Financial Crimes: Catch the Countless Small Fish Too
On 6th September, the Supreme Court of India refused to permit Ravi Ruia, promoter of the giant Essar group of companies to travel abroad. Here’s what a bench of Justices JS Khehar and Arun Mishra said while rejecting his plea. “We have allowed a person to go abroad but he never came back. He was no less big than you in monetary terms. We don’t want to take chances now. We are now once bitten twice shy. We are not going to give liberty to anyone.” 
Although the Court did not name anyone, the immediate speculation was that the judges were referring to Vijay Mallya, the controversial UB group chairman and Member of Parliament who has failed to return to India to face trial.
The apex court’s tough stance is heartening for investors and creditors. Promoters of a slew of Indian companies can remain overseas indefinitely because they have plenty of funds stashed abroad. These funds have been siphoned out of their Indian businesses or raised from money circulation schemes that robbed the rich and poor alike. The Pearls Agro Tech Corporation (PACL), which has been asked by the market regulator to refund a stupendous Rs49,000 crore, has large assets in Australia and a few other countries. The Sahara group, built on alleged investments by India’s poorest people, has assets in the form of luxury hotels around the world including Macedonia. Subrata Roy’s wife and son are even understood to have acquired citizenship of the Republic of Macedonia. 
If this is the case with high-profile and flamboyant businessmen, smaller industrialists with dubious track records are not far behind in diverting funds to build nest eggs abroad. 
Investors faced with huge losses are ending up playing sleuth and setting up groups or associations to track the flow of funds, file cases, or merely support one another, in an effort to recover their investment. This has happened in the case of shady companies like PACL and QNet as well as with smaller listed companies where people have lost a lot of money. The Sahara group is the only exception where no investor seems concerned at the fate of her investment, raising another set of questions about who really invested in its schemes. 
Often, such investor groups do manage to track the fraudulent diversion of funds from listed entities; but their effort is, eventually, frustrated by the tediously slow investigation and judicial process. A good example is that of Dr Datsons Lab, a little-known pharma company that was allowed to run, what seems like, a money laundering and price manipulation operation, right until 22 May 2015 when the two all-India stock exchanges, finally, suspended the shares. 

This was a month after its bankers had obtained a court order putting the company into liquidation, had taken possession of its registered office (which was owned by the promoter Dr Kannan K Vishwanath) and invoked 100% of the promoter’s shareholding which was pledged with banks. And, yet, this company had managed to fool people with a massive investment from foreign institutional investors (who held 56% of its equity at one time) and ‘winning’ a series of awards for good governance, innovation, transformation and leadership! 
Dr Datsons Lab (DDL) is a fit case for investigation under the draconian Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA); but we see no sign of any such action. Instead, a group of investors continues to ferret out information about the promoter’s latest antics and write to the government pleading for action. 
In a letter to the finance minister, an investor, Lt Commander Joginder Pal Kanaujia, has listed seven frauds by DDL’s former promoter Dr Kannan Vishwanath. He has painstakingly compiled this information, along with a group of investors, over the past 15 months. Each instance of fraud, mentioned in the letter, is accompanied by some evidence in the form of court judgements, patent registration details, or mirror companies set up by the promoter (mirror companies are entities with similar names set up in different countries to obfuscate facts and fool regulators and investigation agencies). Lt Commander Kanaujia has sought an investigation by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to bring back Rs250 crore of DDL investors’ money which he believes was siphoned off to Hong Kong through a laundering operation. Here are some interesting questions raised by the letter.
  • When DDL was first listed on the bourses, its IPO (initial public offer) document had disclosed that a part of the issue proceeds would be used to repay its bankers, State Bank of India and Shamrao Vithal Bank, and Rs10 crore of unsecured loans from directors. It now turns out that a ‘consortium’ of bankers, led by Bank of Baroda, had gone ahead and funded its plants which are now being sold to recover money. One can understand investors being lazy and foolish and failing to read a prospectus. But isn’t it time we, as a country, begin to act against public sector bankers who extended fresh loans to DDL without adequate monitoring, when the disclosures in its offer documents proclaimed its shady character?
  • The risk factors in the IPO document had clearly stated that it had negative cash flows at the time of the issue, had placed no orders for plant & machinery and the object for which funds were raised was not appraised by any bank or institution. Worse, many of its trademarks were also not registered in the company’s name but were held by the promoter. Why would Bank of Baroda lend to this company after project appraisal officers had read the stinking prospectus? The answer is obvious; but is anyone asking questions?
  • Has the tax department sent any notices at all to Dr Kannan Vishwanath under the PMLA or obtained information that is being shared by its investors about his brand new Hong Kong-based company called Windsonn Exim Ltd? This company claims to hold the same 15 patents that once belonged to a wholly-owned subsidiary called Fair Success HK Ltd which was acquired by Dr Datsons Lab after fund raising.
  • Which lender or government agency will be authorised to secure overseas assets of DDL such as the following wholly-owned subsidiaries --Eros Pharmachem Pte (Singapore), Aanj Pharmalabs Limited Fze (Dubai), Dr Datsons Labs Limited (UK) and Fair Success (HK) Limited? Of these, Fair Success apparently has Rs80 crore in its bank account.
Unless this government makes a break from the past and holds public sector bankers accountable for corrupt and collusive lending, the mountain of bad loans, which are eventually paid by the taxpayer, will continue to mount. When large lenders collude with fraudulent promoters and allow them to strip cash and assets from the company, they also deal a crippling blow to investors and unsecured creditors. This has been going on for the past several decades; unfortunately, there is no sign that things will change even under this government. A focus on a few big names like Mr Mallya and Mr Ruia only ensures that hundreds of such cases fly below the radars of multiple investigative agencies tasked to bring financial criminals to book. 



naveen chaitanya pappula

3 days ago

Very Good Article written without any fear. Atleast now with the above evidence , SEBI or ED or any other agency must act swiftly and punish the fraudsters severely. India seems to be a safe haven for Financial Mafias.. !! Our bureaucrats are colluded with fraud promoters. Plz save our nation from this mafia.

N.Hanumanta Rao

1 month ago


Kaviraj Patil

1 month ago

Those who invested in IPO's in 90s will be aware of the number of fly by night promoters that flourished those days. As far as my knowledge goes, I dont know a single such promoter being punished. I guess if you make a few crores and throw a couple to a powerful politician, you are assured of immunity. The way BOB harassed a few small account holders since their names were similar to some director in Kingfisher is clear evidence of how slipshod these banks are. So, it is a cosy club of corrupt politicos, crooked promoters and their willing henchmen, the bankers.

Nalin Patel

1 month ago

i agree with ashwin mehta,, very good article

manish jain

1 month ago


Ashwin Mehta

1 month ago

The majority of C.As, LLBs (Advocates) have ruined India, They are the people who advise to do wrong to Businessman/ Builders and common people. Since the LLB degree is awarded to any Tom & Herry, those people keep on misguiding the common man in general by inflicting fears about various Taxes and the harrasement by govt. officials etc.. the honest common man gets carried away by their advice. First they allow the man to commit a mistake and then pose as his rescuer in govt. machinaries.This is true with 80% of the Chartered accountants of India. I congratulate Moneylife for showing courage to expose the mighty Institutions in Financial sector.

Suketu Shah

1 month ago

Very good piece and thoughts.I know of a CA who operates 2 PAn Cards and forces her clients to do white to black for "tax saving".Quote like a doctor suffering from incurable disease trying to cure his patients.Once the law is the same for all such experiences chronic fraudsters wl not survive in India.Things are chaning under NaMo govt although to erase 60 yrs of damage esp the collosal damage under PC 2004-2014 wl take a few more yrs.

Gopalakrishnan T V

1 month ago

Bankers get the first feel of the misuse of funds by the promoters and it is for them to tighten the discipline on the wrong doers and fraudsters. Most of the promoters have fudged balance sheets and their own contribution in the business is by and large in the form of lands with inflated value beyond imagination. The promoters come with the idea of loot and not to run any business. Many defaulters of banks have the backing of Chartered Accountants, bankers, lawyers, bureaucrats , tax officials and Institutions like SEBI. Most of the Corporates have umpteen number of subsidiaries which facilitate them to fudge the accounts in such a manner that even the best intelligent auditor cannot find anything wrong with the accounting. Banks can have an immediate feel of the problems and if they are shrewd to warn the borrowers and their contacts at the right time, many frauds taking place in the economy involving banks and the Government authorities can be easily prevented. The approach of the courts is in the right direction and it should give sufficient warnings to borrowers, banks, Chartered Accountants, bureaucrats and all other associates that things are becoming difficult to loot the system and get away permanently as did by the Great Mallya. This article also is an eye opener to those who have plans to play with the financial system with ulterior motives. Money Life is doing a wonderful service to society by keeping a close watch on the wrong doings by the key Institutions and the Corporates who want to enjoy everything at the cost of tax payers and other stakeholders of the economy.

Vaibhav Dhoka

1 month ago

There are many small fishes in this huge financial sector who plays fraud and remain unnoticed by public,now with present government trying to wipe off corrupts,these fraudsters should be dealt with iron hand.Similar is case with land mafia,tenants blackmailing landlord under umbrage of law and judiciary.

N.Hanumanta Rao

1 month ago

I wish you to highlight similar frauds. Some listed companies like Microtechnologies (India) Ltd, Navi Mumbai, Elder Pharma Ltd, Plethico Pharma Ltd have collected Fixed Deposits through Newspaper ads. etc. Many of the Investors were Senior citizens in their sun-set days (above 65years). Also they don't have pensioners benefits and any other source of income. Even their nearest kith&kin have abandoned them. They are in great distress and misery. Please take an article on such bogus companies and their managements and do justice to the hapless citizens.

Saumil Mehta

1 month ago

What about YashBirla? Jaypee group? Plethico Pharma?


Kamal Garg

In Reply to Saumil Mehta 1 month ago

I remember, persuading me for an FD with Yash Birla's firm, some agent telling me a few years ago that "have you even seen a Birla firm going bankrupt or not honouring their commitment on payment of FD".
There can be numerous such examples of cheating by promoters with one trick or the other. I agree that it is the bankers who can the first sniff of any wrong doing. And that they should be held accountable in the first instance. How on earth, you can have a NPA of more than 6 to 7% of your advances, when HDFC Bank is having it at less than 0.5%. The collusion is very clear.
As far as Dr. Datson Lab is concerned, the government and regulators should hold their noose tight against the promoters, should take over the entire Indian and foreign companies and then resell the same immediately as happened in the case of Satyam Computers.

N.Hanumanta Rao

In Reply to Saumil Mehta 1 month ago

People should come forward and raise their voice against such fraudsters and cheaters.

Game of phones: Interconnect charge emerges as new battleground among operators
Should interconnection charges -- or the payment made for mobile phone calls from the network of one operator to another -- be scrapped?
The industry watchdog and some players appear to be in its favour, even as some others feel it can impact future investments and quality of service. At stake is an estimated Rs25,000 crore in annual revenues.
The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) floated a consultation paper titled "Review of Interconnection Usage Charges" last month, seeking the views of stakeholders on whether interconnection usage charges applied by service providers should stay or be removed. The responses, including counter-comments, have to be furnished by October 10.
At present, such charges for wireless to wireless calls stand at 14 paise per minute -- paid by the mobile operator on whose network the call originates. Bringing it down to zero could potentially cut mobile phone tariffs by a third -- or more.
The issue takes on significance in view of the announcement made by Reliance Jio Infocomm that it will not charge for voice calls. If it has to pay the interconnection charges, it would have to subsidise each such call. Reliance Jio already has some 1.5 million subscribers. 
The watchdog also asked whether termination charges between different networks -- from fixed-line network to wireless and vice versa -- should be symmetric.
"It is true players who are already in the market would like to monetise their investment in infrastructure. They would want those who wish to access their network to pay for it. This is the norm internationally too," said Mahesh Uppal, Director of independent consultancy Com First.
"Abolishing interconnection usage charges in India will reduce the incentive to expand networks. It will especially hurt rural areas. Voice and data connectivity is still poor there and they need significant investment in infrastructure," Uppal told IANS.
The TRAI, in its paper, has asked stakeholders several questions. These include: What will be the impact of zero interconnection usage charges for calls from wireline networks on the growth of the telecom industry?
The regulator also asked: "Which approach should be used for prescribing international termination charge in the country? Should it be kept uniform for all terminating networks?"
According to a source in the regulatory authority, around Rs 25,000 crore of revenue is generated every year from interconnection usage charges.
Bharti Airtel is the biggest recipient of such charges.
"Companies with smaller networks, like Videocon, Aircel and now, Reliance Jio, have fewer subscribers. Hence, they have more calls terminating in other networks. So, their payments for interconnection are higher. They would benefit if the interconnection charge is reduced to zero," Uppal said.
"The watchdog's suggestion of zero interconnection usage charges seems irrational. It will hurt those who have invested in infrastructure at a time when we need to increase, not decrease, infrastructure investment," he asserted.
Nonetheless, several countries have drastically slashed interconnection usage charges over the past year keeping customer welfare in mind, including Australia, Norway, Portugal, South Africa, Saudi Arabia and the United Kingdom.
The Indian watchdog's consultation paper quotes the OECD Digital Economy Outlook as saying that mobile termination charges were on a constant decline. "The OECD average of mobile termination charges fell by 65 per cent in 3.5 years from $0.0561 per minute in May 2011 to $0.0197 per minute in November 2014."
According to Rajan S. Mathews, Director General, Cellular Operators' Association of India, zero interconnection usage charges can cost the industry Rs 8,000-Rs 10,000 crore annually.
"Industry will be impacted in several ways," Rajan said. "When the the revenue stream is curtailed, industry players will rethink on how much to bid for spectrum. Infrastructure spending will take a big hit. Rural roll out of network will get retarded," he said.
"Industry as a whole invests around $8 billion-$10 billion every year for infrastructure roll out, out of which 30-40 per cent goes to the rural sector. As of now, around 85 per cent of the country has coverage for voice. But more investment is required for fibre connectivity. If this flow of revenue stops then in the longer run it will impact quality of service," he said.
Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.



N.Hanumanta Rao

1 month ago

The inter-connection charges must be nil or zero charges so that the general public will benefit. The telecom companies have looted the public and amassed thousands of crores.

Aqeel Qureshi

1 month ago

Well, didn't you see this coming?
How else would you expect the Big R to enter a new sector? Did you think they would slog it out and create space for themselves in the already saturated market?

"Policy Arbitrage" is something that the Big R has survived on and what is on display is a classic example of the same.
While the arbitrage itself can not at all be termed as illegal, I am not sure if it can even be called unethical.
So is it that the Big R has been plain lucky and these huge arbitrage opportunities appear to them out of the blue? There's the catch!!!!

Use of CDMA technology with 'roaming' facility for WLL services. Deja Vu?

Apple and Others Help Customers Donate to the Red Cross, And Only the Red Cross

This month's epic flooding in Louisiana, which destroyed roughly 60,000 homes, is the worst natural disaster in the United States since Superstorm Sandy in 2012. And just like after Sandy and other disasters, local officials have been troubled by the Red Cross' response.


Louisiana's governor has been so concerned by the charity's relief work that a spokesman said even amidst improvements, the state plans to "reevaluate its partnership" with the organization.


But that hasn't dissuaded Apple, Amazon and T-Mobile from soliciting flood relief donations on behalf of the charity, and, indeed, making the charity the exclusive conduit for giving.


Apple has links on its website, iTunes and App Store allowing users to directly donate to the Red Cross. U.S. Bank has a similar set-up for direct donation using its nearly 5,000 ATMs in two dozen states. T-Mobile allows its customers to donate by texting the word "LAFLOODS" to a five-digit number called a shortcode. Brooks Brothers promises to match customers' donations to the Red Cross, using the clothier's Golden Fleece Foundation.


In each case, the Red Cross is the only charity offered as a way to help.


The exclusive solicitations are problematic, said Doug White, the former director of the nonprofit management program at Columbia University. "They promote the idea that the Red Cross is America's charity and the go-to place for disasters despite its history of fumbles."


None of the companies gets any money from the arrangements. But they do benefit by being seen as companies that care. The Red Cross is one of the country's most recognized and venerable charities. "It speaks to what type of message these corporations want to convey," said White. "It's about branding and image."


Apple and others have long-standing relationships with the Red Cross. Apple, for instance, deployed one-click donation buttons after several disasters, such as last year's earthquake in Nepal.


Apple's exclusive arrangement with the Red Cross is particularly notable since the world's largest tech company has strict guidelines barring nonprofits from collecting donations inside iOS apps. All donations must be handled in a web browser outside the app or via text messages. This is part of Apple's "required user experience," it tells developers. (The latest version of ProPublica's iOS app was initially rejected by Apple's App Store review team earlier this year because it had a native button allowing people to donate to us.)


Apple declined to comment on the special status it gives the Red Cross.


Other companies said they're proud of the work they're doing with the Red Cross. "We've worked with the Red Cross for a number of years because they are trusted and they're able to provide timely emergency relief around the globe," said T-Mobile in a statement. (See each company's response below.)


The Red Cross said in a statement: "Cause marketing partners have a long history of generously supporting the Red Cross." The charity also said 3,200 Red Cross workers and volunteers "have tirelessly supported relief efforts in Louisiana." (Read the Red Cross' full statement.)


The Red Cross has suffered steep declines in charitable giving over the past year. A joint investigation by ProPublica and NPR starting in 2014 showed the charity has bungled relief efforts after major disasters, failing to deliver on promises made after the 2010 earthquake in Haiti and again after Sandy. In some cases, the Red Cross lacked basic supplies, even while championing its own work, and ended up giving donated money to other relief groups.


Similar problems have surfaced in its more recent disaster relief efforts. In the first 10 days after flooding began, it received roughly $7.8 million in donations and pledges, according to the Red Cross, far short of its $35 million to $40 million estimate for its ongoing relief efforts.


And new crowdsourced upstarts have eaten into its pool of potential donors. The New Orleans Times-Picayune is offering several options for donations on its website and GoFundMe, the world's largest online fundraising website, which allows users to create individual donation pages, has raised $10 million for Louisiana flood victims, a record for disaster relief in the platform's six-year history.


The Red Cross sent out an urgent call for donations to help fill the gap. It got quick support from its vast network of corporate sponsors to encourage donations. But after two weeks, the total donations are still less than half what the Red Cross says it needs.


The Red Cross and its corporate partners declined to provide a breakdown of its contributions. But T-Mobile said it was "very pleased with the results."


Here's a full breakdown of the companies helping the Red Cross, what they're doing, and what the companies say about their work with the charity:




What it's doing: Apple is giving the Red Cross banner advertisements on its website, iTunes and App Store portals, a so-called "frictionless" system that allows users to donate money directly to the Red Cross


Apple's response: Apple declined to comment.




What it's doing: Exclusive banner advertisements on its website and a shopping list of needed supplies, such as globes, trash bags and shovels.


Amazon's response: None.


Wells Fargo


What it's doing: Exclusive advertisements on its ATMs in the Dallas and Houston metro areas and the state of Mississippi, allowing customers to donate directly to the Red Cross


Wells Fargo's response: Wells Fargo said it had no comment on the criticisms of the Red Cross beyond a statement by its commercial banking head, Doug Kilton, saying the company is "proud to support the hard work of the American Red Cross as it assists those in our community in need of recovery, cleanup and rebuilding."


U.S. Bank


What it's doing: Exclusive advertisements on its ATMs nationwide, allowing customers using its nearly 5,000 ATMs in two-dozen states to donate directly to the Red Cross


U.S. Bank's response: "The Red Cross is one of many organizations we support, including the United Way and other relief agencies."




What it's doing: Part of the "Text to Give" program, allowing customers to send the shortcode, LAFLOODS, to a five-digit number and donate $10 to the Red Cross by adding the money onto their phone bill.


T-Mobile's response: "We've worked with the Red Cross for a number of years because they are trusted and they're able to provide timely emergency relief around the globe."


Brooks Brothers


What it's doing: Donations made through Brooks Brothers go directly to the Red Cross and the clothier's nonprofit charity, the Golden Fleece Foundation, will match contributions, up to $50,000.


Brooks Brothers' response: None.


ProPublica is a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative newsroom. Sign up for their newsletter.











We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

To continue

Sign Up or Sign In


To continue

Sign Up or Sign In



The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)