Fine Print

Life Insurers Get Three Months’ Extension
Life insurance companies got a breather from...

Premium Content
Monthly Digital Access


Already A Subscriber?
Yearly Digital+Print Access


Moneylife Magazine Subscriber or MSSN member?

Yearly Subscriber Login

Enter the mail id that you want to use & click on Go. We will send you a link to your email for verficiation
Has CAD funding affected our long term inflows?

Indian government and RBI played the card of highlighting double-digit dollar returns to investors, who could leverage. While this may buy them some more time markets will, eventually, judge fundamentals and not jugglery

Last few months, every time the Indian rupee is discussed, focus on current account deficit (CAD) is inevitable. CAD has been analysed threadbare and debated ad-nauseam, with oil and gold imports hogging the limelight.

But while we tried to fund the CAD, have we compromised on our ability to keep attracting long term funds at reasonable cost? Would it be problematic to even fund lower absolute CAD levels going ahead?

The following is an attempt to analyse the major sources of capital flows with some numbers and trends. We will start with what are relatively smaller inflows and move onto the bigger ones.

First NRIs

Table below has various NRI account categories with flows for respective categories in adjacent columns.

The NRO rupee denominated accounts for NRIs started in 2006 and promised returns similar to domestic deposit rates for NRIs, who had some rupee transactions to use such accounts. But the NRI, who would probably be looking for dollar returns, was essentially taking the currency risk.

FCNR (B) deposits, which are dollar deposits, were essentially stagnant probably because the returns were not good enough.

As CAD grew post-2008, NRO proved to be inadequate in terms of providing its share of capital flows. RBI deregulated the interest rates offered on NR(E)RA, which are also rupee accounts for NRIs wanting to park funds here. Rupee returns, comparable to domestic interest rates, meant money flooded the country in post-deregulation in 2011.

Funds invested in NR(E)RA were accounts were freely repatriable, unlike NRO accounts, where there were restrictions imposed. But as with NRO, here too, currency risk is taken by the investor.

But take a closer look at the flows and outstanding amount changes in 2013 and 2012 for the NR(E)RA and NRO accounts. These flows also include the accrued interest. The change in the outstanding dollar amount in these accounts is lesser than what the flows would suggest.

For example: In the NR(E)RA accounts while the flows suggest about $25 billion inflow in these two years, outstanding balances changed by around $20 billion only. This $5 billion is the hit NRIs would have taken on their accounts due to rupee depreciation in the same time frame. So while they expected to make maybe 9% rupee returns on the deposits, currency ate away a big part of the return. And this was as of March 2013, what happened in May-July 2013 could have caused further damage, almost to the extent of wiping out all returns and threatening a dent in the principal amount. Story for NRO accounts would be similar.


Next we come to commercial borrowings

Here we discuss both external commercial borrowings (ECBs) by corporates and investments by FIIs in the Indian debt market.

As far as ECBs are concerned, all corporates who thought there was a free lunch on offer in form of cheap unhedged dollar loans, had to foot a huge bill for their meal. Whether this deters them from further dollar borrowing and whether hedged dollar borrowing saves enough money to be worth the effort of taking it are questions which will decide size of incremental dollar borrowing. But to say the least, it has not been a happy experience for quite a few of them.

Short term credit seems to be taking larger share of the borrowings, as commercial borrowings seem to be settling at low levels, essentially reflecting the concern on currency movements.

As CAD went berserk, RBI and the government opened up the debt markets for the FIIs, trying to attract dollars to a market which was almost shut for FIIs. The limits for investing went up with each passing quarter and now around $50 billion is the cap on the FII investments in the debt market across categories.

FII investment went ballistic from about $5 bn in March 2009 to around $38 billion in May 2013. But once arbitrage became incrementally non-remunerative, money started to flow out. And FIIs have withdrawn $10 billion since then. NSDL website shows the rupee value of FII investments to be around 1.45 lakh crore. This corresponds to around $23-24 billion, when it should have been $28 billion (38 minus10=28). The gap is, of course, there because the rupee depreciated and again it’s the investors who took the hit of around $4-5 billion.

Then we come to FDI

While FDI going abroad is an important factor, we are just considering the incoming FDI and its effects here. The aim is to discuss the sustainability of the inflows of FDI to India.

The reported FDI has come down from $35 billion levels to around $27 billon levels. That is in the face of Indian economy almost having doubled in dollar terms. But even that may not give the complete picture.

“Reinvested Earnings”, which is essentially retained earnings from existing FDI investments on the ground in India, is creeping up as a % of the total incoming FDI reported. Average reinvested earnings of around $8 billion per annum have now gone up to around $10 billion. This has been so, while fresh FDI equity inflows have slowed down from mid-20s to teens.

With an existing base of around $230 billion FDI in the country, $10 billion would roughly correspond to 4-5% reinvestment. In the course of normal businesses that reinvestment number seems par for the course and doesn’t necessarily give an idea of incremental attractiveness for FDI investment into India.

But “fresh” FDI equity, which may probably reflect the same, has slowed down. Reasons for this are well known. Effectively without dramatic changes in the situation on the ground, FDI may continue to stagnate.

“Primary Income”, in the table above, reflects the earnings for the foreign investor from all forms of investments, whether stocks/debt or FDI. As external debt and existing base of FDI keeps going up, there is a very good chance the “Primary Income” number will slowly creep up and resulting outflows will become bigger. Last year it came close to equalling the reported incoming FDI itself.

And let us not forget, FDI investors also get hit because of rupee depreciation. So if it has gone from 40 to 60 to the USD, FDI investors who had come in at lower currency levels in 2007 or 2008 have suffered to the same extent.

Finally the biggest of them all, FIIs in equity

Nifty is where it was 6 years back. Currency has depreciated by around 50% in the same time frame. Indices reflect only the top companies, the less said about the broader markets, the better. And this performance is in spite of the billions of dollars that FIIs have poured in every year.

While FIIs may have made some money in specific stocks, broader markets have been disappointing to say the least. They have not performed in Rupee terms, forget dollar terms.

That they still keep coming in hope of better times is an enigma in itself. How long will they keep coming in despite the hammering that currency is giving them, is a big question? Or is there infinite patience out there?

The bottomline

Whether it is NRIs, FII/FDI investors or ECB borrowers, all those who, knowingly or unknowingly, helped bridge the CAD, directly or indirectly, have taken big knocks on their bets and balance sheets. If the situation continues to stagnate, it becomes difficult to attract them incrementally.

One can possibly argue that hedging would have saved them the losses. That’s right but somebody else would have to take the hit. There are no free lunches right? And as more people think its better to hedge, forward premiums on Rupee have shot up. Essentially that’s the markets way of choking loss-making investments or “capital misallocation”, if you like.

It is in that context that the latest move from RBI on the FCNR (B) deposits needs to be seen. Since returns on equity/debt, which have been underperforming, cannot be guaranteed and FDI, kind of, dries up, government and RBI played the card of offering mouth-watering double-digit dollar returns to investors who could leverage. While this may buy them some more time, markets will eventually judge fundamentals and not jugglery.

The already tight rubber-band just got stretched even further. Hopefully we will get our act together before it snaps.



Hemant K Chitale

4 years ago

We have to see if the spread declines after RBI removes the swap window it currently offers the bank.

Hemant K Chitale

4 years ago

I am not sure what you mean by "RBI played the card of offering mouth-watering double-digit dollar returns to investors who could leverage". How did you compute the "double-digit" returns ? For what types of investments ?


Rahul Bhangadia

In Reply to Hemant K Chitale 4 years ago

Assuming spread of 1-1.5% and leverage of 10x, return on invested money for the investor who leverages could easily be in double digits.
Thats my understanding. Let me know if there is something wrong there.Will be happy to correct.

Hemant K Chitale

In Reply to Rahul Bhangadia 4 years ago

AAh. You are assuming a 10x leverage. I don't know about getting 10x leverage but the spread can certainly be higher than 1.5% without leverage. Compare the USD term deposit rates in USA (or even Citibank India USD FCNR) with those offered by Indian Banks for USD FCNR.

Hemant K Chitale

Rahul Bhangadia

In Reply to Hemant K Chitale 4 years ago

Spread will be on borrowing cost...FDs in US may not be right number for spread...even if leverage is 6-7x...and 1% spread...that means 6-7% return due to spread and 4-5% on equity itself...makes it to double digits!

If RBI withdraws discount on swap, this is not economical for banks. FCNR scheme shuts immediately, i think.

Reliance Industries Q2 net profit hit by weak demand

Despite good revenues, RIL reported stagnant profits due to weak demand, solid product cracks, weak gasoline and widening differentials between Brent and Dubai grade oils

Despite healthy growth in revenues, Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL), the country’s largest company from the private sector, reported flat net profit during the September quarter. The poor quarterly result was mainly impacted by weak gasoline, solid product cracks, widening differentials between Brent-Dubai grade and lower domestic sales.

For the second quarter to end-September, RIL said its net profit increased 1.5% to Rs5,490 crore from Rs5,409 crore even as its total revenues rose 14.2% to Rs1.06 lakh crore from Rs93,266 crore, same period last year.

During the quarter, its Brent-Dubai differentials widened to $ 4.1/bbl in 2Q FY14 from $ 1.7/bbl in the trailing quarter.

Mukesh Ambani, chairman and managing director, RIL said: “RIL’s first half performance reflects the resilience of our business model in a period of volatility and uncertainty. Our diversified and integrated petrochemicals business captured margins across segments – delivering near-record profit levels even as the domestic economy slowed. Retail business continues to break new ground, growing 41% in H1FY14. Reliance’s ongoing counter-cyclical investments will strengthen our competitive position in each business segment.”


During Q2FY14, RIL Jamnagar refineries processed 17.7 MMT (highest ever quarterly throughput) of crude and achieved utilization rate of 114%. In comparison average utilisation rates for refineries globally during the same period were 86.7% in North America, 78.7% in Europe and 85.2% in Asia.

During the quarter, RIL’s revenue from refining and marketing segment increased by 16.2% to Rs97,456 crore from Rs83,878 crore, during the three months ended September 2014. Growth in revenue was accounted by 4.9% higher volume and 11.3% increase in prices.

The much touted KG-D6 field where Reliance Industries overestimated production, produced one million barrels of crude oil, 0.13 million barrels of condensate and 94.6BCF of natural gas in H1FY14, a reduction of 41%, 50% and 52% respectively on a y-o-y basis. According to the company, the poor performance was attributed to “geological complexity and natural decline in the fields”.

As on 30 September 2013, the company had an outstanding debt of Rs83,982 crore compared with Rs72,427 crore as on 31 March 2013.

At the same time, it had cash and cash equivalents of Rs90,540 crore ($ 14.5 billion). These were in bank deposits, mutual funds, CDs and Government securities / bonds.

Highlights of RIL performance:

# RIL announced a new gas condensate discovery off the east coast of India in the Cauvery basin. The discovery, situated 62kms from the coast in the Cauvery Basin and is the second gas discovery in the block. RIL is the operator with 70% equity and BP has a 30% share.

# In July 2013, RIL inked a Memorandum of Understanding with the Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) to explore the possibility of sharing RIL’s infrastructural facility in the East Coast.

# RIL and its partners BP and NIKO announced a significant gas and condensate discovery in the KG-D6 block off the eastern coast of India. This discovery is expected to add to the hydrocarbon resources in the KG-D6 block. Appraisal will now commence to better define the scale and quality of the field.

Before the result announcement, RIL closed 0.8% up at Rs870.25 on the BSE, while the benchmark Sensex ended Monday marginally higher at 20,607.


We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

To continue

Sign Up or Sign In


To continue

Sign Up or Sign In



The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)