Citizens' Issues
Cabinet mulling law on misleading endorsement by celebrities
Even as the average consumer opts for products endorsed by celebrities, the central government is all set to come up with a new law that would make such personalities "accountable for misleading ads".
 
The Law and Consumer Affairs Ministry has accepted the recommendation of a parliamentary Standing Committee and decided to impose "stringent provisions including jail term and hefty penalty" of up to Rs50,00,000 for "repeated offence", official sources said here on Tuesday.
 
The Cabinet on Wednesday is likely to give its nod to the "change in the draft law" as being brought into the Consumer Protection Bill, 2015 -- already pending before Parliament. 
 
In its report on the Consumer Protection Bill tabled in Parliament in April this year, the standing committee headed by Telugu Desam Party (TDP) lawmaker J.C. Divakar Reddy had mooted giving "adequate legal teeth to advertising watchdog to curb misleading ads".
 
The panel also recommended severe penalties like cancellation of licence of those involved in food adulteration, an official source said.
 
The government has now decided to bring in some "necessary changes" in the Consumer Protection Bill in tune with the spirit of the recommendation of the standing committee.
 
"The committee strongly feels that misrepresentation of a product, especially of a food product, should be taken very seriously considering the influence of celebrities and individuals and companies. The existing laws are not deterrent enough to discourage manufacturers or publishers from using such personalities for misleading ads," the parliamentary panel on Consumer Affairs had said.
 
Among other issues, sources said, the government also accepted in principle the recommendation of the panel that the Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) should be given more functional autonomy. The committee also favoured suitable provision in the new law to empower chief commissioner and commissioners and officials of the CCPA for initiating actions against defaulters.
 
In fact, industry sources and consumer activists say the issue of celebrities endorsing brands and products, and their punishment if claims made in the advertisements turn out to be misleading and false had first figured in 2012 when a federation of state-level consumer protection bodies had suggested to the erstwhile UPA regime for enacting such a law.
 
"In September 2012, we had submitted a number of recommendations to the Ministry of Consumer Affairs to protect the interests of the consumers. Most important of them is making celebrities accountable for the claims made in the advertisements endorsed by them," Amrit Shah, a former chairman of the Consumer Coordination Council, a federation of state-level consumer bodies, told IANS.
 
Consumer activists had said that a number of complaints have been lodged with the consumers alleging that they were fleeced by brands endorsed by the celebrities.
 
Activists also say a large number of complaints are against claims of weight loss or protecting hair loss endorsed by the celebrities.
 
"Celebrities should check for themselves if the claims being made are genuine or not," says an official in the Consumer Affairs Ministry.
 
Sources also said that the new changes as proposed in the Bill seeks to make any "false or misleading" endorsement -- which would be detrimental to the interest of consumers -- a penal offence, punishable with a jail term of up to two years and a fine of Rs10 lakh for the first such offence.
 
The new law would also bring in provisions to impose imprisonment of five years along with a fine of Rs50 lakh for the second and subsequent offences by any defaulter.
 
Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.

User

COMMENTS

Vishnumurthy Prabhu

3 months ago

Good step indeed. But I have a problem with the existing bill. Endorser is liable not just to the actions under his or her control but also something beyond. With this yardstick, what about the stake holders of the company who will also benefit from selling faulty product. What about the media platform who will also make money by giving space to display such ads? where is the sense of proportionality.
I understand that today people are supporting this law just for their hate against the celebrities more than the purpose for which this is supposed to be enacted. But I am sure that when this goes to court, it can't keep quiet and apply the provisions disproportionately against branding companies or brand ambassadors alone. It will also extend to the whole chain of beneficiaries.

Health Insurance: A Comparison of Cancer Covers
Following the launch of Max Life Cancer Insurance plan, now there are three cancer specific...
Premium Content
Monthly Digital Access

Subscribe

Already A Subscriber?
Login
Yearly Digital+Print Access

Subscribe

Moneylife Magazine Subscriber or MSSN member?
Login

Yearly Subscriber Login

Enter the mail id that you want to use & click on Go. We will send you a link to your email for verficiation
Power Grid Corporation: Low Power
There is a lot of excitement around Power Grid Corporation’s stock. One of the reasons for...
Premium Content
Monthly Digital Access

Subscribe

Already A Subscriber?
Login
Yearly Digital+Print Access

Subscribe

Moneylife Magazine Subscriber or MSSN member?
Login

Yearly Subscriber Login

Enter the mail id that you want to use & click on Go. We will send you a link to your email for verficiation

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
  Loading...
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email

BUY NOW

The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)