier leaked in the media had sparked a political storm with the conversations bringing out the nature of corporate lobbying and also its purported impact on politics.

 

The Income Tax department placed transcripts of 5,800 tapped telephone conversations in 50 sealed envelopes. The conversations were recorded as part of surveillance of Radia’s phone on a complaint to the finance minister on 16 November 2007 alleging that within a span of nine years she had built up a business empire worth Rs300 crore.

 

The government had recorded 180 days of Radia's conversations—first from 20 August 2008 onwards for 60 days and then from 19th October for another 60 days. Later, on 11May 2009, her phone was again put on surveillance for another 60 days following a fresh order given on 8th May.

User

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
  Loading...
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

BUY NOW

The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)