Nation
Freebies by political parties vitiate election process, says SC

Holding that such promises by political parties under present law does not amount to corrupt practice, the apex court, said that election manifesto released by parties can be included in the Model Code of Conduct

Freebies promised by political parties in their election manifestos to lure voters shake the roots of free and fair polls, the Supreme Court observed today as it directed the Election Commission to frame guidelines for regulating contents of manifestos.

 

Holding that such promises by political parties under present law does not amount to corrupt practice, the apex court, however, said that election manifesto released by parties can be included in the Model Code of Conduct.

 

“Although, the law is obvious that the promises in the election manifesto cannot be construed as ‘corrupt practice’ under Section 123 of Representation of People's (RP) Act, the reality cannot be ruled out that distribution of freebies of any kind, undoubtedly, influences all people. It shakes the root of free and fair elections to a large degree,” a bench of justices P Sathasivam and Ranjan Gogoi said.

 

“Considering that there is no enactment that directly governs the contents of the election manifesto, we hereby direct the Election Commission to frame guidelines for the same in consultation with all the recognized political parties,” the bench said adding “a separate head for guidelines for election manifesto released by a political party can also be included in the Model Code of Conduct for the Guidance of Political Parties & Candidates”.

 

The judgement can have wide ramifications and can put a curb on political parties for promising different types of freebies like distributing laptops, TVs, grinders and mixers, electric fans, four gram gold thali and free foodgrain for wooing the voters. The election manifesto of parties will also come under the scrutiny of the Commission.

 

The bench said though the election manifesto is published before the code of conduct comes into force, the Commission can make an exception by bringing it within code of conduct.

 

“We are mindful of the fact that generally political parties release their election manifesto before the announcement of election date, in that scenario, strictly speaking, the Election Commission will not have the authority to regulate any act which is done before the announcement of the date.

 

“Nevertheless, an exception can be made in this regard as the purpose of election manifesto is directly associated with the election process,” the bench said.

User

President signs food security ordinance

The Food Security programme will be the biggest in the world with the government spending an estimated Rs125,000 crore annually on supply of about 62 million tonnes of rice, wheat and coarse cereals to 67% of the population

President Pranab Mukherjee on Friday signed the ordinance on Food Security to give the nation’s two-third population the right to get 5 kg of foodgrain every month at highly subsidised rates of Re1-Rs3 per kg.

 

Mukherjee cleared the ordinance, which was received by the President's Secretariat last night, ending speculation that he may not be in a rush to give his nod in the wake of strong reservations over its present form expressed by BJP, Left and some other major parties.

 

The Food Security programme will be the biggest in the world with the government spending an estimated Rs125,000 crore annually on supply of about 62 million tonnes of rice, wheat and coarse cereals to 67% of the population.

 

The Cabinet, which had last month deferred a decision on the issue following differences within, had approved promulgation of an ordinance to implement the Food Security Bill on Wednesday.

 

The Ordinance comes just weeks before the scheduled Monsoon session of Parliament and political parties demanding that the Food Security Bill be debated in both Houses before being passed.

 

Left parties attacked the government for taking the ordinance route saying the UPA-II has shown contempt for Parliament while BJP termed it an “election gimmick” saying the Congress was running away from a debate in the House.

 

Samajwadi Party, a key outside supporter of UPA, also sharply opposed promulgation of the ordinance saying it was undemocratic and the programme would derail the food economy.

 

The Ordinance will have to be approved by both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha within six months of promulgation.

 

The measure will guarantee 5 kg of rice, wheat and coarse cereals per month per person at a fixed price of Rs3, Rs2 and Re1, respectively,

 

However, about 2.43 crore poorest of the poor families covered under the Antyodaya Anna Yojana (AAY) scheme under the PDS (Public Distribution System) would continue to get 35 kg of foodgrain per family per month but with legal entitlement.

User

SC gives a month to overstaying MPs, judges to vacate premises
The Supreme Court said overstaying in government accommodation encroaches upon the rights of the other person to whom it is to be allotted
 
The Supreme Court today set a one-month deadline for ministers, MPs, judges and bureaucrats to vacate their official accommodation after retiring or demitting Government office.
 
A bench of Justices P Sathasivam and Ranjan Gogoi expressed concern over MPs, ministers and bureaucrats illegally overstaying in their official accommodation and said they must vacate the premises within a month after demitting office.
 
It said the time can be extended by another month under special circumstances.
 
The bench framed a slew of guidelines for government authorities to take action against the illegal occupants.
 
“It is unfortunate that MPs and ministers continue to remain in official accommodation beyond their entitlement,” the bench said.
 
It said in the case of MPs, the Speaker of the Lok Sabha and Chairman of the Rajya Sabha should initiate proceedings against them for breach of privilege.
 
The bench said three months notice should be given to the officials before they are supposed to vacate the premises and reasonable force can be applied against them if they refuse to leave the accommodation.
 
The bench said overstaying in government accommodation encroaches upon the rights of the other person to whom it is to be allotted.
 

User

COMMENTS

Dev

4 years ago

MPs and Judges are not overstaying. It is retired MPs and retired Judges who are overstaying.

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
  Loading...
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email

BUY NOW

The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)