Citizens' Issues
Public Interest Exclusive
Courts should refrain from staying legally valid orders

The judiciary should refrain from granting stays on orders when anyone approaches it after defying a legally valid order. Only respect for courts will not make a better law-abiding nation, respect for the law will

As an information commissioner I have noticed that many public authorities do not obey the statutory orders given by the commission. When faced with action for non-compliance, they obtain a stay from the high court by filing a writ petition. This is the case with statutory orders given by many other authorities, as well. I have been thinking about this common practice in our high courts and feel it does serious damage to the rule of law and encourages disrespect for the law. If anyone—citizen, institution or government department—does not obey a statutory order given with the sanction of law, this should invite the consequences of defying the law. Granting a stay of the original order by a high court provides a legal sanctity to an illegal and undesirable action. When granting these stays on legally valid orders, in most cases no reasons are given, hence there is no evidence of any justification for this protection to the defiance of the law. I strongly feel that any standard action of an instrumentality of the state which may promote lawlessness must be opposed and an attempt made to seek correction of such action. Many times the lawyers hired in obtaining such stays charge between Rs1 lakh and Rs5 lakh for an appearance. This money is paid from public funds to deny information to the public and defy legally valid orders in the name of the public. This cannot be considered to be in public interest or legally permissible. Though my proposition appears to be logical and self-evident, I am quoting some Supreme Court pronouncements in support of this.

The Supreme Court in Prithawi Nath Ram Vs State of Jharkhand & Others Appeal (Civil) No. 5024 of 2000 in its judgment dated 24 August 2004 has stated: “If any party concerned is aggrieved by the order which in its opinion is wrong or against rules or its implementation is neither practicable nor feasible, it should always either approach to the court that passed the order or invoke jurisdiction of the appellate court. Rightness or wrongness of the order cannot be urged in contempt proceedings. Right or wrong the order has to be obeyed. Flouting an order of the court would render the party liable for contempt. While dealing with an application for contempt the court cannot traverse beyond the order, non-compliance of which is alleged. In other words, it cannot say what should not have been done or what should have been done. It cannot traverse beyond the order. It cannot test correctness or otherwise of the order or give additional direction or delete any direction. That would be exercising review jurisdiction while dealing with an application for initiation of contempt proceedings. The same would be impermissible and indefensible.” I think it is logical to deduce from this, that if flouting of an order invites contempt proceedings, a stay on an order granted after the order is defied has no legal basis. Such a stay is not in the interest of nurturing respect for the law.

Further, in Prakash Narain Sharma Vs Burma Shell Cooperative Housing AIR 2002 SC 3062, the Supreme Court of India has observed that a judicial order, not invalid on its face, must be given effect entailing all consequences, till it is declared void in a duly constituted judicial proceeding. Justice SN Variava in Ghaziabad Development Authority Vs Balbir Singh (2004)- (002)- CPJ- 0012- SC  stated that unless there is a stay obtained from a higher forum, the mere fact of filing an appeal or revision will not entitle a person who is required to pay the penalty to not comply with the order of the lower forum. Even though the person may have filed an appeal or revision, if no stay is obtained or if a stay is refused, the order must be complied with. In such cases, the higher forum should, before entertaining such appeal or revision, ensure that the order of the lower forum is first complied with.

It appears to me to be self-evident that no organ of the state should allow or encourage defiance of the orders of any statutory authority. There are also the judicial pronouncements in support of my contention, which I have quoted above. I hope there can be a public discussion on this matter and the judiciary would refrain from granting stays on orders when anyone approaches it after defying a legally valid order. If there are extenuating reasons for granting such a stay, they must be provided in the order. Our present practice in the courts favours those who can spend money on hiring lawyers. In most of these cases it is the public authority which spends the money. Thus public money is spent to either deny information to the public or protect the guilty officer from paying penalty! This is done by refusing to obey legally valid orders. This needs to be stopped. Only respect for courts will not make a better law-abiding nation, respect for the law will.

The views expressed here are the author’s own personal views

(Shailesh Gandhi is a Central Information Commissioner; he is the first RTI activist to be on the central commission. An IIT Mumbai alumni, the author has closed down his business to devote his time to social causes, especially the RTI Act.)



vijay paliwal

4 years ago


P M Ravindran

4 years ago

Shailesh Gandhi has made a very pertinent observation. I am sure it is based on experience as an information commissioner when penalties imposed are not complied with. Strictly speaking the courts have NO jurisdiction in this matter except when the information commissioner had not given an opportunity for being heard to the PIO before imposing the mandatory penalty. In other cases it is mostly left to the complainants/ appellants under the RTI Act to go to the judiciary when this mandatory penalty is not imposed on the defaulting PIOs.


4 years ago

Sir, It is not just 'STAYS'. Speaking in Gandhinagar on Jan 7, 2012, the Vice President Mr. Hamid Ansari stated :
" "It is sad, but true, that the litigants seek and the court grants adjournments at the drop of a hat. Adjournments have grown like cancer, corroding the entire body of the justice delivery system". How sad !! Regards

Dr Vaibhav G Dhoka

4 years ago

CIC Mr Gandhi has perfectly pointed to the judicial involvement in prolonging any matter for any time as our courts readily grants stay and adjournment.About five years back I wrote to Mr Wahibtula first Chief CIC stating that second appeal which lies with CIC for a common person it is beyond reach on the contrary the opponent who is generally from government service readily contest at public cost.It was in my second appeal from SEBI ,they took three adjournments and flew thrice from Mumbai to New Delhi at whose cost(ofcourse public money).The gist is judicial process is misused and judiciary itself should be blamed.


P M Ravindran

In Reply to Dr Vaibhav G Dhoka 4 years ago

It is not only the judiciary that is rotten but it has enabled other public authorities to cheat the public, swindle public resources and murder democratic rights!

Economy & Nation Exclusive
Foreign brands: Shop till you drop!

Despite local demand, Chinese and other emerging market firms have not established their own brands. Instead they have often tried a short cut, purchasing western brands. The main problem for the emerging markets is learning the art of protecting their local brands

The growth of emerging markets is having an enormous impact on everything. However, marketing and brand management in these markets can be a bit of a challenge. This is true for both multinational companies attempting to sell into these markets as well as for emerging market companies competing with them and attempting to expand internationally.

One of the most interesting examples are brand named luxury goods. The sales of these products grew 13% in 2010 to $228 billion and another 10% in 2011 to $252 billion, renewing the growth trajectory that started in 2007 when sales hit a previous record of $224 billion. As with all things concerning emerging markets, sales in China have led the way. Sales of branded personal luxury items purchased by Chinese globally add up to a whopping $52 billion. This is 80% of the $63 billion in sales of the largest market, the United States.

But China is not alone in its tastes for brand names. Latin Americans led by Mexicans and Brazilians are raiding the posh stores of New York, Milan and Paris with reckless abandon. Local markets are growing, as well. Sales in Brazil grew 50% from $2 billion in 2009 to $3 billion in 2011. Sales grew in the same period by 12% in the Middle East and by 25% in Korea.

But catering to these markets often means adapting to local tastes, which are often quite different than in Europe or the US. For example Chinese women’s taste for whisky and sports cars is higher. In China, Maserati sells 30% of its cars to women, while in the west women buy only 2% to 5%. In contrast, Chinese men purchase more far more grooming products including face creams than in older markets. They also are large consumers of luxury bags. Coach sells $1.7 billion worth of leather bags in China, 45% to men compared with 15% globally.

Despite the local demand, Chinese and other emerging market firms have not, with a few exceptions, established their own brands. Instead they have often tried a short cut, purchasing western brands. This process has even been sanctioned by the Chinese government.

But government encouragement does not necessarily mean success for the Chinese any more than it did for their Japanese predecessors who did the same thing 30 years ago. The computer firm, Lenovo Group, purchased IBM’s personal computer business in 2004. Lenovo now sells computers under its own brand and the only thing left of the IBM brand is the name ThinkPad.  The problems with the IBM brand have not stopped the Chinese from buying others. The Chinese car company Geely bought Volvo last year and a Chinese bulldozer manufacturer bought the Italian luxury yacht maker Ferretti, owner of the legendary Riva boat brand. Not to be outdone, one of India’s largest industrial group, Tata, purchased the famous British tea company Tetley and more recently Jaguar Land Rover.

Still marketing success has proven elusive even on their home turf. Chinese car companies have been unable to pry the more lucrative parts of their own market away from VW and General Motors. The foreign-branded cars are seen as more reliable, stylish and a better value than their Chinese competitors. This leaves the Chinese car makers with the low end of the markets where competition is only on price and margins are razor thin.

Emerging market governments are all ambitious to make their mark in the world and have no problem supporting their locals. In China this means reviving a bit of socialist history with the Mao era Red Flag limousine. Like its Soviet counterpart the Zil, it was originally produced for the communist leadership in 1958. But it fell out of favour with the Chinese leadership who preferred the more polished Audi, which dominates 30% of the market. Discontinued in 2010, it is now back as the first choice of the upper echelons of the party.

But the main problem for China and other emerging markets in learning the art of marketing is the protection of the brands themselves. The Chinese governments, usually local governments in trying to protect home grown industries, have been ruthless in slandering foreign brands. Luxury brands including Hermès, Hugo Boss and Tommy Hilfiger Chanel, Armani, Christian Dior, Zara and Burberry have been attacked as substandard. Wal-Mart in Chongqing found itself the scapegoat for high pork prices, while Coke, Heinz, Procter & Gamble General Mills, Lipton Teas, Colgate-Palmolive all have been accused of selling adulterated products.

Besides slander, the Chinese are notorious for intellectual property violations and trademark infringement. This consistent disregard for property rights was supposed to damage multinational firms, but the real losers are in China, for without these basic protections, the locals can only hope to produce basic commodities and leave the more profitable higher end to foreigners.

(William Gamble is president of Emerging Market Strategies. An international lawyer and economist, he developed his theories beginning with his first hand experience and business dealings in the Russia starting in 1993. Mr Gamble holds two graduate law degrees. He was educated at Institute D'Etudes Politique, Trinity College, University of Miami School of Law, and University of Virginia Darden Graduate School of Business Administration. He was a member of the bar in three states, over four different federal courts and has spoken four languages. Mr Gamble can be contacted at [email protected] or [email protected]).



Life Exclusive
Uneasy truce at the office

It was time to bid adieu to the garment industry and go west; to remember the desert and invite the snow! The 30th part of a series describing the unknown triumphs and travails of doing international business


My return from Muscat was welcomed by the staff as I had close relations with all of them. In fact, I may even say it immodestly that I could identify every single member of the 550 odd people in the factory by their name! Of course, Perera was doing a great job, but, somehow the staff members had developed a special affection for me, which I reciprocated.

However, it was not a victorious return, as, in the next few days, letters started arriving from Muscat about the problems they were facing in my absence. Apparently, Abdullah started coming down to the plant and started spending time with the coordinator, who, in turn would walk around the plant issuing conflicting work orders. Though orders on hand were small, the speed at which they were being executed left much to be desired, all because the coordinator was asking for some personal dresses to be made!

I was in touch with a couple of them, primarily Francisca and Ranjan, who were keeping me informed of the problems. I had left a note for payment of electricity and water bills because the cheques (mine, of course!) were in the custody of Abdullah, but when the payment was not made, someone had called for settling the same. In the afternoon, at tea break, the staff members had always received some snacks but these little considerations were missing when Abdullah took over.

Exactly one week after my departure, Abdullah came to Dubai for discussions with Zubair; though I did see him walking into our plant, I was not called in to participate, because he wanted to have a chat with Zubair on a one-to-one basis. However, he wanted me to return back and do the daily reporting to him so that the plant can work smoothly. Besides, he wanted Zubair to pump in more funds for efficient running of the plant.

Frankly, I do not know till today what really transpired in that meeting; but knowing Zubair, I knew that he was not going to invest more money on a venture on which we had no control, and with a partner who was whimsical and had not even invested a dime.  If I may say so, the only investment he made was giving out his premises on an inflated rent to the company and on which we had further invested in the conversion process. It would only mean that we would be investing more good money against an unlikely, bad return and on which we had no control whatsoever! On a rough estimate, Zubair, being the financier lost a little more than half a million dollars, and I felt responsible for this loss.

I was very upset and bad about the whole affair. What a brilliant start we had and what we had landed in less than 18 months!  Other units in Muscat were doing well and were really expanding, including my erstwhile company, Gulf Garments, which had shifted from Jebel Ali Free Zone and began its operations in Muscat.

In the office, it was an uneasy truce for me. We had several long-term orders on hand and we had continuous supplies and shipments. Occasionally, when we had the gap in the production capacity, we could pick up an order or two from the Free Zone companies and did contract jobs. Our staff had become very proficient in manufacturing a variety of jackets, in which our net realization was much higher than basic garments. Also, we were willing to do swap deals to keep our plant going in full swing. 

JAGTA as the association was still in great demand, in terms of information and assistance to garment makers, whether they were members or not. I was keeping myself busy, but felt that if I continued, I would be an economic burden on the company. Meanwhile, Perera was also groomed well to handle many of the local problems, many through Vimala Sena—the able all rounder I had selected. I came to know through my grapevine that he had assured Zubair that he would have no problem if I was absent, as he had done the job well, in my absence in Muscat. 

In fact, one day Zubair called me in to take a visit to Bahrain the next day, and gave me my ticket to meet a license holder there, who wanted someone to help him set up a factory. This person, let us call him Faisal, received me at the airport and took me straight to the site. He left me there for making a detailed assessment and collected me after about two hours.  From there, we went to his office for a discussion and then on to a hotel (which was his) where I stayed for the night before my return back to Dubai. 

During the discussions in the afternoon, I explained to him the possibilities and how I could get the plant into production in less than 100 days, provided he was able to arrange for purchasing the machinery and for getting visas for staff and wanted his clarification if Zubair was anyway partnering him in this venture. I wanted his confirmation about his financial contribution and assurance that we will have absolutely free hand in the operation; I confirmed that I was aware of the Bahraini law that first job preference was to be given to the local staff, before employing others.

He said he would discuss the issue with Zubair, who would let me know on my return. 

The next day, when Zubair and I had lunch, I summarized the visit. With our bad experience in Muscat, I did not want Zubair to burn his fingers again, unless the terms laid down by me were acceptable, which Zubair wholeheartedly agreed, but Faisal was only willing to give his ‘warehouse’ and nothing else. The project in Bahrain failed before it started! This was also a hint that I would be a burden if I continued with my aspirations with Finetex.

My departure from Finetex was now a open secret; I was a dead man walking in a plant that I had really shed my blood to build; but sometimes, one had to bite the bullet, whether one liked it or not!  We kept our communication lines open, and I had spoken to Sundaram, whose unused building I had helped to convert into a full-fledged plant, which had grown to some 180 staff members. He was happy to take my help and assistance, and I started my work there, though I was frequenting the Free Zone office in Dubai.

In the next few months, we built one of the most comprehensive garment units in the country.  Texpo plant was built with beautiful staff facilities and a canteen, with special independent two bedroom self-contained house for the manager; we even obtained a suitable job for Nayana’s husband, who joined her. The factory was well planned, which was completed in a record time of eight to nine months. There was no dearth of orders. In fact, one of the major work achievements was securing a large order for embroidered shirts (Walt Disney’s Jungle Book!) for supplies to Germany. This enabled me to acquire new knowledge on making shirts and blouses with embroidery, which came to my rescue later. This Ajman factory was self-contained with lots of moving space, where staff members could walk to the main factory in two minutes!

But my love for Finetex and the methodical way Free Zone worked in Dubai brought me back to zone. I returned back and joined the Palmon group to look after Wellworth, their plant making basic garments such as shirts, and stayed with them for another year and half. 

Joining Wellworth, I travelled back to Colombo, and recruited some more staff to meet our requirements. In this plant, we had staff from India, Bangladesh, the Philippines and Sri Lanka.  It was pleasant to be back in the Free Zone and we had a great time. On National Day of Sri Lanka (4th February), I addressed them in Sinhala and when the first opportunity came, it was in Bengali to the delight of our staff. The team work was fantastic with no troubles whatsoever.

It was almost towards the end of 1996 when we received our long-awaited call for a trip to the West. Our family decided to go west and seek our fortune there; to remember the desert and invite the snow! 

(AK Ramdas has worked with the Engineering Export Promotion Council of the ministry of commerce and was associated with various committees of the Council. His international career took him to places like Beirut, Kuwait and Dubai at a time when these were small trading outposts. From being the advisor to exporters, he took over the mantle of a trader, travelled far and wide, and switched over to setting up garment factories and then worked in the US. He can be contacted at [email protected].)




Nagesh Kini FCA

4 years ago

I thoroughly enjoyed reading Mr.Ramdas whom I eagerly look forward to meet.
Like him I''ve also a stint as the CFO with a 100% export garment Delhi and can understand his experiences of 'shirts and blouses'!

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

To continue

Sign Up or Sign In


To continue

Sign Up or Sign In



The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)