Connect with Us
Moneylife - Facebook Moneylife - Twitter Moneylife - Linkedin Moneylife - Youtube Moneylife Rss feed
close

Moneylife » Life » Book Reviews » India wins Freedom: A true picture of the Freedom Movement

India wins Freedom: A true picture of the Freedom Movement

Nagesh Kini | 19/05/2012 12:25 PM | 

India wins Freedom is the best source for a ringside view of the happenings in pre-independence India between 1920 and 1947 from the eyes of the an insider—Maulana Abul Kalam Azad

I first heard about this book from my favourite English teacher at school, but could lay my hands only after I entered college. Reading it then, as out of school youngster living through the immediately post-independence era-then virtually one-party rule, one leader-Nehru, of the socialistic pattern of Five Year Plans with "commanding heights", the wars with Pakistan and China, was different from reading it now, with certain banned sections restored.

The story of how India wins Freedom was written by one of the most low profile dramatis personae of the Freedom Movement known to all as Maulana Azad, independent India's first education minister. It provides the reader a peek into what actually happened along the long road to freedom.

After all, over 30 million copies of this book have been sold. At his request the initial editions of India wins Freedom had blocked certain passages that he considered politically sensitive just then. Though its full text was confined under seal in the National Library, Calcutta and the National Archives, New Delhi for thirty years, in 1958 a slightly abridged and revised version was published leaving out "incidents and reflections mainly of a personal character."

I have now reviewed the complete text, its 2009 reprint-initially released in September 1988 under a court directive. All the words and phrases of the original have been reproduced to restore the tone and temper to unravel the controversies that simmered for long about what lay in the blocked text. The Maulana comes out with his frank personal assessments and forthright views of the events and personalities involved. He depicts them in their true colours that were hitherto shielded from public eye and his assessments, on the benefit of hindsight are bang on.

Abul Kalam Azad, a Maulana and a distinguished scholar was elected president of the Indian National Congress first in 1923. This was at a time when he and Gandhi just entered the Indian political arena almost hand-in-hand. He was considered closer to Nehru, but disapproved of his ways as those of Gandhiji and Sardar Patel-he doesn't mince words, he is brutally frank in expressing his views that he penned.    

The 1940s were momentous years in the history of the Freedom Movement. Azad was re-elected Congress president in 1940 and held office till 1946, another landmark year. Azad along with Gandhi and Nehru held talks with the British Cripps Mission, Viceroys Wavell and Mountbatten.

Azad recounts two of his conclusions during the talks with the British that were "doomed to failure". The arrest of the Congress leaders on the morning of 9 August 1942 following the Quit India Resolution and the World Wall II was coming to and end with the Allies firmly in control. Following Gandhiji's 21-day fast he took a decision that if India was declared free, it would voluntarily side with the British by extending full support to the war effort. The second was at making fresh attempts to meet Jinnah to come to an understanding with the Muslim League. He writes "It was largely due to Gandhiji's acts of omission and commission that Jinnah regained his importance in Indian political life. In fact, it is doubtful if Jinnah could have achieved supremacy, but for Gandhi's attitude."  

After Azad stepped down from his Congress presidentship in 1946, he said later that he'd have preferred Vallabhai Patel as successor, but under intense pressure had to choose Nehru. He frankly concedes, "That was, perhaps, the greatest blunder of my political life... (had Patel been chosen) he would have seen to it that the Cabinet Mission was successfully implemented... he would have never committed the mistake of Jawaharlal which gave Jinnah the opportunity to sabotage the Plan... I cannot forgive myself when I think that if I had not committed the mistakes of the history of the last ten years would have been different." It indeed would have made a world of difference to India's history-no Partition and massacre of both Hindus and Muslims, no Pakistan, no wars, no cross-border terrorism and 26/11s.

Azad also recounts in detail the errors committed by everyone and all that smack of blatant hypocrisy. As Congress president Azad, in 1940, had declared that if India's political problem was to be solved it should not only join the war of its own free will but would also adopt conscription and send every able young man to the war front. No one heard him then. He believed that had this happened the duration of the war would have shortened and rendered British morally indebted and the Muslim League and Jinnah could have been totally sidelined and the disastrous consequences-no Partition. Unfortunately for India his advice was disregarded!

Azad takes us into the times, mindsets and the outcomes of the contradictory stands taken by his illustrious contemporaries like MN Roy, Gandhi, Patel, the Nehrus-Motilal and Jawaharlal, CR Das, Rajaji and Subhas Chandra Bose. Of his friend Nehru, he says was prone to talk in his sleep "carrying on a debate, sometimes muttering and sometimes talking loudly...  indicating how much strain under which Nehru was working."

As one who has also read earlier volume I find this one much more alive. His views on the Muslim League and Jinnah-disapproval of Gandhiji conferring the title Qaid-e-Azam on  him and letting the League have the finance portfolio just because Patel wanted Home, makes us admire a afresh the honesty and courage of this son of India who has been largely ignored by our historians. This book is a must read for those really want to know of Indian Freedom Movement in the context of contemporary Indian history.    

(Nagesh Kini is a Mumbai based Chartered accountant turned activist.)


Post Comment

More in Moneylife

Saradha, Speak Asia, QNet, PCMCS Act, direct selling companies, Modi government, chit fund, money circulation schemes, Department of Banking and Financial Services.

Is the Modi govt helping Ponzi, MLMs become legal? +11564 views

TODAY'S TOP STORIES

Post your Comment


Alert me when new comment is posted on this article
 Please read our Moderation Policy and Terms of Use before posting


Comment

5 Comments
raj

raj 2 years ago

really good review Mr. Kini. History is always interesting read....

Reply »Link » Report abuse
X
Ratanlal Purohit

Ratanlal Purohit 2 years ago

Dear Mr Kini,
You have made Good Observation. No Partion No 26/11. NO KAYDE AZAM TITLE NO PAKISTAN. BUT I DONT UNDERSTAND AZAD HOW FIGHTING WAR FOR BRITISH WOULD HAVE GIVEN US AKHAND BHARAT. THE SEEDS WERE SOWN LONG BACK. IT WAS BRITISH PLAN AND HATCHED MUCH BEFORE. THEY DID USE JINNAH GANDHI DIFFERENCES. THEY WANTED HOLD OF THAT LAND TO KEEP AN EYE ON MIDDLE EAST OIL AFTER QUITTING INDIA.

Reply »Link » Report abuse
X
Nagesh Kini

Nagesh Kini 2 years ago in reply to Ratanlal Purohit

This book states in so many words that the egos of Gandhi,Jinnah, Nehru and Patel simply failed to see reason and hear the Maulana.
The British can no longer be blamed for the "Divide and Rule" it was a myth created by the Congress. History will bear it out.

Reply» Link » Report abuse
X
bharati

bharati 2 years ago in reply to Nagesh Kini

Nice take. Always blame some Indians for whatever wrong happened. 'British morally indebted'! Since when have colonizers/ slavers ever shown the slightest morality? It is impossible to find a single thing Brits did in India out of love or common decency: the royal decree was clear. Everything was to be paid for in Indian blood and any money/profit was to be shipped out.

Like some expats today who command high prices: any profit is from my cleverness. Any failure is because of those terrible/lazy/communal Indians, especially Hindus, especially Brahmins?! It served the British, (whom the Church served) to tar them.

4 mill Bengalis starved because of Churchill's war. Another 4+ mill were killed in the war. Commodities were taken from India to support UK's conquests, leaving India poorer and poorer.

History will certainly NOT bear this 'myth' out, that Indians divided the country. Also terribly easy to say what should have been done, years later, and in free country with access to information.

Why is to so easy for Indians to believe anything written against them? Colonial English mission schools have done a good job? Even when media is so suspect?

Reply» Link » Report abuse
X
nagesh kini

nagesh kini 2 years ago in reply to bharati

Neither the book nor the review is any attempt to belittle our people but only to point out the role that some of our leaders played in the bringing about the partition and its consequences.
Internationally today people of Indian origin are to be large numbers the world over and the days of 'expats who command high prices' are gone. The use of 'those terrible/lazy/communal, Indians, especially Hindus, especially Brahmins' is certainly uncalled for.
Bharatiji, you need to withdraw this nasty comment!

Reply» Link » Report abuse
X
Daily Newsletter

1,00,000 Readers

Follow Moneylife
DNL facebook icon DNL linked in icon DNL twitter icon DNL youtube icon DNL rss icon
Moneylife Magazine

What's your say?

Will the cut in diesel price help cool off inflation & lower the govt's subsidy bill?
Yes
No
Can't Say
 
Enter Code : secure code
    change code
VOTE

What you said

Which party would get majority in Maharashtra Assembly Election?

Thanks for casting your votes! View Previous Polls

Join Over 100,000 Awesome Readers

  1. News that Mainstream media does not always cover
  2. Views that are bold and unbiased
  3. Reports that focus on your interests as consumer, investor & citizen