Economy
India: November PMI suggests rising output, easing price pressures

HSBC PMI for India rose to 51.3 in November from 49.6 in October led by a pickup in output and new orders

India
’s manufacturing purchasing manager index (PMI) rose to 51.3 in November from 49.6 in October, above the expansion/ contraction threshold of 50 and led by a pickup in output and new orders.

 

HSBC India has said that companies have raised their production level for the first time in the last seven months, which resulted in PMI to climb to above 50 level in November.

 

Leif Eskesen, chief economist for India and Asia at HSBC said, “Manufacturing activity picked up led by a rise in new domestic orders, which helped pull up output growth. Encouragingly, input and output price inflation eased, which, if sustained, could imply that the RBI is getting closer to the end of its tightening cycle, although it may still need to notch rates up a bit further.”

 

HSBC India PMI is a composite index depicting operating conditions in the manufacturing sector. It rose to 51.3 in November from 49.6 in October.

 

For the first time after July, the index is above 50. This also shows that output has increased so as new orders, while there is modest growth of input buying.

 

The output index jumped to 51.5, its first reading above 50 in the last seven months, up from 48.6 in October and led by the consumer goods sector.

 

New orders rose to 51.9 in November from 48.9 in October, its first reading above 50 in the last six months, led by the consumer goods sector likely because of the good summer harvest. However, export orders eased to 50.6 from 52.3 in October, which indicates marginal slack in external demand.

 

Firms de-stocked finished goods inventories to meet demand, as power outages constrained operations. As a result, the new orders-to-inventory ratio rose to 1.03 in November from 0.94 in October, which suggests scope for manufacturing output to increase further if the improvement in the demand outlook continues.

 

On inflation, the input price index dropped sharply to 58.0 in November from 64.5 in October, reversing the steep uptrend of the previous five months and likely reflecting rupee appreciation over the last three months. Likewise, the output price index eased to 51.9 from 55.3, which suggests that firms responded to the decline in input costs. As the input price index fell more than the output price index, the ratio of output to input prices – a proxy for margins – improved this month.

User

Sonia Gandhi worth $2 billion, claims Huffington Post

According to Huffington Post, the Congress party chief is on 12th position among world's richest leaders with a wealth of $2 billion

HuffPost World has compiled a list of the 20 richest world leaders currently in power based on available data. The list led by Russian president Vladimir Putin (estimated to be worth $40 billion) also features Congress president and United Progress Alliance (UPA) chairperson Sonia Gandhi. She is at 12th position and worth $2 billion on the list of world's richest leaders.

 

"The roster includes a mixture of kings, presidents, sultans and queens. Most are male (as the world's political leaders tend to be, too). They skew to the Middle East, with seven of the 20 leaders originating from that region, and their wealth generally comes from family connections, profitable investments and in some cases, corrupt rule. Unsurprisingly, many of their country's citizens lead much, much humbler lives," the report says.

 

Here is the list of world's richest leader compiled by Huffington Post...
 

SrN

Name of the leader/Country

Estimated Wealth

1

Vladimir Putin, President of Russia

Worth: $40 Billion

2

Bhumibol Adulyadej, King of Thailand

Worth: $30 Billion

3

Hassanal Bolkiah, Sultan of Brunei      

Worth: $20 Billion

4

Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz Al Saud, King of Saudi Arabia

Worth: $18 Billion

5

Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan, President of the UAE   

Worth: $15 Billion

6

Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Emir of Dubai

Worth: $14 Billion

7

Kim Jong-un, Supreme Leader of North Korea

Worth: $5 Billion

8

Hans-Adam II, Prince of Liechstenstein

Worth: $5 Billion

9

Mohammed VI, King of Morocco

Worth: $2.5 Billion

10

Sebastian Pinera, President of Chile

Worth: $2.5 Billion

11

Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani, Emir of Qatar

Worth: $2 Billion

12

Sonia Gandhi, President of India's INC

Worth: $2 Billion

13

Albert II, Prince of Monaco

Worth: $1 Billion

14

Qaboos bin Said, Sultan of Oman

Worth: $700 Million

15

Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo, President of Equatorial Guinea

Worth: $600 Million

16

Bashar Al-Assad, President of Syria

Worth: $550 Million

17

Ilham Aliyev, President of Azerbaijan

Worth: $500 Million

18

Elizabeth II, Queen of England

Worth: $400 to 500 Mln

19

Sabah IV Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah, Sheikh of Kuwait

Worth: $400 Million

20

Mswati III, King of Swaziland

Worth: $100 Million

 

Courtesy: huffingtonpost.com

User

COMMENTS

Vinay Joshi

3 years ago

Hello Ms.Sucheta,

Update facts in MLDT post as under asap!

After declaring Congress President Sonia Gandhi the 12th richest leader in the world three days ago, the Huffington Post has deleted her name from the list with rejoinder.
The Huffington Post report now carries a footnote at the bottom of the article stating, "Sonia Gandhi and the former emir of Qatar Hamid bin Khalifa al-Thani have been removed from this list. Gandhi was originally included based on a listing on a third party site which was subsequently called into question. Our editors have been unable to verify the amount, removed the link, and regret any confusion."

According to the list Sonia Gandhi was the 12th richest world leader. Huffington Post has compiled a list of 20 richest world leaders currently in power.

Huffington Post deletes Sonia from the richest world leaders' list
According to the earlier list Sonia Gandhi was the 12th richest world leader and had assets worth $2 billion.

According the list, Sonia Gandhi was worth $2 billion (approximately Rs 12,000 crore). However the survey did not specify any methodology or source of information.
It claimed that the HuffPost World had compiled the list based on available data.
The Congress had reacted angrily to the list and had rubbished the report saying that it is an attempt to malign the image of Sonia Gandhi, who actually leads a simple life.

The report had placed Sonia Gandhi as richer than Elizabeth II, the Queen of England and Bashar Al-Assad, President of Syria.
Sonia Gandhi's affidavit on assets:

In 2009 while filing her nomination for the Lok Sabha election, Sonia Gandhi, stated that she owns neither a car nor a house in India but she has an ancestral home in Italy valued at Rs 18.02 lakh.

Sonia Gandhi's assets, according to the affidavit, totalled Rs 1.38 crore, nearly Rs 1 crore less than what her son Rahul Gandhi reportedly has.
Her affidavit said that she had Rs 75, 000 in cash and Rs 28.61 lakh in bank deposits.
In addition she had mutual funds worth about Rs 20 lakh and Rs 12 lakh in Reserve Bank of India bonds.

A sum of Rs 1,99,000 was deposited in post offices and Rs 24.88 lakh with the Public Provident Fund.
Sonia Gandhi's jewellery, weighing about 2.5 kg, was valued at Rs 11 lakh while 88 kg of silver possessed by her was stated to be worth about Rs 18 lakh.

She owns two plots of agricultural land totalling up to about 15 bighas and valued at Rs 2,19,000. Their location is not mentioned in the affidavit.
Sonia Gandhi paid Rs 5,58,000 in income tax for the assessment year 2008-09 and Rs 32,512 in wealth tax.

But a report in one of the top websites in the world claimed the Congress President has assest worth $2 billion.

However, the report did not clearly state how it has arrived at the comparisons and monetary values of the leaders.

The list caused a lot of embarrassment for many world leaders.

Huffington Post list of the top 20 richest world leaders (Revised):

1. Vladimir Putin, President of Russia - $40 billion

2. Bhumibol Adulyadej, King of Thailand - $30 billion

3. Hassanal Bolkiah, Sultan of Brunei - $20 billion

4. Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz Al Saud, King of Saudi Arabia - $18 billion

5. Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan, President of the UAE - $15 billion

6. Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Emir of Dubai - $14 billion

7. Kim Jong-un, Supreme Leader of North Korea - $5 billion

8. Hans-Adam II, Prince of Liechstenstein - $5 billion

9. Mohammed VI, King of Morocco - $2.5 billion

10. Sebastian Pinera, President of Chile - $2.5 billion

13. Albert II, Prince of Monaco - $1 billion

14. Qaboos bin Said, Sultan of Oman - $700 million

15. Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo, President of Equatorial Guinea - $600 million

16. Bashar Al-Assad, President of Syria - $550 million

17. Ilham Aliyev, President of Azerbaijan - $500 million

18. Elizabeth II, Queen of England - $500 million

19. Sabah IV Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah, Sheikh of Kuwait - $400 million

20. Mswati III, King of Swaziland - $100 million

Regards,

REPLY

Vinay Joshi

In Reply to Vinay Joshi 3 years ago

Hello Ms.Sucheta,

A separate communication of this post by me is sent to your personal mail, vide my e.mail.

Regards,

nagesh kini

3 years ago

How come the former Pak President Zardari who was nicknamed "Mr.10%" missing?

shadi katyal

3 years ago


the list only gives names of the rulers of various parts of the World. Where and how such figures were given is a guess.

MOHAN

3 years ago

This is only individual data. What will be the combined family wealth (excluding Vadra)? If Vadra is also included the figure will be "2G"!!

REPLY

shadi katyal

In Reply to MOHAN 3 years ago

The list if that of the people in power and not of the families. Beside Vedera is not part of Gandhi but of his own family.

nagesh kini

In Reply to shadi katyal 3 years ago

Shadi - You're cutting it too fine.
In the Adarsh scam the then Maharashtra CM claimed that his wife's mother and sister weren't his 'relations'.Though his wife hailed from the same clan!!

shadi katyal

In Reply to nagesh kini 3 years ago

It is evident that publication did not carry the whole family. What Maharashtra CM has to say is correct because does they file any taxes, if any, as a joint family. Legally he is correct when it comes to joint family system

Aadhaar and UPA govt's obsession for private sector benefits–Part 12

The vision statement of Aadhaar states: “use of UID to speed up certain businesses, especially in the insurance and credit sectors, may eliminate the need for private sector to set-up parallel identification systems leading to improved efficiency in delivery of their services and a reduction in identity-related frauds in the service delivery”

Supreme Court bench of Dr Justice BS Chauhan and Justice SA Bobde heard the case against 12-digit Aadhaar/ unique identification (UID) number for biometric profiling on 26 November 2013. The next date of hearing is on 10 December 2013. Raj Pal Singh, director, Planning Commission has filed the counter affidavit in the Writ Petition (Civil) No. 833 of 2013 (Aruna Roy Vs Union of India providing the backdrop of the establishment of Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI). It is evident from the counter affidavit that it is directed towards the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and attempts to underline in the Court that there is bipartisan support for UID/ Aadhaar number project.

 

The counter affidavit argues that UIDAI was set up in furtherance of the recommendations of the Group of Ministers (GoM) on Reforming the National Security System were accepted by the BJP-led government besides the recommendations of the Kargil Review Committee and the amendment to the Citizenship Act, 1955 notified on 7 January 2004. GoM under the chairmanship of LK Advani also included the Defence Minister, External Affairs Minister and Finance Minister. The report was submitted to PM on 26 February 2001. The Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS) had considered the GOM report on 11 May 2001.

 

The counter affidavit based on inputs from Census Commissioner-cum-Registrar General of India, National Population Register (NPR), Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) underlines that “the need for creation of a credible citizen database having a system secure form of personal identification of individuals has acquired importance due to a variety of reasons which include:

a) changing security scenario in the country, (b) realisation for better targeting of services and benefits under different schemes of government, and c) increasing identity frauds.”

 

It refers to the ‘provision for a secure “cyber-space” for creation of NPR, handling and transmission of data between the local service centers and national data centers” which was presented to the Committee of Secretaries (COS) in October 2006. The studied silence of the counter affidavit about how “secure cyber-space” has turned out to be a myth in the post Wikileaks and in post-Snowden era is quite stark.

 

Chronologically, it is revealed that “the concept of a unique identification was first discussed in 2006 when administrative approval for the project – ‘Unique ID for Below Poverty Line (BPL) families” was given on 3 March 2006 by the Department of Information Technology, Ministry of Communications and Information Technology.” A Processes Committee under Planning Commission was set up on 3 July 2006 to suggest processes for creation for the “core database”.
 

The counter affidavit states that COS was “apprised about the Unique Identification Number (UID) scheme of the Department of Information Technology (DIT) for creation of a residents’ database based on the electoral rolls database of Election Commission of India...”. It adds that the rest of the population (was to) be covered during Census 2011 to prepare National Population Register (NPR).

 

The fourth meeting of EGoM to collate two schemes- National Population Register (NPR/MNC) under the Citizenship Act, 1955 and the Unique Identification Number (UID) project of the Department of Information Technology (DIT) held on 4 November 2008 at 162, Committee Room, South Block. MNC stands for Multi-purpose National Identity Card based on NPR, which was envisaged during the tenure of BJP-led government. As per the minutes of the meeting, chairman of the EGoM, Pranab Mukherjee, the then Minister of External Affairs concluded that “It also needs to be appreciated that the whole exercise being technology based and system driven, there is immense scope far outsourcing the data collation and validation work and other tasks to expert agencies in the public or private sector through a transparent process while retaining requisite control over sovereign functions.”

 

In the context, he mentioned the Passport Seva Project where retaining the sovereign functions within government (MEA) rest of the infrastructure, management and software development functions have been outsourced through a transparent process to private sector. Mukherjee stated that the UID project is unique in that the organization (UIDAI) has to work in close collaboration with large number of institutions and agencies both within and outside the government and will take at least five years to stabilize. The government at that time may need to take a fresh view particularly in light of further advancements in technology. This keeps the door open for DNA based identification. 

 

A 14-page long document titled ‘Strategic Vision: Unique Identification of Residents’ prepared by Wipro Ltd and submitted to the Processes Committee has finally emerged. Its vision statement reads: “Creating a unique identification system of all residents in the country for efficient, transparent, reliable and effective delivery of various welfare and private services to the common person.” The cover page of the document mentions National Institute for Smart Government, DIT and Wipro Consulting. The ‘Strategic Vision on the UIDAI Project’ of Wipro Ltd, the consultant for the design phase and program management phase of the pilot UIDAI project. It envisaged the close linkage that the UIDAI would have to the electoral database. On 4 December 2006, the Prime Minister constituted an E-GoM comprising of Shivraj V Patil, Minister of Home Affairs, A Raja, Minister of Communications & Information Technology under the Chairmanship of Pranab Mukherjee, the then Minister of External Affairs. Doesn’t the presence of Raja as a member of EGoM and as the minister-in-charge of DIT which is/ was responsible for UID make the entire exercise tainted and create a rationale for re-visiting DIT’s proposal advanced in 2006 before the COS? 

 

At the first meeting of the EGoM on 7 November 2007, “the need for creating an identity related resident database and identify and establish and institutional mechanism that will “own” the database and will be responsible for its maintenance and updating on an ongoing basis post its creation was recognized.” The proposal of UIDAI was approved on 28 January 2008. Pursuant to a meeting held on 25 January 2012 under the chairmanship of the Prime Minister, “UIDAI was allowed to enroll 60 crore number by EFC which was formally approved by the Cabinet Committee on UIDAI in its meeting on 27 January 2012.” The fact remains Prime Minister is yet to reveal whether he and his family members have enrolled for biometric UID/ Aadhaar number.

 

Earlier, Prime Minister’s Council on UIDAI constituted on 30 July 2009 under the chairmanship of the Prime Minister held its first meeting on 12 August 2009 after Nandan Nilekani assumed charge as the chairperson in the rank and status of a cabinet minister. After that a Cabinet Committee on UIDAI was constituted on 22 October 2009. In a related development, Goolam E Vahanavati, Attorney General for India gave his written opinion on 6 August 2011 stating, “I do not consider the issuance of Aadhaar numbers to be a violation of right to privacy contained in Article 21 of the Constitution.” Wipro Ltd, Consultant of Planning Commission as part of a section titled ‘Implementation challenges’ refers to the issue of Transparency vs. right to privacy. The basic premise for the success of UID is the concept of “one owner, many users”, according to the document. But as of now the fact is that there are multiple owners of the database both inside and outside the government.

 

Notably, Wipro, the Consultant of Planning Commission states that “It is envisaged that, in the long term, UID would transform into being a de facto identifier for all residents of the country.” Its document states that “Importantly, statutory backing would be required for the adoption of UID by residents, Government departments, its agencies and the private sector in the long term. But as of now UID is conceptualized as de facto identifier and not a de jure identifier.  This document has a section “Benefits to private/NGO Sector” wherein it states that “Private sector would be able to leverage the resident identification infrastructure and in turn, contribute to effective development activities, Use UID to speed up certain businesses, especially in the insurance and credit sectors, may eliminate the need for private sector to set-up parallel identification systems leading to improved efficiency in delivery of their services and a reduction in identity-related frauds in the service delivery.” Why this Congress led Government so obsessed with ensuring benefits for private/NGO sector using citizens’ personal sensitive information?  

 

Ravi Shankar Prasad, member of Parliament, (MP), general secretary and chief spokesperson, BJP issued a statement on behalf of the party dated 21 January 2012 on the subject of “UID & National Security”? The question is did he carefully read the report of the Yashwant Sinha headed Parliamentary Standing Committee (PSC) on Finance that was submitted to both the Houses of Parliament in December 2011. It appears that he and his party has not done so. Had it done so it would have realized that “preparation of Unique Identification Number (UID) (Aadhaar) being prepared by the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI)” itself is legally and constitutionally questionable. BJP maintains a deafening silence over the issue of illegal and illegitimate biometric data collection. This was an issue categorically raised by the Parliamentary Standing Committee and its Prime Ministerial candidate. Arun Jaitely also raised deep concerns about privacy in Aadhaar era in writing.  
 

BJP has asked the Indian National Congress led Government as to ‘What is the “Sanctity and integrity of the data” being collected by the UIDAI?’ Will a solemn reply by the Government stating that the “sanctity and integrity” of data in general and biometric data in particular being collected is being taken care assure and satisfy the principal opposition party? Is it looking for merely an assurance? Why is it choosing to be complicit about the illegality of biometric profiling as has been pointed out by the Parliamentary Committee? Will it continue with the illegality if it wins the 2014 elections? Its silence in this regard is quite glaring.
 

Why is BJP mixing up the issue of “National Register of Indian Citizens” and the identification of residents of India as proposed by biometric Aadhaar/ UID? The principal opposition party appears convinced about a need for a centralized database of citizens’ sensitive personal for “National Security”.

 

In its affidavit on UID/ Aadhaar number based biometric identification, the Congress-led Government has trapped the main opposition party in a political trap by paraphrasing what BJP- led government had articulated and undertaken when they were in power. This affidavit is also an attempt to give a political message to the Parliamentary Committee in question that both BJP and Congress essentially have similar position on biometric profiling of Indians and BJP’s opposition is merely a token opposition to justify its role as the principal opposition party. Notably, BJP is yet to take a position that if it wins 2014 elections it will dismantle the Aadhaar project as it suffers from democracy deficit.    

 

Meanwhile, on 26 November 2013, the Supreme Court gave an order that reads: "After hearing the matter at length, we are of the view that all the States and Union Territories have to be impleaded as respondents to give effective directions.  In view of these notices to be issued to all the states and union territories through standing counsel. The advocates who have already entered appearance must file their replies within a period of three days from today. Learned standing counsel for the states who were not represented may take instructions from their respective states and file their response within one week."

 

The Court refused to modify its order its order of 23 September 2013 stating that Aadhaar cannot be made mandatory. Its modification was sought by the central government implying that it wanted to make it mandatory. This is contrary to the written opinion of Attorney General for India dated 6 August 2011 wherein he stated, because “…participation in the Scheme is voluntary”, it is not a violation of right to privacy.    


Citizens and states must note that it is not a question of Aadhaar number being voluntary or mandatory, which seems to be the focus of the proposed resolution in the West Bengal State Assembly. It is a question of citizens being turned into subjects using illegal and illegitimate biometric Aadhaar number.

 

You may also want to read…

 

Why biometric identification of citizens must be resisted? Part I
 

Biometric identification is modern day enslavement -Part II
 

Biometric profiling, including DNA, is dehumanising -Part III
 

Marketing and advertising blitzkrieg of biometric techies and supporters -Part IV
 

History of technologies reveals it is their owners who are true beneficiaries -Part V
 

UID's promise of service delivery to poor hides IT, biometrics industry profits –Part VI
 

Technologies and technology companies are beyond regulation? -Part VII
 

Surveillance through biometrics-based Aadhaar –Part VIII
 

Narendra Modi biometrically profiled. What about Congress leaders?-Part IX
 

Aadhaar: Why opposition ruled states are playing partner for biometric UID? -Part X

 

Is Nandan Nilekani acting as an agent of non-state actors? –Part XI

 

(Gopal Krishna is member of Citizens Forum for Civil Liberties (CFCL), which is campaigning against surveillance technologies since 2010)

User

COMMENTS

Chingkheinganba

3 years ago

MY govt. spying on me :(

Next to the US spy project India launch a new Spy project towards it's own second largest population

Ravi S

3 years ago

Opponents of Aadhaar believe that snooping / surveillance cannot be done without Aadhaar. Narendra Modi (CM of Gujarat) did the extensive (every minute) snooping of a female Architect (his alleged girl-friend) not only on land but also in airplane in the year-2009 i.e. before existence of Aadhaar. How this snoop-gate happened? Because intentions of the powerful in government matter a lot!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveillance
http://edition.cnn.com/2013/07/17/opinio...
http://www.scu.edu/ethics/publications/s...
http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-electron...
http://www.ico.org.uk/for_organisations/...

REPLY

Mumbai One

In Reply to Ravi S 3 years ago

In addition, just think as per your wording "Because intentions of the powerful in government matter a lot!"...
NOW think (if you have the organ for this), what the UID can do to demolish/destroy you!

Mumbai One

In Reply to Ravi S 3 years ago

Well...well...well!
Looks like the PR of UIDAI ( or pvt contractor, who is suffering from such articles) is on a big HIT job again today.

Anyway...just give answers to two simple questions...
1. Who owns the UID database? Is it the Indian govt or private agencies/firms?
2. Which is the law that regulates the collection of biometric data, and Aadhaar itself? Don\'t hide behind the lapsed executive order as any such thing become irrelevant after six months.

All this information is being collected for sale to the corporate !

Who will then squeeze the pulp out of us to the very skin and then sell us even our air and the water !

BTW....Get well soon, CONgressi from the NaMofobia... LOL

Ravi S

3 years ago

Transgender MumbaiOne, please do not hide behind burqa of pseudonym. And learn to write substance, not just release gas.

REPLY

Mumbai One

In Reply to Ravi S 3 years ago

BTW...Is something missing before the S in your name? like A*s? Transgender KING..sorry AKKA!

Mumbai One

In Reply to Ravi S 3 years ago

ANSWERS PLS....

1. Who owns the UID database? Is it the Indian govt or private agencies/firms?
2. Which is the law that regulates the collection of biometric data, and Aadhaar itself? Don\'t hide behind the lapsed executive order as any such thing become irrelevant after six months.

All this information is being collected for sale to the corporates like Ravi S !

Who will then squeeze the pulp out of us to the very skin and then sell us even our air and the water !

Ravi S

3 years ago

Opponents of Aadhaar believe that snooping / surveillance cannot be done without Aadhaar. Then how Narendra Modi (CM of Gujarat) did the extensive snooping (every minute) of a girl not only on land but also in airplane in year-2009 i.e. before existence of Aadhaar? Intention of the powerful matters a lot!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveillance
http://edition.cnn.com/2013/07/17/opinio...
http://www.scu.edu/ethics/publications/s...
http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-electron...
http://www.ico.org.uk/for_organisations/...

REPLY

Mumbai One

In Reply to Ravi S 3 years ago

BTW...What Narendra Modi has to do with this? Or you CONgressi can't think without him?
LOL

Mumbai One

In Reply to Ravi S 3 years ago

Well...well...well!
Looks like the PR of UIDAI ( or pvt contractor, who is suffering from such articles) is on a big HIT job again today.

Anyway...just give answers to two simple questions...
1. Who owns the UID database? Is it the Indian govt or private agencies/firms?
2. Which is the law that regulates the collection of biometric data, and Aadhaar itself? Don\'t hide behind the lapsed executive order as any such thing become irrelevant after six months.

All this information is being collected for sale to the corporate !

Who will then squeeze the pulp out of us to the very skin and then sell us even our air and the water !

Ravi S

3 years ago

Corrupts wants privacy to commit corruption so that they are not tracked and caught later.

REPLY

Mumbai One

In Reply to Ravi S 3 years ago

Well...well...well!
Looks like the PR of UIDAI ( or pvt contractor, who is suffering from such articles) is on a big HIT job again today.

Anyway...just give answers to two simple questions...
1. Who owns the UID database? Is it the Indian govt or private agencies/firms?
2. Which is the law that regulates the collection of biometric data, and Aadhaar itself? Don\'t hide behind the lapsed executive order as any such thing become irrelevant after six months.

All this information is being collected for sale to the corporate !

Who will then squeeze the pulp out of us to the very skin and then sell us even our air and the water !

Ravi S

In Reply to Mumbai One 3 years ago

First, do not hide yourself behind burqa i.e. pseudo name. Tell your real name. Male, female or transgender (hizra)? Looks like transg.....

Second, tell what corruption you have to hide.

Mumbai One

In Reply to Ravi S 3 years ago

No Point in getting Angry old man...

Just give answers to two simple questions if you have guts...
1. Who owns the UID database? Is it the Indian govt or private agencies/firms?
2. Which is the law that regulates the collection of biometric data, and Aadhaar itself? Don\'t hide behind the lapsed executive order as any such thing become irrelevant after six months.

Ravi S

3 years ago

Aadhaar status {verifiable with UIDAI website portal (dot) uidai (dot) gov (dot) in}
People registered: Over 600 million (60.0 crore) i.e. Half the population,
Aadhaar assigned: About 500 million (50.0 crore),
Population of India: 1250 million (125 crore or 1.25 billion),
Average Aadhaar rate: 30 million/ month,
Milestone planned: 600 million Aadhaar by March-2014 (easily achievable @ 1 million / day),
Remaining Enrollment of 650 million continues thru NPR (Ministry of Home Affairs - Census Operations - RGI) in illegal migrant infested states and populous states like UP, Bihar, J&K, W. Bengal, TN, Arunachal, Assam, Mizoram etc. Enrollment thru NPR is done only for Citizens after weeding out the Illegal migrants.

REPLY

Mumbai One

In Reply to Ravi S 3 years ago

Well...well...well!
Looks like the PR of UIDAI ( or pvt contractor, who is suffering from such articles) is on a big HIT job again today.

Anyway...just give answers to two simple questions...
1. Who owns the UID database? Is it the Indian govt or private agencies/firms?
2. Which is the law that regulates the collection of biometric data, and Aadhaar itself? Don\'t hide behind the lapsed executive order as any such thing become irrelevant after six months.

All this information is being collected for sale to the corporate !

Who will then squeeze the pulp out of us to the very skin and then sell us even our air and the water !

Ravi S

3 years ago

Privacy of corruption?
Some privacy champions raise the privacy issue which is irrelevant in a poor country like India where about 750 million people starve for 2-square meal, where illiteracy is high, where religion & caste-based-bias continues, rampant corruption & exploitation exists. They forget that India has a law called Information Technology Act 2000. It has been in existence since year 2000 that protects Aadhaar information along with other laws.

Aadhaar registration collects biometric data and bare minimum information (proof of identity, age, and residence) through enrollment form. Peruse the Enrollment-form with data fields on page-1 and instructions on page-2. No profiling information is collected, like religion, caste, income, property-holding, education etc.

Privacy issues and risks equally apply to information and data (with or without biometrics) provided by people to census office, tax office, passport office, driving license, vehicle registration, land and building registration, registration of birth, marriage and death, employers (current, past and prospective), banks, credit card companies, insurance companies, telephone service provider, television service provider, internet service provider, internet services (email, video, social media, search engine, chat, voice, file-storage and transfer etc.), registration at school/college, marriage bureaus, post-office and courier services, hospital registration and medical records, visa of US and UK etc.

In India, government departments, public and private sectors have been using biometrics (fingerprints, blood group, color of eyes, height, weight and face photo) for various purposes for decades and centuries in some or all offices. Biometrics record has been a mandatory condition for employment with civil services and Defense departments (10 fingerprints, face photo, color of eyes, blood group, height, weight) since British era to the modern day; nowadays it is also used for access and attendance. Examples of fingerprints usage in other areas are: Land and building registration (since British era), Planning Commission (for access and attendance), census office (for compulsory NPR), Passport, RTO (for driving license), insurance companies, IT, BPO and healthcare companies (for access and attendance), visa of US and UK etc. Aadhaar does not violate any privacy or fundamental right.

India has seen anti-modernization protests in the past too. Some people caused bandh & hartals in protest against modernization and computerization of Banking & Rail-ticket 25 years ago. Today people are very happy to enjoy bank ATM and to book rail-ticket from anywhere. Then they had argued that paper records were better than computers. Now those protesters never want to reveal that they ever protested against computerization.
Ironically, there is no opposition to collection of biometric data at other points of services. People stand in long queues to imprint biometrics for obtaining Indian passport, US, UK visa. The attendance & access of most of the IT & ITeS companies are biometric based. The attendance & access of the Planning Commission of India is also biometric based. People have been imprinting all ten-fingers plus details of eyes and other identification marks on body on the first day of joining employment in Defense department of India (civilian as well as service personnel) since British rule of India. Yet one never opposed all that.
The use of electronic devices provides no privacy; such as mobile phone, internet (particularly social network media), email, television, bank card, traffic camera. At any moment the government and the service provider knows of geographical location of people, of conversation on phone, with whom, what we are reading, writing or watching on internet, and what TV channel we are watching, when and for how long. All this is done under electronic surveillance thru device identifiers like IMEI, IP address, GPS etc.

Embassies have switched over to mechanical type-writers in 2013 after CIA worker Snowden’s disclosures. Government also knows our movements thru the traffic cameras on roads, our vehicle number plate, our face etc.
Despite this knowledge, the privacy champions do not want to stop using mobile phones, internet, TV etc. Their sole objective is subversion of Aadhaar, nothing else, and they will not succeed because Aadhaar has already crossed the critical-mass on 15-Aug-2013 by enrolling about 450 million people, assigning 400 million Numbers and linking 30 million bank accounts for Direct Benefit Transfer across many states. And as of November-2013, 500 million Aadhaar have been assigned.

Opponents of Aadhaar believe that snooping / surveillance cannot be done without Aadhaar. Then how Narendra Modi (CM of Gujarat) did the extensive snooping (every minute) of a girl not only on land but also in airplane in year-2009 i.e. before existence of Aadhaar? Intention of the powerful matters a lot!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveillance
http://edition.cnn.com/2013/07/17/opinio...
http://www.scu.edu/ethics/publications/s...
http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-electron...
http://www.ico.org.uk/for_organisations/...

REPLY

Mumbai One

In Reply to Ravi S 3 years ago

Well...well...well!
Looks like the PR of UIDAI ( or pvt contractor, who is suffering from such articles) is on a big HIT job again today.

Anyway...just give answers to two simple questions...
1. Who owns the UID database? Is it the Indian govt or private agencies/firms?
2. Which is the law that regulates the collection of biometric data, and Aadhaar itself? Don\'t hide behind the lapsed executive order as any such thing become irrelevant after six months.

All this information is being collected for sale to the corporate !

Who will then squeeze the pulp out of us to the very skin and then sell us even our air and the water !

Ravi S

3 years ago

As the public databases are getting inter-linked one by one thru Aadhaar Number in various States (particularly Delhi, Maharashtra, Andhra), we see the following effects:
1. Middlemen & Officials are finding difficult to continue with corruption in public welfare pensions, scholarships, public health, NREGA, subsidy on PDS Ration, Kerosene, LPG etc.
2. Ineligible, duplicate and fictitious beneficiaries are getting eliminated from public welfare programs.
3. Corrupts will find difficult to buy & sell benami land & building (i.e.under fictitious name).
4. Corrupts will find difficult to open & operate benami companies for money-laundering.
5. Corrupts will find difficult to open & operate benami bank accounts for keeping black-money.
6. Tax-evaders will find difficult to evade taxes.
7. Impersonation & proxy will be difficult to commit.
8. Criminals & Terrorists will get detected and tracked thru inter-linked databases of mobile phone, bank account, travel documents etc.
9. Illegal Immigrants will get detected and tracked thru inter-linked databases of mobile phone, bank account, travel documents etc. They will have no place to hide on Indian soil.
10. It will get difficult for Criminals to hide as records are getting accessible to Police from any State of India.
11. It will get difficult to obtain another new Driving License and Arms License from another State once it got impounded.
12. Fraudsters will not be able to steal Provident Fund money.
13. Onion Hoarders will get tracked easily.
14. Dummy candidates will not be able to write competitive exams for others for the sake of money.
15. Ineligible people will not be able to misuse the certificates of income, domicile, education degrees and caste to deprive the eligible people.

REPLY

Mumbai One

In Reply to Ravi S 3 years ago

Well...well...well!
Looks like the PR of UIDAI ( or pvt contractor, who is suffering from such articles) is on a big HIT job again today.

Anyway...just give answers to two simple questions...
1. Who owns the UID database? Is it the Indian govt or private agencies/firms?
2. Which is the law that regulates the collection of biometric data, and Aadhaar itself? Don\'t hide behind the lapsed executive order as any such thing become irrelevant after six months.

All this information is being collected for sale to the corporate !

Who will then squeeze the pulp out of us to the very skin and then sell us even our air and the water !

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
  Loading...
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email

BUY NOW

The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)