Alternative Investment
Gold finance companies & their revenue models-II

Borrowing against gold is becoming more popular as the yellow metal’s price reaches for the stratosphere and Indians lose their inhibitions over pledging their family heirlooms as collateral. Is it safe to do business with these gold-loan companies? 

In the previous part of this two-part series, we examined how loans against gold gained popularity ( We now examine the revenue models of these gold-loan companies.

The biggest advantages for a gold-loan company are the following:

1) The hefty interest they can charge on these loans. The illiterate farmer has no other place to go and it was an opportunity for these companies.
2) They operate at huge margins - sometimes as high as 20%.
3) They offer very short terms of lending and they can ask the borrower to repay/give more assets or auction the securities (and in auctioning also there are so many fraudulent activities like not giving proper notices to the borrower/imposing very high penalty rates/taking the pledged ornaments in auction through people known to them, the list goes on).
4) No elaborate documentation involved. Just a promissory note and an application form.
5) Safe custody of documents/securities was easier (as they were just bundled in a cloth bag and kept with the name of the borrower tagged to it inside their strong room. And today a share broking company has to keep its shares and clients' shares separately - these gold loan companies have no such norms).
6) Normally, there are huge increases in market rates of assets pledged resulting in heavy gain for lenders due to the high margins while granting a loan.
7) These companies adopted intricate networks for easy reach, coming across as a "saviour" for the local people.

While banks thrived well and succeded in banking as they started other loans like cash credits, term loans by lending to industrial and trading activities, the small NBFCs (non-banking financial companies) and gold financing companies could not do it in the organised sectors. They still continued lending against ornaments to their existing client base and survived. When the liberalisation process started in India, these companies could see a silver lining for survival and waited patiently for the banks to diversify. Along with the banking reforms that were implemented due to the intervention of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), these companies providing loans against gold started an active campaign for their comeback not in any traditional growth areas, but for the same old "loan against gold ornaments" category. These companies confined their operations to local districts (or maximum to their states) to float in the turbulent market, so that they would be well-poised to reap the benefits of any possible recovery in the market.

And now we see some of the companies trying to reach out to a pan-India audience, with branches at key centres. It can be seen that all these centers will be middle- and lower middle-class dominated areas. They are coming up with massive advertisements to attract customers. These companies are trying to raise money from the public both by way of debt and equity.

Some of them want to come out with initial public offerings (IPOs) to ride the current market highs and some are raising funds through private equity placements. 

Even compared to sectors like real estate, these gold loan companies are finding it easier to attract entities for equity participation or equity lending.

Ultimately these lenders are in it for short-term returns and are not long-term players in this market. Gold loan companies are sure that none of their FDs or bonds will be rated. And same is the case with their deposits. Hence they are taking deposits from the public through the same way they used to collect earlier. As the cost of deposits has fallen down over a period of 20 years today, they are able to garner deposits @ 15% pa (as against the earlier 24%) and are lending at 24% to 30% pa. These costs may not be transparent as they will have appraising charges, processing fees on a quarterly/half-yearly basis, safe custody charges and so on.

These monies are taken for a term of 1 to 5 years and they also borrow from private moneylenders and from some banks against securities. The pooled money is lent against ornaments at exorbitant rates where they have at least 10% gross margin. Their operating cost is very low as they operate from ordinary places; thereby saving on overheads and the staff cost is not at the market level. The people employed are not qualified professionals. Thus they are able to get a huge profit margin and have started approaching the urban/metro sector population, using the latter's greed for retail assets and up-market living style.

Is it safe to deposit money with these companies?

No, for the following reasons:

1) They have no regulator. Though they say that they are regulated by the RBI, the grip on these companies by RBI is too weak. They are under the ambit of NBFCs; depositors should not forget the tough time they had during the days when NBFCs were giving out very huge rates of interest and incentives for mopping up deposits and all of a sudden the bubble burst. Anyone paying more than 200bps (around 10 % now) is to be avoided.
2) These companies have no asset backing. They do not have any fixed assets to floating assets like raw materials and work in process. They have only the money raised from you and from other sources and at any time of downfall there is no asset base cushioning for them.
3) They do not have a long-term plan to diversify into other areas of business and unless there is diversification in related areas in a financial service company, growth cannot come about. Hence they are short-sighted and want to make use of the sunshine now.
4) Their business model is just dependent on a single metal and the vagaries in price of this single asset, gold, will affect them both ways to a larger extent.
5) The deposit guarantee schemes given by the government will not apply to the deposits made with these gold loan companies.
6) Due to cost constraints, they operate from tiny residential areas; keeping a watch on them will be difficult.
7) There is no transparency in their deployment of funds raised as many are not listed companies or fall under the purview of any regulator like SEBI or IRDA.

And what about using them for raising loans?

Invariably, you will be requested to deposit some money or pay a rate of interest based on the amount funded. The usual margin they have is from 25% to 40%. And the amount you get in hand plus the interest you are going to pay will be a huge burden on you. Since these are considered as short-term loans, you need to close them on time or otherwise again pay through your nose to get them rolled over. The EMIs are structured in such a way that the main portion of it goes to interest in the initial period (though they are short-term loans). As a result you will be in a position to lose the ornament and the replacement cost will be higher for you with the cost of the yellow metal going up.

Hence investors are advised to exercise utmost caution while dealing with these companies. It is time that they are screened properly by the regulator and their dealings are made more transparent.

(The author is a management and financial consultant and can be reached at [email protected])




7 years ago

I think half the facts in this article are wrong. For a more reliable view of the inner workings of a Gold Loan NBFC please visit the SEBI website ( and view the DRHP filed by Muthoot Finance (on October 4th 2010). The DRHP is available under the link "offer documents --> Public Issues Draft Offer Documets".


7 years ago

The Regulatory boards can ddo nothing against these gold companies..they dont dare to to anything and the resason is better known to the regulators..They can only regulate the system that is genune...

IIP growth down to 5.6% on contraction in capital goods' output

New Delhi: India's industrial growth slowed down to 5.6% in August from 10.6% in the corresponding period last year, on the back of a 2.6% contraction in the capital goods production, reports PTI.

Among the main industry segments, manufacturing activity declined to 5.9% from 10.6% a year ago. Mining sector growth was at 7% as compared to 11% in August last year.

Electricity generation growth, too, slowed down to one per cent from 10.6% in August last year.

Capital goods sector contracted by 2.6% in August, in comparison to 9.2% growth in the year-ago period, official data released here said.

Also, consumer non-durables, which are mainly fast moving consumer goods (FMCG), recorded a negative growth of 1.2%, in comparison to an expansion of 6.1% in the same month last year.

Consumer durables was the only segment of goods, which saw an output growth over the year-ago period. In August consumer durables expanded by 26.5%, as compared to 24.7% in the year-ago period.

Of the 17 industry groups, as many as 14 have shown positive growth during the month of August. The industrial expansion figure for July was revised upwards to 15.2% from the earlier estimates of 13.8%.

Industrial growth for the first five months of this fiscal stood at 10.6% in comparison to 5.9% growth in the same period a year ago.

Experts had projected that the industry growth might slip to single-digit level because of the high base effect of last year.

Moderate growth in core sectors, which accounts for 26.7% of the total industrial output, was also seen pulling down growth in factory output in August, experts said.

The core sector, which includes crude oil, petroleum refinery products, coal, electricity, cement and finished steel, grew by 3.7% in August. The growth had slowed from 3.9% recorded in July.


Earnings preview: Castrol India, Exide Industries

Here are the earnings that can be expected from these companies


Net sales: Rs6.4 billion-Rs7.2 billion
Net profit: Rs1.1 billion-Rs1.5 billion

Operating margins are expected to be about 500bps lower due to higher raw material prices and a weaker rupee. The quarter is also seasonally weaker for Castrol so q-o-q volumes may also dip.

In the September quarter, its FII shareholding went up to 6.3% from 5.8% in June and 5.2% y-o-y. However, the DII share came down to 7.3% from 7.8% in June and 8% y-o-y. Promoter share was steady at 71%.

In the June quarter Castrol earned a net profit of Rs1.5 billion vs. Rs1.3 billion y-o-y. Its net sales were Rs7.5 billion vs. Rs6.4 billion y-o-y. In the September 2009 quarter, Castrol earned a net profit of Rs956 million and net sales of Rs5.7 billion. The share price hit a new all-time high of about Rs558 late August. However, since then it has oscillated in the
Rs480-Rs540 range.


Net sales: Rs11.4 billion-Rs12.3 billion
Net profit: Rs1.8 billion

Watch out for statements about its battery sales to Tata Motor's Nano model since the automobile manufacturer was planning to ramp up capacity at its Sanand plant in Gujarat. Exide is one of the largest battery suppliers for the Nano. The company had announced last quarter that it is planning to spend Rs4 billion in FY11 on capacity expansions.

The telecom segment continues to be a laggard for this company. However in the previous quarter, UPS, especially the home inverter segment, had done very well - however, the commercial UPS segment had not done so well.

Watch out for statements about lead recycling as well. This is supposed to be a major money saver for Exide. About three years ago, in October 2007, Exide entered into lead smelting and recycling to reduce its dependence on lead imports. Currently, its tie-ups in this direction are providing about 45% of its lead requirements, which are expected to inch up to 50% by the end of FY11. The company's target is 100%.

In the June quarter Exide earned a net profit of Rs1.6 billion vs. Rs1.2 billion y-o-y. Its net sales were Rs11.5 billion vs. Rs9 billion y-o-y. In the September 2009 quarter, Exide earned a net profit of Rs1.5 billion and net sales of Rs9.5 billion.

The stock hit a new all-time high of Rs179 today at 11:15 AM on the BSE. FII shareholding in the stock has almost doubled from a year ago to 15% while DII share has come off a bit to 16.5%.

(This article is based on secondary research. The report is for information only. None of the stock information, data and company information presented herein constitutes a recommendation or solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any securities. Investors must do their own research and due diligence before acting on any security. Some of the opinions expressed in this article are the author's own and may not necessarily represent those of Moneylife).



Dr Rajeev Peeka

7 years ago

Dear Munira

Your Pre Result estimates for Castrol are way off the Mark , if I am not wrong.



Dr Rajeev Peeka

7 years ago

Dear Munira

Your Pre Result estimates for Castrol are way off the Mark , if I am not wrong.





In Reply to Dr Rajeev Peeka 7 years ago

Dear Dr Peeka... A few points:
1. These are not my estimates. They are brokerage estimates which i present in a band -- from the lower end of the scale to the upper end
2. Castrol's results came in at the lower end of the band. So they were not really way off the mark
3. In the specific case of Castrol, I happen to know that their management interacts regularly with the investor community (institutional investors) on a quarterly basis, through brokers who track the stock. While they might not give out specific estimates to their investors, I happen to believe that with such widespread interaction, where brokers receive direct feedback about business growth on such a regular basis, estimates should ideally be in a much more narrow range. But, as you can see, they are not.


In Reply to Munira 7 years ago

Let me understand. Doesn't this mean that Castrol underperformed or that its management misled the analysts who they "interact" with regularly? Was the street led to believe that performance would be better than it has turned out to be? Must look at the price trend in that case... I dont follow the stock so I have no clue.


In Reply to som 7 years ago

Dear Som, A few things. Despite the management's extensive interaction with institutional investors, Castrol remains a thinly tracked stock, i.e, very few brokers track it. To my knowledge, Castrol does not make direct earnings projections. Analysts do tend to make their assumptions based on their interaction with the company management. But please note that not all analysts were wrong -- obviously the broker at the lower end of the spectrum did get it right. It would be safe to assume that Castrol has disappointed on the earnings front. Regards, Munira

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

To continue

Sign Up or Sign In


To continue

Sign Up or Sign In



The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)