Kingfisher Airlines Q2 loss widens to Rs468.66 crore

Bankers have made it clear that Kingfisher’s promoters will have to infuse Rs800 crore worth of fresh equity into the company if they are to consider a second restructuring of existing debt, even as opposition mounted to any bailout of the private carrier

Mumbai: Debt-ridden Kingfisher Airlines today reported that its net loss doubled to Rs468.66 crore in the quarter ended 30 September 2011 from Rs230.81 crore in the same period last year, as higher fuel prices depressed operating margins, reports PTI.

The company’s income from operations, however, rose by 10.5% to Rs1,528.16 crore in the July-September quarter from Rs1,382.72 crore in the year earlier period.

Bankers have made it clear that Kingfisher’s promoters will have to infuse Rs800 crore worth of fresh equity into the company if they are to consider a second restructuring of existing debt, even as opposition mounted to any bailout of the private carrier.

The bankers have asked the troubled airline to come out with a ‘credible’ plan.

The lenders—a 13-bank consortium led by State Bank of India (SBI), who were yet to decide on ways to soften the troubled airline’s Rs7,057.08 crore debt burden—are due to meet Kingfisher management today.

Kingfisher had suffered a loss of Rs1,027 crore in 2010-11 and is estimated to have debt of over Rs7,000 crore.

The airline has cancelled several flights over the past few weeks.

Meanwhile, shares of the company were trading at Rs 21.65 apiece, up 1.41% from their previous close on the Bombay Stock Exchange at 11.30am today.

User

IDBI Dynamic Bond Fund, a concept that looks good only on paper

The idea of dynamic bond funds has mostly proved to be good only on paper. We studied eight of them and their returns since inception do not seem great. Some of them have given returns as low as 3% since inception

IDBI Mutual Fund has filed offer document with SEBI to launch IDBI Dynamic Bond Fund, an open ended income fund. The NFO is priced at Rs10 per unit. The objective of the Scheme is to generate regular income while maintaining liquidity through active management of a portfolio comprising of debt and money market instruments.

A Dynamic Bond fund, as the name suggests, is designed to give the fund manager the flexibility to change the duration of the bond as and when needed.

Interest rates and bond prices are inversely related. When the interest rate is rising, bond prices fall and the fund manager should be able to decrease the duration of the bond; short-term bonds face a lower impact. In addition, when the interest rate is falling they should be able to increase the duration of the bond.

 The other flexibility is to move into cash and sit on the sidelines when the interest rate is rising sharply over different horizons. It is to offer the flexibility that dynamic bond funds were introduced. They will dynamically move from a fully invested situation to a fully cash position and various stages in between, depending on the fund manager’s reading of the interest rate situation. One of the most difficult things to predict.

Not surprisingly, the idea of dynamic bond funds has by and large proved to be good only on paper. We studied eight of them and their returns since inception do not seem great. Some of them have given returns as low as 3% since inception. Birla Sun Life Dynamic Bond Fund - Ret gave a return of 8% and Tata Dynamic Bond Fund fetched a return of 5 %. Among the others are Taurus Dynamic Income Fund (7%), UTI Dynamic Bond Fund (7%), Canara Robeco Dynamic Bond Fund - Retail (5%), Axis Dynamic Bond Fund and SBI Dynamic Bond Fund whose return is 3% each is the worst among the lot.

(SBI Dynamic Bond Fund was launched in February 2004 and Axis Dynamic Bond was launched in April 2011)

IDBI Dynamic Bond Fund  will invest 100% in debt instruments (including fixed/floating rate debt instruments, government securities and securitized debt) with low to medium risk profile and invest up to 100% in money market instruments with low risk profile. Investment in securitised debt not to exceed up to 20% of the assets of the scheme.

Fund manager of IDBI Dynamic bond fund is Gautam Kaul.

User

COMMENTS

madavachar

5 years ago

abt yu idbi

Narendra Doshi

6 years ago

The write up is very correct. For so many years NONE of the dynamic funds have ever given good returns and YET new funds with the same/similar mandate are approved for NFOs by other AMCs.
Is there NO statutory audit BEFORE for same/similar schemes await approval for NFOs?
Rules MUST ask the AMCs with existing schemes BEFORE approving NEW NFOs with similar logic. Existing AMCs must be questioned and ordered to RECTIFY within a specified time frame or else close the schemes, paying penalties. New AMCs must be made aware that if they do not meet the mandates they ALSO will have to quit & NO OTHER AMCs should be allowed without rigid performance monitoring and penalties for nonperformance.
The above SHOULD apply to ALL other NAMED schemes.

How organic is your natural food?

For the domestic market in India, anybody and everybody happily places a sticker saying ‘organic’ on anything they want, after all this NPOP, NSOP and certifying agency system!

As with most such things, it starts with anecdotal personal experiences, and then it moves into research. This, therefore, was no different . . .
 
For years now, one has been keeping one’s eyes open for organic agri-products while travelling around the country. It has usually, been a pleasure as well as an education to look deeper into such discoveries, meeting people. They are really trying to keep pesticides and chemicals out of the growth chain, including the water being used. Typically, this has been an open experience, with people proud to show off their efforts. This is true from the Sunderbans to Mountain Kerala to Garhwal to Jodhpur, and more. However, of late, one has also observed the proliferation of signboards pointing to ‘certified’ organic farms, which on enquiring do not permit visitors inside.
 
Retail outlets in larger cities now devote increasingly more space, especially, in affluent areas for ‘organic’ products. Spices, tea, coffee, coconut, cereals, eggs, vegetables, fruits, juices and more—pretty much everything now has an ‘organic’ option available on the shelves, and it seems to cost a lot more too. The problem lies in the fact that somewhere in the fine print you can spot ‘like organic’ or ‘nature organic’ or even ‘organic approved’. Whether processed and packaged or sold fresh, there is still no clarity on the subject. So, it is pretty much about trusting the seller and parting with more money.
 
What has become even more visible of late is the term ‘organic’ being pasted on or over-printed onto the packaging of processed food imported into India. It is increasingly obvious that the original label, which may be in another language, has nothing to do with the product being organic. It has been added on by some entity usually as unverifiable as the sticker with the alleged importer’s provenance next to it.
 
There is more. Packaged breakfast ‘cereals’, amongst the most industrialised and mis-nomenclatured of all readymade convenience foods ever invented, are an example. Eggs in pretty cartons with little holograms pasted on are also promising in not just organic qualities, but also yellower yolks and browner skins.
 
So what’s really organic, to start with, in India? To start with, legally only those food products, which have had their production certified as per the National Programme for Organic Production (NPOP) as laid down by the Government of India, can use the term ‘organic’. Requirements vary by crop and product. They require intensive record-keeping and tracking, non-usage of a variety of chemicals for a number of years, and strict segregation, as well as, control at all stages in the production chain. This would include even the transportation and storage aspects—a truck used to carry non-organic produce, for example, would not be valid for organic food without serious cleaning up—organically. If a cold storage or vegetable or fruit shop does not clearly segregate organic from non-organic, then certification is at risk.
 
(This has, incidentally, been a mixed blessing for the smaller farmers. On one hand, they can join ‘groups’ which have moved into organic farming, thereby sharing costs and methods, and on the other hand, have to now deal with a ‘system’ that is as yet far from perfect).
 
Next, is an accreditation system—there are dozens of such certifying agencies in India. Obviously, where there is going to be competition of this sort, there is going to be room to manoeuvre.  So every, now and then, there are reports of such agencies indulging in fraudulent practices. Luckily, they also get caught, it seems. Genetically-modified cotton being passed of as organic cotton is one such popular scam. But, by and large, as of now, the system does appear to work. These certifying agencies are supposed to not just grant certification to farmers and others in the business of organic products but also carry out regular verifications. They are supposed to do this under the NSOP (National Standards for Organic Production).
 
Finally, there are the entities in the business of organic products. They ensure that the land used is fit for organic farming. They are also responsible for sourcing seeds and natural fertilisers. All of them need to be certified and that’s where the issue comes—as of now, unlike in other countries, there is no single ‘mark’ or ‘logo’ which provides a single-point re-verification on this for the eventual customer. Nor is there a requirement that the product or packaging (or even advertising) for the domestic market has to carry details of the certification under the NPOP or NSOP—as yet.
 
So, what happens is that for the domestic market in India, anybody and everybody happily places a sticker saying ‘organic’ on anything they want, after all this NPOP, NSOP and certifying agency system. Obviously, for the export market, documentation is strong enough to cover this lacuna; otherwise the NPOP/NSOP would lose the rest of the world as a customer.
 
But when it comes to the Indian customer, pretty much anybody from anywhere in the world, or domestic, can happily put the word ‘organic’ on it. That’s the real and simple truth as on date. And there does appear to be a bit of a racket in this—after all, it is the same ministry of agriculture that is involved, which is also pushing non-organic farming methods and products. So the conflict is clear and there for anybody to see.
 
What is the solution? Well, other than sitting with the retailer and getting her to explain the complete chain, not much else. Yes, there are shops and outlets which have built up a reputation over the years, but they are few and far between. They are in danger of being hidden by the louder and brighter smart alecks in the game. But at this point in time, if that package or display says ‘Organic’, then some amount of re-verification is certainly in order. Some how!

User

COMMENTS

gaurav

6 years ago

vegetables is shoddy and unforgivable. Grains would rather be allowed to rot, by the government, than be distributed, to people, whether free, or at a price.
We MUST ban all modern fertilizers, stop using pesticides which aren't of made from natural sources, and Complete Ban all GM foods. There is no other alternative.

gaurav

6 years ago

The National Standards for Organic products (NSOP) under the National Programme for organic Production (NPOP), seems to be highly questionable. Firstly, the Indian Organic Certification Agency of India should start by certifying food as GM, Pesticide Sprayed, Fertilizer Enhanced (Specifying the kind of fertilizers used), and let us Indians know, what is the junk, that is going into our mouths. Then the government should start answering questions, as to why all good Organic Foods are exported to the EU, and other countries, where we get to eat the garbage, that we do, produced in India, and imported from the world, at MANY TIMES, the price, that they retail at, Around the World.

REPLY

malq

In Reply to gaurav 6 years ago

Dear Gaurav ji, thank you for writing in, and valid points.

Why not start by just sending an RTI application asking the very questions you want answers for, please?

My take is that the food industry, which has increasingly got stronger roots in India and links with the healthcare industry, will simply not permit truth in labeling and selling junk food in India along the same lines as they do in their other (developed??)country markets.

We need to expose' this, but more, need to also counter it.

Humbly submitted/vm

Prakash Bhate

6 years ago

There is no way you can feed 7 billion people by organic farming. You either pay through your nose for a genuine organic product and derive mental satisfaction for consuming something that is not really any different from what is available through commercial farming. Or get cheated by people who put false labels. Or consume commercially farmed products. The last choice is exercised by at least 6 billion people and they are all alive and getting on with their jobs.

REPLY

malq

In Reply to Prakash Bhate 6 years ago

Dear Prakash Bhate ji, thank you for writing in, and appreciate your candour.

Certainly, commercially farmed products are about the only viable solution going, but as you correctly stated - this business of false labels needs to be stopped. And more importantly, what is going into commercially farmed products needs to be looked into - start with the high-protein diet components that an "improvement" iin economic status motivates people towards - things like chicken, milk products, soya products and even some "new" types of fish. Can we have some rational solutions on the labels which cover much of the new-generation fish-meal, poultry-feed, ferts, chemicals and other raw materials used for commercial agriculture please?

Humbly submitted/vm

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
  Loading...
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email

BUY NOW

The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)