American forces will not be returning to combat in Iraq, but we will help Iraqis. The US will help the country with 'targeted and precise military action' if required, says Obama
US President Barack Obama has made it clear that American combat troops will not return to Iraq to fight Islamic militants, who have seized a section of the country. He, however, assured Baghdad of launching 'targeted and precise military action' if required.
“American forces will not be returning to combat in Iraq, but we will help Iraqis as they take the fight to terrorists who threaten the Iraqi people, the region, and American interests as well,” Obama told reporters at a news conference after meeting with his top national security advisors.
He said, “We do not have the ability to simply solve this problem by sending in tens of thousands of troops and committing the kinds of blood and treasure that has already been expended in Iraq. Ultimately, this is something that is going to have to be solved by the Iraqis”.
Iraq had requested the US to help under the security agreement (between the two countries), and to conduct air strikes on the militants of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), who have seized the country’s second largest city of Mosul and advancing towards the capital.
“It is in our national security interests not to see an all-out civil war inside of Iraq, not just for humanitarian reasons, but because that ultimately can be destabilising throughout the region,” Obama said even as he noted that he is prepared to carry on targeted and precision strikes.
“We will be prepared to take targeted and precise military action if and when we determine that the situation on the ground requires it,” he said.
The US, he said, also has an interest in making sure that there is no safe haven that continues to grow for Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) and other extremist jihadi groups who could use that as a base of operations for planning and targeting US.
“If they accumulate more money, they accumulate more ammunition, more military capability, larger numbers, that poses great dangers not just to allies of ours like Jordan, which is very close by, but it also poses... a great danger, potentially, to Europe and ultimately the US,” he warned.
US Secretary of State John Kerry said the US is committed to fight back the militants who are inching closer to Baghdad, but America’s efforts would be successful only if Iraqi leaders embrace a political process shunning differences.
He said the efforts made by the US “will only be successful if Iraqi leaders rise above their differences and embrace a political plan that defines Iraq’s future through the political process, not through insurgency and conflict.”
Meanwhile, Sunni radicals in Iraq, who have overrun a swathe of territory north of Baghdad in a lightning offensive, have taken control of one of Saddam Hussein’s former chemical weapons factories.
“We are aware that the ISIL has occupied the Al Muthanna complex,” State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said in a statement.
But she said she didn’t think the ISIL militants would be able to produce usable chemical weapons there, because any materials remaining are old and unwieldy.
The New York governor has called for closing a gap in the state’s campaign finance laws, but he’s taken far more through the loophole than his predecessors, much of it from real estate developers
When he ran for office four years ago, New York Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo pledged to close a loophole in the state's campaign finance regulations allowing corporations and individuals to pour unlimited amounts of money into politics.
Instead, he's become the loophole's biggest beneficiary.
New York State forbids corporations from giving more than $5,000 a year to candidates and political committees. But limited liability companies—businesses that share attributes of corporations and partnerships—are allowed to give up to $60,800 to a statewide candidate per election cycle and up to $150,000 a year to candidates and committees overall. What's more, corporations and individuals can set up an unlimited number of LLCs through which to donate, making the caps effectively meaningless.
Cuomo took contributions from LLCs while running for governor in 2010, but said at the time that he was only accepting them so that he could get elected and change the law. He has twice proposed legislation that would eliminate the LLC exception, most recently in his budget proposal in January, but it hasn't been enacted. He told reporters Wednesday that there was little chance any campaign finance reforms would pass before the legislative session ends next week.
Cuomo has accepted more than $6.2 million from LLCs in the three and a half years since he took office, according to a ProPublica analysis of state campaign finance filings. That's more than double the amount his two predecessors, Eliot Spitzer and David Paterson, took in during their combined four years in office. The contributions make up a sizeable chunk of the $33 million Cuomo has reported raising for his re-election campaign. (The data reflects contributions reported through mid-January, when candidates last filed disclosure reports.)
In a statement, Cuomo spokesman Matthew Wing offered this to explain the apparent contradiction: "The Cuomo campaign is following existing campaign finance laws, while the Governor is leading the charge to reform them, including closing the loophole for LLCs."
That's of little consolation to campaign finance watchdogs concerned that those who have—or are seeking to have—business with New York are continuing to use this wrinkle in the state's contribution rules to exert their influence. Much of the money coming to Cuomo through LLCs appears to be from real estate developers, with cable companies and liquor distributors among those also providing healthy cash infusions.
"This is a gaping hole," said Dick Dadey, the executive director of Citizens Union, a New York good-government group. Getting rid of it is "an easy fix that would turn the spigot down a bit of the flow of money from big contributors."
It's not always immediately apparent who controls the LLCs making the contributions. Some, like Time Warner NY Cable LLC, have familiar names. But many LLCs don't give much of a clue as to who's behind the money. Some controlled by real estate interests are named for streets or addresses—Arwin 88th Street LLC or 134 W 58 LLC—that require some digging to connect the dots.
Cuomo has also taken far more from LLCs since his election than any other New York State politician or committee. Attorney General Eric Schneiderman has accepted about $1 million from LLCs since 2011, according to ProPublica's analysis. The Senate Republican Campaign Committee has received about $851,000, while the Democratic Senate Campaign Committee has totaled about $172,000.
New York's rules for political giving by LLCs are among the loosest in the nation.
Federal regulations generally bar LLCs, along with corporations and unions, from giving directly to federal candidates. The rules vary at the state level—at least six states allow unlimited contributions from all types of donors, while others ban donations from corporations and other businesses entirely. But few states have carved out exceptions for LLCs as generous as New York's.
Maryland and the District of Columbia passed legislation to close their versions of the LLC loophole last year.
Cuomo has repeatedly called for tightening New York's campaign finance limits since his election. After lawmakers failed to pass the ethics reforms he proposed last year—including closing the LLC loophole—Cuomo formed a Moreland Commission to investigate corruption and recommend new campaign finance laws.
The commission's preliminary report, released in December, illustrated how companies use LLCs to avoid contribution limits. A "representative string of emails" subpoenaed by investigators included "a lively discussion among members of an organization about which of the organization's LLCs should be used to make a round of outsized contributions, based upon which ones had already given outsized contributions in the past," the report said. The commission recommended closing the loophole, among other reforms.
Instead, the loophole survived when Cuomo announced in March that he was shutting down the Moreland Commission. Lawmakers had agreed to adopt new bribery and anti-corruption measures, he said, so there was no longer a need for it.
But that halted the panel's investigation into potential campaign finance abuses by LLCs.
"The commission was not given the time to accomplish what it was charged with doing," said Richard Briffault, a Columbia Law School professor who served on the commission. "None of the investigations had time to be completed."
Of the LLCs giving to Cuomo, the most generous are controlled by Glenwood Management, a real estate development company headquartered on Long Island. Headed by Leonard Litwin, a reclusive 99-year-old magnate, Glenwood has given $800,000 to Cuomo since he took office using 19 separate LLCs. Glenwood's LLCs have also given millions of dollars to other New York candidates and committees, both Democratic and Republican.
Another real estate developer, the Extell Development Co., has also given extensively to Cuomo through LLCs, including two donations last year that were flagged by the Moreland Commission.
Two LLCs affiliated with Extell gave the governor a total of $100,000 on Jan. 28, 2013—two days before Cuomo signed legislation that granted a tax break to Extell's One57 skyscraper in Manhattan, as well as properties owned by four other developers. Two other LLCs with ties to Extell gave Cuomo another $100,000 six months later. (The contributions were first reported last year by The Daily News.)
"While we do not comment on any specific campaign contributions, we categorically deny any quid pro quo between contributions and legislation," Anna LaPorte, a spokeswoman for Extell, said in a statement to ProPublica. "Any suggestion to the contrary is an attempt to inhibit our constitutional right to have our voice heard on public policy issues."
There is no evidence that Cuomo played any role in inserting the tax breaks. Without naming Extell or Cuomo, however, the Moreland Commission called out the developers' donations, saying they created "the appearance of a relationship between large donations and legislation that specifically benefits large donors."
"Our investigation continues and we draw no premature conclusions" about whether the tax breaks were improper, the commission wrote in its December report, "but it is clear that the combination of very large campaign contributions and very narrowly targeted benefits to those same donors creates an appearance of impropriety that undermines public trust in our elected representatives."
Real estate interests may take advantage of the LLC loophole partly because of the way their businesses are structured. Developers typically keep each of their properties in a separate LLC to limit their legal liability, giving them plenty of LLCs with which to write checks to politicians.
"There is a lot of business they have before Albany," said Bill Mahoney, the research coordinator for the New York Public Interest Research Group, "and this is one way for them to buy more access than other folks."
Indeed, other businesses with huge stakes in New York have used LLCs to write outsized checks to Cuomo.
Since the governor took office, Time Warner Cable has contributed more than $60,000 to him through its LLC; LLCs affiliated with Cablevision have given $110,000. Two liquor distributors, Empire Merchants LLC and Empire Merchants North LLC, have given over $120,000. And two LLCs affiliated with the Ultimate Fighting Championship have contributed $115,000 to Cuomo, plus tens of thousands of dollars more to state legislators and political committees.
Cuomo has not proposed any legislation to legalize professional mixed martial arts events in New York, the only state that bans them. But almost a year after he received a $50,000 check from one of the LLCs, Cuomo seemed to come out in favor of overturning the ban.
"I think we need economic activity, especially in upstate New York," he said in a radio interview in 2013. "I think this is a major endeavor that is televised, that is happening all over the country at this point. You're not going to stop it from happening. And I'm interested in the potential economic potential for the state."
Wing, the Cuomo spokesman, said there was no connection between the governor's comments and the contributions.
Facebook suffered an unusual crash on Thursday leading to users taking to other social networking sites like Twitter to poke fun and despair at the state of their 20 minutes breakdown
Mark Zuckerberg, founder of Facebook in the movie Social Network is quoted as saying,“The difference between Facebook and everybody else is WE DON’T CRASH.” The world’s most popular social networking site Facebook faced outage for 20 minutes Thursday afternoon. Users who are not used to functioning without a Facebook window open on their devices all day, received a message saying “Sorry, something went wrong.”
As almost 1.8 billion users faced the longest outage after four years, the hashtag ‘#facebookdown’ trended on Twitter throughout the day. To show their angst, Twitter was flooded with the posts on the outage.
The outage has hit both the website and the Facebook app users. This was not enough, once the site started working as usual, the reaction again trended on Twitter, but this time it was hashtag #whenfacebookwasdown.
To apologise to the users, a Facebook spokesperson said in a statement sent to The Guardian, “Earlier this morning, we experienced an issue that prevented people from posting to Facebook for a brief period of time. We resolved the issue quickly, and we are now back to 100%. We're sorry for any inconvenience this may have caused.”
To the technology doomsayers this was dream come true, and to some a sign of our times when a Facebook outage was among the top news of the day. For the health and well-being of millions of millennials around the world, let's hope this does not happen again, or maybe that would help.