Karachi Airport attack leaves 28 dead, including 10 terrorist of Pakistani Taliban

Twenty-eight people, including 10 terrorists, were killed in the attack, one of the most daring in recent years in the port city of Karachi in Pakistan

In a brazen attack, heavily armed Pakistani Taliban terrorists launched a major assault on the country’s largest airport at Karachi in which at least 28 people, including 10 terrorists, were killed before security forces eventually regained control on Monday.


The 10 militants divided into two groups of five, attacked the Jinnah International Airport late Sunday night, resulting in a six-hour gun battle with security forces involving army, paramilitary Rangers, police and Airport Security Force.


Explosions and gunfire rang out as the attackers wearing military uniforms and suicide vests, and armed with grenades and rocket launchers attacked the airport in Karachi, Pakistan’s biggest city and financial hub.


According to reports, eight ASF personnel, two Rangers officials, one police officer and three Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) officials are among the dead.


Twenty-eight people, including the 10 terrorists, were killed in the attack, one of the most daring in recent years in the port city. Twenty-four people have also been injured.


“The airport has been cleared. The security forces killed seven terrorists while three blew themselves up during the fight,” Director General, Rangers, Major General Rizwan Akhtar told media.


“Very soon we will hand over the airport to the civilian aviation authority to start its normal operations,” he said.


Earlier, the military had declared an end to its operation to secure the airport but were forced to relaunch an assault after fresh firing erupted.


“All 10 terrorists have been killed, the airport secured and they were unable to damage any aircraft or installations,” a spokesman of the military’s Inter Services Pubic Relations (ISPR) said.


The terrorists were cornered and shot down after they stormed the old airport terminal building posing as Airport Security Force (ASF) personnel.


The ISPR spokesman said that army units from the nearby Malir cantonment base, ASF commandos, paramilitary rangers and police had carried out the joint operation to clear the area.


Sophisticated machine guns and rocket launchers were recovered from the slain terrorists who were being identified, he said.


The outlawed Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) has claimed responsibility for the attack.


“We carried out this attack on the Karachi airport and it is a message to the Pakistani government that we are still alive to react over the killings of innocent people in bomb attacks on their villages,” TTP spokesman Shahidullah Shahid said in a statement to the media.


He said that the attack was also carried out to avenge the killing of former TTP chief Hakimullah Mehsud in a US drone strike.


PMO to unblock 10,000 Twitter accounts blocked by Singh govt

The Prime Minister's Office has decided to unblock nearly 10,000 twitter accounts which were blocked by previous Congress-led United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government

After receiving nearly 4,000 requests to unblock their twitter accounts, Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Office (@PMOIndia) has decided to unblock about 10,000 Twitter handles that were blocked by the former PM, Dr Manmohan Singh's media advisor, Pankaj Pachauri.


A report in DNA quotes a member of Bhartiya Janata Party's (BJP) IT team as saying, "Nearly 2,000 followers have already been unblocked. By the end of this week, we would be able to unblock all the blocked followers. This number is expected to be around 8,000-10,000.”


Some of these accounts, labelled as 'Internet Trolls' were used to poke fun at the UPA, former PM Dr Singh as well as other ruling members of the Congress. Back in 2012, journalists Kanchan Gupta and Shiv Aroor were also blocked from Twitter along with 16 other handles for being partial to the Right wing and speaking against the Congress Government. They were later unblocked following outrage from public regarding 'freedom of speech' and 'freedom of press'.


Among the blocked accounts were also those who were using abusive language against the BJP during the recent Lok Sabha elections. Speaking on this, Economic Times (ET) quoted Vinit Goenka, co-convenor of BJP's IT Cell as saying, “We had blocked some accounts with abusive posts and tweets but with the government in place, it is time to look at interacting with everyone about collective development.”


Narendra Modi, who is extremely active on Twitter with 45 lakh followers, is hoping to interact with everyone, and hence planning to unblock the accounts. According to the ET report, Goenka said “The party now wishes to 'adopt a new policy' on trolls. We have still not decided how to go about abusive posts. But we will consult our members and do the needful. The cell that was managing the accounts of all BJP leaders and campaign units said it was not just them, but Congress too had blocked many accounts during the past few months.”


Advertisements that Buy the Media

Angry about ads that promote government achievements and the leaders? Make yourself heard before the Supreme Court appointed committee for framing guidelines on publicly funded government ads like Bharat Nirman

In the first week of June, the ministry of information and broadcasting (I&B ministry) invited the public to offer suggestions on framing guidelines for publicly funded government advertising campaigns.

The basis of this is an important Supreme Court (SC) judgement of 23 April 2014 on a writ petition filed by two NGOs, viz., Common Cause and Centre for Public Interest Litigation. The petitioners had complained about the misuse of public funds by political parties for image building and media support. They also pointed out that “such advertisements become more blatant and assume alarming proportions just before the announcement of the general elections.”

The SC order has asked the government to distinguish between advertisements that are a part of “government messaging and daily business,” and “advertisement that are politically motivated and designed to patronise media organisations and get favourable media coverage.” A three-member committee has been appointed to suggest guidelines for public advertisements within three months, until the legislature enacts a law. You can email your views and suggestions to [email protected] at the I&B ministry.  

The judgement comes at an interesting time. Although the litigation was filed almost a decade ago, the issue of misusing public funds came to the fore again during the 2014 elections. The Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP’s) aggressive social media followers have been vocal about the misuse of public funds, ‘paid news’ and the role of journalists, who Narendra Modi had dubbed ‘news traders’.

Their anger was aimed at the beneficiaries of government largesse at the cost of the exchequer. The SC judgement now puts the onus on a BJP-led government to implement the guidelines that will be framed by the three-member committee and take it forward by enacting appropriate legislation. This also means that there cannot be a repeat of the ‘India Shining’ type of blitzkrieg five years from now.

Concerned citizens must react to the committee’s request for suggestions from the public. In fact, this may be an opportunity to extend the discussion to other areas where politicians, government departments and bureaucrats use public money to cadge favours from the media. So where do we begin?

The SC noted that governments around the world, facing similar allegations, have resolved the issue by framing guidelines for advertising projects and policies. India, too, has such a framework under the Directorate of Advertising and Visual Publicity (DAVP), but it needs teeth to stop the mis-utilisation of funds evident in the run up to the elections.  

An RTI query revealed that the UPA government spent a massive Rs418.95 crore in the past four years on the Bharat Nirman advertisement campaign. Of this, Rs187 crore was in the election year 2013-14 and Rs100.95 crore was in the year before that.

Various ministries, as well as public sector undertakings (PSUs) under their control, spent crores of rupees on advertisements to commemorate births and deaths of prime ministers of the Nehru-Gandhi family. When the 2104 election results indicated that people voted for development and growth, some states cashed in on the public mood with a multi-page advertising blitz that prominently featured their respective chief ministers.

Can all of this be stopped through a set of guidelines? We will have to wait and see. The SC order has listed key points on government spending that apply in Australia. But the SC-appointed committee needs to go far beyond it and also be more explicit.

From the Indian perspective, the biggest public concern is over the misuse of public money to commemorate birth and death anniversaries and leaders of a political party. The second area of concern is the publication of photographs of politicians and ministers in government advertisements as if to credit them personally with public works.

Anil Galgali, an RTI activist, found out that MMRDA (Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority) spent a massive Rs15.82 lakh a month on public relations and image building exercise during the Lok Sabha elections. MMRDA operates directly under the chairmanship of the Maharashtra chief minister, so this big publicity budget is a matter of suspicion. The use of PSUs to issue expensive advertisements, or to gratify bureaucrats, politicians and the media, is well known and should be included in the recommendations on government spending.

The Australian code prescribes that, “Campaigns must comply with legal requirements and procurement policies and procedures.” The Indian guidelines need to be more explicit. The Bharat Nirman campaign brazenly lied when it depicted a functioning realty regulator and legalising of hawkers, complete with identity cards for street vendors. The two Bills had not even been cleared by parliament. Bharat Nirman advertisements about the Food Security Bill and the Land Acquisition Bill were not false, but were certainly misleading.

Had these advertisements been issued by the private sector, they would have fallen foul of the Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI) code. However, ASCI, a self-regulatory body, keeps away from government and political advertisements, for obvious reasons. The SC committee, in addition to other issues, can recommend that government advertisements must also comply with the ASCI code. The Bharat Nirman advertisements were shocking, since they were issued by the I&B ministry.

In the financial world, a significant sum of investors’ money is commandeered by the government and various regulators through legislation. It started with the Investor Education & Protection Fund (IEPF) set up under Section 205C of the Companies Act, 1956, which put a whopping Rs1,000crore+ of unclaimed dividends, corporate fixed deposits and interest into the government’s hand.

The insurance and banking regulators have adopted similar rules in the name of investor education and protection. However, nobody wants to examine whether IEPF has succeeded in its mandate, or whether regulators are merely appropriating money that belongs to savers. Moneylife believes it is the latter.

The SC committee ought to look into such funds, since big chunks of it are spent on advertising. As a member of the IEPF, I had pointed out that an investor protection message couldn’t carry the photograph of the then minister of corporate affairs since it was not paid out of government funds. My intervention was met with complete silence and I was out of the committee soon thereafter. In fact, the MCA, under Sachin Pilot, cancelled the accreditation of all NGOs working for investor protection and allowed business and professional associations to appropriate investors’ unclaimed money.

It is the same with ‘professionally-run’ stock exchanges which also act as first-line regulators. The two national bourses have several hundred crores of rupees earmarked for investor protection. These are doled out to favoured media or entities, without any clear rules or guidelines.

Stock exchanges have escaped public scrutiny for a decade by refusing to be covered by the Right to Information Act. Both, the National Stock Exchange (NSE) and the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE), have challenged an order of the Central Information Commission, which said that they are a public institution (as first-line regulators) and ought to be subject to RTI. In this, they have had tacit support from the Securities & Exchange Board of India (SEBI) which is all but hostile to RTI queries.

Finally, the SC-appointed committee needs to question whether the age-old practice of issuing advertisements, including tenders in national dailies, makes any sense at all? Internet-based advertising is far more cost effective, provides clear metrics of reach and views, to ensure that they reach the target audience. The committee must examine whether dated rules for statutory advertisements can also be revised and updated.

Call for bids, contracts and government tenders can be posted on websites of ministries, PSUs or municipal corporations. Those interested can subscribe to automated information mailers to remain updated.

We hear that the babus on Raisina Hill are scurrying to ensure cleanliness of corridors when the PM is expected to do his rounds. Prime minister Narendra Modi can ensure a more fundamental clean-up of surrogate funding of the political agenda by merely signalling to the I&B ministry that he wants positive, long-term change.

Sucheta Dalal is the managing editor of Moneylife. She was awarded the Padma Shri in 2006 for her outstanding contribution to journalism. She can be reached at [email protected]



Anup Nair

2 years ago

The matter related to government ads such as Call for bids, contracts and government tenders is spot on! I was planning to put in an RTI application to ascertain information regarding Govt's spend on these type of ads by number & media publication.

What is quite interesting is that the Supreme Court's judgement has quoted 2 paragraphs verbatim about the Govt ADvertising policies in Australia/Canada from a report submitted by Columbia University to the Bhutanese Government.

Anup Nair

2 years ago

The matter related to government ads such as Call for bids, contracts and government tenders is spot on! I was planning to put in an RTI application to ascertain information regarding Govt's spend on these type of ads by number & media publication.

What is quite interesting is that the Supreme Court's judgement has quoted 2 paragraphs verbatim about the Govt ADvertising policies in Australia/Canada from a report submitted by Columbia University to the Bhutanese Government.

Dr Paresh Vaidya

2 years ago

Governments have to publicize their schemes to the target groups. To that extent advt is needed, but it need not carry photographs of the Ministers or the Secretaries.Small newspapers in vernacular languages survive on such advertisements from the Governments. So far as they are given impartially and without any string attached,it may be alright.

And it is not always that these Ads come before elections. This year, just after the Loksabha election results were out, there were full page Ads in Mumbai newspapers about the achievements of Tamilnadu Govt, with large photographs of Ms JJ. This went for 4 days !! What relevance it had except to declare that, 'not Modi alone, I also work'.

MG Warrier

2 years ago

I had responded to a report on cleansing Ganga which appeared in The Hindu Business Line thus:

Message from Ganga

This refers to the report “Govt forms panel for Ganga rejuvenation(June 7). It is heartening to see that the new government in Delhi is initiating steps to fulfil some of the major promises which brought them to power. Ganga rejuvenation should go beyond cleansing and ‘protecting’ the mother of all rivers. This should become a symbol of India’s resolve to move away from the phase in which values which the country had taught the world had been shadowed by the distrust and disharmony created by a small minority of the ‘greedy and the ambitious’.
Cleansing and rejuvenation need to be undertaken in all walks of life across geographic, cultural and financial sectors. The drainage channelss in the cities and wells and tanks in villages should get the same attention in cleansing and rejuvenation as Ganga is expected to get now. Similar cleaning process should clear the politics and financial sector too of the unhealthy and corrupt practices which have brought them to disrepute in recent years. Let us welcome the beginning and be vigilant while committing ourselves to cooperate and participate in the cleansing process.
M G Warrier


2 years ago

The basic dictum should be that governments should not advertise achievements. Government's work is made known by the media even without advertising.

Money spent on government advertising mostly serves to line the pockets of government functionaries and to unduly influence media and public opinion.

Procurement, Sale Tenders and other Notices should be limited to small, standard sizes, that allow a summary description and a link to the website that has the details.

The current practice of bringing out multi-page supplements of examination results and other selection exercises must be discontinued as an utter waste of public money and newsprint. This information can be provided by sms to candidates and also displayed in relevant government websites and offices.

Public sector units should be prohibited from showing any political personality, dead or alive, in their advertising, with severe personal penalties on the executives for non-compliance.

Rohit Mandrekar

2 years ago

Bravo Ms Dalal for this communication; but don't stop hereafter only pointing out effects. We need to know how a common man should react to stop this wastage by the Government and who should we contact for clarifications or suggestions

tapan sur

2 years ago

only way 2 control wasteful adv. spend by govt.4 vested interest is by reducing individual tax by half, so that Govt. does not have extra money in their hands 4 wasteful expenditure? If you earn you will know how to spend?

Hemlata Mohan

2 years ago

Yes we have to stop this self certification and narcissistic culture- some states revel in this- carrying the CM's photo even if it is a family wedding or birthdays. In one of the states, a new culture has developed to put up posters of private citizens who are dead or for their condolence meetings using public space on trees, electric poles etc- this is ridiculous. And there is always THE 100 DAYS OF A NEW CM, OR HIS/HER FIRST ANNIVERSARY OR BIRHDAYS- WHEN ALL THEIR "ACHIEEMENTS" ARE SPELT OUT ...

Meenal Mamdani

2 years ago

I totally agree with Davidson and wish there was a swift remedy like tearing down of hoardings that are illegal.

Davidson D

2 years ago

Why only ads in newspapers but even hoardings for any silly reason should be banned. Also all visits of ministers for various functions be restricted as it puts a lot of strain on security, traffic causing lot of inconvenience to general public besides spending public money for flimsy reasons. Even the adjournment of Parliament when in session on the demise of any members should be stopped. Two minutes silence would be more than sufficient.


Simple Indian

In Reply to Davidson D 2 years ago

Fully agree with you. The government has little money for welfare schemes, but enough to project their own 'so-called' achievements. Also, adjournments in parliament have become routine.

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

To continue

Sign Up or Sign In


To continue

Sign Up or Sign In



The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)