“I still have a lot more questions for the Red Cross,” said Sen. Charles Grassley
The American Red Cross met a deadline this week to answer congressional questions
about how it spent nearly half a billion dollars donated after the 2010 Haiti earthquake, but the group says details can't yet be released publicly.
And the senator who posed the questions is not satisfied.
"I still have a lot more questions for the Red Cross," said Sen. Charles Grassley in a statement. "I have other questions about the spending numbers and how they add up and the overhead costs for both the Red Cross and the grantee organizations. Also, I'd like to see more details of the results achieved from each of the partner organizations."
After taking out a slice for overhead, the Red Cross passed on much of the donated money to nearly 50
other aid groups to do the actual work in Haiti. The Red Cross gave details to Grassley about that money, but it asked the senator not to release the information.
The group told the Iowa Republican that its contracts with other groups do "not permit us to disclose the information to the media or donors."
Grassley questioned that arrangement.
"It's unclear why the Red Cross enters into contracts with other organizations stipulating that details of grants can't be disclosed to the media or donors," said Grassley in his statement. "Who's driving the lack of disclosure, the Red Cross or the grant recipients? What's the rationale for it? It's hard to see how disclosing the dollar amounts given from the Red Cross to the individual organizations and how those organizations spent the money would harm anyone. I look forward to an explanation."
The Red Cross did not immediately respond to requests for comment. It's not clear when or if the other groups will give permission for the information to be released. (Here
is a copy of the letter the Red Cross sent this month to one of the groups seeking permission.)
The senator's office did release 12 of the 72 pages
the Red Cross provided in response to Grassley's questions
. The responses released so far contain few new details about the Haiti program.
Among the responses:
"Your question asks how many permanent homes have been 'built,' but providing permanent homes can be achieved in a number of ways including repair, retrofitting, rental subsidy, and transitional shelters," the Red Cross said in its response to Grassley.
It's not clear why the group considers a "transitional shelter" to be providing a permanent home.
The group did provide Grassley with a topline breakdown
of its shelter spending.
The group gave a bit more explanation on how the Red Cross counts "beneficiaries
" of its work in Haiti. The Red Cross letter states that beneficiaries could be anyone from people who received a handout of soap to those who got construction training. It also states that the Red Cross is "conservative and reliable in reporting even if it means under-reporting our impact."
But as we have previously reported, internal Red Cross assessments have concluded that the group sometimes overcounts
how many people it helps. One internal report on a health project called the beneficiary count "fairly meaningless
The Red Cross said that when it gave money to other groups to do projects, it kept close track
of how money was spent. "After grant awards are made, American Red Cross requires, per our agreements, careful reviews of financial and narrative reporting, detailing how partners spend our funds."
That is at odds with internal assessments of some of the group's projects that found "no correct process
for monitoring project spending." In the case of $10 million for cholera projects, one of the assessments found that oversight was so poor that… Continue Reading…