Commodity Trends


The commodity market regulator, the Forward Markets Commissions, plans to allow sugar...

Premium Content
Monthly Digital Access


Already A Subscriber?
Yearly Digital+Print Access


Moneylife Magazine Subscriber or MSSN member?

Yearly Subscriber Login

Enter the mail id that you want to use & click on Go. We will send you a link to your email for verficiation
Rupee to have distinct symbol, joins elite currency club

The unique symbol would help in distinguishing the Indian currency from rupee or rupiah of countries like Pakistan, Nepal, Sri Lanka and Indonesia

The Indian rupee will soon have a unique symbol — a blend of the Devanagri 'Ra' and Roman 'R' — joining elite currencies like the US dollar, euro, British pound and Japanese yen in having a distinct identity, reports PTI.

The new symbol, designed by Bombay IIT post-graduate D Udaya Kumar, was approved by the cabinet today — reflecting that the Indian currency, backed by an over-trillion dollar economy, was finally making its presence felt on the international scene.

"It's a big statement on the Indian currency... The symbol would lend a distinctive character and identity to the currency and further highlight the strength and global face of the Indian economy," information and broadcasting minister Ambika Soni told reporters after the cabinet meeting.

Though the symbol will not be printed or embossed on currency notes or coins, it would be included in the 'Unicode Standard' and major scripts of the world to ensure that it is easily displayed and printed in the electronic and print media.

Among currencies with distinctive identities, only the pound sterling has its symbol printed on the notes.

Unicode is an international standard that allows text data to be interchanged globally without conflict. After incorporation in the global and Indian codes, the symbol would be used by all individuals and entities within and outside the country.

The symbol will be adopted in a span of six months in the country, and within 18 to 24 months globally, Ms Soni said, adding that it will feature on computer keyboards and softwares for worldwide use.

Ms Soni said that the symbol, which reflects the Indian ethos and culture, would help distinguish the currency from the rupee or rupiah of other countries like Pakistan, Nepal, Sri Lanka and Indonesia.

Besides this, state governments would be asked to proactively promote the use of the new symbol, she added.

Mr Kumar's entry was chosen from 3,000 designs competing for the currency symbol. He will get an award of Rs2.5 lakh.

"It is a perfect blend of Indian and Roman letters -- capital 'R' and Devanagri 'Ra' which represents rupaiah, to appeal to international and Indian audiences... My design is based on the tricolour, with two lines at the top and white space in between," a visibly-happy Kumar said.

The jury, which had sent the five short-listed entries for the cabinet's approval, was headed by a Reserve Bank of India (RBI) deputy governor.


Making ULIPs less attractive without making changes in traditional plans may be against policyholders’ interests

IRDA has moved swiftly to make ULIPs less attractive for agents and insurance companies. While this is laudable, there is an unintended impact. Policyholders will be persuaded to buy the more opaque traditional plans now

Unit-linked Insurance Plans (ULIPs) were the main source of revenues for insurance companies all these years. The new framework of ULIPs substantially reduces the profitability of companies and agents. As a result, agents will be less motivated to sell ULIPs and they may shift to selling traditional plans like endowment plans and money-back plans. For the insurance companies too, selling traditional plans means more profits now. A lot of them were making money from high surrender charges so far on ULIPs. The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) has capped surrender charges drastically.

But both commissions and surrender charges for traditional plans remain as high as before. The commissions for selling traditional plans are still 30% to 35% in the first year; in the second and third years the commission is 7.5%; from the fourth year onwards, the commission is 5% for a 15-year policy. Clearly, traditional plans would be an important focus now.

This is where the customer loses out. "When you compare ULIPs to traditional plans, in a traditional plan there is a lack of clarity, no choice in the allocation of funds and surrender charges are unclear. However with a ULIP plan, the customers can easily understand the commitment he has made," GN Agarwal, chief actuary and chief risk officer, Future Generali, told Moneylife.

In a traditional plan, nearly 85% of that money will go into bonds and the remainder will go into the equity market. But there is no way of knowing how much is invested when and how they are performing. In other words, traditional plans are opaque.

In ULIPs you know how much money is going into stock markets. ULIPs allow you to invest in a 60:40 portfolio (60% in equity and 40% in bonds). For that matter you can also put your money in a 70:30 portfolio or 50:50 portfolio and know how you are faring.

"We explain to our clients that in traditional plans the risk is low, so your benefits are also low, whereas in ULIPs more often, the money invested enters stock markets, which gives them a higher yield," explains an agent of Max New York Life Insurance.

"A traditional plan is a rigid plan and the insurance cover in it has a pre-determined premium rate depending on the term of the insurance. It's a good preservation asset but not a good accumulation asset," said an agent of HDFC Life Insurance.

Another drawback of traditional plans is that they are not flexible. The money put in traditional plans remains locked. You cannot shift your investments to any other pool. However, ULIPs gives you the luxury of being flexible. You can shift your invested amount from the equity markets to bonds, if you fear that the markets would go down, allowing you to change fund allocation and giving ULIP customers a better chance of controlling what they get out of these instruments.

"ULIPs are more transparent, which gives the consumer the opportunity to view the product. Traditional plans on the other hand, only give you the sum assured payable on death or maturity, along with the bonus amount declared by the insurer from time to time. Also, a majority of investments are put in bonds and you cannot shift your funds as per investment guidelines of IRDA," an official from Bajaj Allianz said.

Therefore, what is the upshot of all this? In a supreme irony, in trying to help customers, the insurance regulator has now pushed them into a product that makes them worse off.

It may be recalled that the regulator has ordered that commission charges in ULIPs be distributed evenly over the entire lock-in period, which has been extended to five years from three years. IRDA has capped the charges at 4% annually for 5 years, and 3% for 5-10 years and 2.25% for products above 10-year terms.

Of course, choosing between ULIPs and traditional plans still means sailing between the devil and the deep blue sea. Even with ULIPs having become cheaper and traditional plans being costly and opaque, it is still advisable to go for term plans as they are more beneficial for the consumer. If IRDA has to be really customer-friendly it has to ensure that term plans become ubiquitous. Insurance companies have a nasty habit of denying you term plans.



sahil mahajan

7 years ago

Are yaar kyu hmari job k piche pde ho????????????

Duraisamy P

7 years ago

All the days i can say ULIPs remain the best. If IRDA insists agents commission to spread over the years, it is good for the dedicated agents who sell the policies professionally and the companies can also have the agents stick with the company in the long term perspective.

nagaraja k

7 years ago

Article is an eyeopener. People should not insure in the first place. People
should move to MFsor invest in stock market ,because ULIPs and traditional plans mean sailing between the devil and the deep blue sea. Even if they go for term plans they get nothing in the end if they survive.

TP Viswanathan

7 years ago

At least the existing policy holders should be helped out or shown some ways to exit with minimum possible loss.

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

To continue

Sign Up or Sign In


To continue

Sign Up or Sign In



The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)