Citizens' Issues
Hiring rises by 13 percent in August:
Hiring in India rose by 13 percent in August 2015 compared to August 2014, leading Indian job site announced on Monday through Naukri Job Speak Index.
"Job market seems to be moving north, sustaining the momentum gained over the first four months of this financial year with an impressive 13 percent year-on-year (YoY) growth in August," V. Suresh, executive vice president,, said in a statement.
"This growth is led by sectors like IT, banking and pharma and we can expect the other sectors to pick up in the next few quarters," added Suresh.
Banking and Financial Services (BFSI) witnessed the highest growth at 26 percent on a year on year basis followed by healthcare (26 percent), pharmaceuticals (13 percent), IT software (13 percent), telecom and media (nine percent) and entertainment industries (seven percent), the statement said.
However, insurance sector continued to see a decline in hiring while auto and ancillary industries witnessed stability.
According to Naukri Job Speak Index, Hyderabad recorded the maximum growth in hiring among all the metro cities in India, with a growth rate of 24 percent, followed by Mumbai (19 percent), Pune (15 percent), Bengaluru (13 percent), and Delhi and Chennai (10 percent each).
Hiring activity remained stagnant in Kolkata.
In the functional area analysis executed by the Naukri Job Speak Index, demand for pharma professionals rose by 18 percent and for ITES/BPO professionals by 13 percent in August 2015.
Advertising, PR and marketing professionals also witnessed demand for their services, the statement added. started operations in 1997 and is owned by Info Edge. 
Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.


Public Interest Exclusive
How the Andhra government killed the education system–1: Growth Years
  • Education in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana was thriving on open competition. Then the government came up with sponsored education scheme leading to more colleges without any real intention to provide education. Add the draconian Right to Education law and you know how and why education is deteriorating in India. This is first part of a two part series 
A recent survey conducted by Pearson India revealed that 60% of the students in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana were not employable. Though the survey does not take anyone by surprise, it gives us an opportunity to reflect upon our dying education system. In my last post, I explained how the government intervention is killing research and affecting teaching standards in the country. Here, in the light of the survey, I want to look at the education system in Andhra Pradesh and study its passage in the last two decades to see how the government handled it. You will see how the education system benefitted when the government loosened its grip, and how it got destroyed when the same government intervened and distorted the market.

Government loosening its grip

When Chandrababu Naidu became the Chief Minister (CM) of Andhra Pradesh in 1995, the state was on a complete decline financially. He had to somehow revive the economy. Realising the potential of the information technology (IT) sector, with a single-minded focus, he worked to attract investments into the sector by de-regulating the processes. In his book "Plain Speaking", Naidu recounts how he went out of his way to convince Bill Gates to set up Microsoft in Hyderabad, which completely changed the face of AP. It was a huge achievement considering the fact that Bangalore had already grown into an IT hub by then.  As a part of creating the IT ecosystem, the first thing Naidu did was to make it relatively easy for people to set up engineering colleges. When he assumed the office, there were only some 20 odd engineering colleges in the state, when he left, that figure went up to 220. All through his stay in the office, his party was part of the ruling alliance at the centre. So he was able to pressurise the centre to get permissions for establishing new engineering colleges since the whole process was under centre's purview. Yet times, he had to literally fight with the central regulatory authority, the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) to ease up rules. 
Once the engineering colleges started adding up, and the IT industry started coming in, it created an enormous interest in the people of the state to take up engineering course. This created huge demand for junior colleges offering Engineering, Agriculture and Medical Common Entrance Test (EAMCET) (state entrance exam for engineering) and Indian Institutes of Technology (IIT) oriented coaching. To cater to the demand, a lot of corporate junior colleges started mushrooming. The state government eased the rules a bit in this area, but mostly bribing would work in overcoming regulations. Once colleges were established, there was intense competition between these colleges. This created an unprecedented phenomenon, where in, these junior colleges would scout for the best talent in the state and compete to enrol them in their colleges, in the hope that if properly coached they would secure good ranks in EAMCET, and increase the college’s reputation. So they would offer concessions ranging from 25% to 100% on college fees depending on the student’s score in the 10th standard. A student whether rich or poor if he had scored over 90% in his 10th standard would be eligible for free quality education (including boarding).
It didn't stop here. The idea percolated further down, and there started coming up lot of model and corporate type schools. Again, the competition forced them to find the best talent. These schools, dozens in number, every year, conduct scholarship test for students for 5th standard and above, and top performers are given free schooling. Today, in AP, a 5th standard student, if he shows signs of merit, will not be left behind for lack of finances.  This is disbursing Scholarships the market way, the right way. Not only that, James Tooley, a professor of Education policy from England, came to Hyderabad in 2001 to study how the poor were getting educated. He mentions this in his book "The beautiful tree" about how he was delighted to find so many low cost private English medium schools costing only a dollar a month at that time. And they were incomparably better than any public schools in the localities. 
But then the accepted wisdom is private education institutes are only there to exploit us. Yet they achieved this despite all the draconian rules and regulations. They made the best out of a very narrow opening they were provided. When there is a clear purpose and when there is competition fuelled by little to no entry-barriers, private businessmen, to earn profits, need to provide quality. It is only when government stifles entry into the market, existing ones become complacent. Here, in the case we discussed, there was a clear demand for technical resource for the IT industry. From parents to students to educational institutes everyone knew what they were doing. This is in a way, a purposeful education. Here, I am not talking about the purpose at the micro-level of how a particular lesson/subject would benefit the student…we have a long way to go before we talk about that, but on a broader level the purpose was evident. 
The criticism is that people say this made robots out of the students, with virtually everyone being forced to become an engineer. Two things to this: one, it is a choice parents and students make, you cannot complain about that; you need to use your wisdom. Two, this was nowhere an ideal system. Growth was fuelled by the government, so there will be discrepancies like cronyism and concentration of growth in the sector the govt picks. But as long as the two important resources for industry: land and power are firmly in the government’s control, there is little choice but to look for the government initiative. This case study is only to give an idea of how even a little freedom can make a great difference. If we look at the number of students being admitted into IITs, we will understand the whole effect this little phenomenon had from a national perspective. Every year, an average of 20% of the students that get qualified to IITs are from AP alone. This has been happening for more than a decade now. No other state comes close to this achievement.
(The author can be reached at



Fairy gada

2 years ago

Does anyone know about the rural Maharashtra. i shifted from Mumbai to Shahapur. This place has the worst education facility I can imagine.


2 years ago

I am not able to make out what the article is trying to communicate. Is it good or bad? Reasons for good or bad? I think the article should have been better articulated.

Mahesh S Bhatt

2 years ago

This is UP article in Times of India last week 

"When the Uttar Pradesh government advertised for posts of 368 peons on August 11, it couldn't have guessed the response would be so overwhelming.

More than 23 lakh applications have poured in-over 6,000 per post.

Among the applicants are over 2 lakh graduates or those with degrees like BTech, MSc and MCom.
The applicants also include 255 with PhDs.

The minimum qualification for the post was Class V pass but only 53,000 of the candidates who had applied had not studied beyond even Class V.
UP has a dismal employment scenario.
According to an 2013 NSSO report, some 1.32 crore people in UP aged 15-35 are jobless.
The job of a peon in UP government fetches a take home salary of Rs 16,000 per month.

But beside this, candidates have their reasons for applying. “It's better to work as a peon than to wander without a job,“ said Alok, an applicant who holds a PhD. Another applicant Rekha Verma said it was better to serve water to officials than to lead a life of dependency .
“If you are jobless, you eventually seek help from rela tives or friends... but for how long can one survive on the kindness of well-wishers,“ she said. Last Sunday , over 26 lakh candidates appeared for 13,600 posts of lekhpal (revenue re. cord keepers).

All Politicians have raped looted innocemt students /parents & created colleges with Trusts run by their akin.
SC can see conflict of interest in BCCI's Srini case but closes eyes on all politicians on above sysem

Meenal Mamdani

2 years ago

I find it difficult to understand the praise being showered on the private colleges when the article starts out by saying that 60% of graduates from Andhra are unemployable.

If the private colleges are so good, then why are their graduates so poorly educated?

It is not enough to attract the top notch talent to your school/college, the quality of teaching shows up in the overall percentages of students who pass exams, score above 70% in exams.

A bright, hardworking student will succeed no matter the quality of teaching. The school's dedication to teaching shows up in how the average students fare in exams and then in obtaining jobs.

It should be mandatory for all colleges to publish the pass rate of students, the percentage who have achieved first class marks, the number that get offered employment in their subjects, etc. Otherwise parents will spend hard earned money in paying exorbitant fees of third grade schools and colleges.


Shirish Sadanand Shanbhag

In Reply to Meenal Mamdani 2 years ago

I fully agree with the views expressed by Meenal Mamdani.


In Reply to Meenal Mamdani 2 years ago

If there were no private Colleges, who would have educated these lacs and lacs of aspirants? In all States including Maharashtra it is the same situation. General Public must understand that it is just not possible for the Government (with their speed of acting and lack of understanding the peoples' Aspirations) to keep pace with the requirements of Industry. Look at the Skill Develpment Programme of Modi Government.

Shirish Sadanand Shanbhag

In Reply to Ravindra 2 years ago

I agree with Ravindra views.
But, PM Modi's Skill Development Programme (SDP), is meant to devedlop skills to workers and not for Engineering College students.
If these students from private Engineering Colleges find no jobs, then surely they will have to join SDP to get them some skilled job, since all jobs of SDP are from engineering line. industry, although they are for skilled workers.

ch prakash

2 years ago

pl write about SCAM regarding Fee reimbursement scheme. Feeding the Private Engineering Colleges, many substandard and understaffed Colleges, with the fee reimbursement by the Government. It is nothing but a big SCAM. Majority of the colleges established by politicians are for making money in short time. The students coming out of these Engg colleges of unemployable.

m e yeolekar

2 years ago

Unifocal attention to and interest in tertiary superspeciality medical care is not adequate ,as pointed out by the author. Primary holistic healthcare in all its aspects are crucial ,as highlighted. Appreciate . Dr M E Yeolekar, Mumbai.

Everyone’s Juicing Steroids
Latest raids in the US of undercover steroid labs suggest the market for steroids goes way beyond the world of elite athletes 
Earlier this month, the Drug Enforcement Administration announced that it had busted 16 underground labs and seized 134,000 steroid tablets and pills, 8,200 liters of injectable steroid liquid (that’s 140 kegs worth), and 1,400 pounds of the raw powder from which steroids are made. In Arizona alone, four labs and 150,000 doses of all types were taken by DEA agents in an undercover operation that spanned 20 states and four foreign countries. 
There are, clearly, a lot of steroids out in the world. Investigators suspect there are hundreds more labs churning out performance-enhancing drugs. According to the DEA, most of the material used to make steroids isn’t even in the U.S. – it’s in China. As big as it was, the DEA inquiry offers a view through the smallest of keyholes of this illicit business.
One reasonable inference from the amount of steroids seized might be: there must be a heck of a lot of athletes who are doping. And that’s true.
This month, the British Parliament released a previously unpublished study by the World Anti-Doping Agency that used anonymous surveys to estimate the prevalence of doping at some recent competitions. It estimated that between 29 and 34 percent of the athletes at the 2011 world championships in track and field in Daegu, South Korea used performance-enhancing drugs that season. As many as half of the competitors at the 2011 Pan-Arab Games in Doha, Qatar had recently juiced, the study found. (I was at those Pan-Arab Games, and privy to the barely noted fact that nine gold medals were stripped before the event even ended.) 
Amazingly enough, world-class athletes are merely the fine layer of frost atop the iceberg’s tip when it comes to the steroid economy. 
To illustrate, and speaking of ice, take Iceland. As part of this recent operation, a lab was busted there. Iceland sent five athletes total, all skiers, to the last Olympics. (Compare that to nine people who were arrested at the steroid lab.) It’s unlikely that an underground steroid economy in Iceland subsists on elite athletes alone. So who is driving this tremendous market?
One answer is non-elite athletes. In years of reporting on performance-enhancing drugs, I’ve frequently been asked why athletes in smaller sports or facing lower stakes would dope, given that there’s little money in it for them. 
My answer: people like being good at sports, and anyone who has ever scheduled their life around training for a sport, no matter how big or small, would never have to ask that question. 
My alma mater, Columbia University, launched a steroid probe into the football team way back in 1988, when the team had not won a game in five years. Two players admitted to steroid use as part of that internal investigation.
More than a decade later, while I was a Columbia student-athlete, two students were busted for selling steroids on campus, and one claimed he sold to an athlete. 
This is a university that gives no athletic scholarships and whose greatest sports successes (post-Lou Gehrig) have come in the pool, on the track, and in the fencing hall. I happen to know about these incidents only because I went there. And still, my reporting has shown that there are nowhere near enough sub-elite athletes to account for the booming trade in illegal steroids. So, again, who is driving this market? 
In my observation, the main customers for what’s being churned out of the illegal labs the DEA took down are gym-goers who want to get stronger and look different, supplemented by people in professions where physical strength is prized, such as police officers and soldiers.
For a 2008 Sports Illustrated article on steroids that I co-wrote with L. Jon Wertheim, I spent several days in England with a man named Tony Fitton. Despite not having a college degree, in the 1980s Fitton was given a faculty position at Auburn University, in the National Strength Research Center. 
Fitton was already well-versed in steroid use. Years earlier, he had disrupted a study on the training effects of steroids when he began buying the… Continue Reading…
Courtesy: ProPublica


We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

To continue

Sign Up or Sign In


To continue

Sign Up or Sign In



The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)