New Delhi: The finance ministry today said it will provide equity support of about Rs8,700 crore to the public sector banks, a move that will enable lenders to raise funds from the capital market without diluting the government holding to below 51%, reports PTI.
"Next tranche of the capital infusion in the banks will be to raise government's holding in the public sector banks to certain level, which is being worked out," Department of Financial Services secretary R Gopalan said on the sidelines of Orient Grameen Swarojgar Card launch by Oriental Bank of Commerce here.
"So that at time when we are not in a position to fund them through budgetary resources they will be in position to go to the market and raise resources to beef up their Tier I position," he said.
The government is also conscious of Basel III requirement where addition Tier I capital has been prescribed, he added.
The government will look at those banks where government's holding is at minimum at 51%.
In the first tranche the government has approved capital infusion of Rs6,211 crore in the five public sector banks announced in June this year.
Finance minister Pranab Mukherjee in his budget speech this year announced that the government planned a capital support of Rs15,000 crore to public sector banks during the current fiscal to ensure that these entities could attain a minimum 8% tier-I capital by 31 March 2011.
As much as Rs8,789 crore would be part of second tranche.
There are six public sector banks - Bank of Baroda, Oriental Bank of Commerce, Andhra Bank, Dena Bank, IDBI Bank and Vijaya Bank - where the government holding is less than 55%.
The Centre's holding in Bank of Baroda stands at 53.8%, Oriental Bank of Commerce at 51.1% while in case of Andhra Bank, it is 51.6%. In IDBI Bank, Dena Bank and Vijaya Bank, the government holding is 52.7%, 51.2% and 53.9% respectively.
When asked if the government had taken any decision on the State Bank of India's proposal of Rs20,000 crore rights issue, Mr Gopalan said, "we are still examining. We have not finalised the assessment."
On the operations of microfinance institutions in the country, Mr Gopalan said, "It is not possible for any one to control interest rates. It is just not feasible."
He added," As far as we are concerned Microfinance Institutions Regulation Bill is in the offing, which is under consultation with number of stakeholders. In that Bill we will never have a provision of control of interest rate, as it is not feasible."
When asked if the Bill was likely to be tabled in the upcoming winter session of Parliament, Mr Gopalan said, "It depends on number of legislative agenda there. We have finished consultation with stakeholders and we will have to look at taking it forward."
New Delhi: The National Multi Commodity Exchange of India (NMCE) today said it will raise Rs25 crore by selling its 12.82% stake to Bajaj Group arm - Bajaj Holdings and Investment Ltd, reports PTI.
"This investment will help NMCE to meet its regulatory capital requirement and strengthen its balance sheet for investment in exchange infrastructure," NMCE said in a statement.
Both companies today jointly announced that they have signed a definitive agreement under which Bajaj holdings has agreed to invest Rs25 crore in the commodity exchange, the statement added.
Equirus Capital acted as the exclusive financial advisor to NMCE for the transaction.
NMCE would also utilise the raised capital for strengthening of the exchange IT infrastructure, business development and human resources, the exchange said.
Commenting on the development NMCE vice chairman Kailash Gupta said, "We are pleased to partner with a reputed business house like Bajaj Group in our next stage of growth. We believe this association would further diversify our investor base and facilitate in strengthening the exchange infrastructure and ecosystem."
Bajaj Holdings and Investment Limited is the parent company of Bajaj Auto Limited (BAL) and Bajaj Finserv Limited (BFL) and is a part of the Bajaj Group.
"We are excited to invest into NMCE. They lead in select agri commodities. We are hopeful that the impending regulatory changes and the robust growth envisaged in the physical economy would boost the commodity exchange volumes in India," Bajaj Holdings director Sanjiv Bajaj said.
Other shareholders in NMCE include National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India, Gujarat Agro-Industries Corporation Limited, Punjab National Bank and Reliance Money and the bourse is promoted by Central Warehousing Corporation and Neptune Overseas Limited.
As the deadlock between the two majority stakeholders WMDC and Bajaj Holdings over the sale of the government’s stake in the shell company continues, anxious minority shareholders could be left high and dry
The saga surrounding the stake-sale row in Maharashtra Scooters Limited (MSL), the now inoperative geared scooter manufacturer, may soon reach boiling point. With the court case involving majority stakeholders Bajaj Holdings and Western Maharashtra Development Corporation still subjudice, minority shareholders of the company are hoping for a favourable outcome.
However, the protracted battle has much at stake for all parties concerned; no party is willing to concede an inch to the other. Vested interests, political arm-twisting and sheer connivance have all played their part in creating a soap opera around this issue. At the centre of all the controversy is a portfolio worth more than Rs1,100 crore - the estimated value of MSL's investments in Bajaj group companies. Caught in the crossfire are the anxious minority shareholders, who are keen to get their rightful share of the pie, but which has eluded them thus far.
Much muck has been thrown around in this tussle, with shareholders accusing Bajaj group of using its muscle power to snatch WMDC's stake in MSL at a throwaway price and usurp its valuable portfolio in the process. Shareholders also accuse the entity of intentionally withholding price sensitive information about the recent Bombay High Court ruling in favour of WMDC. This enabled them to corner shares from the market at the expense of ordinary shareholders and needs to be investigated fully, say shareholders.
Bajaj Holdings on its part is desperate to keep MSL from selling these valuable holdings in its group companies. Minority shareholders, however, are not amused. They have made representations to the government to allow WMDC to sell these liquid investments and pocket the gains, which could then be offered to MSL shareholders as a one-time special interim dividend. The legality of such an action while the case is still subjudice remains to be established and is under consideration. A WMDC spokesperson told Moneylife that since the matter is subjudice, the company would not be in a position to comment on the matter.
Moneylife asked Bajaj Holdings its view on the submission by minority shareholders. The company responded, "BHIL recognises the democratic right of any shareholder of MSL to do what he pleases and which is legal and accordingly, has no comments. However, it is to be noted that major shareholders amongst the so-called minority shareholders, who have made such representations, have acquired shares of MSL in the year 2004, i.e., after the commencement of the dispute over valuation of shares between BHIL and WMDC."
BHIL also pointed out that developments in the last seven years have in no way adversely affected MSL shareholders, old or new. "MSL has a track record of consistent dividend payment since 2003 i.e., the year in which the dispute regarding valuation of shares started. Market value of quoted investments and share price of MSL have appreciated over the last 7 years except for during 2007-09, when the stock market was affected by the global crisis. However, dividend of Rs5.50 per share was maintained during this crisis period."
MSL's share price has witnessed a whopping 553% spike since April 2003, when WMDC first announced its intention to sell its stake in the company. It is currently trading at around Rs410, purely driven by the value of MSL's holdings in companies like Bajaj Auto, Bajaj Holdings, Bajaj Finserv etc. At current prices, this portfolio is worth more than Rs1,100 crore. Shareholders argue that this investment puts the intrinsic value of MSL's share at around Rs1,000, much higher than what it is fetching in the market now. Add to this the value of MSL's property holdings, machinery and equipment, which if sold could add handsome gains to the stock price.
Asked why they sought to stall the sale of investments and distribution of special dividend by MSL, BHIL replied, "Due to the dispute between BHIL and WMDC being subjudice and the since the appeal is pending for hearing, the Board of MSL has not taken any step in a hurry. The Board of MSL did not need to consider such an issue as they are well aware that investments made by MSL would continue to provide the cash flow by way of dividends. The decisions in the Board Meeting of MSL have always been unanimous."
The issue reared its head in April 2003 when WMDC had communicated to BHIL its proposal to divest its 27% stake in MSL to BHIL. While BHIL had confirmed its interest in buying the shares, it was not agreeable with the price at which the shares were offered by WMDC. To resolve this issue, in terms of the Protocol Agreement between the two parties, a joint reference of the matter regarding valuation was made by both for arbitration to Justice AV Sawant. The protocol agreement for the joint venture provides for mutual consent to retain 'absolute control' over the company by either partner in case one intended to exit. It also provides for arbitration to fix a rate for such purchases and gives the partners first option to purchase the other's share. The agreement, however, does not make it mandatory for the seller to accept the arbitrator's price recommendation. The price decided by the arbitrator was not acceptable to WMDC, who then challenged the arbitral award before the Bombay High Court.
The Bombay High Court, while confirming the ruling of the arbitrator on valuation and the methodology adopted for the valuation set aside the award of the arbitrator on the ground that the award goes contrary to the provisions of Section 111A of the Companies Act, 1956, which relates to free transferability of shares in a public limited company. BHIL however challenged the decision of the Single Bench before the Division Bench of the same High Court on various grounds. BHIL's appeal is now pending for hearing before the Division Bench of Bombay High Court. Shareholders will have to wait patiently to see which way the pendulum swings in this highly politicised drama.