A moderate El Nino in 2002 resulted in one of the worst droughts in India, in the past 100 years!
The Chief Monsoon forecaster, Shivanand Pai at the Indian Meteorological Department (IMD), Pune, has cautioned, according to the press, that a weak El Nino weather pattern can trigger a drought in India around July. He is reported to have stated that "there are approximately equal chances for neutral or weak El Nino conditions during the latter part of summer".
We all know that El Nino refers to a warming of water in the Pacific Ocean every three to five years that lasts for about 18 months.
India experienced drought conditions in 1997 and 2009 when El Nino weather pattern was observed. Yet, a moderate El Nino in 2002 resulted in one of the worst droughts in India, in the past 100 years!
In a recent policy announcement, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has stated that El Nino can cut the gross domestic product (GDP) to 5% and spike inflation to over 8.5%! It is said that a weak South West Monsoon supplemented by El Nino effect can disrupt the rainfall, which can impact agricultural growth, something with direct consequences, which we need to guard against.
Shivanand Pai's caution is supported by the Australian Meteorological Bureau who have stated that there are 70% chance for El Nino to occur, while the US Climate Prediction Centre feels that it has 50% chances. Either way, if El Nino occurs, Indian agriculture output can be in trouble.
Recently, it may be recalled we had unseasonal rains and hailstorms during February-March, which damaged our standing crops, particularly in Maharashtra that resulted in financial assistance to the affected farmers. However, one redeeming feature of this unseasonal rain has resulted in better water storage level in 85 major reservoirs. But this should not unduly influence our approach to the problem if El Nino occurs, the intensity of which we still do not know, and IMD is continuously watching the situation to be able to give a reasonably accurate indication soon.
In the meantime, our foodgrain stock situation is satisfactory in as much as stocks are higher than the strategic buffer and reserve norm. For instance, government has projected wheat production at 95.6 million tonnes but actual size is expected to be lower due to the unseasonal rains and hailstorms mentioned above, affecting the crop. The Indian government intends to procure 31 million tonnes of wheat, against the last years' purchase of 25 mt, but for various reasons, this process has been delayed by more than three-four weeks. The central pool as on 1st March is reported to be over 20.83 mt, higher than the buffer, as stated above.
Sugar production is also expected to be higher than 23 million tonnes, and our exports of various foodgrains are moving out without a hitch. The political turmoil in Ukraine has also resulted in wheat prices being firm.
Hopefully, the IMD is expected to announce their projections of monsoon in the next few days, and, they will be continuously monitoring the situation, by keeping in constant touch with others like Australian Meteorological Bureau and US Climate Prediction Centre who are all watching the El Nino movement.
In the meantime, a new government is expected to be formed soon after the election results are announced. The new government would need some more time before portfolios can be allotted and government work can commence in right earnest. The Food Corporation of India, holding the primary responsibility of stocking and distribution of foodgrains need to take additional care for preventing loss due to poor storage conditions, weather conditions, pilferage and rodent attacks.
(AK Ramdas has worked with the Engineering Export Promotion Council of the ministry of commerce. He was also associated with various committees of the Council. His international career took him to places like Beirut, Kuwait and Dubai at a time when these were small trading outposts; and later to the US.)
The best# three and the worst three schemes over the past three years, in different...
The Whistleblowers’ Bill aims to protect those who expose malpractice or corruption. But will the Bill in its current form be really effective?
The ‘Whistleblowers’ Bill’, which aims to protect whistleblowers who expose malpractice or corruption, was finally passed by the Rajya Sabha on the last day of Parliament in February 2014. Will this Bill, when passed into an Act, make any difference? Moneylife Foundation organised an open house discussion on this subject, at its Knowledge Centre in Mumbai recently. Environment activist Sumaira Abdulali and Advocate Mohana Nair explained the various features of the Bill, including its weaknesses.
Ms Abdulali, convenor of MITRA (Movement against Intimidation, Threat and Revenge against Activists) and founder of Awaaz Foundation, emphasised the need to strengthen the NGO-media-RTI activists’ network, to protect anyone who exposes illegality. She also mentioned that it is important to monitor the Act and draft rules suited to Maharashtra where a large number of activists have been murdered.
Advocate Mohana Nair, who practises at the Bombay High Court and takes up public interest litigations, highlighted the intricate legal aspects of the Bill. She explained the positive features of the Bill like concealing the identity of the complainant for protection from threat and victimisation, penalty against false complaints or in case the complainant is acting with malafide intentions.
But the Bill also has many negative aspects, mainly vague definitions, such as victimisation of the whistleblowers. She also clarified that this Bill concentrates more on the government sectors and government officers who need to be protected, as whistleblowers, for exposing the malpractices in government departments. Moreover, the ambit of the Bill is only financial corruption and financial loss to the government, not other issues of public interest such as environmental degradation or public health.
Ms Nair pointed out another major negative of the Bill: anonymous complaints are not acceptable. “This is either being myopic, or a deliberate attempt to discourage whistle blowing. The best whistleblower protection laws in the world, including those in UK, US and South Africa, allow for anonymity,” she pointed out.
The presentations of Ms Abdulali and Ms Nair were followed by a discussion during which Railway activist, Samir Zaveri, shared his experiences about how he and other activists were harassed by the police. He said he had filed many RTI applications to expose the ‘Railway Scam’ at Kurla terminus by RPF officers. The RTIs have ‘to be in a good faith’. However, the Whistleblowers’ Bill doesn’t have the provision of being ‘in good faith’. In fact, it imposes penalties if the complaint is found malafide. This provision can be abused.