Stocks
Cyclical wonders

When we closely examine some of the popular stocks, we wonder how many are worth holding for...

Premium Content
Monthly Digital Access

Subscribe

Already A Subscriber?
Login
Yearly Digital+Print Access

Subscribe

Moneylife Magazine Subscriber or MSSN member?
Login

Yearly Subscriber Login

Enter the mail id that you want to use & click on Go. We will send you a link to your email for verficiation
CCI sends notices to carmakers for selling parts at higher costs

The Competition Commission sent out show-cause notices to 17 carmakers, many of them foreign entities, regarding allegations of providing spare parts to customers at higher prices

 
New Delhi: The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has sent notices to 17 carmakers on an alleged anti-competitive practice of selling spare parts at higher prices to consumers and it is likely to schedule the hearings for next month to seek explanations, reports PTI.
 
The Commission has sent out show-cause notices to 17 carmakers, many of them foreign entities, regarding allegations of providing spare parts to customers at higher prices, which is against healthy competition, said a source close to the development.
 
The Director General of the Commission has submitted the investigation report on the matter, following which the notices have been served, the source said, adding that the hearings are likely to take place next month. However, names were not disclosed.
 
The CCI would take a final decision on the alleged anti-competitive practice after taking into account the explanations of the carmakers as well as the report of the Director General. The DG acts as investigating arms of the fair-trade regulator.
 
CCI is pursuing the case under Section 4 of the Competition Act that relates to abuse of dominant position by enterprises.
 
The probe was conducted after a complaint was filed with the CCI last year against certain carmakers for allegedly abusing their dominant market position by selling spare auto parts to customers at high prices.
 
Going by the complaint, the carmakers were making available spare parts only through their authorised dealers, who in turn sold them on high rates.
 
In August, the government had said the CCI is investigating allegations of anti-competitive practices by a section of carmakers in the country.
 
In a written reply to the Lok Sabha, Minister of State for Corporate Affairs RPN Singh had said CCI had received certain information against some carmakers.
 
"The CCI, which is a quasi-judicial body, is getting the matter investigated for appropriate action in the matter as per the provisions of the Competition Act, 2002," the Minister had said.
 
Generally, CCI refers complaints related to anti- competitive practices for further investigation by its DG, before taking any action.
 

User

COMMENTS

Nayan Doshi

6 months ago

hallo sir my mother kidny reletive madicine mmf 500 mg how rate to posible to me reply

Nayan Doshi

6 months ago

hallo sir my mother kidny reletive madicine mmf 500 mg how rate to posible to me reply

Vikas Gupta

4 years ago

CCI/IRDA should also look into the monopoly status of Car Dealers by which they can provide special OD Discounts to their Customers which no other person whether individual agent/corporate agent can offer to the same customer.

IRDA slaps Rs6 lakh fine on SBI Life insurance

Imposing a penalty of Rs6 lakh on SBI Life Insurance, the insurance regulator also reprimanded the company that its business practices severely dent public faith

 
New Delhi: The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) has imposed a penalty of Rs6 lakh on SBI Life Insurance Company for violation of various norms, reports PTI.
 
IRDA has also reprimanded SBI Life saying "... business practices adopted by life insurer (SBI Life) and the intermediaries involved, severely dent the faith of insuring public".
 
The regulator has fined SBI Life for paying higher commissions to intermediaries, which pre-dominantly include State Bank of India and its associate banks.
 
It said SBI Life sold the two-year policy under the Dhanaraksha Plus scheme as a single premium policy. It also did not give informed choice to the insured.
 
As regards premium, the order said, it was paid to corporate agents over and above the eligible 2% commission.
 

User

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
  Loading...
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email

BUY NOW

The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)