Forecasting elections and polls

All sorts of financial information are produced by polls, including PMI, Consumer Confidence, etc, and not just in the US but around the world. So for the investor what appears to be a credible prediction may be anything but...

The American presidential election is over to the great relief of most of the electorate. Over $6 billion were spent in this election, an amount that is greater than the GDP (gross domestic product) of about 46 countries. The pain was particularly acute in the so-called battleground states. For the uninitiated the battleground states are about nine states where neither party reliably wins elections. Due to a quirk in the US Constitution left over from its origins in the 18th century, winning these states is exceptionally important. So the money spent in these states is far greater than in other states that consistently vote for one party. 
One would think that the election was important for investors in the US. The reality is that it probably did not matter much, because it did not change the balance of power in any meaningful way. So the bitter partisan divide will continue until the next election in two years time. There were two very interesting results. The first was the effect of the continuing demographic shift. The second and more important was the inaccuracy of the polls. 
The US population and voters used to be overwhelmingly whites of European origins. This has changed dramatically. Over the past 20 years, this group of whites has gone from 76% to 63.4% of the population. As the number of African American, Latinos and Asians has grown, so has their voting power. They voted overwhelmingly for Obama: 93% of African Americans, 71% of Latinos, 73% of Asian Americans, and 58% of other minority voters voted for Barack Obama and the Democrats. The Republican Party, in contrast, finds its base consistently shrinking. As one of its leaders, Senator Lindsey Graham said “We're not generating enough angry white guys to stay in business for the long-term.” 
From an investment point of view this is positive. The great economist, Mancur Olson, explained in his book “The Rise and Decline of Nations” that major changes like technology advances, war and demographic shifts lessened the control of entrenched power groups. Freed of distortions the economy becomes more efficient. Still such a fundamental change in the ethnic and political make up of the country is deeply upsetting and helps explain the depth of the rift.
The divide might also help to explain the failure of many predictions about the election’s outcome. Seven of the eight national polls released in the final week forecast the race as a dead heat. The same was true for polls in the all important battleground states. In contrast to the polls’ predictions, the final result was anything but. President Obama won by 51% with over 3 million more votes. It was hardly a landslide, but nowhere near as close as the 2000 election when neither candidate won over 50%. The Republican vice-presidential candidate Paul Ryan said afterwards that he was shocked by the result and a famous Bush presidential advisor, Karl Rove, refused to believe the numbers.
Part of the problem was the methodology used by polling firms to conduct their surveys. The polling firms that concentrated on landlines did poorly since the one-third of Americans who rely exclusively on mobile phones tend to be younger, more urban, worse off financially and more likely to be black or Hispanic. Polling with the internet with firms like Google Consumer Surveys, was more successful and missed the final result by only 0.3%. In contrast the Gallup poll, which has been forecasting presidential elections since 1936, has had three poor performances in a row. Part of the problem with many of the polls is that they are unaware of the biases that they introduce into the process.
The most successful prediction processes were the prediction markets. These markets allow participants to trade options on the outcome of any particular race. There are two famous ones—Intertrade and the Iowa Electronic Market (IEM). Before the election Intertrade gave Obama a 72% chance of winning compared to only a 28% probability of winning for Mitt Romney. Intertrade was also very accurate in predicting the outcomes of the Senate and House of Representative races. They correctly predicted that the Democrats would control the Senate and the Republicans the House insuring continuation of the status quo. 
Although trying to guess the outcome of an election might help some investors, the impact is probably slight. The real conclusion from the inaccuracy of the polls has to do with the inaccuracy of financial information created by polls. For example the United States Labor department conducts the all important unemployment survey using a poll. They are not alone. All sorts of financial information are produced by polls, including PMI, Consumer Confidence, etc, and not just in the US but around the world. So for the investor what appears to be a credible prediction may be anything but.
To read more articles by the same writer, click here.
(William Gamble is president of Emerging Market Strategies. An international lawyer and economist, he developed his theories beginning with his first hand experience and business dealings in the Russia starting in 1993. Mr Gamble holds two graduate law degrees. He was educated at Institute D'Etudes Politique, Trinity College, University of Miami School of Law, and University of Virginia Darden Graduate School of Business Administration. He was a member of the bar in three states, over four different federal courts and has spoken four languages.)


Mumbai bids tearful farewell to its Tiger, city shuts down

The Thackeray phenomenon was in evidence once again in death as he brought Mumbai to a halt with all marketplace, from the swanky malls to the tiny tea stalls and ‘paan-beedi’ kiosks, closed

Mumbai: The mortal remains of Bal Thackeray, a Hindutva mascot and flag-bearer of Marathi pride, were consigned to flames as lakhs of mourners joined the Shiv Sena founder’s grieving family to bid him a tearful farewell, with the city observing a virtual shutdown, reports PTI.
In a spontaneous outpouring of grief, a sea of humanity, unprecedented in recent memory, descended on the streets leading from ‘Matoshree’, Mr Thackeray’s Bandra home, to Shivaji Park, to catch the last glimpse of the uncrowned king of Mumbai.
As several times in life, the Thackeray phenomenon was in evidence once again in death as he brought Mumbai to a halt with all marketplace, from the swanky malls to the tiny tea stalls and ‘paan-beedi’ kiosks, closed and all roads leading to ‘Matoshree’, Shiv Sena Bhavan in Dadar and Shivaji Park, where his last rites were performed.
Loud roars of “Parat ya parat ya Balasaheb parat ya (Come back, come back, Balasaheb come back), Kon ala re, kon ala Shiv Senecha wagh ala (Who has come, who has come, Shiv Sena's tiger has come)” and “Balasaheb amar rahe” (long live Balasaheb) rent the air as an emotional Uddhav, the youngest son of the departed leader and Sena’s executive president, lit the pyre.
In a reflection of the respect Mr Thackeray commanded across the board, a galaxy of politicians, from allies to rivals, film stars to captains of industry were attendance.


Balasaheb Thackeray Dead: End of an Era in Maharashtra Politics

The demise of Shiv Sena supremo Balasaheb Thackeray spells the end of an era in Maharashtra politics. The state has lost a charismatic leader who built a party from scratch based on a unique understanding of the ordinary Marathi person's sense of resentment about being relegated to second-class citizenship in Mumbai. Over the past 40 years Shiv Sena has acquired a presence across Maharashtra but Mumbai remained Balasaheb's karmabhoomi


ShivSena leader Bal Thackeray passed away at 3.30 pm on Saturday after a cardio-respiratory arrest, his doctor Jaleel Parkar announced at Bandra, Mumbai. The Tiger, as he was known, breathed his last at the age of 86 after several months of illness. Rumours about Mr Thackeray’s imminent demise and critical health had led to a near complete shutdown of Mumbai on Thursday – some say out of fear and others claim it was a gesture of deep respect.  The city had barely hobbled back to normalcy by Friday.


ShivSena spokespersons announced that Balasaheb’s body would be kept at Shivaji Park from 7am on Sunday morning, for people to pay their last respects to their charismatic leader. Shivaji Park has a lot of significance for the ShivSena. It is the ground where Balasaheb gave his most rousing speeches; the park has a statue and memorial of his late wife Meenatai, it is a stone throw away from the ShivSena headquarters and his once-estranged nephew Raj Thackarey lives in a home overlooking the park. So in many ways, it seems fitting that Mr Thackarey’s last place of rest should be the iconic Shivaji Park at Dadar in Mumbai.


Bal Thackeray, born on January 23, 1926, is one of nine siblings and the son of Prabodhan Thackeray a social reformer. He started his career as a cartoonist with the Free Press Journal, where he was a friend and colleague of the famous R K Laxman. He formed the ShivSena in 1966 and struck an immediate chord with Marathi people with his unique brand of oratory, his connect with the ordinary people and his championing of the “sons of the soil” issue.

Interestingly, while the party has sometimes been accused of encouraging lumpen politics, one of Balasaheb Thackeray’s strengths has always been his keen media sense and ability to communicate. His magazine Marmik and later the party newspaper Samna carried thundering editorials and occasional cartoons by the maverick leader for decades. Also, Shiv Sena shakas made it a point to encourage newspaper reading by making them available free. The shakha network (branches) helped him build a statewide cadre of leaders and followers who swore unwavering loyalty to Balasaheb.


Balasaheb attracted a fair degree of criticism for promoting parochial politics and repeatedly shutting Mumbai down with the threat of violence. Yet, even his worst critics would admit that Mr Thackeray’s powerful hold over a large swathe of the people of Maharashtra. Sometime in the late 1980s, the Sena began to eye a more national role and adopted a hardline Hindu ideology. However, the party was never able to establish a presence outside Maharashtra and managed to control the Maharashtra assembly only once (between 1995-99), that too in collaboration with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).


In recent years, the leader was apparently pained by nephew Raj Thackarey’s decision to form the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) in 2006. But he chose to support his less charismatic son Uddhav Thackarey. In recent months, there are indicators that a rapprochement of sorts may be in the air, but there is little doubt that the senior Thackarey’s exit will lead to a power-tussle for the Tiger’s mantle.



We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

To continue

Sign Up or Sign In


To continue

Sign Up or Sign In



The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)