Right to Information
Govt refers RTI Amendment Bill to Standing Committee

Bit by bit, through individual telephone calls, petitions, letters, ballots and multifarious ways citizens have pressurised the government to follow correct democratic procedures. However, this is not the time to rest, feels the former Central Information Commissioner

Right to Information (RTI) users have been allergic to any amendment in the Act because they know they have an Act, which is one of the best transparency acts in the World. Despite poor respect for laws and uneven implementation, citizens have found it acting as a great instrument for change. Most users have begun to feel empowered in negotiating with those in power using this instrument. Hence, they have been resisting any change in the Act. They rightly realize that those in power are uncomfortable with the Act and will weaken it if they have an opportunity. The Cabinet first decided to amend the RTI Act in 2006 and nationwide opposition to this move forced them to stall the move. In 2009, another move was made to get the Information Commissioners to support amendments to the Act, which was skilfully deflected. In 2012, ultimately the Cabinet decided not to pursue the agenda of amending the RTI Act and buried its decision of 2006 by giving a public assurance and burial to amendments.

 

The Central Information Commission’s decision on 3 June 2013, holding six major political parties as public authorities subject to the RTI Act, upset them. This meant being accountable to citizens at not only the time of elections, but all the time in terms of providing information. This irritated them and was a challenge to their arrogance. The government used this to get collusive agreement to issue an ordinance to amend the RTI Act. Public outrage at the thought of misusing a Constitutional provision brazenly managed to stall this. The government then decided to bring an amendment bill in the Parliament, realizing the unconstitutionality of its earlier move. Across the country, there were demonstrations and petitions opposing this.  Over one lakh signatures were collected by a petition of National Campaign for People's Right to Information (NCPRI). In Gujarat, ballots were collected against the amendments and Mumbai held demonstrations outside railway stations. From many places there were reports of protests in a variety of ways.

 

Suresh Ediga staying in the US decided to call up members of Parliament (MPs) over telephone to persuade them to oppose the amendments. Many others took to this method and either met MPs or telephoned them. The grotesqueness of the political system ganging up to hurriedly pass an amendment to constrict the citizen’s fundamental right has now begun to dawn on our politicians. Citizens pointed out to the MPs that they did not appreciate their idea of changing the law without consultations with them. They pointed out that transparency in the political parties would improve faith and trust in them and lead to a better India. The Government appears to have realized the self-goal it was scoring and hence has decided to refer the bill to the Standing Committee. Citizens have cause to celebrate and congratulate themselves.

 

As individual citizens without any central organizing body, they are exercising their sovereignty. They did not get together in a mass, which would threaten authority. But bit by bit, through individual telephone calls, petitions, letters, ballots and multifarious ways they put pressure on those in power to adopt the correct constitutional device first and then to adopt a proper consultative and deliberative process. Citizens have done this exercise in a very mature fashion, demonstrating how to make democracy function and have held a candle to their MPs. This is how democracy must work through peaceful, persuasive engagement; not using whips and unruly methods.

 

They will continue this process of engagement with the political class and the Parliament, until it is accepted that no RTI amendments will be made until 2025. That will be a solution, which will allow them to focus on spreading the law to all and making transparency and accountability non-negotiable in our governance. This is not the time to rest. Yes, we, the people, will make it happen. 

 

(Shailesh Gandhi served as Central Information Commissioner under the RTI Act, 2005, during 18 September 2008 to 6 July 2012. He is a graduate in Civil Engineering from IIT-Bombay. Before becoming a full time RTI activist in 2003, he sold his packaging business. In 2008, he was conferred the Nani Palkhivala Memorial Award for civil liberties.)

User

COMMENTS

S BHASKARA NARAYANA

3 years ago

Hats Off to those Citizens, who have done the above exercise in a very matured fashion. I feel guilty for not taking part with them so far.

Sensex, Nifty may rally subject to dips: Weekly Market Report
If the weekly low holds, the Nifty is  likely to move up
 
We had five consecutive weeks of negative closing on the Sensex and the Nifty, following severe decline in the value of rupee. However, the pace of decline is slowing down. The Sensex has lost 79 points (or 0.42%) to close the week at 18,519 and the Nifty settled at 5472, down 36 points (or 0.66%).
 
The week saw the failed efforts from the government and RBI to revive faith in the economic scenario. The prime minister Manmohan Singh on Saturday, 17 August 2013, said that the country although has a large current-account deficit, it has plenty of foreign-exchange reserves. The RBI on Tuesday relaxed some rules that will help banks deal with the notional or marked-to-market loss in their government bond portfolios due to a recent sharp fall in bond prices.
 
On Thursday, the rupee made a record low again when it hit 65.56 to the dollar. However, as rupee strengthened from that level, the index broke the trend of four days of consecutive loss starting Friday, 16 August 2013 and closed in the positive on Thursday. Continued strength of the rupee ensured that index closed in the positive on Friday too. Among the major indices the top two gainers were Metal (11%) and Commodities (2%) while the top two losers were Media (5%) and Pharma (4%).
 
Among the Nifty-50 stocks, Tata Steel (20%); Sesa Goa (18%); Jaiprakash Associates (14%); Jindal Steel & Power (13%) and Hindalco Industries (11%) were the top five gainers while among the top five losers were ACC (15%); Ambuja Cements (8%); Bharti Airtel (8%); N T P C (8%); Sun Pharma (6%).
 
Out of the 27 main sectors tracked by Moneylife, the top five and the bottom five sectors were:
 
Top ML sectors   Worst ML sectors  
Non-ferrous metals 12% Cement -7%
Steel 9% Telecom services -6%
Software & IT services 2% Energy -6%
Oil & Gas 2% Media -5%
Hotels 1% Real estate -3%

 

User

Changes in the Companies Act: What should you expect?

With every new legislative act one would hope that the law will be simpler, more transparent and will be for the larger good of the citizens. Will these changes lead to better governance and more investment opportunities?

The new Companies Act has made many sweeping changes regarding governance, transparency, disclosures, responsibilities of directors, class action suits and a more powerful Serious Fraud Office. On the face of it, the new company law has fewer provisions—with only 470 sections compared to the present Companies Act, 1956 which has nearly 700 sections. However, the new law has many more provisions by way of rules. Separately, amendments to the SEBI Act have made it one of the most powerful market regulators in the world, given it the power to search, seize and freeze accounts and assets, with very little oversight on its actions. Will these changes lead to better governance and more investment opportunities? At an exclusive Moneylife Foundation event, two very knowledgeable and independent-minded people in the business— Savithri Parekh, Head of Legal & Secretarial, Pidilite Industries and Jayant Thakur, Chartered Accountant, shared their views on these two momentous legal changes
 

Ms Parekh discussed the highlights of the Companies Bill 2012. Given the recent corporate scandals there has been a greater focus on corporate governance and transparency. There have been substantial changes in the restructuring provisions with greater focus on disclosure and compliances. The Director’s Report will contain enhanced disclosures such as number of meetings of the board, policy on Directors’ appointment, remuneration including qualification, positive attributes, independence and other matters, particulars of loans guarantee and investments and details about CSR policy and initiatives.
 

While the earlier Act had no provisions on insider trading, under the new Act insider trading is prohibited and penal provisions under the corporate laws will also be applicable. This would mean the guilty would be subject to imprisonment up to 5 years or fine of minimum Rs. 5 lakhs and maximum Rs. 25 crores or three times amount of profits or both. It is not uncommon to find companies taking their minority shareholders for granted; some even go to the extent of virtually short-changing investors who put their faith in the company. Knowing the limitation of individual investors to fight against a company’s might, many a company has taken them for granted. To overcome this weakness in the law, the Companies Bill has now proposed a new Clause 37 that provides for action by a group of shareholders

Mr Thakur, who has advised listed and non listed companies and intermediaries on SEBI laws, other corporate laws, etc, spoke on the new provision for independent directors. The new provision states that a listed company should have at least one-third independent directors and no stock options can be given to independent directors. This move ensures that rotation of independent directors is envisaged. It ensured improved transparency in the conduct of business.
 

Speaking on related party transactions, Mr Thakur said, there was limited scope for transactions and persons covered under the earlier Companies’ Act. The new provisions have an enhanced scope of reporting transactions. ‘Related parties’ would include relative, directors with certain shareholding, persons in advisory capacity to the board. This ensures greater transparency in operations with key persons. 
 

While the existing law has no provision for the tenure of auditors, the maximum tenure of auditors under the new provision individual auditors to be rotated every five years and audit firms every 10 years. The auditors would need to comply with the auditing standards. There are also restrictions on the auditors which is inline with global audit norms. The provisions also introduce an increased liability of auditors if found involved in fraud or has abetted or colluded in any fraud. Auditors can also act as whistleblowers.
 

For the first time, a provision has been made for class action suits. It is provided that specified number of members, depositors or any class of them, may, if they are of the opinion that the management or control of the affairs of the company are being conducted in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the company or its members or depositors, file an application before the Tribunal on behalf of the members or depositors. Knowing the limitation of individual investors to fight against a company’s might, many a company has taken them for granted. To overcome this weakness in the law, the Companies Bill has now proposed a new Clause 37 that provides for action by a group of shareholders.

User

COMMENTS

nagesh kini

3 years ago

Undoubtedly one of the best events that was House full with informed questions from participants of all ages!

Mr. S. Chandramohan,the President & Group CEO of TAFE, writing the bill in the Opinion column of the Business Line very rightly called "Companies Act, a curate's egg." That it is only good in parts was diligently amplified by both the learned speakers of the day - Savithri from the CS's point of view and Jayantbhai from the audit profession's.
The Rules should now be put up in the public domain for a more detailed discussion before they are notified.

Vaibhav Dhoka

3 years ago

The changes should be pro investor and not anti investor to boost investor/depositors confidence.

REPLY

Vinay Joshi

In Reply to Vaibhav Dhoka 3 years ago

Exemplify your st. such cryptics of no use!

Regards,

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
  Loading...
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email

BUY NOW

The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)