New Delhi: The government has notified procedures for regular export of 5 lakh tonnes of sugar, out of which the country's top two makers Bajaj Hindustan and Balrampur Chini have got permission to ship over 33,000 tonnes, reports PTI.
"The export quota of five lakh tonnes has been pro-rated among sugar factories by taking into account their three years' average production," as per the circular issued by the food ministry.
In case of a factory that has not operated in one of the three years, the export quota has been arrived on the basis of two year's average production, it said.
Last year's sugar production has been taken into account for those mills which started operation in 2009-10 sugar year (October-September), the circular added.
With sugar output estimated to cross the annual demand of 23 million tonnes, food and agriculture minister Sharad Pawar had recently announced that the government would export five lakh tonnes of sugar under the open general licence (OGL) scheme to benefit from high global prices.
OGL is a permit the government gives to mills to export sugar without any restriction and conditions.
The export under OGL would be over and above the export obligation of about 1.5 million tonnes of sugar via the Advance License Scheme (ALS) and imported stocks stuck at ports.
In order to give equal export opportunity under OGL, the food ministry has fixed the quota between 40 and 3,000 tonnes per mill to more than 500-odd sugar factories.
The government has fixed the export quota of 18,812 tonnes for Bajaj Hindustan, while that of 14,436 tonnes for Balrampur Chini. Leading sugar refiner Renuka Sugars has been allowed to ship nearly 5,000 tonnes of sugar.
The mills have to export sugar produced in the 2010-11 sugar year in their own factory or can source the sweetener from other factory to minimise transportation costs, it said.
India, the world's second biggest sugar producer but largest consumer, is estimated to produce 24.5 million tonnes of sugar in the 2010-11 crop year, as against 19 million tonnes last year.
With an increasingly larger share of money being raised in the emerging markets and the attraction this hold for investors, there is increasing concern about the quality of public issues
An important part of the emerging market growth "story" is the shift in capital markets away from older financial centers like New York and London to newer financial centers in emerging markets. Proof of this shift was especially evident this year in initial public offering (IPO) activity.
IPO activity for 2010 reached a total of $263 billion, double the 2009 level. Asia-Pacific issuers accounted for 60%. China and Hong Kong supplied 75% of the Asia-Pacific total. The total amount of Chinese issues was triple the amount of new money raised in New York. This trend is supposed to continue into 2011. So far, over $100 billion worth of IPO offerings have been announced in the Asia-Pacific region.
Asian IPOs also made a splash on Wall Street. The growth 'stories' of technology and China are invariably irresistible. Two IPOs stand out. One was Youku.com Inc a company often referred to as the YouTube of China. The other was the E-Commerce company DangDang Inc, considered China's Amazon.com.
Within one day of its issuance Youku soared 161% beating the previous record set by ChinaCache whose value increased a mere 95%. DangDang was not far behind with a first-day pop of 86%. With increases like these, it is hardly surprising that these new issues attract enormous amount of attention if not worship. It appears that investing in new Asia-Pacific IPOs is an easy and sure way to make money. But there is a dark side.
The first point is that although these stocks can make enormous amounts of money on the first day, they can also quickly lose value in the following trading.Youku.com subsequently lost 36% from its post-issue high. ChinaCache and DangDang lost similar amounts, falling 36% and 31% respectively.
The other problem is simply trying to take advantage of new public offerings. Getting allocations in these deals is very difficult for large institutions let alone the average investor. Retail investors are limited to the aftermarket with its attendant risks.
The other problem with these IPOs has to do with quality. According to a South China Morning Post analysis, 106 companies listed in Hong Kong in 2010. Of those, eight companies reported sudden post-issuance earnings drops, which ranged from 13.5 % to 97.4%. There were no earnings forecasts in the offering documents and the earnings surprises came without warning. Of the remaining 98 firms 46 have reported profits, and 52 have yet to report.
In the US there is a different problem. There are more than 500 Chinese companies listed on American exchanges. The vast majority of these firms did not go through traditional IPOs. Instead they found shells of US listed companies, and used a technique called a reverse merger to back-door their way into a listing.
The US securities watchdog, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), is conducting a major crackdown on these reverse mergers due to widespread allegations of accounting misstatements and outright fraud. Over 340 of these firms used small unknown US auditing firms that often outsourced the accounting back to local Chinese firms. This produced a problem because some work papers were in Chinese and the US auditors couldn't even read them.
It is not just IPOs from China that are a cause for suspicion. According to research by Moneylife, a Mumbai-based financial magazine, IPOs in India are not very profitable either. In August of 2009 the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) created an IPO index, a stock index designed to track the value of recent IPOs listed on the BSE. After two years, the index is down 2%. In contrast, the BSEs's flagship index, the Sensex, is up over 28%. According to Moneylife, the best strategy to make a profit in IPOs involves 'flipping', which means subscribing to the IPO and then selling it on the first day of its launch. Buying and holding a newly-listed company would've resulted in a loss 56% of the time.
Problems with IPOs certainly are not exclusive to emerging markets. In the US, during 2001, after the dot.com meltdown, 23% of the 2,600 IPOs of the past five years delisted. Still the present vogue for Chinese IPOs might remind investors of that time and of one stock in particular.
Sina Corp is one of three Chinese Internet portals. Its IPO was on 23 April 2000, just one month after the peak of the dotcom bubble. Its initial listing price was 20. In one month it had more than doubled to 47, but sixteen months later it had fallen 97% to $1.20. After its precipitous fall, some investors actually read the fine print in the prospectus and discovered that Sina did not own a license to operate an internet business in China. Fortunately, for its investors, it has recovered and recently reached an all-time high of over 70. However, its volatility remains a stern warning to those investors with dreams of buying into the 'can't lose story' of a new stock.
(The writer is president of Emerging Market Strategies and can be contacted at [email protected] or [email protected])
New Delhi: With different taxes rates leading to fuel prices varying from state to state, the oil industry has demanded inclusion of crude oil and its products and natural gas in the reformist goods and services tax (GST) regime, reports PTI.
Petrofed, a body representing both public and private sector companies like Indian Oil Corporation and Reliance Industries, has written to the government seeking inclusion of crude oil, petrol, diesel, aviation turbine fuel (ATF) and natural gas in the GST that is likely to come into effect from next year.
The finance ministry's draft proposal for GST regime proposes to keep crude oil, petrol, diesel, ATF and natural gas permanently outside GST through a constitutional amendment.
This has been done to protect finances of states, which rely heavily on collections from levies on oil products to make up for their budgetary targets.
"We have consistently been requesting for inclusion of petroleum in the GST with full pass-thru for the healthy growth of the industry," Petrofed director general AK Arora wrote to the petroleum secretary S Sundareshan on 30th November.
The partial implementation of GST for some petroleum products will push up costs for the sector, as the states would be levying service tax under the new regime and input credits cannot be availed of by the sector for the excluded basket.
"On the other hand, the inclusion of petroleum products under GST will eliminate stranding of taxes paid by suppliers as well as by the industry at different stages in the petroleum value chain, besides enabling the states and the Centre to capture full revenue potential up to sale to final consumers," Petrofed wrote.
Countries like Australia, Canada, Sri Lanka, Singapore and Brazil have included petroleum products in GST by customizing GST to meet local requirements through special provisions, such as restrictions on input tax credit on non-rebatable specific additional levies.
Petrofed said the 13th Finance Commission has recommended that petrol, diesel, ATF, crude oil and natural gas should form part of GST legislation.
"It has also recommended that the revenue concerns of the states and the centre can be addressed by levying, if necessary, an additional tax (excise tax) on these commodities in addition to GST, while bringing them within the ambit of GST," it said.
Petrofed said the exclusion of petrol, diesel, ATF, crude and natural gas from GST through a constitutional amendment was not desirable, since any changes in future to bring the above products under GST will need the constitution to be amended again.
The organisation also suggested options in case a full-fledged GST with complete pass-thru of all central/state taxes and local body levies cannot be brought into force on petrol, diesel, ATF, crude oil and natural gas simultaneously with introduction of GST on other goods and services.
It said then the existing levies on these products can continue until GST is made applicable to these five products, at a later date.
"Our submission is that the constitutional amendment made now should provide for their inclusion under GST, instead of completely shutting out the extension of GST to petrol, diesel, ATF, crude oil and natural gas for all times to come," it said.
The Centre/state governments should be in a position to extend GST to oil and gas products through appropriate legislations rather than awaiting an amendment of the constitution to implement the same, it said.