Last year the lender raised $500 million for its overseas operations and the issue was oversubscribed four times
Mumbai: Public sector lender Indian Overseas Bank plans to raise funds of about $500 million through Medium Term Notes (MTN) this year, a senior bank official said, reports PTI.
"We are looking at raising $500 million in the current year through MTN. We have already appointed merchant banker for the same and waiting for conducive market conditions," IOB Chairman and Managing Director M Narendra told reporters.
The bank raised $500 million last year for our overseas operations, Mr Narendra said, adding that the issue was oversubscribed by four times.
The bank hopes to achieve 20% topline growth in FY13. The bank planned to achieve total business of Rs4 lakh crore in FY13 from Rs3.85 lakh crore, Mr Narendra said.
The bank will focus on retail, SME and agriculture sector in the current year, he said.
The Bank reported a net profit of Rs528.81 crore for the fourth quarter ended March 2012, up from Rs434.29 crore in the same period in the previous year. Its total income grew to Rs5,415.09 crore in fourth quarter FY12 as compared to Rs3,916.58 crore in the same period last year. Net interest income rose to Rs1,340.58 crore (Rs1,215.28 crore). Interest on advances stood at Rs3,740.56 crore (Rs2,615,64 crore).
During FY12, IOB's gross NPA stood at Rs3,920.07 crore as against Rs3,089.59 crore in FY11 with gross NPA ratio of 2.74% and 2.72%, respectively. Its net NPA in FY12 stood at Rs1,907.44 crore in FY12 as against Rs1,328.42 crore in FY11.
You can’t select a candidate just because he was an outstanding performer in his previous job. Neither can you reject one because of mediocre performance in his last role. Are companies thinking creatively?
Amol Kale (not his real name) is devastated. A star-performer in a well-known multinational, he joined an organisation in the sunrise industry to escape the monotony and stagnation in his earlier job. There was not much scope for him in terms of career growth opportunities in the multinational organisation where he worked for more than a decade. This prompted him to accept the offer to join this little-known firm that held lot of promise for the future. There was a lot of scope to perform, learn & unlearn and contribute to the growth of this organisation. It sounded pretty much exciting to be part of a growth story of an upcoming industry. However, Amol is currently on the look-out for another job - barely fourteen months after he joined the new organisation.
The reasons are crystal clear. What works for one organisation seldom works for another. The leadership style varies from organisation to organisation. Star performers in an organisation succeed because there is a synergy between their skills, aptitude and capabilities and the organisational culture and infrastructure. In the absence of such factors, it is an enormous challenge for star performers to replicate the earlier success story in new organisations that they join. For instance, budget availability in cash rich multi-national firms may not be an issue for new initiatives; however, the funds may not be so easily available in Indian companies unless there is a clear business need for the same.
There needs to be a change in hiring techniques employed by organisations. In a fluid business environment, where change is the only constant, organisations need to use creative thinking to hire the best talent. A resume can say a lot about a candidate's skills, experience and competence, but very little about the intangibles. It is easy to look at the profiles of candidates who have similar experience for a new job. However, there is a need to look beyond. It is also important to understand the reason(s) behind a candidate's desire to seek a job change. This is why a reference check or a background check is assuming lot of significance nowadays.
You can't select a candidate just because he was an outstanding performer in his previous job. Neither can you reject one because of mediocre performance in his last role. Performance is relative - it can never be absolute. Firms need to use psychometric tools as one of the techniques to gauge the suitability of a candidate. But the decision to hire a candidate must be made on the basis of cumulative factors.
One has to accept the fact that, on most occasions, personal interviews are subjective affairs. A candidate who speaks passionately about his role and shows pride in his work can be easily labeled as one with loads of attitude. Many candidates fall into the trap laid by interviewers regarding the compensation. In his book 'What Color is Your Parachute', Richard Bolles says that compensation should always be discussed at the fag end only when there is a clarity that the organisation is keen to recruit the candidate and that the candidate is willing to take the bait. In reality, most firms use the "CTC" (Cost to Company) numbers to reject candidates.
Besides looking at qualifications, the scope for sharpening the learning curve of a candidate through on-the-job training needs to be explored too. Many candidates are asked to jump onto the fray right from day one. A warm-up time to settle down in the job, understand the organisational culture and team dynamics is vital. This explains the need and relevance of induction programs.
Hiring a right candidate is similar to the process of buying your own home. Hasty decisions can be counter-productive. If an organisation takes too long to decide, then they may lose a good candidate. An employee who is on the look-out for a job, almost always behaves like a patient in a hospital who has recovered from a major illness and is to be discharged soon. So, it is necessary to communicate the decision about a selection within a reasonable time-frame. Some organisations do not communicate any decision at all - which is even worse.
Amit Malhotra (not his real name) is embittered when a chemical firm in Mumbai (Galaxy Surfactants) shortlisted him for a job after conducting an interview and subjecting him to psychometric assessments. The HR head then asked him to send all his salary details of the last 16 years - month on month. Amit was seeking a change after 16 years in an MNC.
Amit who was pretty much organised did that. He typed out all the salary details in an excel spread sheet. But the appointment letter remained elusive. The HR head simply refused to take the call. This happened despite the fact that Amit had spent a whole day filling up application forms and appearing for the interview which seemed to have gone exceedingly well. Later on, Amit came to know that they were not willing to pay him the kind of salary that he was currently drawing. Rather than being spot-on about it, the firm used devious tactics to reject him. Such hiring practices do not augur well for an organisation's future. Many candidates do accept a lower remuneration if the long term job prospects are good. Why the hesitation? It is a myth that all candidates who seek a change are doing it only for money.
Most entrepreneurs have expressed their views that they have always felt the need to do a second guess while hiring a candidate for senior most roles. Sometimes, they may ask others in the organisation to re-evaluate a candidate. Though this is the right approach, one has to be circumspect about the strength of the re-evaluation panel. Too many members and their diverse opinions can only compound the confusion. Experts have advocated the use of gut-feel to decide on a suitable hire when everything else fails.
Commercial banks must encouraged to offer preferential rate of interest to the physically and mentally-challenged people
On reading the article on “RBI Monetary Policy for 2012-2013: Policy on deposit rates requires change” published in the Moneylife Digital Newsletter dated 2 May, 2012, my good friend, Mr Nagesh N Kini made a very crypt and apt comment. He said, “instead of giving higher rates to rich and the ultra-rich, the RBI should consider giving higher rates to disabled/physically-challenged and charitable institutions who promote their cause.” They certainly deserve a helping hand by way of additional interest, which can make their life’s struggle a little smoother without any feeling of obligation towards the giver. The RBI should, therefore, certainly consider this proposal and instruct banks to offer additional rate of interest to the less-privileged; namely disabled, physically and mentally challenged individuals to help them to meet their day-to-day needs.
But are the banks willing to bear this additional burden? India’s first disability census 2001 report brings out the fact that two out of every hundred Indians suffer from some form of mental or physical disability. That means that there are approximately 22 million (i.e.2.2 crore) physically and mentally challenged people in our country and this forms about 2% of our population. However, there are no statistics available as to the amount of deposits placed with banks by these people to assess the impact on banks if such a move to offer higher rate of interest to this class of people is implemented. How do you lighten the burden on banks, if they are willing to consider this proposal?
According to Section 135 of the Companies Bill, 2011, presently under the consideration of the Parliament, every company having a net worth of Rs500 crore or turnover of Rs1,000 crore shall make every endeavour to ensure that the company spends in every financial year at least 2% of the average net profit of the company made during the three immediately preceding financial year in pursuance of its corporate social responsibility policy (CSR). Though the Companies Act is not applicable to the public sector banks due to their incorporation through separate statutes, they are expected to comply with this part of the CSR like any other company.
As per the statistics released by RBI, all commercial banks together made a net profit of over Rs70,000 crore during the year 2010-11 and 2% of this amounts to Rs1,400 crore per year, which should be more than adequate to meet the obligation of additional interest payable to this special class of depositors by all the banks put together, if the proposal is implemented. Besides, if the RBI abolishes the present practice of giving better rates on a single deposit of Rs15 lakh and above, it would save a considerable amount and add to their kitty to pay higher rate to these disabled people, who deserve it more than the rich depositors.
It is to meet this statutory obligation that all the banks could consider this additional payment of interest to disabled/physically challenged individuals and identifiable charitable organization who promote their cause, as a part of their CSR by including this objective in its CSR policy. And the ministry of corporate affairs, too, should consider this as redemption of their CSR obligation under the new Companies Act when it becomes law. The ministry should, therefore, include this objective under permitted activities in CSR policies listed in Schedule VII to the proposed Companies Act.
All things considered, this is an ideal opportunity for the banking sector to express its solidarity with the disabled people of our country. In fact this will be a blessing in disguise for the banking institutions as well, because more often than not, considerable money spent on social projects is knocked off by the intermediaries and do not reach the right beneficiaries, resulting in frittering away precious resources in the name of corporate social responsibility. But if the banks are allowed to give additional interest to this class of depositors and treat such additional payments under CSR obligations, banks will get the satisfaction of having disbursed the amount to the right people for a right cause.
Will the RBI take the initiative to consider this proposal of permitting the banks to offer a minimum of 1% of additional interest over and above the normal rate of interest on all types of deposit accounts to the disabled/physically and mentally challenged individuals and also to the identified charitable organizations who promote their cause, as a token of our concern to these less privileged members of our society? Apart from permitting this additional benefit to them, the RBI should come out with clear-cut guidelines to enable the banks to identify such customers to ensure that the benefit of this move goes to the right beneficiaries. As this scheme is a socially desirable, nationally important and functionally easy to operate, the RBI should persuade the banks to take up this project with a missionary zeal by giving enough publicity to attract the attention of the people at large.
In the present context of a gloomy state of affairs pervading in our country with rampant corruption in every walk of life, scams galore in every aspect of political scene, land grabbing and illegal mining becoming a way of life and female foeticide being order of the day, this proposal of offering additional interest to the most deserving members of our society when put in place will be a refreshing change, coming as it does from a staid financial institution like the RBI will be a breath of fresh air that will stir the conscience of our people to elevate our society to a new orbit of egalitarianism for the greater good of our country.
(The author is a banking analyst and he writes for Moneylife under the pen-name ‘Gurpur’)