Mutual Funds
Hybrid Funds: Adding gold did not help

Adding gold to mutual fund displays herd instinct, with random results

SBI Mutual Fund...

Premium Content
Monthly Digital Access


Already A Subscriber?
Yearly Digital+Print Access


Moneylife Magazine Subscriber or MSSN member?

Yearly Subscriber Login

Enter the mail id that you want to use & click on Go. We will send you a link to your email for verficiation
Public Interest Exclusive
President Pratibha Patil’s palatial home in Pune: Many unanswered questions

While activists campaigning against President Pratibha Patil’s palatial post-retirement home in Pune are starting a signature campaign today in Pune for citizen support, they are waiting for some crucial answers to their queries invoked through the RTI Act

While the work (though slowed down) is in progress at the 2,42,000 sq ft defence land in Kirkee Cantonment, Pune, where President Pratibha Patil’s palatial mansion in is under construction, RTI (Right to Information) activist Anoop Awasthi who is also part of the campaign against this construction, has asked a series of RTI queries that could further nail the President.
Mr Awasthi is part of the team lead by war veterans Col Suresh Patil and Comm Ravindra Pathak, in the mission to compel President Patil to surrender the land to the defence authorities. Mr Awasthi served as a naval officer (JCO rank) for 15 years. A tenacious RTI activist, Mr Awasthi had also fought a silent battle in the Lavasa campaign.
Some of the RTI applications lying with several defence offices in Pune further pinpoint the illegality involved in the defence authorities handing over this land for such construction:
Date of RTI application: 29th March
Office to which RTI query sent: Chief Executive Officer, Kirkee Cantonment Board
Queries asked:

  • Details of contractor appointed for President Pratibha Patil’s post retirement home at Khadki
  •  Copy of tenders floated with cost estimates

(Awasthi’s remarks: The contract has been allegedly given to contractors who are not registered with MES—Military Engineering Services— a mandatory clause)
Date of RTI application: 20th April
Office to which RTI query sent: Garrison Engineer, MES, Khadki
Queries asked:

  • Details of tree cutting at Survey no 26 A and 38 (the two defence bungalows on A 1 land that have been given to Patil for her home)
  • Total number of trees cut to undertake construction of President Patil’s post-retirement home
  •  Details of revenue received from above said tree cutting
  • Names and dates of contractors appointed for above work
  • Number of trees planted as refurbishment to above tree cutting
  • Copy of the letter of approval from various authorities as per National Tree Act Policy, 2006

(Awasthi’s remarks: The contract has been again allegedly given to contractors who are not registered with MES, a mandatory clause)
Date of RTI application: 20th April
Office to which RTI query sent: Headquarters Southern Command
Queries asked:

  •  Details of status of accommodation, rank-wise—for officers and jawans 1) Major to Brigadier rank, 2) Captain and below rank, 3) JCOs and others
  • Sanctioned strength of personnel for the Station (meaning entire Pune area)
  •  Actual strength of personnel for the Station
  • Number of authorized separate family quarters of the Station
  •  Personnel living in type B/C/temporary accommodation
  •  Actual constructed accommodation in possession of army of the approved type
  •  Average tenure of personnel in Station
  • Waiting period for allotment of quarters
  •  No of personnel on a sharing accommodation basis

(Awasthi’s remarks: This information would give the crisis-like situation in accommodation for the thousands of officers and jawans who serve at the headquarters of the Southern Command. Against this backdrop, President Patil building a palace is very stark)
Date of RTI Application: 14th April
Office to which query sent: Principal Director, Defence Estate Office, Southern Command, with similar RTI queries filed to Tree Officer, Pune Municipal Commissioner and CEO, Kirkee Cantonment Board
Queries asked:

  •  Details of tree cutting at Survey no 26 A and 38
  •  He has added this letter to it: “It has been brought to my notice that the above said survey numbers were having dense greenery which was totally destroyed and construction of President’s post-retirement accommodation is being built on a huge place. I hereby request you to provide me details on the following:

1. Number of trees brought down to facilitate construction on above said land
2. Copy of permission from Tree Department/respective authorities
3. Revenue received from these trees
4. Name and details of contractors appointed
(Awasthi’s remarks: Under the amendment of the National Tree Act Policy 2006, punishment is stringent as it includes imprisonment and a penalty of Rs10,000)
Date of RTI application: 19th March
Office to which query sent: Deputy Director General, Defence, Raksha Sampada Bhavan, Delhi
Queries asked:

  •  Present status of land allocated
  •  Details of lease holders/owner of above land
  • Documents regarding rules under which this land is allocated

(Awasthi’s remarks: Both the bungalows are on A1 Defence land—which means it can be used strictly for military official purpose. Under what rule has it been given for President Patil’s personal use?)
The Only RTI that was answered was in the regard of lot allotment
Date of RTI application: 29th March
Office to which query sent: Defence Estate Office, Pune
Query asked:
Details regarding the nature of land.
Date of Reply: 18th April
Reply: The 26A and 38 Bungalows are on A1 land.

Comm Ravindra Pathak (retd), Lt Col Suresh Patil (retd), and Anoop Awasthi are sitting outside the Pune Collector office from 1100 to 1800 hrs on 25th and 26th April to launch their signature campaign. Puneites are requested to visit them and sign the paper. Volunteers are welcome, they write in their press note.
Here’s a petition grievance letter posted by Comm Ravindra Pathak on the website of the President of India:
The registered number is
Your Request/Grievance Registration Number is: PRSEC/E/2012/06069
Dear Hon Smt Pratibhatai Patil President of India,

“We the undersigned appealed to you to return the Army A 1 land that you have selected for your stay post retirement.

“Madam, documents reveal that your office has twisted the facts and told half-truths to cover up the manipulations in getting this land to you for use post retirement.

“If you care to look at the letter written by your secretary to the home secretary with a copy to the defence secretary you will find following error.

“The letter states that you have selected Pune as the place for post-retirement home. Madam welcome to Pune. The letter also states that bungalow number 38 and 26 A have been selected. Dear Madam President, who has given this right to your secretary to select the plots where you will stay? The rules state that in areas outside New Delhi highest type of existing government accommodation shall be made available.

“Further the letter states that your secretary has spoken to the defence secretary. Why has this been done by your Secretary? That is the job of the home secretary.

“We hope you are aware that your type VIII entitlement ends in New Delhi. Outside New Delhi your entitlement is only 4,498 sq ft plinth with additional 1,065 sq ft for your office security, etc, of temporary and portable specification. Please note no rules talk of size of plots in the entitlement. So why has your secretary brought our plot sizes? We are sure you are aware that even in Delhi all Type VIII bungalows do not have same size of plot.

“Dear madam how has your secretary has come to a conclusion that a plot of 1,29,373 sq ft is not adequate to meet all legal needs of the President? What is the FSI your secretary has used?

“We hope that a serving military officer who staying in bungalow No 38 was made to shift residence for the sake of your palace. Is this fair play?

“Madam President your secretary has clearly stated that special repairs would have to be carried out. Madam we hope you are aware that special repairs do not include pulling down of the old structure.

“Please see the photo to see how much environmental damage your Special repairs have done.

“The secretary further goes on to state that that special repairs and further maintenance would be required to be carried out by Defence establishment. Why should the defence establishment bear the cost of your retirement the secretary suggests that unless there is a reason no cost would be borne by home ministry or the urban development ministry?

“Dear Madam if it is the duty of defence establishment (read army) to bear the cost of your retirement as Supreme Commander after a tenure of just five years why is it that you have not bothered to look after the interests of your soldiers who live in slums and your retired soldiers who are being wrong pension even after the recommendations of Sixth Pay Commission and why is your government fighting every case of veterans in the court?

“If the Supreme Commander for five years service, living in luxury of Raisina Hill gets so much, then please give at least four times more to those who have served in hardships for more years than you.

“You have refused to be the chief patron of one of our veterans’ organizations. We hope you were aware that all past presidents have graced that patronship in the past.

“We the citizens are worried and angry that you are setting a bad and dangerous precedent of people in high government posts to usurp army land meant for army use only. None of her predecessors ever asked for such a favour and were happy retiring in modest residences.

“We request you to reconsider your and only your decision to stay on army land meant for army use and return the land for army use.”

Comm Ravindra Pathak (retd)

(Vinita Deshmukh is a consulting editor of Moneylife. She is also an RTI activist and convener of the Pune Metro Jagruti Abhiyaan. She is the recipient of prestigious awards like the Statesman Award for Rural Reporting, which she won twice in 1998 and 2005, and the Chameli Devi Jain award for outstanding media person for her investigation on Dow Chemicals. She co-authored the book “To The Last Bullet - The Inspiring Story of A Braveheart - Ashok Kamte” with Vinita Kamte. She can be reached at [email protected])



budget hotels in pune

5 years ago

I sincerely support this petition. President Patil has, in fact, set a very bad example by taking over army land meant for army use only. It is certainly true that none of her predecessors ever asked for such a favor and were content retiring in modest homes. She must reconsider her inappropriate decision to stay on army land, and should immediately surrender the land to the defence authorities.


5 years ago

It is disgrace Atleast henceforth we should not get such president is my wish.

Ratanlal Purohit

5 years ago

This is a victory.
Victory of the Public at Large.
Victory of the Civil Society.

Irfan Shaikh

5 years ago

Vande Mataram !!!
Vinita Madam good work.


5 years ago

Good work and excellent win Vinita, we support you.


5 years ago

Now Smt Pratibha Patil must saY; I completely forgo my entitlement .I have properties and I will stay there.

Govind Shanbhag

5 years ago

Mm - Vineeta congrats and all the best.
Somebody has to take the issue of VIP security Z+, Z and Y etc. All these politicians, burecuauts, sportsperson, criminals are being guarded at public exchequer cost. They selected this profession on their own , not thrust on them and they are in a position to afford private security then why Govt.should provide them this security. In fact police chief has already said because of this security provision, they are finding it difficult to help common man.

Jagdish Buch

5 years ago

We need to find out details of application if any made by Mrs.Patil and the the persons and the authority who has approved and terms and conditions of. such approval

Nagesh Kini FCA

5 years ago

All the best to you Vinita, you've done it again. Even in your TV interviews you've rightly credited Money Life for its contribution. This is in deed a classic case of like minded professionals coming together to set right systemic defects.
Proves that nothing is difficult to achieve. There has to be no hidden agenda.
The contribution of the brave ex-service men who put RTI to effective use should also be lauded.
Agey bado, Vinitaji, hum tumhare sath hai!


5 years ago

The shameless UPA which propped up PRATIBHA PATIL will never accept the embarassment caused to itself by the 'LAND GRAB".
The appointment, by the UPA, of a president by whose precedents have been questionable and not convincingly clarified by the President herself, is a shame to INDIAN DEMOCRACY. It will go down as a BLACK CHAPTER in India's history.
But then the UPA itself is thick-skinned like a RHINO-SEROUS and with a lame-duck PM, so we cannot expect any corrective action. It is really sad period for INDIA's democracy.


5 years ago

Politician,.....thy name is greed.
The bigger, the greedier.


5 years ago

There is acute shortage of accommodation for officers, JCOs and Jawans. Large number of them are not able to stay with their families when posted to peace station like Pune.
People like Pritibha Patil, Sharad Pawar have usurped army land. Greed has no limits. Absolutely shameful! But they must know that only three feet worth land is required at the end.


Rattanlal Purohit

In Reply to PSRandhawa 5 years ago

No land required for Hindus. Only Rajah Chhatri. Noob Maqbara Peer Darrgah.


5 years ago



Ratanlal Purohit

In Reply to DR DIPAK CHATTERJEE 5 years ago

Any one who want to represent public is a politician. Dont you think its catch 22 situation Dr Dipak Chatterjee. Think.

Mr Rohinton Khambata

5 years ago

President Patil, if she has any sense of shame should immediately stop construction and give up this palatial land un-scruptioulsly acquired by her. Otherwise as is rightly justified by the fed up Indian public that "ALL POLITICIANS ARE CROOKS".

P M Ravindran

5 years ago

I too have registered a complaint at


I am disgusted at the shoddy clarification.

There are enough allegations against you in public domain and this beats them all.

I request you to get out of defence land and choose an accommodation as per the entitlement elsewhere.

The confirmation of registration of the complaint is :

Your Request/Grievance Registration Number is : PRSEC/E/2012/05595

Revised mutual funds requirements will hurt independent distributors, enrich NISM

Independent mutual fund agents and distributors will now have to shell out more than double the amount in order to continue doing their business. Is NISM looking to needlessly increase cost of doing business for its own benefit?

Small mutual fund (MF) distributors and agents who rely on their certificates for doing business, will now have to shell out more than double the amount in order to keep the certificate, as the National Institute of Securities Market (NISM), and the Securities Exchange Board of India (SEBI) are making life tough for them. It costs, at the most, Rs3,600 for adhering to the new mutual fund requirement norms stipulated by NISM at a time when the business is dwindling. This move also enriches NSIM which has little or no contribution to spreading genuine financial literacy.

According to the communiqué issued by NISM around two months ago, the candidate can opt to get the certificate in one Rs1,800 per day per candidate, in case candidate opts for a single day training (i.e. the candidate chooses to complete the continuing professional education—CPE—for only one day at a time out of the two days of the CPE programme); or Rs1,700 per day per candidate in case candidate opts to complete both days training on two consecutive days of the two days of the CPE programme. A candidate with a valid NISM/ AMFI certificate is required to complete the mandated two-day NISM CPE programme within a period of 12 months preceding the date of the expiry of the said certificate.

This means, for a two-day course, the maximum the candidate will now have to pay is Rs3,600 (Rs1,800 x 2 days; two non-consecutive days) or Rs3,400 (Rs1,700 x 2; two consecutive days). Earlier it was Rs1,500 for just a one-day programme.

“NISM has unnecessarily hiked prices at their own convenience, for unknown reasons”, complain distributors. Because this is a regulatory requirement, advisors and certificate-holders don’t have any other choice but to shell out more. SEBI already squeezed them out with the banning of entry loads. Asset Management Companies (AMCs) usually reimburse the fees to their employees who take the exam.

Further, the communiqué said, upon expiry of the validity of the certificate possessed by an associated person, the certificate may get revalidated, provided the associated person successfully completes a programme of CPE, as specified by NISM during 12 months preceding the date of expiry of the certificate, or by passing the relevant NISM certification examination before the expiry of the existing certificate.

The funny thing is that one could fork over far less money for a fresh exam than attend two days of ‘training’. The NISM-Series-V-A: Mutual Fund Distributors Certification Examination, which is the main certification exam, costs just Rs1,000 NISM more, theoretically, the candidate can flunk the exam twice and still save money if the examination route is opted (Rs400 saved—assuming two flunks and a pass on third attempt). Also, previously, the candidate had to renew the certificate within six months from expiry. Now that has been elongated to 12 months from expiry. 

To provide a smooth transition, NISM will continue to offer the current CPE programme (the one-day programme) till 31 May 2012. An associated person holding a certificate whose validity will lapse on or before 30 November 2012 may undergo the current programme till 31 May 2012. Such a person holding a valid certificate whose validity will lapse between 1 June 2012 and 30 November 2012, and who has not undergone the above programme, may attend the NISM Mutual Fund Distributor (MFD) CPE as per the revised requirements from 1 June 2012 onwards, within the validity period of the said certificate. An associated person holding a certificate whose validity will expire on or after 1 December 2012 must undergo the NISM MFD CPE as per the revised requirements from 1 June 2012 onwards.

NISM performs two functions delegated to it under the SEBI (Certification of Associated Persons in the Securities Markets) (SEBI CAPSM) Regulations, 2007. These are:

1) Offering mandatory certification examinations for associated persons of securities market intermediaries. (i.e. NISM-Series-V-A: Mutual Fund Distributors Certification Examination)
2) Offering CPE programmes for associated persons of market intermediaries who are holding valid certificates. (i.e. NISM MFD CPE)

As per SEBI Notification Cir/IMD/DF/5/2010, since 1 June 2010, NISM MFD CPE programme has replaced the AMFI Refresher Course programme for the purpose of revalidation of NISM/ AMFI certificates.

Advisors are required to hold a NISM-MFD certificate in order to distribute mutual fund products and keep renewing them when they’re about to expire. NISM is a public trust, established by SEBI, the regulator for securities markets in India. According to the website, the board of governors of NISM include:

  • UK Sinha, chairman, SEBI (chairman, board of governors)
  • Prashant Saran, whole-time member of SEBI
  • PK Nagpal, executive director of SEBI
  • Uday Kotak, vice-chairman & managing director of Kotak Mahindra Bank
  • Chanda Kochhar, managing director & chief executive officer of ICICI Bank
  •   RM Malla, chairman & managing director of IDBI Bank
  •   Dr Anil Khandelwal, former chairman of Bank of Baroda
  • MS Sahoo, Advocate.

This isn’t the first time this kind of thing happened. Even AMFI had done it before, when it was in charge of issuing similar certificates, especially when they were losing ground to NISM (Mutual fund industry dealt another blow, AMFI hikes ARN fees). Is NISM looking to needlessly increase cost of doing business for its own benefit?




5 years ago

SEBI is a big bully. It demolished the upfront commission and reduced the trails. AFMI charges Rs.5000/- for new registration for ARN for 3 years. That is way steep. For ARN renewals it takes Rs.2500/-. AMFI just wants to make money by squezing IFAs. For becoming Life Insurance Advisor the fees are much less.
Organisations like NSE, NISM are just here to make money and very profitable. Why in financial services business every three years IFA need to renew the certification by paying fees? So that these people can make money. And the syllabus won't change every three years for mutual funds or equities.



In Reply to niraj 5 years ago

up to 10.06.2012 nism fees is 1500/- but from onward it will be 3500/-
reson they are hiring third party and period is for 2 days
making fool to distributer


5 years ago

Now, SEBI itself can be closed as they are not of use for a common investors - SEBI is there to support large corporates to make more money.

SEBI, always against IFAs and they will work against IFAs, as they want to show their power.

Nowadays. so many banks are selling MF units and how many of them have NISM certificates?

Ms. Chanda Kochchar should be removed from the Board of Governors of NISM as ICICI Bank is one of those banks selling MF units on a large scale and Ms. Chanda will definitely work against the IFAs so that banks can have a field day.


5 years ago

so the distributors should expect no increase in their operating expenses ? IFAs are entrepreneurs and should know how to handle their revenues and expenses. Let us not look at everything with dark glasses - it would be good to review NISM for their deliverables and pull up them where required, instead of grudging a hike of Rs. 300 to be amortised by the IFAs over a long period !

girish prasad

5 years ago

still people some ifa in not understanding the case .this is a sieving . by reducing upfront some ifa is removed . then by bringing KYD some are again removed .by doing above some more will be seprated..days are not so long when for every form ifa have to pay process charge entry charge amc govering charge etc and that you have charge to customer .that will be crushing time .
seems friction today ? wait then

R balakrishnan

5 years ago

First, let SEBI prescribe an exam for those who manage the money. This is merely a money making racket for NISM. Anyone who passes the exam does not become knowledgeable merely because of this. A compulsory license for the bus conductor, but none for the driver! SEBI zindabad



In Reply to R balakrishnan 5 years ago

Yes Balakrishnan you've hit the nail absolutely on the head

Mukesh Kamble

5 years ago

What abt other un-secured bonds sold by unprofessionals. My friend has been selling Twinkle Company Bonds (Coupon 13.5%) for last so many years without any certification or qualification. Why is the honest always punished??


5 years ago


We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

To continue

Sign Up or Sign In


To continue

Sign Up or Sign In



The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)