Consumer Issues
EPFO to provide minimum mothly pension of Rs1,000 from 1st September

The decision to fix pension entitlement of Rs1,000 under the EPFS-95 scheme will immediately benefit around 28 lakh pensioners who at present are receiving less than this amount

 

The Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) said it would start implementing its much awaited Rs1,000 minimum monthly pension and Rs15,000 higher wage ceiling social security schemes from 1 September 2014.

 

The government’s decision to fix pension entitlement of Rs1,000 under the Employees’ Pension Scheme 1995 (EPFS-95) will immediately benefit 28 lakh pensioners who get less than this amount at present.

 

The move to enhance the minimum wage ceiling for becoming a subscriber of EPFO to Rs15,000 per month is expected to bring about 50 lakh additional formal sector workers under the ambit of the PF body.

 

The government has also enhanced the maximum sum assured under Employees’ Deposit Linked Insurance (EDLI) Scheme to Rs3 lakh. The maximum sum assured under the EDLI works out to be Rs3.6 lakh including 20% ad hoc benefit over the prescribed amount under the notification.

 

This means that in case an EPFO subscriber dies, his family will be entitled to maximum sum assured of Rs3.6 lakh instead of existing Rs1.56 lakh.

 

The decision to provide the entitlement under EPS-95 was taken by the Union Cabinet in its meeting held on 28th February. However, it could not be implemented as the model code of conduct came into force after the general election dates were announced on 5th March.

 

The decision will immediately benefit about 28 lakh pensioners, including 5 lakh widows. In all, there are 44 lakh pensioners under the EPFO scheme.

User

COMMENTS

Mr Jitendra

2 years ago

There was no need for this step. Infact, after 19 yrs of its inception, the EPS scheme has no books in order. Several crores of losses have occurred for EPFO members whose Rs 541 should not have put in EPS. The scheme is designed in a manner like a 'leaky matka' which needs to be filled with water every now and then. Increasing EPS contribution of employee from his employer contribution from Rs 541/- to Rs 1249/-is filling the matka with new water. :)

Mr Jitendra

2 years ago

There was no need for this step. Infact, after 19 yrs of its inception, the EPS scheme has no books in order. Several crores of losses have occurred for EPFO members whose Rs 541 should not have put in EPS. The scheme is designed in a manner like a 'leaky matka' which needs to be filled with water every now and then. Increasing EPS contribution from Rs 541/- to Rs 1249/-is filling the matka with new water.

Non-filing of I-T return for assessees is subject to tax audit before 30th September

The CBDT order has created a lot of confusion among taxpayers and tax professionals by not specifying the due date for filing the income tax returns

 

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has vide its above order extended the due date for e-filing of Tax Audit Report to 30 November 2014 for AY2014-15 from 30 September 2014. The order has not mentioned anything about the due date for e-filing of Income tax Return (ITR). It seems the due date for filing of ITR has been kept the same, viz. 30th September 2014.  The Assessee’s who are covered under tax audit provisions of section 44AB, but not under transfer pricing provisions as required by section 92E, do not file the ITR on or before 30 September, 2014, may have the following implications:-


1. He may have to pay interest u/s 234A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on taxes outstanding.


2. Losses if any may not be allowed to be carried forward under the provisions of section 80 Read with section 139(3) of the Income tax Act, 1961.


3. To claim deduction of statutory expenses falling under section 43B, the assessee will have to pay these statutory dues on or before the filing of ITR or the due date of filing the return (due date of return of income-ROI is 30 September 2014), whichever is earlier.


4. Some of the deductions i.e. under Section 10A, which requires the assessee to file his return on or before the due date specified under sub section (1) of section 139, may not be allowed to the assessee.


5. If the assessee is not able to file his return on or before 30 September 2014, he may not be able to revise his return of income.


6. In true terms for the tax professional as evident from the Order, there is no extension of date for submission of tax audit report as most of the professionals prepare the ITR only after completion of tax audit report. This is so because certain disallowances are directly linked to the tax audit findings.


7. The tax audit report has to be filed by the chartered accountant through his login ID on the I-T website under client's PAN, which the client has to accept and only then can the return be filed. In such circumstances if the return filing date is not also extended the clarification issued has no meaning.

 

The CBDT Order has created a lot of confusion amongst the taxpayers and tax professionals by not specifying the due date for filing the ITR. The CBDT needs to immediately clarify its stand on the due date for ITR filing. A simple sentence adding the line in bold given below would have made things clearer:


“In exercise of power conferred by section 119 of the Income-tax Act (‘the Act’), the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) hereby extends the due date for obtaining and furnishing of the report of audit under section 44AB of the Act for Assessment Year 2014-15 in case of assessees who are not required to furnish report under section 92E of the Act from 30th day of September, 2014 to 30th November, 2014 and consequently also extend the due date for filing the return of income under section 139 for all assessees covered under section 44AB to 30th November, 2014.


Just that simple addition would have avoided all the confusion. In fact there is still time for the CBDT to come out with a clarification to the clarification already issued to clear the air of confusion which has been brought to bear on the tax filing community.

(Girish Borkar is a Mumbai-based Chartered Accountant and a managing partner of M/s Borkar & Shenoy, Chartered Accountants. He can be contacted at [email protected])

User

COMMENTS

rs

2 years ago

Please review the title in the first instance

shivkumar

2 years ago

Be it Company Law or Income Tax Law, the authorities seem to excel in creating confusion where none exist. So much for simplification,

Mumbai EOW unearths Rs1,000 crore bank FD fraud

According to reports, Mohammed Fashiuddin of Showman Group is the mastermind of this fixed deposit racket, estimated to be about Rs1,000 crore involving several PSU and private banks

 

The Economic Offences Wing (EOW) of Mumbai police on Thursday said it has unearthed a largescale banking fraud worth about Rs1,000 crore related with fixed deposits (FDs) in several banks. So far, the EOW said it has registered 10 first information reports (FIRs) against several people, including some officials from banks.

 

According to reports, banks involved in this large scale FD fraud include, Dena Bank, UCO Bank, Syndicate Bank, Bank of Baroda, Vijaya Bank, Dhanalaxmi Bank, Bank of India and Indian Overseas Bank among others. Among the institutions who were victims of the fraud are the Mumbai Metropolitan Regional Development Authority (MMRDA) and South Indian Education Society (SIES) Trust.

 

"The mastermind of the scam is reported to be Mohammed Fashiuddin of the Showman Group. So far, four of the accused have been arrested. Searches and raids are ongoing at offices and homes of some of the accused," says a report from Business Standard.

 

Last week Dena Bank and Oriental Bank of Commerce initiated action against bank officials following reports of Rs436.7 crore fraud in their branches. Dena Bank officials allowed Rs256.69 crore transfer through overdraft facility, while OBC transferred Rs180 crore received from Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust (JNPT) as bulk deposit to one Padmavati International.

 

JNPT had already filed a case with Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the matter is under investigation.

User

COMMENTS

Dipakkumar J Shah

2 years ago

Dear Mr. Shah,

We refer to your appended e-mail of August 25, 2014 addressed to Head Service Quality.

We asked Mr.Modi to provide his 12-digit account number, contact details to assist him further.

We assure best of your services at all times.

Sincerely,

Vamsi Priya
Office of Head Service Quality

CONFIDENTIALITY INFORMATION AND DISCLAIMER

"This e-mail message may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. It should not be accessed by anyone who is not the original intended recipient. If you have erroneously received this message, please delete it immediately and notify the sender.You will appreciate that e-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as its contents are susceptible to loss, damage, interception, destruction, etc. Before opening any attachments please check them for viruses and defects.The notice appended to the emails is not intended to prejudice the interests of our customers in any manner or to evade responsibility for any act of done with the endorsement of ICICI Bank."
Dear Mr Modi,
Kindly give me reply at [email protected]
They are sking some details .
Shah D J

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
  Loading...
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email

BUY NOW

The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)