Flip Flops
This has reference to your article “Winter in Autumn” (Moneylife, 4 June 2009). SCUP is retained for those who have completed 58 years of age. Why is it in vogue for one set of people and terminated for another group? I have a copy of the brochure issued at the launch of SCUP in 1993. It says, “Recognising the contribution of senior citizens to the society, UTI plans to pay respect to them by building into its operations special benefits and privileges for this section. Towards this end, as a first step, UTI is launching the Senior Citizen Unit Plan.” Besides, UTI News (volume 7 No2 for April – June 1993), says: “The maximum amount of medical benefit cover of Rs5 lakh is not static. It will be reviewed periodically. For example, after a few years it may be increased to Rs6 lakh or Rs7 lakh to take care of the inflation. So as the cost of the treatments goes up, the medical cover also will be revised accordingly. The minimum amount of initial investment will take care of any extra premium payment in this regard and the member will not be asked to pay any extra amount for this.”

It is evident that the minimum amount of initial investment had sufficient leeway. SCUP Scheme is with UTI MF and not with SUUTI. All NAV-based schemes are vested in UTI MF. The termination circular for SCUP (8 January 2008) gives two reasons—interest rate on investments made by the Scheme has declined substantially, thus affecting its earning potential over the years; and the premium charged by New India Assurance Company also has risen substantially. The circular further stated that returns from such investment portfolio were not self-supporting and that the scheme was not in compliance with SEBI Regulations.

Both reasons appear incorrect. Interest rates declined only after March 2008 and had increased since the launch of the Scheme in 1993. Premium payment to New India starts after the age of 55 years and ceases on attaining 61 years; the premium is paid by redeeming the units. So both reasons for SCUP’s termination are invalid. Moreover, the Scheme provided for an annuity for those who joined the plan before the age of 55 years, at rates to be declared. This annuity was last declared for 2001-02. NAV per unit of SCUP was Rs10.7619 on 31 March 2003 and increased to Rs14.1175 on 31 March 2004. It was Rs23.2257 at termination on 18 February 2008.

UTI MF has been acquiring other mutual funds. UTI’s G-Sec Fund was ranked as the best performing fund in the open-ended gilt fund (one-year) and US95 was the best amongst the open-ended balance fund (three-year) by Moody’s Investor Services. So it is beyond comprehension why SCUP will do badly. KP Ghosh, VP, Department of Investor Services, (Moneylife 17 July 2008) said the termination was with the approval of the Government and SEBI. I have asked SEBI for the information. My RTI query to UTI MF drew a blank. I am awaiting a reply from SEBI.

SCUP provided for a one-time investment which investors made as prescribed. After 15 years, UTI MF has no valid, legal right/ authority to terminate the Scheme unilaterally. UTI MF’s circular of 8 January 2008 dishonestly and falsely says, “When UTI decides to terminate the UTI SCUP, it will be binding on the members and they shall have no rights to persuade UTI to continue the UTI SCUP…The terms of this UTI SCUP, including any amendments thereof from time to time shall be binding on each member and every other person, claiming through him, as if he had expressly agreed that they should be so binding.”

No such terms were there in the Scheme when it was launched nor were they there in the brochure then issued. No new terms and conditions can be imposed unilaterally by any party.

There are valid and reasonable grounds to oppose the termination of SCUP. It might be worthwhile for Moneylife to consider filing a class action complaint. Expenses will be contributed by the members of the Scheme who wish to participate in the case. I will file a case under the Consumer Protection Act in Kolkata as soon as I get the information from SEBI for which cost has been remitted.

I became a member of SCUP in 1993 and a membership was taken in the name of my son. Under the Scheme, units for annuity used to be credited at the day’s NAV, and units for dividend payment and premium paid to NIAC used to debited to the member’s account at the day’s NAV. After the age of 61 years, a member could withdraw the total amount outstanding and no further annuities needed to be paid, but medical benefits would continue as prescribed.

Accordingly, I opted to withdraw the total outstanding amount in my name in November 2001, after I completed 61 years. After constant follow-up, I received the withdrawal amount, but it was much less than what it should have been. I had to file a complaint with the District Consumer Forum, since UTI did not clarify the calculation. I got the decree from the Consumer Forum. But UTI filed an appeal and later on paid an amount almost equal to what was earlier paid to me. This shows how dishonest and investor un-friendly UTI has become.
Vishwanath Poddar, 82/3A, Ballygunge Place, Kolkata, 700019

POLL RESULTS ---THE OTHER SIDE
Sociologists and political analysts have found that people have similar views, whether they belong to the Republican or Democrat parties in the USA or the Congress or the BJP in India. There is little to differentiate between the approach and policies of the Congress and the BJP. Only a slight swing in votes is required to bring a party to power. But no one is interested in changing the electoral system and making elected institutions more representative of what the people want.

Where were the issues? Who challenged the atrocities that were committed? What happened to the honest people and parties who worked hard but failed to get elected? Those who canvassed for the capable and committed, and people with integrity, and didn’t belong to either of the two big parties, told me that the electorate listened, agreed and showed concerns on different issues, but didn’t have the courage to vote for a ‘change’. The subservient Indian culture voted for status quo, safety and security behind the big names. Those who had a message, vision, desire to do something for the country outside the policies and programmes of the big parties didn’t have a chance. The Sensex leapt on the first day of the trading session soon after the election results were announced. The business community was sure that the agenda of the new government would be a continuation of what had created the Indian mega rich.

I have witnessed many elections which have stirred me. This one failed to excite me. I witnessed the total revolution launched by JP (Jai Prakash Narayan). There were elections where the powerful were taken head on and defeated – like Indira Gandhi who lost to Raj Narain or SK Patil getting defeated by George Fernandes. There should have been movements to ensure that people like Arun Bhatia, the former municipal commissioner of Pune, with an unblemished record of performance, made it to the 15th Lok Sabha. Instead, we saw the perpetrators of violence winning in Gujarat, Pilibhit, Kandhamal, Karnataka, especially in Bengaluru and Mangalore. Doesn’t this tell us something? As I write this piece, there is news on the TV channel regarding a Tamil Nadu minister justifying the auctioning of seats in medical colleges with a starting price of Rs50 lakh-60 lakh, which along with the annual fees works out to Rs1 crore. Yes, it’s quite legal because these are seats for NRIs, where the deemed universities can do as they please. But is it right?

Far from taking pride that we have a democracy that works and that the secular forces have won, we must ensure stricter implementation, action, performance and change. The elections are a wake-up call and a time for introspection, not only for the political parties and candidates who lost, but also for the aam admi of India.
Francis Lobo, by email

RESEARCHERS OR ASTROLOGERS?
Your analysis of Genus and Murli Industries was good. On NDTV Profit, Amisha Vora of Prabhudas Lilladher hopes it would cross the previous high before December 2010. These people seem to possess a crystal ball. If the anchor had queried her with more persistence, maybe, we could have got the date and time of the event! Nobody is an expert. Markets may go up; may well cross the 25,000 mark, but there are many ‘ifs’ and ‘buts’. Can you predict monsoons for the next two years? Is she sure that nothing like the subprime crisis will happen in the next two years? What happened to MajorGainZ’s stock picks? Why did the anchor not ask her what to do with the stocks bought after her last recommendation? If management discussion is the only criterion for a multi-bagger, why do we need analysts? What is the difference between Harshad Mehta and this bull? Such people take a supari from the market operators and promoters to sell their maal. This is their business model. Even astrologers predict the Sensex targets, but we know what they are following. Nobody takes them seriously, except those who believe in astrology. But it’s shameful for the heads of well-known research centres to come out with cheap statements at a time when lots of people undoubtedly follow them. Even I am very bullish on Reliance but it will be too early for me to guess where the market would be after one month or a year.
Santosh Mhamunkar, by email

HOW TO REACH US
Letters to the Editor can be emailed to [email protected] or
can be posted to:
The Editor, MoneyLIFE Magazine, Unit No. 315,
3rd Floor, Hind Service Industries,
Off. Veer Savarkar Marg, Dadar (W), Mumbai 400 028
or faxed to 022-24442771.
Letters must include the writer’s full name, address and telephone no.
and may be edited for clarity or space.
New Subscription & Customer Service
For new subscription requests, complaints about current subscription
and books, write to [email protected]
or to Subscription Manager, Unit No. 315, 3rd Floor,
Hind Service Industries, Off. Veer Savarkar Marg,
Dadar (W), Mumbai 400 028
or call 022-24441059-60 or fax to 022-24442771.
Advertising
For information and rates,
email us at [email protected]
or call 022-24441059-60.

User

Dash for Cash
What a difference a few months can make in a world of globalised money. About seven months ago, businessmen all over the world were crying about the liquidity crunch. To deal with that, quantitative easing came to be the buzzword among central bankers, as they flooded the banking systems with billions of dollars. Now, the pendulum has swung to the other extreme. Following almost a 100% rise in the Sensex between 6th March and 10th June, a flood of money has hit the Indian markets from a variety of sources, most notably from abroad. Businessmen are gleeful at the prospect of raising new money. Initial public offerings (IPOs) and qualified institutional placements (QIP) are being ardently explored. Fund-raising is not limited to private-sector players. The dramatic improvement in market sentiment, following a surprisingly strong mandate for the Congress party, has encouraged market-players to believe that this government will make a series of big-ticket disinvestments. If we add up the IPOs, QIPs and disinvestment plus continuing foreign direct investment (FDI), we are suddenly talking of Rs120,000 crore being poured into businesses and government from a variety of sources over 12 months starting March 2009. Sounds incredible? Look at this math:
• Since April, foreign institutional investors (FIIs) have pumped over Rs30,000 crore into the Indian market.

• Oil India and National Hydroelectric Power Company are sitting on clearances to make IPOs. That would mean another Rs4,000 crore raised from the market.

• Disinvestment in public sector units (PSUs) can easily fetch Rs30,000 crore, if the government chooses to sell a 10% stake in just a few of the listed companies where it holds more than 90% of the equity.

• QIP is a quick route to raise money from large institutional investors. Over the past two months, a rash of companies (mainly real-estate companies) has raised about Rs8,000 crore by this route. Many more QIPs are in the pipeline. Then there are IPOs which have not even started hitting the market as yet. According to an estimate by Goldman Sachs, share sales by Indian companies may increase to $13 billion this fiscal year. That is another Rs60,000 crore. Of this, another $5 billion - $7 billion would come through share placements over the next few months!

What would this flood of money mean for the markets and for you? Will it change the very contours of the economy with the huge fiscal deficit turning irrelevant, as happened in 2004? At that time, galloping government revenues pared down deficits, changed the economic fundamentals and brought more FIIs into India. Will the same thing happen this time as well? Is this what the market is anticipating? Let’s look at each of these segments starting with the segment from where money has already come in – the FIIs.

Foreign fund managers are buying Indian shares as if they are going out of stock. Overseas funds pumped in Rs7,384 crore in April, Rs20,607 crore in May and Rs4,602 crore in the first 10 days of June. The investment in May was the biggest investment since May 2007.

Arguments that had lost currency for the past year-and-a-half are popular again. Scenarios of India’s superb growth prospects, fuelled by the huge market of 1.1 billion consumers and billions of dollars needed to improve Indian infrastructure are back in currency, as are the dubious merits of India -- such as rule of law, familiarity with the English language and our democratic system. Stephen Roach, chairman of Morgan Stanley Asia, has even said that India may outperform China and other countries in the Asia-Pacific region in terms of economic growth. The Indian economy has done fairly well in the first quarter, recording a 5.8% growth. Nobody has the time to see that it was a sleight of hand by Indian statisticians (See Random Numbers). Growth of China’s GDP slowed to 6.1% from 6.8% over the same period.

FIIs can invest in a variety of ways in India. One of them is QIPs which have become something of a rage. Property developers, including DLF, Unitech and Indiabulls Real Estate, have raised more than Rs8,000 crore in share sales since April. The other route to raise money is placement of shares with private equity investors. On 11th June, Parsvnath Developers, a Delhi-based real estate company, announced that it has raised Rs90 crore by selling an 18% stake in a premium housing project to global real-estate private equity fund, Red Fort Capital.

Apart from real-estate companies, among those raising money would be media and retailing who have glamorous businesses to run but hardly make any money and are perennially short of funds. For instance, at the time of writing this piece, Network 18 Media & Investments said it would raise Rs119.63 crore in one or more tranches by issuing shares on a preferential basis to SAIF III Mauritius Company, a private equity fund.

Nilesh Shah, deputy managing director, ICICI Prudential Asset Management Co Ltd argues that “if the government can convince overseas investors, who are getting close to 0% return on their investment in the developed countries, about the economic reforms in India, then there would be much more flow from FIIs and QIPs.”

First Day, First ShowAfter QIPs, come the IPOs. IPOs are an extremely cumbersome process that can stretch capital-raising over six months. But if the market continues to remain firm, IPOs will be back any day now, after almost two years of drought. Ads would be splashed across television screens, newspapers and hoardings. The ‘first day, first show’ phenomenon – huge pop for the stock on the first day of trading that feeds further frenzy – would be a popular topic on the front pages of newspapers and on business TV, and will form the hottest topic of discussion – engaging everyone from businessmen to corporate executives to housewives. Goldman Sachs estimates that Indian companies could raise as much as $4 billion- $6 billion (or Rs19,000 crore-Rs28,000 crore) from IPOs in the 12 months ending 31 March 2010. As of now, Adani Power has filed an IPO prospectus to raise Rs2,000 crore and Sterlite Energy is rumoured to be planning to raise about Rs5,000 crore. Mahindra Holidays too is waiting in the wings. But we expect the queue to be pretty long. IPOs are a peculiarly bull-market phenomenon. Whether it is companies entering the bourses for the first time or existing ones hitting the market with a fresh offer, a persistent rise in stock prices has always attracted a flood of IPOs – as we witnessed in 1988, 1994, 2000 and 2007. The frenzy faded away after the disastrous issue of Reliance Power in January 2008 and the subsequent market crash. Indeed, if the Sensex stays around the current levels, expect a flood of IPOs to hit the market.

There is one other source of money – FDI. India attracted FDI worth $33.6 billion in 2008-09, just about 2% down from the year before. Portfolio investors are convinced that emerging markets like India are the place where they can earn fat returns. This realisation is yet to percolate widely among businessmen. Even when they are convinced, India’s maddening rules, regulations and erratic policies put them off. This is why a large number of Fortune 500 or Fortune 1000 multinationals are either un-invested or under-invested in India. But India continues to remain high on their list and, therefore, we can expect that FDI flows will continue whether through new investments or takeovers. The market expects relaxation in foreign ownership in sectors like insurance, banking, civil aviation, real estate, retailing, etc, which will be followed by greater FDI flows. In early June, Norwest Venture Partners, a California-based investment firm, agreed to pick up a 2.11% stake in the National Stock Exchange.

Selling Family Silver If the private sector is raising money, the government cannot be left behind. And nothing excites the market more than disinvestment of government’s stakes in PSUs. Dr Manmohan Singh’s announcement in late May was appropriately bland: “Fiscal deficit and disinvestment of public sector units — all these issues will be tackled by the finance minister in the Budget,” said Dr Singh. It triggered headlines like “Disinvestment process likely to begin soon” followed by reports like “There’s some good news for whoever expected the newly elected UPA government to go full throttle on divestment of government companies. The forthcoming budget is likely to announce some stake sale in PSUs, as well as steps that would give a boost to economic reforms.”

While this enthusiasm has been somewhat dampened by subsequent wishy-washy talk by finance minister Pranab Mukherjee, the media and markets have concluded that there will be major disinvestment over the next couple of years. After all, National Hydroelectric Power Corporation (NHPC) and Oil India’s mega IPOs are expected to hit the market by September. In 2007, the Cabinet had approved a sale of 10% government stake in OIL and 5% in NHPC through IPOs. A big boost to the market’s confidence came from the Presidential Address of Pratibha Patil to the joint session of Parliament: “Our fellow citizens have every right to own part of the shares of public sector companies, while the government retains majority shareholding and control.’’ She added that “My government will develop a roadmap for listing and people-ownership of public sector undertakings while ensuring that government equity does not fall below 51%.’’

Anonymous officials have been quoted in the media as saying that the government has targeted Rs10,000 crore from disinvestment over 12 months starting July 2009 – more than what the previous UPA government achieved during its entire five-year tenure. For this, key ministries have been asked to submit a list of companies. In its entire five years, the UPA government had raised about Rs8,500 crore through disinvestment, while the Vajpayee-led NDA government had raised Rs28,000 crore. Since the start of the liberalisation process in 1991, the central government has raised Rs53,423 crore from stake sales in State-owned companies, partly through the sale of minority stakes and partly through strategic sales.

A target of raising Rs10,000 crore from stake sale in PUSs is peanuts. There are dozens of extremely valuable companies, selling just 10% of which would fetch huge revenues for the government. These include: Bharat Sanchar Nigam, Bharat Oman Refineries, UTI Asset Management, Manganese Ore, Rail India Technical and Economic Services (RITES), Rashtriya Ispat Nigam, Coal India, Housing and Urban Development Corporation (HUDCO), Air India, Export Credit Guarantee Corporation, Indian Railway Finance Corporation and many power companies like North East Electric Power Corporation. A disinvestment of just 10% in BSNL alone could fetch around Rs20,000 crore.

But any talk of disinvestment gets bogged down in discussions about the cumbersome process of making IPOs in India or the opposition of labour unions and even the sensitivity of state governments if such states are ruled by coalition partners. Besides, the telecom and aviation ministers are really not interested in seeing BSNL and Air India getting listed. This is where follow-on offers are important. The media and broking companies are speculating about already listed PSUs that can make follow-on offers. One estimate says that the government can easily raise Rs30,000 crore if it offloads 1%-10% stake in listed PSUs in which it has a 90%-99% stake. There are 13 such companies, which remain listed – in violation of the norms that all listed companies must have a minimum floating stock of 10% of total equity. So, the disinvestment in these companies could also be justified as complying with SEBI regulations.

Separately, the government is keen to sell Indian Telephone Industries (ITI) in parts. The communications ministry has invited expressions of interest (EoI) from equipment manufacturers and investors to invest in three of the six manufacturing plants run by ITI. The telecom secretary, Siddharth Behura, is clear that each of the six units operated by ITI can be separated and given to investors who can either enter into a joint venture or buy out the unit. ITI, plagued by poor management, recorded a net loss of Rs191 crore in the quarter-ended March 2009. ITI, in which the government has a 92.87% stake, is listed and its shares have been shooting up in expectation of divestment.

So, money is flooding in and the pipeline is really wide. What does it mean for the economy, markets and you? Nilesh Shah, says that fund flows from FIIs and QIP would help the economy. FII inflow has been great for portfolio investment and mutual funds; QIPs have helped real estate projects to restart. All this means more growth, higher revenues for the government and a brighter job scene. However, there is a dark cloud to this sunny scenario and that is IPOs. Every bull market since 1991 has seen companies come, collect public money at extremely high prices and then underperform. It is a pattern. So, examine the IPOs very carefully before taking the plunge in the new round of IPO mania that may hit the market shortly. Better still, avoid them unless you merely want to play the first-day pop of newly-listed shares in a bull market.

This is because raising capital has little to do with providing returns. In fact, IPO booms and subsequent returns are often negatively correlated. Remember the showpieces of the 2006-07 IPO scene -- DLF, the biggest name in the Indian real estate industry? And Reliance Power which managed to raise Rs11,600-crore in 60 seconds from an issue that was oversubscribed 10.55 times, by creating an investor frenzy to buy shares of a shell company? When the real-estate companies had launched their IPOs, we advised investors to stay away.

In the Moneylife issue of 14 September 2006, we had said: “If the IPO market picks up, expect aggressive pricing from all players. Which ones should get your attention? Stay away from the realty-construction plays because there are just too many issues of management and accounting about them – prices of land acquisition, management quality, private partnerships, investment companies and long gestation periods could trap even the savviest of investors.” Real estate stocks, like DLF, simply collapsed, many of them going down by as much as 90%. Fund raising by companies or government is great for everybody as long as the money does not go from your pocket!

User

Modi-fied

The corporatisation of the Hindi film industry got another leg up after Dr Bhupendra Kumar...

Premium Content
Monthly Digital Access

Subscribe

Already A Subscriber?
Login
Yearly Digital+Print Access

Subscribe

Moneylife Magazine Subscriber or MSSN member?
Login

Yearly Subscriber Login

Enter the mail id that you want to use & click on Go. We will send you a link to your email for verficiation

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
  Loading...
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

BUY NOW

The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)