World
Health care delays squeeze patients in state high-risk pools

Many state and federal insurance pools covering patients with pre-existing conditions are set to close 31st December, but it’s an open question whether patients will be able to find policies on Healthcare.gov in time

“This is what keeps me up at night,” Tanya Case told me earlier this week.
 

Case is executive director of the Oklahoma Temporary High Risk Pool, funded by the federal government to sell insurance to people denied coverage by private health insurers. Her worry is about some 300,000 people in her program and others like it who now must quickly find health insurance under the Affordable Care Act.
 

Many of the programs are set to close by law on Dec. 31.
 

By then consumers are supposed to be able to enroll in new plans that can’t discriminate against them based on their health status.
 

But as problems continue to bog down the federal health insurance marketplace, Healthcare.gov, it’s an open question whether people in the risk pools can get a policy in time.
 

“They are very frightened because many of them are undergoing chemotherapy or they’re on high-dollar drugs, and they need to make certain that they have coverage effective Jan. 1,” said Case, who is also chairwoman of the National Association of State Comprehensive Health Insurance Plans, which represents plans in 35 states.
 

“One lady expressed to me, ‘I’m in the middle of chemotherapy, and then I have to deal with this on top of everything else and quite frankly, I’m scared to death.’ That’s what she told me, and you hear that or a version of that quite frequently,” Case said.
 

People like this were supposed to among the biggest winners under the Affordable Care Act because insurers can no longer discriminate based on pre-existing conditions. As a result, the cost for many is expected to go down substantially.
 

Advocates say they still hope that will happen despite the current glitches.
 

“We’re all in this tough spot right now of guessing whether people will reasonably be able to get through” to purchase insurance on Healthcare.gov, said Stacey Pogue, senior policy analyst for the Center for Public Policy Priorities in Austin, Texas.
 

The concern is particularly acute in the 36 states that are relying on Healthcare.gov to process insurance enrollments. The other states and the District of Columbia are running their own marketplaces.
 

A spokesperson for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services said the agency believes that there is enough time for individuals in the high-risk pools to sign up by Dec. 15 for coverage that begins Jan. 1.
 

Federal officials have pledged that Healthcare.gov will be fixed by the end of November. But even if they are true to their word, Pogue said, that would only give consumers two weeks to choose a plan and enroll.
 

“I just don’t know yet whether it’s reasonable,” Pogue said.
 

Texas is one of 14 states that plan to close its high-risk pool by Jan. 1, according to Case’s group. Texas gives its insurance commissioner a bit of discretion to certify that insurance options are “reasonably available” before the state plan shuts down, Pogue said.
 

A federal program set up under the Affordable Care Act that serves much the same purpose (and funds Oklahoma’s program) will similarly close then. Last week, Indiana became the first state to delay its program’s closure, giving its 6,800 participants another month to find new plans. “The state of Indiana will ensure that these Hoosiers, who are facing significant health care challenges, maintain their health coverage until the problems with the federal marketplace are resolved,” Republican Gov. Mike Pence said in a statement.
 

Other states are considering similar moves, Case said.
 

Although some consumers have been successful signing up for new coverage, she said, “I would say that the majority have not been.”
 

In California, officials are feeling good about the transition. “There are no barriers I am aware of with people from California’s high-risk pool or anyone with pre-existing conditions getting covered for January,” said Ken Wood, a senior adviser for Covered California, the state’s insurance marketplace. “Based on the types of calls our service center has received, these individuals were reaching out the first week of October to understand their options and beginning to move through the enrollment process.”
 

Case said she and her colleagues in other states are encouraging consumers to shop around by calling different insurance companies — even if they cannot yet enroll on the marketplace website. They can use an online calculator to determine their eligibility for premium subsidies.
 

The program Case runs will shut Dec. 31 because it is funded by the federal government. But Oklahoma runs a second program that isn’t set to close right away, she said.
 



A map of states with high-risk pools for those with pre-existing conditions that deem them medically uninsurable. Similar federally-funded plans under the Affordable Care Act may not be shown here. (Source: National Association of State Comprehensive Insurance Plans)

 

Courtesy: ProPublica.org

User

Dead Man Walking (With apologies to Sean Penn)

Legal issues about a person who does not ‘exist’ anymore

Last month, Judge Allen Davis, presiding in a court in Ohio (USA), told the man seated in front of him, “No, you are still deceased.” Donald Eugene Miller Jr, was in court wanting to be told that he was alive. According to the judge, Miller was as dead as a dodo, “...in law.” This author has always maintained that though people might say the law is an ass, it is not a donkey. So why is a living, walking, talking, man declared ‘dead’?
You be the judge on this one. It has not been decided yet.

Donald Miller was living in Arcadia. Having lost his job, he decided to try his luck elsewhere. The ‘elsewhere’ happened to be 1,700km away. It took him 19 years to get back. By which time he was declared dead. Or, at least, ‘legally dead’.

The law in America states that if a person is unheard of, not seen, not contactable for five years, he is ‘presumed dead’. A similar law exists in India and the period of waiting is seven years. The reason for this is simple. There are situations that need to be taken care of. The man’s estate. The man’s family. The man’s insurance.

After the period of waiting, interested parties approach the court. Following due diligence, the court arrives at a decision and pronounces the person ‘legally dead’. His estate is settled, either by his Will and through a probate, or as an intestate’s property. The wife, or husband, is declared a widow or a widower. The insurance is paid out as per the law.

There is, of course, a built-in safeguard. The process takes a specific period of time. It can be reversed, if circumstances can be proved otherwise. On the other hand, if it is proved that the person has, indeed, died, the ‘legally’ tag can be eliminated. The problem arises when, in spite of all the procedures, the person turns up alive, as Donald did.

You be the judge.

The matter has been discussed in public and some tongue-in-cheek comments made. “If Donald is murdered, can a person be charged with ‘killing’ a dead man? Would it amount to desecrating a corpse?” Will the insurance company charge Donald, or his heirs, with fraud, ask for repayment and cancel the policy for lapse? But these are small problems compared to the ones that Donald is facing.

A ‘dead’ man can have no identity. In America, there is the social security number, something on the lines of the aadhaar, which is cancelled on a person’s death. On ALL records, Donald is now non-existent. He cannot get a stable job nor can benefits be given him as an unemployed person. No one will give him medical assistance except out of humanitarian concern. He cannot get a driving licence nor can he use his old licence because then he would be arrested for impersonation. The list is endless and can only grow by the day.

The author suggests a solution. Use existing laws to relieve, and ‘relive’, the poor man from his burden. After all, it wasn’t he who asked for him to be declared dead. All this was, technically, done behind his back. He was not a party to this unhappy state of affairs that the State has put him in. There is what is called the ‘witness protection programme’. Whistleblowers, whose lives are in danger, are given a new identity and relocated to protect them from retribution. That could be tweaked a bit and Donald resurrected from the ‘dead’. Rebirth, if you wish. And called Donald Eugene Miller III.

As for the ‘murder’ question above, the killing of a ‘dead’ man would still be a crime. The body would be the necessary evidence of murder. The victim, non-identifiable, would be named John Doe, a common term used when a person’s name cannot be established.
(And, in India, we could give him a government job where he would simply ‘disappear’ once again; as most government servants are wont to do!)

apoo Malcolm is a practising lawyer in Mumbai. Please email your comments to [email protected] or [email protected]

User

Equity mutual fund schemes continue to suffer massive redemptions

As much as Rs6,139 crore was redeemed from equity mutual fund schemes during October 2013, leading to a huge net outflow of Rs3,542 crore for the month

Equity mutual fund schemes have reported a net inflow of funds in just three of the past 18 months. Over the past twelve months, as much as Rs15,000 crore has flowed out of equity mutual funds. Though sales of equity schemes improved in October to Rs2,597 crore compared to Rs1,996 crore in September, high redemption pressures led to a massive outflow of Rs3,542 crore, the highest in the past 13 months. Redemptions peaked to Rs6,139 crore, the highest in the past four months.

 

 

With the heavy redemption, the number of equity folios also declined. The number of folios declined to 30.62 million in October from 31.17 million in September. Despite the huge outflow, equity assets under management (AUM) in October increased by 6.77% to Rs1.73 lakh crore from Rs1.62 lakh crore in September, thanks to a boost in stock markets. Over this period the S&P BSE Sensex gained as much as 9.21%.
 

Since the beginning of April 2013 to the end of October 2013, equity folios have declined by 7.69% to 30.62 million from 33.17 million recorded on 31 March 2013. According to a report from CRISIL on mutual fund folio numbers, a sharp decline in retail folios was mainly in the equity category which has been impacted by the ongoing volatility in the segment. “Macroeconomic weakness in the domestic market coupled with some mixed cues from the global market led to the decline in the local market,” the report stated.

While retail investors are moving out of equity, high networth individuals have not lost their faith in the long term wealth generating asset. According to the research report, the total folios held by high networth individuals (HNI), defined as individuals investing Rs5 lakh or more, rose three times in the first half of the current financial year led by a sharp rise in equity folios. In the category, the equity segment added over 14.27 lakh folios followed by balanced funds and debt oriented funds, which added 3.45 lakh and 2.72 lakh folios in the past six months (ended September 2013). In AUM terms, HNI portfolio in equity oriented funds increased by 30%.
 

The CRISIL report further stated that, debt funds continued to attract retail investors with the category witnessing an uninterrupted rise in retail folios since March 2009. Debt funds added 1.79 lakh folios over the past six months (ended September 2013) compared to 1.69 lakh folios added in the previous six months ended March 2013.

User

COMMENTS

jaideep shirali

4 years ago

I feel that our investors want to invest in assets that have the lowest risk, but highest return. But risk and reward always move in opposite directions. We would not buy any commodity, say, mangoes at the beginning of the season at some thousand rupees a kilo, but wait till they come to affordable levels. However, in stock markets, our investors wait till the markets have risen, then they buy. At low prices, we somehow think the world is coming to an end. It is no surprise that the buying at peak prices is followed by a loss, due to stock market cycles. Hence the investor's frustration with equities. Equities outclass other assets in the long run in returns. Mutual funds invest not only in equities, but also debt, gold, government securities, etc. Similar is the case with ULIPs, where investors should choose their portfolio, not just blindly sign a cheque. As each investor has his own tolerance for risk, we must invest to the extent we are comfortable with. I do not think criticism of mutual funds as an investment is warranted.

Suiketu Shah

4 years ago

The intentions of the MF companies and their fund managers are anti-investors inspite of the knowledge they have which is why investors and leaving MFunds and rightly so.

D A Bhatt

4 years ago

Mutual fund establishments are operating in our country for almost over thirty years. In fact they are rotten seeds of western economy and wrongly implanted into economic soil of our country. Now white investors of our nation have understood that their operating principles are not suitable to economic and social texture of indian society. Basically; they follow money siphoning and laundering techniques under legal protection provided by nonaccountable authorities of our country at the cost of poor knowledged investors. I am of opinion that all types of ULFPs following NAV based procedures must be banned with immediate effect in our country. unfortunately; in our country financial wisodum is an individual entity and not mass perception.

Prakash

4 years ago

The government is more concerned for FII investment than retail investment. We have seen consequences of this in September when FII withdrew money from equity as well as debt markets. The faith of retail investors in Indian financial products has been shattered. The government directed investment like home loan { tax exemption on interest and principal),ELSS,small saving schemes creating anomaly in investment preferences by retail investors. Why bonds are given indexation benefit? Why not on FD's? These anomalies must be addressed by government. Then only the faith of retail investor will be restored. Till then we have to face such volatility.

Prakash

4 years ago

The government is more concerned for FII investment than retail investment. We have seen consequences of this in September when FII withdrew money from equity as well as debt markets. The faith of retail investors in Indian financial products has been shattered. The government directed investment like home loan { tax exemption on interest and principal),ELSS,small saving schemes creating anomaly in investment preferences by retail investors. Why bonds are given indexation benefit? Why not on FD's? These anomalies must be addressed by government. Then only the faith of retail investor will be restored. Till then we have to face such volatility.

Nilesh KAMERKAR

4 years ago

'Experts' are calling these heavy redemptions as 'profit booking', 'taking money off the table', while pointing to Sensex @21000.

But, the fact, mutual funds have failed to attract fresh investments from Indian Savers / Investors

It is less about index levels, & more about incentive levels. Things may not improve till the powers that be get the incentives right.







We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
  Loading...
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email

BUY NOW

The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)