Hasmukh Adhia, who was Modi's Prinicipal Secretary in Gujarat for two years, will replace GS Sandhu as Financial Services Secretary
After transferring Arvind Mayaram, the topmost bureaucrat in the Finance Ministry, the Narendra Modi government shifted another top level babu. Financial Services Secretary Gurdial Singh (GS) Sandhu is transferred to National Authority for Chemical Weapon Convention as its chairman. Sandhu will be replaced by Hasmukh Adhia.
Adhia is an officer from the Indian Administrative Service (IAS)'s 1981 batch, and was working as Additional Chief Secretary, Finance Department in Gujarat. During May 2004 to May 2006, he also served as Principal Secretary to Gujarat's the then Chief Minister Narendra Modi.
Sandhu is the second secretary among five Secretaries in the Finance Ministry who has been shifted after Mayaram in past few days. Mayaram who was Finance and Economic Affairs Secretary was transferred twice over past 15 days and finally shunted to less important Minorities Affairs Ministry as Secretary.
Mayaram, a 1978-batch officer was replaced by Rajiv Mehrishi, the chief secretary of Rajasthan. Expenditure Secretary Ratan P Watal, who is the senior most among all the five secretaries in the Finance Ministry is likely to be the new Finance Secretary.
Despite much noise and fanfare, whether the Bill delivers for citizens, or for policemen and politicians, is yet to be seen
The draft of the ‘new’ Road Transport and Safety Bill 2014 has been on the road transport and highway ministry’s website and has been discussed at various forums for some time now. In some form or the other, this proposed successor to the Motor Vehicles Act has been in the offing for several decades and provisions have been added in fits and starts.
The end result appears to be a sort of hacked and pasted documents; bits and pieces are borrowed from online resources on legislation in other countries and some strong deterrents have been thought up locally. It is not likely to improve road safety for all stakeholders; it might have the effect of putting an AK-47 in the hands of a monkey would, considering that the previous Motor Vehicles Act was like a baton in those hands.
There appear to be very strong penalties and post-facto deterrents, but there is not much about pre-empting the causes of road accidents like issues of responsibilities and accountability for design, construction and management of roads. A motor vehicle-owner or operator can be penalised for missing a badly positioned traffic signal but a shopkeeper who usurps the pavement and a part of the road will continue to go scot-free.
In addition, several ‘exemptions’ and ‘benefits’ have been provided for those in power, making it a very unfair Bill. The culture of red beacons and toll exemptions, for example, will continue. While citizens may continue to face harassment for re-registration of vehicles, government employees will continue to be exempted.
The draft Bill does not appear to take into account two major parameters which are part and parcel of all sustainable and successful civilisations.
1) Free unhindered passage to all for legitimate purposes and intent, including for all people and vehicles carrying goods or passengers with minimal additional costs and inefficiencies;
2) Minimal inequity on the roads and lesser discomfort to more people, especially at inter-modal exchange points, with safety for all as a simple guideline. If you want to see what that means, please travel by Delhi Metro.
On the issue of automobile companies seeking and accepting ‘bookings’ for motor vehicles not yet in the market, or for those with waiting lists for whatever reasons, the customer/consumer’s interests and point of view appear to be the last parameter on the minds of those involved. As somebody who has booked a Maruti Suzuki Ciaz, I speak from first-hand experience as well as wider research and other people’s experiences.
First of all, even though it is the manufacturer who solicits advance bookings from customers, it is the dealer who collects the money and in the name of the dealer. This is wrong and needs to be controlled immediately.
Next, there is no interest payable on the booking amount if the delivery of the vehicle is delayed beyond reasonable limits. In the case of the Ciaz, the manufacturer announced a ‘launch’ and an ‘introductory pricing’ with great fanfare; but, when it came to deliveries, prospective buyers were informed that it would take at least another three-four months. I leave it to the customer to judge whether this is a fraud or not.
Third, the manufacturer is clearly launching an untested and unproven product, as can be deduced from the feedback on problems being faced with the upper-end variants.
If one were to connect the dots, it appears to be no more than a way to work with dealers to raise funds at low cost and not deliver the promised goods. Imagine, for a moment, that an airline persuaded us to buy low-fare tickets months in advance and, closer to the date of travel, simply refused to communicate with customers and actually withdrew the flight and route? Something similar is happening with bookings for cars, lately.
(Veeresh Malik started and sold a couple of companies, is now back to his first love—writing. He is also involved in helping small and midsize family-run businesses re-invent themselves.)