CREDAI to file complaint with CCI against cement price rise

CREDAI decided to file a complaint with the CCI against the 'illogical' price hike in cement, which it said is creating pressure on developers to increase sale price of homes

Criticising steep increase in the cement prices, the Confederation of Real Estate Developers' Association of India (CREDAI) has decided to file a complaint with the Competition Commission of India (CCI) against this hike.


In a statement, Lalit Kumar Jain, chairman of CREDAI said, "The sudden increase in price of cement will have an adverse impact on real estate and infrastructure sectors which are already reeling under crisis due to high input cost, developers".


He said the association will file a complaint with the CCI against the 'illogical' price hike, which creates pressure on developers to increase sale price of homes.


There has been a steep increase in cement prices from Rs120 to Rs320 over the past few years, CREDAI said.


"Usually, monsoons bring down the number of constructions, so the prices too slip. This helps to average out the yearly pricing parameter which has been the norm. It is therefore the cement price hike is unjustified," he said.


The costs of inputs like steel, labour, funding have been on the rise, which is expected to see a nearly 20% hike contributing to the increased cost of homes, which realtors are fighting against, Jain said, adding, "The construction cost will overall see a nearly 20% hike."


While steel prices that have risen from Rs47,000 to Rs52,000 per tonne, labour cost has increased by 20% and building products like electrical, wood, paint and sanitary ware by 5%, he said.


Building a Better India –Part 15: Reforming the Judiciary

In the midst of all the hue and cry about Gopal Subramaniam's appointment, the most important issue - of judicial reforms - has taken a backseat

The entire judicial system, including appointment of judges and advocate/solicitor generals, is ripe for a re-look. There are talks of the Judicial Appointments Bill, there has recently been a raging controversy about Gopal Subramaniams appointment to the Supreme Court as a Judge. The government and the judiciary seemed to be at loggerheads. In the midst of all this, the most important issue - of judicial reforms - has taken a backseat.

1. The procedure of appointment of judges :

The present collegiums system of appointment of Supreme Court and High Court judges by a panel of 5 supreme court judges, is erroneous and opaque. It is in some sense a coterie system that runs the higher echelons of the judiciary. The question being whether other constitutional and parliamentary bodies should also have a say in these appointments. This practise of judges appointing their colleagues possibly has no parallel in the world. Surely, keeping the judiciary independent is most desirable for the country, and the countrymen are proud of their judiciary; let the Honourable Judges be appointed either by a Judicial and Law Commission of India or otherwise by a committee consisting of The President, Vice President, Prime Minister, Leaders of Opposition of both houses, The Chief Justice and 4 senior Supreme Court judges, two members from bar council and 2 eminent citizens, to bring transparency to the system and to ensure that there is no discrimination or favouritism.

Similarly, the district and metropolitan judges should be appointed by a committee constituted in each state, comprising of High Court judges, Chief Minister, Leader of Opposition in the assembly, Governor, Law Minister, one member from Bar Council and 4 eminent citizens.

2. Increase the number of judges and their working days and hours:

The number of judges should be increased immediately and suitably, to clear the huge backlog of court cases as fast as possible and to lower the burden of all our judges. The help of retired judges can also be taken on a temporary basis. The number of holidays in courts should be drastically cut so that cases are expedited.

3. Renovation and upgradation of court premises:

Many court premises are in deplorable conditions with shabby looking old structures, old furniture, crammed accomodation, inadequate computers, unplanned data storage for pending and disposed off cases, inadequate seating capacity, creaky fans, leaky toilets and unsafe drinking water facilities.

Hence, the court premises should be modernised, upgraded, renovated and equipped with modern gadgets by using the money collected as court fees. Let the court fees not go to the govt till this task is completed.

4. Special Courts:

Constitute separate special courts, equal in power to those of high courts for corruption, taxation and money recovery matters for quicker judgements.

5. Branches/benches of Supreme Court at six centres:

The number of judges in apex courts is just 29, and in the year 2013, they sat in court for only 176 days and have 66,349 cases pending. How it is possible for apex courts to give a fast verdict unless the number of judges is increased and working days are substantially increased too, along with more branches.

The centralised Supreme Court at Delhi is highly inconvenient and expensive for people of distant parts of the country. The Supreme Court must have at least 6 Benches located at Mumbai, Nagpur, Chennai, Kolkata, Allahabad and Guwahati, with at least 5 judges. How it is possible for one Delhi based Supreme Court to take care of a vast nation of 1250 million people?

6. Rationalisation and fixation of lawyer’s fees:

The fees structure needs to be regulated and rationalised, and should be fixed case-wise irrespective of number of hearings involved and for the full tenure of the case till the verdict is announced. The fees of supreme court lawyers are too exorbitant more often than not and has broken all records and is beyond the reach of even upper middle class litigants.

7. Court Reporting:

The system of quarterly court news by the apex court, which used to give information of cases pending in high courts and subordinate courts along with strength of judges, has been abandoned since 2009. This system must be reintroduced with further reforms.

You may also want to read...





Shreekanth Prabhu

3 years ago

Also the number of appeals should be reduced. Ideally only two levels. Also current system favors rich. If you can afford a good lawyer, like Lalu Prasad, you can come out on bail quickly. Also kind of fines imposed are a pittance compared to the loot of treasury. Time taken for trial in US and UK is far less. Also courts should not spend time on frivolous stuff. They also should not allow themselves to be manipulated by smart lawyers. See the way Sahara dodged till finally court had to act tough.

Yerram Raju Behara

3 years ago

Any reforms to the Judiciary structure in India should bear in mind delivery of speedy justice to the people seeking it.
Second, appointment of judges should be above board and beyond reproach.
Third, Any complaint against any judge should be handled with care and concern to the judicial system and such complaints should be addressed by a Judiciary Review Committee appointed by the Supreme Court within no more than 3months.
All Court cases should be governed by the basic principle - justice delayed is just denied.
Fourth, reference to the higher tier by the affected party should be addressed only by the Special Courts.
There can be no denying the fact that the judiciary is too few in numbers and the courts and judges at the present level cannot address the cases with expedition they deserve.

Prof Abdul Gani Bhat

3 years ago

The Judicial Commission for appointing judges should not contain any judge, because they are bread and have lived in authority and power arrogance. The Commission should contain mostly eminent persons from the public and should be all powerful to enquire into complaints against judges, fine them and dismiss them. The author may like to go through my PIL in the Supreme Court about "STREAMLINIG JUDICIARY AND BRINGING DOWN THE BACK LOG OF CASES" (D.No.2638/13, which is not to the likes of the Judges and they are not inclined to give it a thorough hearing, as it is acting against their vested interested in prolonging the rot. The PIL has fine recommendations and if put into practice would definitely bring down the back log of cases, efface the hegemony of judges and their would be superfluity of judges.


3 years ago

1. This article is silent about Government Pleaders and Pubic Prosecutors.

2. Should we abolish MACT tribunals, Family courts etc

3. Do we have special rules for Amicus curiae?

The Supreme Court of the United States has special rules for amicus curiae briefs sought to be filed in cases pending before it. Supreme Court Rule 37 states, in part, such a brief should cover "relevant matter" not dealt with by the parties which "may be of considerable help".[5] The cover of an amicus brief must identify which party the brief is supporting, or if the brief supports only affirmance or reversal. Supreme Court Rule 37.3(a). The Court also requires that, inter alia, all non-governmental amici identify those providing a monetary contribution to the preparation or submission of the brief. Supreme Court Rule 37.6. Briefs must be prepared in booklet format, and 40 copies must be served with the Court.[6]

In the United States Supreme Court, unless the amicus brief is being filed by the federal government (or one of its officers or agents) or a U.S. state, permission of the court (by means of motion for leave) or mutual consent of the parties is generally required. Allowing an amicus curiae to present oral argument is considered "extraordinary".

Mutual Fund AUM up 9% to Rs9.85 lakh crore in June quarter

Asset base of top 10 AMCs, which contributed 85% to the mutual fund industry's growth, rose by around Rs68,000 crore or 10% during April-June 2014

Improved market sentiments helped Indian mutual funds' assets under management (AUM) to increase by 9% or Rs80,000 crore to Rs9.85 lakh crore during the June quarter.


According to latest data available with Association of Mutual Funds in India (AMFI), the country's 44 fund houses together had an average AUM of Rs9.85 lakh crore during April-June 2014 quarter, up from Rs9.05 lakh crore in the preceding three months.


However, AUM had touched a record Rs10.11 lakh crore at the end of May.


Industry experts said the quarterly rise in AUM is largely due to gains in equity markets. Besides, retail participation in equity schemes has increased significantly during the recent months.


During the quarter, BSE mid-cap grew by an impressive 32%, while BSE 100 accelerated by 15% and benchmark Sensex moved up by over 13%.


HDFC Mutual Fund (MF) retained its top position with an average AUM of Rs1.3 lakh crore, a surge in asset base by over 15%, while ICICI Pru MF saw its asset base grow by 10.52% to Rs1.18 lakh crore during the same period.


In the top league, HDFC MF and ICICI Pru are followed by Reliance MF (Rs1.12 lakh crore) Birla Sunlife (Rs98,556 crore) and UTI MF (Rs79,441 crore), in terms of average AUM in the first quarter of 2014-15.


Interestingly, the asset base of the top 10 AMCs climbed by around Rs68,000 crore or 10%. They together contributed 85% of industry growth during the quarter.


We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

To continue

Sign Up or Sign In


To continue

Sign Up or Sign In



The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)