Finmin asks steel ministry to carry out RINL divestment in 2 years

As per the condition laid out at the time of giving the ‘navratna’ status, RINL has to get listed in the next two years, else the status would be withdrawn

Taking forward the drive to sell stake in state-owned firms, the finance ministry has asked the ministry of steel to divest about 10% of its stake in Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd (RINL) within next two years and list the firm on bourses or else the PSU's status of Navratna will be withdrawn, reports PTI.

"Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd (RINL) was recently given the Navratna tag. As per the condition laid out at the time of giving the status, RINL has to get listed in next two years, else the status would be withdrawn.”

"Thus, the Department of Disinvestment under the finance ministry has directed the steel ministry to divest some stake in the company within next two years and get it listed," a senior official of the PSU said.

At present, the Union government holds 100% equity in the steel maker. According to steel ministry sources, a minimum of 10% of government's stake could be sold in RINL through an initial public offer.

Department of Disinvestment joint secretary Sidhartha Pradhan had earlier said that RINL could be disinvested in January 2011.

RINL could be the fourth steel PSU after NMDC, SAIL, Manganese Ore India Ltd (MOIL), in which government is going for disinvestment to part-fund its social and infrastructure plans.

"Before carrying out the disinvestment in RINL, the company is likely to restructure its equity base to attract better valuations," the official said, adding that no estimates of the amount to be raised by the government through share sale of the company have been worked out yet.

RINL in March 2010 joined the club of Navratna companies like SAIL, NMDC, Coal India. The status gives more financial and administrative autonomy to the company's board. The board can take investment decisions for an amount of up to Rs1,000 crore, without seeking steel ministry's permission.

The Centre has set a target of raising as much as Rs40,000 crore through share sale programmes this fiscal. It had raised about Rs10,000 crore by selling around 8.38% of its stake in NMDC.

It is expected to raise a total of around Rs16,000 crore through SAIL share sale, which will see the government selling 10% of its equity in the steel firm and the company raising fresh equity in the same proportion.

In case of MOIL, the government is considering selling 10% of its stake and list the company on the bourses. According to Pradhan, MOIL could be divested by December.


Property rates are zooming, but realty firms don’t seem to be raking it in

Developers claim that they are reporting good sales across the country. What do their financial results indicate?

Property prices are shooting up in almost all realty projects across Mumbai, Delhi and Bengaluru, but are the properties actually selling at such high prices? After the March 2010 quarter results, most listed developers were quoted in media reports claiming that they were satisfied with the annual sales growth over the past fiscal.

However, the numbers portray a mixed bag of results. If we compare the operating profit of FY09-10 versus FY08-09, of a few listed real-estate companies, this is the picture that emerges. DLF Ltd has reported a fall of 36% in operating profit (FY10 was at Rs1,109.61 crore; FY09 at Rs1,721.58 crore), Sobha Developers Ltd has reported a drop of 6% in operating profit (FY10: Rs254.5 crore; FY09: Rs269.7crore), Parsvnath Developers Ltd reported 5% annual growth (FY10: Rs233.31 crore ; FY09: Rs221.24 crore).

Only Orbit Corporation Ltd has bucked the trend and reported 71% growth in operating profit (FY10: Rs154.87 crore; FY09: Rs90.43 crore).

Unitech Ltd and Omaxe Ltd have not declared their annual results for the last fiscal ended March 2010. We decided to compare their results of FY08-09 with the performance for the first nine months of the last fiscal, ending December 2009.

Unitech Ltd reported a drop in operating profit of 23% (FY08-09: Rs1,047.41 crore; annualised performance for nine months ended December 2009 at Rs808.08 crore) while Omaxe Ltd reported a growth of 42% (FY08-09: Rs135.65 crore; annualised nine months: Rs192.51 crore).

“One of the major reasons for de-growth is that developers are initiating new construction when the corresponding sales are not happening. Developers are failing to report incremental sales. They are just holding on to high prices without being bothered about sales,” said Aditya Bansal, vice president (finance), Liases Foras.
There have been a few places in metros like Mumbai and Delhi, where a few residential properties have been sold for almost Rs50,000 per sq ft. However, this does not indicate that consumers are buying property at these hugely inflated rates—Moneylife has consistently reported on how developers are not being able to sell real estate at current rates.

“As for the quarter ended March 2010, prices have gone up further by 15%-20% and we are estimating sales to be down further by 25%-30%. Property prices are (now) indicating the rise of another asset bubble,” said Pankaj Kapoor, founder, Liases Foras.



Shantilal Hajeri

7 years ago

Recently I eqnuired with many builders at Pune. they behaved as if they do not need the customers and as if they have sold all their stock of houses. I really wonder whether the people are really buying the houses at such an astronomical high prices. It may be a strategy by the builders to create artificial demand.

Large-scale changes in mutual fund distribution system on the cards

A slew of changes in the way funds are created and sold, would come about in the next 12-18 months, asserted KN Vaidyanathan, an Executive Director of SEBI, while speaking to Moneylife in an exclusive interview. This is the first story of a series

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) is pushing for a series of reforms over the next 12-18 months to streamline further the process of how mutual funds are created and sold. This would mean further changes in the roles of distributors—both national distributors and Independent Financial Advisors (IFAs) who are currently not regulated.

In an exclusive interview to Moneylife editor Debashis Basu, KN Vaidyanathan, an Executive Director of SEBI said, “We will first deal with the banks and national distributors and then handle the IFAs. We have already started doing certain things. We have taken the exam away from the Association of Mutual Funds in India (AMFI). It will be handled by National Institute of Securities Markets. The test will be more current. There will be a demarcation between passing the test and getting the certificate.”

When it was pointed out that with the smaller IFAs pushed to the background, banks have emerged as powerful national distributors leading to a lot of mis-selling, Mr Vaidyanathan replied: “It’s true that banks alone enjoy the trust of investors and some of them have been abusing that trust. Maybe the fund distribution will be done by a different set of banks, provided the fund companies get their product right. Instead of feeding investors 10 different funds, nothing stops a fund company from offering one fund that does asset allocation and ensures low volatility.” Indeed, as Moneylife has pointed out many times, mis-selling often starts with product design itself.

Mr Vaidyanathan is currently talking to the asset management companies as to whether mis-selling can be rooted out through an institutional process. “The key issue on the distribution side is how do you institutionalise the due diligence process. I told the funds, you can take the view that mis-selling is not mis-selling unless I am caught. That to me is low-grade. The issue is how do I build systems in an organisation which makes it institutionally difficult to mis-sell. Banks have such systems in place. When you open a new account, there are calls from the quality control departments asking questions about various service parameters—there is a verification of the on-boarding process in place. Does the mutual fund industry have this? Why not? After all, many of them have been set up by banks. This upsets me because they are making a distinction between banking and mutual funds, depending on what is on (the) balance (sheet) and what is off balance sheet.”

Based on Mr Vaidyanathan’s suggestions, funds are working on creating appropriate internal systems. SEBI is also pushing the fund industry to develop a code of ethics and stick to it.




6 years ago

Why IFA ,ARN required for MF Selling (Mis-selling of Fund) ?


7 years ago

Can Mr Vaidhyanathan define mis-selling?is mis-selling means suggesting a debt fund today looking to market scenario and after 2 yrs debt fund are in no attraction bcos equities are in favoured flavour-will SEBI catch the IFA for mis-selling of debt fund?
or today suppose reliance diversified power sector fund is doing very well and after one year some govt policy changes and the fund looses lusture-will be IFA responsible?will he be sentenced for allegation of misselling?

It clearly looks SEBI is trying to abolish IFA's by providing newer and lethal weapons to clients in name of investor protection-
these tools are same like women protection law against DOWRY or domestic violence-which is used now to dominate MALE community?it is so much mis-used by many smart women that even courts have admitted its mis-use.
i am sure there can not be any defination of mis-selling which intelligent guys of SEBI are trying to define-
have they ever defined or took action against TIPS for penny or bluechip stocks?all brokerage firms give tips in early morning trade-do all those tips work out fully?
has SEBI any ears to listen to invetors who loose money in those tips?
then why only MF brokers to be paralysed by all hook or crook?
SEBI should come forward to answer all these clarifications in open forum before any implementaion of such unjustifiable FATWAS-


7 years ago

Most of misselling is done by National Distibutors and Banks.We have formed an association for IFA which will adhere to code of conduct as per regulators circulars and guidelines.


7 years ago

It seems that so much of criticism of SEBI has forced mr Vaidhyanathan to appear in moneylife office-may be he trying to give explainations to their wrong deeds-
Has mr vaidhyanathan called up any retail investors meet to discuss theri issues?has he ever talked to IFA's to understand the ground reality?it seems SEBI has found a soft target to whom they can put up all their frustrations-
subah biwi se jaghda hua to mutual fund ko koi naya fatwa dedo-gussa shat ho jayega-
it looks they are alwasys dreaming to kill MF industry with all posible ways and tools-if they are really serious-
THEY should call up a retail investors open dialogue form along with IFA's-
and they should face and answer all querries-
if they can really face this situation-then only they should call themselves as HONEST APPROACH

Mukesh Chothani

7 years ago

Mr. Vaidyanathn point wel taken but who think about small IFA who live in small city.At present out of total brokrage paid by AMC how much to the big broker and how much in percentage to small IFA ? How we encourage new genration to make careear in MF industry. there is no material on vernacular language about MF.Hope regulator think on that.


7 years ago

Please appoint regulators for all types of distributors why only Mutualfund industry every other industries be it realestate,consumerproducts,hospitals,govt.bodies,travel agents,rto agents,bmc,police,electricity,water management,railways and many more as they are all money related products and services.We are just paying our taxes blindly without even knowing how and why its been spent in this manner.Lets help ourselves to be regulators in all these fields there is no accountability for corruption,mismanagement etc,labour department,facilities depart.Laws and bills passed in the parliment, NGO's.When we all will learn to be a responsible citizen of this country state etc.Everthing is been taken for granted whether your are educated or not.A problem is problem for all


7 years ago

Mr. vaidyanthan is in ivory tower. What did he do when SEBI came out with a circular that broker code can be changed without permission of earlier broker? many Institutional Investors kept seperate work force only to do this job . NJ Investment was one of them ( Mr. Vaiyanathan ha d given them clean chit as reported by money life). I think Vaidyanathn should do his homework properly before he does anything . or else he will close down the industry(Already he has killed it.)

K. sriram

7 years ago

I hope Mr. Vaidyanathan sticks to the deadline which seems too long. It needs to be done on a fast track with thorough discussions with each & every stackholder involved so that NO FURTHER evolution of ideas are necessiated thereafter. He must cover ALL financial products & NOT just the mutual funds
sivasri premier
ARN 19262


7 years ago

The process of institutionalising Mtutual Fund distribution is the final agenda of all the concerned agencies. I think this is not a healthy trend which will kill the industry altogether. Mis-selling is bad at any point of time. There are other ways and means to handle the same. Investor Education and Distributor Education are the most important ways of tackling the problem. But no one seems to be interested in it.


7 years ago

.SEBI has issued guidelines for demat of mutual funds which is really beneficial to retail investors to have a single statement of accounts in respect of their holdings. But no one seems to be serious about this benefit. Both the Registrars do not "demat" the certificates sent by a distributor even after 2 months simply because the regulation does not fix any time limit.


7 years ago

Please define mis-selling ( Mr Vaidyanathan's point of view) particularly for Mutual funds.& even money life view - support with an e.g.

too much talk on regulation in the name of small investor.

Steps should be taken to include retail investor and not scare away with horror stories and generalzing all intermediries without any study/ statistics.

Mutual funds give very good returns - enough statistics available - every one knows that returns are market linked. no one talks about the the returns and the service intermediaries have done.

banks allowed to distribute is another story.


Sushil Kumar

7 years ago

SEBI is doing lot of good work for investors but what are they doing for the distributors?. Sure their are bad distributors and also bad clients. How does SEBI intend to regulate investor? There are many incidents were after awailing services investor refuses to pay. What is solution for that. Surely it is high time SEBI introduces variable load system so that !) system is fair to both investor and distributor. 2) It will also help IFAs to save on cost of collection and business would be viable. SEBI has to under stand no industry can work without distributor so survival of distributor is essential. Already lot of small investors are facing heat as they have no service provider as providing service to small investor is not viable for IFA's

Narendra Doshi

7 years ago

I hope Mr. Vaidyanathan sticks to the deadline which seems too long. It needs to be done on a fast track with thorough discussions with each & every stackholder involved so that NO FURTHER evolution of ideas are necessiated thereafter. He must cover ALL financial products & NOT just the mutual funds.


7 years ago

i dont know what is going on.sebi is over reacting and going to no good to industry.sebi s action is like that to giving cancer drug to a child for mere india mf industry was trying walk on his own feet but sebis overdoses of action will making it sebi who are making rules they dont know ground realities.they are sitting in ac rooms and read some foolish news and hear some so called experts and take is nothing but going to destroy industry

Hemant Beniwal

7 years ago

Power to Investors

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

To continue

Sign Up or Sign In


To continue

Sign Up or Sign In



The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)