Moneylife » Markets » Equities » Domestic institutional investors are betting on a totally different set of stocks compared to FIIs
Domestic institutional investors are betting on a totally different set of stocks compared to FIIs
| 12/02/2013 07:24 PM |
Follow @mldigital
Domestic Institutional Investors (DIIs) have sold an estimated $3.5 billion worth of equities, in contrast to their foreign counterparts who have been pumping money as if there is no tomorrow. They are averse to financials while FIIs are heavily betting on exactly those
Yesterday, we had written about how FII ownership in Indian equities has reached an all-time high (http://moneylife.in/article/fii-holdings-in-indian-equities-at-an-all-time-high/31227.html ), and how the Indian stock market had reacted with respect to influx of foreign money pouring in. Equally interesting is the action of domestic institutional investors (DIIs) who remain cautious. DIIs have sold an estimated $3.5 billion worth of equities and hold only 12% of the BSE100 stocks in the third quarter, when compared to over 19% held by FIIs.
Interestingly, FIIs and DIIs have taken opposing stance on the same sector—banking and financial services. FIIs are bullish while DIIs are bearish. The top 10 FII underweight list in many ways mirrors the top 10 overweights list of domestic mutual funds (DMFs). In fact, while FIIs have kept ITC, L&T, State Bank of India, Tata Steel and NTPC as underweight while the DIIs have kept these stock in the overweight category. Similarly, while FIIs are bullish on HDFC, Infosys, Axis Bank, Kotak Mahindra Bank and Sun Pharma, DIIs have kept these stocks in the underweight category, reflecting their own investment strategy.
FII underweight

DII overweight

DIIs have continued to be big sellers in January and February. They continue to be overweight on consumer, capital goods and energy, while remain underweight on banking and software. The top stocks bought by DIIs were NMDC, Reliance Power and Cairn India.
DIIs have been reducing exposure to domestic cyclicals including autos (which FIIs are bullish on). They have also been switching out of defensives and putting more money into materials.
On other specific stocks, FIIs have sold Cairn India while DIIs have lapped it up. Ditto for United Phosphorus.


Last year, DIIs were net sellers for nine months out of 12 while the Sensex has moved up roughly 25%. As the market moved up, they’ve been taking advantage of the situation by cashing out, probably because they are facing redemptions as new money into mutual funds and insurance companies have dried up. Some of the DII dominant-held sectors, according to Edelweiss, as of the third quarter of 2013 fiscal are: 23% in capital goods, 17.6% in consumer goods (down from 18.1%), 11.9% in autos (down from 13%). Interestingly, DIIs have sold as much as Rs16,207.32 crore in the month of January 2013 alone, which is nearly the same amount that DIIs have sold in the third quarter of fiscal 2013 combined. On the other hand, FIIs have bought over Rs19,000 crore in January 2013 alone. FIIs have been net sellers in just two months out of 12 months last year, helped by quantitative easing of central bankers which found their way to Indian shores.
According to Edelweiss, of all the money that FIIs poured in the third quarter, a whopping 41% was taken up by financial sector companies, followed by the auto sector (11%). This is probably in gleeful anticipation of interest rate cuts, without realizing that the RBI is not like other central banks.
More in Moneylife
PNB Metlife refunds Rs25,000 to the correct policyholder: another Moneylife victory +3336 views
TODAY'S TOP STORIES
Post your Comment
| Alert me when new comment is posted on this article | |
| Please read our Moderation Policy and Terms of Use before posting | |
VIDEOS
Keep your Money Safe: Avoid money traps and MLM
LATEST COMMENT
I smell a fish in SEBI's Consent Order mechanism. It is an easy and inexpensive way out for those promoters and t.. sachchidanand
MORE
Sensex, Nifty may still have some steam left: Thursday Closing Report
Do FIIs buy high and sell low–III? Panic-selling during declines
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Take advantage of all our features and functionality exclusively designed for Moneylife.in members. Registration gives you easy access to - Moneylife Newsletters - Exclusive News - Special Features - Membership to Moneylife Foundation - Other Value adds And the registration to this website is completely free. Go ahead and submit this form to create your new profile. |
Tell us about yourself
I have read and agreed to the Terms & Conditions | |||||||||||||||||||
- The draconian LBT: Local Body Tax explained
- Do FIIs buy high and sell low – I? Maximum buying at peak index levels
- Is the interest in Gold ETFs waning?
- Ashok Leyland: Sharply lower EBITDA margin is a matter of concern
- Income Tax dept slaps Rs557 crore notice on BPO firm WNS
- Cummins India’s guidance on the export business and sustainability of margins are key inputs for investors
- Competition Commission probing IATA for unfair practices
- OMCs to stop LPG deliveries to houses with multiple-connections from 1st June
- Do FIIs buy high and sell low–II? Momentum-chasing
- MMM India, another MLM taking people for “double-your-money” ride
- RBI tells HDFC Bank not to make up its own KYC verification rules
- Why I-T returns of Pawar, Jindal and Gandhi are exempted from RTI?
- How much longer can the FM, RBI ignore HSBC in India?
- Aadhaar: Private ownership of UID data- Part I
- The draconian LBT: Local Body Tax explained
- Aadhaar: Who owns the UID database? –Part II
- Did HSBC Bank resort to toxic churning and illegitimate transactions to earn commissions?
- PNB Metlife refunds Rs25,000 to the correct policyholder: another Moneylife victory
- The draconian LBT: Local Body Tax explained
- Goa’s Advocate General is the highest paid across the country, reveals RTI
- System glitch deducts 40% amount as TDS from SBI depositors’ account!
- Do FIIs buy high and sell low – I? Maximum buying at peak index levels
- Mass mis-selling: 59,000 investors in Kolhapur are alleged to have lost money in LIC ULIPs
- High Mark to sell 250 million records to another credit bureau?
- Do FIIs buy high and sell low–II? Momentum-chasing
- Do FIIs buy high and sell low–III? Panic-selling during declines
- Investors lost Rs1 lakh crore due to poor regulation. Will there be a CBI probe?
What's your say?
| Yes | |||||||
| No | |||||||
| Can't Say | |||||||
|
What you said
Thanks for casting your votes! View Previous Polls
Join 22, 000 Others
Membership Benefits
- Daily & Weekly newsletters
- Access to www.moneylife.in to comment, create alerts
- Your own profile in Moneylife.in
- All special mailers
- Basic membership to MSSN, our new initiative
- Free ebooks
- Invitation to events
- Invitation to round-table meets
- Access to Insurance helpline
- Access to counselling sessions
- Access to Reading room in Mumbai
| Name: |
|
| Email: |
|
| Phone: |
|
| Catagory | |
| Message: |
|
| Enter Code: |
|






























Comment
Nem Chandra Singhal 3 months ago
It seems that trading is done in a closed group. When one buys, another sells. Otherwise also, stock trading is a zero sum game.
Krishnaswami CVR 3 months ago
"DIIs have sold as much as Rs16,207.32 crore in the month of January 2013 alone, which is nearly the same amount that DIIs have sold in the third quarter of fiscal 2013 combined."- Something wrong here.. or should it read as ..." same amount FIIs have sold.."
While there may be some substance in the article, comparing Q1 F13 and comparing Q3 F13 does not make any support to the conclusion.. Or it is not clear to me?
saravanan 3 months ago in reply to Krishnaswami CVR
yes, agree with CVR on Q1 vs Q3 !
prem sunderdas 3 months ago
It is wrong to say that diis and fiis have taken opposite stand. They are both part of cartel. From years when fiis buy, diis are always sellers and when fiis sell diis are always buyers. The major losers are always mutual funds (controlled by diis). Despite nifty moving up from 4500 to 6000 mutual fund investors do not get 50% returns of bank deposit rates.
Suiketu Shah 3 months ago in reply to prem sunderdas
MF deserve to be losers.Their agents/wealth management companies in their greed for abnormal commission have mislead clients thruout India.Todays ET states 56% MF purchased directly and if this trend continues it wl spell doom for MF agents and deservingly so.
prem sunderdas 3 months ago in reply to Suiketu Shah
Yes. Besides, even the volumes in the stock market have shrunk drastically because of the greed of algo manipulation by unscrupolous operators which ensures that every intraday trader loses.Pity is that despite rampant manipilation and insider trading the regulator is a silent spectator.
saravanan 3 months ago in reply to prem sunderdas
True. retail investors do not understand why these two complement each other in trading. retail investor may adopt different strategy of buying what DII buy and investing in MFs of FII !