Even the best funds tie up the bulk of their money to the heavyweight stocks of the benchmark, making it hard for investors to separate market performance from stock-picking skill
The popular perception of fund management is that investment experts pick stocks that either reasonably valued or have strong earnings growth ahead of them or both. Some also believe that fund managers are experts at buying and selling. While all this is sometimes true, the fact is that most fund managers are happy to pick the heavyweights of the underlying benchmark indices and sit tight. This often leads to two results. One, the portfolios look similar and two, they perform in line with the overall market. In technical terms, they deliver a lot of beta (market returns) not much alpha (returns from specific stock picking).
Take the case of some of the largest and best performing funds. The recent portfolio of Birla Sun Life Frontline had Reliance Industries (5.2%); ITC (4.9%); ICICI Bank (4.4%); Bharti Airtel (4.2%); Infosys (4.2%); Tata Consultancy Services (3%); Larsen & Toubro (2.9%) and HDFC (2.5%) as the top holdings. Now, you don’t need anyone to tell you that these are blue-chip stocks to buy and would do well for the long term. But there is another reason these stocks find a place in the portfolio of this scheme. They are heavyweights in the BSE 200, which also happens to be the benchmark of Birla Sun Life Frontline. Now look at another portfolio: Reliance Industries (6.5%); ITC (5.2%); ICICI Bank (4.6%); HDFC Bank (4.37%); Infosys (4.17%); Tata Consultancy Services (3.2%) and HDFC (3%) as the top holdings. The stocks are almost identical to the Birla scheme. How and why? This is the recent portfolio of Fidelity Equity Fund. These stocks find a place in the Fidelity scheme for the same reason. Fidelity’s benchmark is also BSE 200, so the portfolio is remarkably similar. The difference in performance between one scheme and another lies in the fact that weightages and cash levels are different in different schemes.
We are neither for, nor against, this approach of tying up the fortunes of the fund to the benchmark stocks and sitting pretty—but this creates difficulties for investors to assess performance.
If superior performance is coming from changing the weightages (position-sizing) and varying the cash levels (market-timing), investors can never separate out these two factors and while assessing performance. Under the situation, the only approach for investors is to have faith—that funds that have a consistent record of beating the benchmarks must be doing something right.
Decreasing cover for loans; increasing cover for term life
Bajaj Allianz Life has launched...
SMS World Biz claims it’ll provide daily income just for ‘reading’ SMS messages. And it sports all the typical features of a typical MLM scheme—binary returns, referral income, and of course, a business model that won’t hold water
Pesky SMSs are often ignored and deleted by many of us. But here is a multi-level marketing (MLM) company, ‘SMS World Biz’, making an unbelievable claim that you can earn just by ‘reading’ an SMS. Experts say that SMS advertising seems to be the new happy hunting ground for MLM schemes.
SMS World Biz claims to be a mobile marketing company and says that it provides SMS advertising services. It proclaims, “SMS World is a service that offers users the opportunity to read advertisements and earn money. Users can also invite other users to read ads and earn—thus building a community of consumers. The bigger community you build, higher are the rewards.”
The company has a typical MLM business model. According to the company’s claim, one is paid just for reading an SMS. SMS World Biz claims that it will pay higher compensation if its SMS universe is expanded with the addition of more members. In simple words, this firm is inviting more people to join it—a typical trait of any MLM scheme.
It has advertisement packages ranging from Rs5,000 to Rs50,000. And the registration costs Rs2,000. The company claims daily compensation (income on a daily basis) depending on the advertising package. For instance for the ‘Pack-I’ advertising package, the daily compensation is Rs50 for one year, which would increase to Rs500 for another package.
SMS World is no exception to other such schemes in promising binary income, which is paid once you successfully enrol two people (on the ‘left’ and ‘right’ side) and they join the company. Interestingly, according to SMS World Biz, there is capping on binary income. For a package less than Rs50,000, there is a weekly cap of Rs5 lakh and it is Rs15 lakh for a package more than Rs50,000. It gives referral income of 10% only once, when a person referred by you joins in.
According to SMS World, the income earned can be withdrawn on either 15th or at the end of every month.
Experts say that such a business model is unsustainable, at least over the long run, given its claims of generating high income. And since the number of mobile phone users is rising, with such a lure of high easy income by the company, many gullible people would be a target. Now will somebody take a call on this before it is too late?