China needs four yuans of debt to create one yuan of growth!

The new reforms announced over the summer and at the conclusion of the Third Plenum of the 18th Party Congress are supposed to change all this. But they have a long way to go

Laws are meant to be obeyed. So when politicians, bureaucrats, and even central bankers have a problem they simply publish a law and assume that people will fall in line. This is basically what the Chinese have done for many years with interest rates. But there is something that doesn’t obey laws: markets. Now the Chinese have decided to reform their financial system by publishing a new law. They may be in for some surprises.


China’s financial system is still true to its communist roots. All property belongs to the state. This included all of the money in banks. So the state has the right and duty to decide how that money is used. As a result the government told the state owned banks what to charge borrowers and what to pay depositors.


This system has worked rather well. It is particularly useful after a recession. During the last recession about 12 years ago, the banks had huge amounts of bad debts on their books as high as 25%. These debts were never collected and basically never written off. The losses were made good over the years on the spread between the low interest rates paid depositors and the higher rate charged borrowers. Both of these were set rather low to encourage economic growth. Depositors bore much of the burden. But they had few other investment choices. They could put money in the banks for a meagre return or, if they were more fortunate, invest in real estate.


The consequence of this system was predictable. The low interest rates for borrowers spurred investment mostly in a rising property market, while depositors’ return was insufficient to increase consumption. The Chinese economy became notoriously imbalanced. It relied on export, which has been weak. It also became addicted to cheap credit which made firms especially state owned firms inefficient. So much so that it takes four yuan of debt to create one yuan of growth. The property market rose to bubble territory. Many newly constructed towns do not even have residents.


The new reforms announced over the summer and at the conclusion of the Third Plenum of the 18th Party Congress are supposed to change all this. But they have a long way to go.


In the US the central bank, the US Federal Reserve (Fed), has a number of tools it can use to set interest rates. But there is a major difference between what the Fed does and what the Chinese have done. The Fed uses its tools to manipulate the market. The Chinese have simply told the market what to do.


For example one way the Fed influences interest rates is through open market operations. Once the Fed decides on what it believes to be an appropriate interest rate, they buy US government bonds to increase the money supply to make interest rates fall or sell government bonds to decrease the money supply to make interest rates rise. They also have the power to increase or decrease the reserves that banks hold. If a bank does not have sufficient assets to meet this requirement it can borrow from the Fed at its discount window. The Fed will charge a rate appropriate to help it meet its interest targets.


This does not mean that the Fed always gets its way. Last May when the Fed announced that it was considering the famous ‘taper’ of its bond buying extravaganza known as QE, interest rates on the market shot up. The rate for 10-year US government bonds went from 1.63% on May 2nd to 2.97% almost 3% on September 5th. They have come down some to 2.75%, but nowhere near the previous low which the Fed would undoubtedly prefer. The market gets its way.


Last July, the Chinese central bank, the People’s Bank of China, decided to gradually reform its system. The PBOC said that they would no longer set a ‘floor’ or a minimum interest rate that banks could charge corporate customers. In theory this will increase competition between banks for customers. While this was interesting, what was more important is what the government didn’t do. It did not lift the cap or ceiling on what the banks can charge. It did not change the cap on what banks can pay depositors.


Recently the PBOC made another ‘reform’. It established a ‘prime rate’. It used to set a bench mark rate, but since it had already set caps and floors for borrowers, that rate was essentially meaningless. It has not been changed since last year. In contrast the new prime rate is to be set by the markets. It is to be calculated daily through an official price quotation system and be based on a weighted average of rates from nine domestic commercial banks. The old bench mark was 6%. The new prime rate was initially set at 5.71% for one year loans.


While an official ‘prime rate’ will be welcome, the market has already created SHIBOR. SHIBOR is the rate Chinese banks charge each other. It is sort of a Chinese version of LIBOR. What is interesting about SHIBOR is that it does not show a normal yield curve. Most western banks charge more for longer dated loans. For example the yields for US Bonds with three month and six months maturities are 0.05% and 0.08% respectively. The yields SHIBOR for three and six month terms are 4.71% and 4.22% respectively. In fact the highest yield is for one month at 6.37%, far higher than the one year which has been stable since June at 4.40%


The difference in rates could reflect the uncertainty surrounding the PBOC’s injections of money into the system. The PBOC requires banks to maintain reserves. In the past, if a bank ran short, the PBOC would automatically inject money into the system by buying bonds through repo agreements. However in June, the PBOC did nothing.


Banks were so desperate for money that the overnight loan from one bank to another briefly hit 30%. On Friday November 14th it spiked again opening a full percentage point higher than its close on Thursday. Also, on Friday, the PBOC auctioned off 50-year bonds at 5.31% also over a 100 basis points higher than the last auction. In essence the PBOC is signalling tighter monetary conditions.


So far the reforms have been limited. A reform liberalising of deposit rates will have to wait for the creation of a deposit insurance system to protect depositors in case of a bank failure, a very real possibility for some smaller banks. But like SHIBOR, the market hasn’t waited. Depositors already have a choice. They can put money in the shadow banking system and get much higher rates by purchasing Wealth Management Products or WMPs. It is the source of nearly half of the credit growth this year. The higher rates for investors mean higher rates for borrowers often in double-digit interest rates, even for the highest quality borrowers. To profit from such transactions requires the borrowers to speculate on real estate transactions.


Any reform of this system by liberalising deposit rates could have a disastrous impact. It would lead to surging lending rates. It would impact not only the real estate bubble, but also the entire economy. The end of QE in the US might have a similar effect in China due to the carry trade.


The Chinese government is well aware of these risks. As part of the reform package of the Third Plenum, president Xi Jinping will set up a “national security commission” which will allow him to take direct control of domestic security. He will also tighten control over the internet.


The market originally celebrated the introduction of the reforms. But as they take shape and the market regains control, some of the distortions created by the rules could disappear in a rather violent way. Whether the equity markets will be so optimistic then will be something to seen.


(William Gamble is president of Emerging Market Strategies. An international lawyer and economist, he developed his theories beginning with his first-hand experience and business dealings in the Russia starting in 1993. Mr Gamble holds two graduate law degrees. He was educated at Institute D'Etudes Politique, Trinity College, University of Miami School of Law, and University of Virginia Darden Graduate School of Business Administration. He was a member of the bar in three states, over four different federal courts and has spoken four languages.)


Cooperative Housing Society Issues: Your Rights & Remedies

Moneylife Foundation held yet another event for its members, where Vinod Sampat addressed queries on the vexing issues concerning Cooperative Housing Societies in Mumbai

With the recent Campa Cola episode, Moneylife Foundation has been receiving huge request from its members to conduct seminars relating to realty issues and issues relating to cooperative housing societies (CHS). After many such successful events in the past Moneylife Foundation conducted another workshop on issues related to CHS. Advocate Vinod Sampat, an expert in CHS matters, in association with Moneylife Foundation, spoke extensively on co-operative housing society issues, member’s rights & remedies available.

“Common issues in any CHS can be resolved by discussion. If this does not solve the issue, the complainant may have to raise it to appropriate authorities, like municipal corporation, deputy registrar for cooperatives, consumer court and police,” explained Mr Sampat to a packed audience. Many residents are not familiar with the workings of the CHS, and are left confused while dealing with a variety of civic and legal compliances. Mr Sampat went on to speak on several issues like when conveyance is not obtained by society, occupation certificate not handed over by the builder, building completion certificate not handed over and many such issues involving the builder and society. He specifically mentioned that affected members should approach consumer courts before the regulatory act is enacted, which is all in favour of builders. He said one should claim heavy damages and file criminal complaint against builders.

Sometimes, there are infractions between housing societies and individual apartment owners, as well as outsiders. However, many individual apartment owners are at a loss as far as grievance is concerned and do not know how to proceed with their complaint. There are several issues in a CHS, like car parking, leakages, fraudulent auditing, unauthorised construction, and many other issues. Home owners need to know the right recourse to take action to ensure that their rights are maintained and upheld.

He further spoke on conveyance and re-development. He said, “Unfortunately, the real estate sector is unregulated, and few people have knowledge about its various laws. And even fewer can stand up to the powerful builders’ lobby.” The recent Campa Cola episode shows that co-operative housing societies must exercise due caution, when it comes to maintaining and ensuring that their buildings comply with the law.

As per the provisions of section 11 of the Maharashtra Ownerships Flats Act (MOFA), the promoter is duty-bound to complete his title and convey the same to the organisation of persons who had bought the flat (i.e. cooperative society, CHS, home buyer, apartment owner, etc). The conveyance has to be executed and the promoter or builder has to deliver the title relating to the property. It is also the duty of the promoter to file a copy of the conveyance with the flat purchasers and the competent authority under section 11(2).

Mr Sampat also offered tips to the audience on selecting developers for redevelopment projects. He insisted that the process should be transparent, and advised that members should have legal and technical consultants to interact with the builder. Also, it is important to check the builder’s credentials and financial conditions.


Read more on CHS and important points to consider before buying a home:

Cooperative housing societies: Common issues and solutions

How to buy home or flat in Mumbai safely and smartly

Home buyers’ checklist while dealing with the builder, developer

Deemed conveyance: Who is responsible, CHS or the builder?


Those seeking help or advice on CHS issues can contact
Moneylife Foundation’s Legal Resource Centre (LRC) ( )



nagesh kini

3 years ago

In his otherwise great talk on CHS issues, Adv. Sampat's snide remarks on elders/senior citizens were certainly unwarranted more particularly when the majority of the participants were elders. They do not go well.

Mr. Samat needs to provide the age profiles of the managing committee members of CHS and NGOs to acertain the numbers.

Experience shows that the youngsters do not come forward saying that "they are too busy" naturally it falls to the lot of the elders to step by default rather let the institution go to the dogs.

In public bodies the elders are certainly treated with much more respect and dignity in attending to the societal concerns. The youngsters not only throw their weight around but tend to pressurise the babus by throwing about big names.

Over to the elders and youngsters for their response.
It must be conceded that the 60+ have more exposure to ground realities much than the brash kal-ka-bachas!


nagesh kini

In Reply to nagesh kini 3 years ago

para 2 please read "Sampat" for "Samat".

Sensex, Nifty struggle for direction through week, move sideways and end weak

The bulls battled in first half of the week, while bears took the upper hand in the end. The strong trend is missing and it is a sideways market. Expect uncertainty to continue, with bouts of volatility

Last week, we had suggested that NSE Nifty may put in a small rally but may again head lower given strong macro headwinds. This is what happened. The BSE 30-share Sensex fell 182 points (or 0.89%) to close the week at 20,217.39, while the Nifty closed at 5995.45, down 60.70 points (or 1.00%).

Initially, the markets looked like it was headed for a winning streak, after moving up for 3-consecutive trading sessions starting 14th November. However, the streak was broken decisively on Wednesday. Overall, it has been a weak week.

On Monday, the trading session staged a massive rally following a strong US market a stronger rupee, various speeches by the RBI governor and the finance minister over the weekend and unveiling of China’s 10-year economic plan (in which liberalisation is in the cards).

However, on Tuesday there was no follow through to the Monday’s strong session. Bulls hungrily bought the dip and pushed the market higher again. The entire trading session was characterised by small moves up and down. There was not much news, except investment houses, like CLSA, being bearish on India’s economic prospects unless the government implements economic reforms.

Wednesday’s highlight was that a massive selling took place at the fag end, destroying the confidence of the bulls. The Sensex fell 300 points in a matter of one hour, the highest fall since 30 September 2013. This was a signal that the upcoming sessions would be weak and markets would fall.

Indeed, the weakness continued, with Thursday’s session extending Wednesday’s losses. The markets fell sharply, erasing in just two days, all the gains made since last week’s Thursday (i.e. since 14 November 2013). After a huge opening decline, broad-based weakness dragged the markets down, in a steady declining downtrend, without any fight back from the bulls, throughout the day.

Friday’s session was interesting. The markets had a spirited opening, in the green, with sustained strength through the day, before a dramatic sell off during late afternoon, through the end, erased all the gains made during the day. NSE volumes fell to just 49.43 lakh shares, showing that bears may have had their fill, allowing for a weak rally next week.

Among the 1,266 shares that traded on the NSE this week, 578 rose, 645 fell and 43 remained unchanged.

Among the other indices on the NSE, the top two indices were Realty (0.60%) and Infrastructure (0.25%) while the top two losers were Pharmaceuticals (-2%) and Media (-5%).

Among the Nifty stocks the top five gainers were Tata Steel (5%); Jindal Steel (4%); Cairn India (3%); ONGC (3%) and Hindalco Industries (3%), while the top five losers were Sesa Sterlite (-9%); Bajaj Auto (-7%); Cipla (-4%); Sun Pharmaceuticals (-4%) and Hero MotoCorp (-4%).


Out of the 27 main sectors tracked by Moneylife, top five and the bottom five sectors were:


Top ML sectors


Worst ML sectors








Non-Ferrous metals


Oil & Gas




Consumer durables


Foods & Beverages








We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

To continue

Sign Up or Sign In


To continue

Sign Up or Sign In



The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)