Cabinet approves BP buying stake in RIL’s 21 blocks

RIL had on 21st February agreed to sell 30% stake in 23 out of its 29 oil and gas blocks to London-based BP Plc for $7.2 billion, and may get an additional $1.8 billion if the two explorers find more hydrocarbons

New Delhi: After nearly five months wait, the government today cleared UK's BP Plc buying 30% stake in most of Reliance Industries' (RIL) oil and gas blocks, including the showpiece KG-D6 gas fields, for $7.2 billion, reports PTI.

The Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA), headed by prime minister Manmohan Singh, today approved BP buying stake in RIL's 21 blocks, sources said.

The CCEA could not meet on its scheduled day yesterday as the oil ministry had not circulated the agenda in time.

RIL, India's most valuable company, had on 21st February agreed to sell 30% stake in 23 out of its 29 oil and gas blocks to London-based BP Plc for $7.2 billion, and may get an additional $1.8 billion if the two explorers find more hydrocarbons.

The CCEA approved sale of stake only 21 blocks as exploration status in the two remaining blocks was in dispute.

BP will have to furnish a bank guarantee and performance guarantee as has been prescribed under the production sharing contract.

The deal, which may increase to $20 billion with future performance payments and investment, will give RIL access to BP's expertise in deep-water drilling and accelerate development and production at its fields particularly the under-performing eastern offshore KG-D6.

For BP, which has been struggling to battle back from the disastrous Gulf of Mexico oil-spill disaster last year, the transaction is a chance to enter a market where energy demand is growing at 5%-8%.

Officials said RIL had on 25th February applied for government nod for the stake sale. The New Exploration Licensing Policy, under which RIL had won the oil and gas blocks, allowed for sale or assignment of participating interest (farm-out), which is routinely approved by the oil ministry.

But the ministry, even though competent to approve the deal, decided to refer it to the CCEA.


Why would I trust a telecom services provider with my banking details if it cannot handle a simple DND database?

Non-banking fiduciary products, whether cash to/from ATMs, or bill payments, or anything else, are still at a stage where you have to be prepared to bend over backwards to work on matters if things go wrong

The menace of unsolicited telephone calls appears to get worse when one travels. It is almost as though telecom providers keep track of the movement of their customers, and then the moment they are out in roaming jurisdictions, the number of calls and SMS messages are notched up, probably as a means of generating additional revenue. In addition, all sorts of new plans for voice, data and text/SMS, add other options like GPS and more, and now mobile payment platforms-and you have a situation where the already incoherent bill is guaranteed to be even more difficult to understand—should you accept.

Broadly, as anybody in design will tell you, if the designers would just play around with the fonts, it would be so much easier for customers to understand things. But no, take a close look at most telecom bills, and you will see that the fonts as well as colours used are chosen to confuse rather than make things easier. And then, in the midst of all this, you will get some random voice asking you to subscribe for more connections, more plans, and pay some more.

As a subscriber and customer, there is, in real terms, not much you can do about it beyond registering with the DND (do not disturb) facility, which in itself is more like a game the telecom providers play with their customers. When a proposal was made to have a simple alternative that worked the other way around—wherein all customers were supposed to be on a DND registry unless specifically stated otherwise—the biggest opposition came from (you guessed right), the telecom providers.
Likewise, as far as the bill is concerned, it helps if you keep your plan as simple as possible. And hold on as far as mobile phone-based mobile wallets or whatever new buzzword they give it are concerned, as the technology is far from stabilised and the billing is far from accurate at this juncture. Sincere advice from somebody who has been in the technology end of this product is, stay away till further notice.

Non-banking fiduciary products, whether cash to/from ATMs, or bill payments, or anything else, are still at a stage where you have to be prepared to bend over backwards to work on matters if things go wrong. And should you end up using your mobile wallet when roaming, the heavens may not be able to help you unless you go back to the merchant for resolution.

And as I said at the beginning, telecom providers appear to keep a very sharp eye on your phone when you are in roaming areas.
Certainly, online payments appear to have stabilised, and for that we have the Indian Railways to thank. The standards they have set online, especially with reference to the usual bugbears of refunds and clarity in showing transactions, mean that the others have to match them, or go bust. As a result, utility bills, for example, paid online are a boon. If your mobile phone helps you do so, all good luck to you; this does appear to be working well and the resolution mechanisms through your credit card or debit card have been finessed over time.

But to start using the mobile phone as a payment facilitator, with a brand new payment processor known as your telecom company? Hang in there. It is nobody's contention that our telecom providers are customer-friendly with their basic telecom services. When they can't implement even a simple DND, would we trust their databases with our bank accounts, and a mandate for them to play around with our life's savings?

The root of the issue that the telecom companies do not address is this bothersome business of unsolicited calls. And be assured that if you get into their databases as somebody who spends with his or her mobile phone, then you could well be a target for more calls to buy this and buy that, mostly stuff you don't need. Sometimes, finding that you have been billed for something you didn't buy either. And they can prove you were there, too.

But the problem of unsolicited calls still remains unresolved.

There are a few ways to counter this. One is to, for example, get hold of the mobile numbers of the senior people at the telecom companies and then involve them in these unsolicited calls by either bringing them into conference mode or by calling them back subsequently. This was what Dhaval Valia did with Vodafone, who initially slapped him with a legal notice and a threat of Rs20 crore, and after a big furore online and elsewhere, had to withdraw.

But one of the methods I have always recommended has been that of becoming a small shareholder in the company that runs your mobile phone. Not only do you remain informed of how and what they are doing as an investor, but you also have certain rights as a shareholder, which are way above that of a consumer. And reminding them does not seem to hurt, as a matter of fact it gets faster resolution. I have helped people do this with Airtel, Reliance and Vodafone-and it always works. Nobody wants a consumer who is also a shareholder to make a formal complaint to the board of directors.

That is, nobody other than Idea Cellular Ltd and Pankaj Kapdeo, who is something or the other with a fancy title at Idea.  
Here's my first message to him:-
"Good morning and Jai Hind, This is to inform you that I am receiving telephone calls from 0-98914-62227 claiming to be from Idea Cellular, despite my placing my number 09xxx-xxxx4 on the DND list. Please take suitable action and advise. I am a shareholder as well as subscriber to Idea and will escalate this to the board of directors at the next AGM/meeting/as required. Sincerely."

The reply I got is this:
"Gentleman, Being a shareholder and being a subscriber are two different things and have nothing to do with AGM of the company where only the business relating to the agenda contained in the AGM notice is taken up. However, u have raised an issue relating to DND facility and rest assured that it would be handled by correct person to your satisfaction, in case your complaint falls into that category. Thanks. Pankaj Kapdeo."

What do you do in such cases?



p k

6 years ago

dear Mr Malik

very informative article.idea shows the management caliber and it has to be taken up on face book or such social media. pankaj or whatever needs to be shown his ":AUKAT".. it also shows how much management cares for customers.


6 years ago

In such cases, our only hope is to put the number's in some sort of identified caller name. For example I have 6-7 contacts in my mobile which are like VodafoneAdvt1, VodafoneAdvt2...this is an ever expanding list. And more often than not, when they use a previous number, then I'm able to reject the call.



In Reply to Ramanand 6 years ago

Thanks for writing in, Ramanand ji, good idea. In addition, suggest you join the Unofficial Vodafone pages on Facebook where the phone numbers of senior Vodafone enities are published, and divert these calls to them or bring them into conference.

The bigger issue here is whether we can trust such incompetent rascals with our banking lives.


6 years ago

DND is a joke. Because no matter how many times you lodge a complaint, you keep getting it unsolicited calls and SMSs. I seek guidance if I can go to Consumer Courts on this matter against BSNL



In Reply to Vaidya 6 years ago

Dear Vaidya ji, thank you for writing in. Certainly, you can and should approach the Consumer Courts. However, large corporates are worried more about bad publicity, so please use that route too - as long as you are sure of your facts.

Good luck/VM

Post de-merger, Octant Interactive shareholders still await listing of spun-off business

It has been seven months since Octant Interactive demerged its financial arm and vested in Five X Finance. But Five X Finance is still awaiting the market regulator’s permission for listing—leaving investors in the lurch   

Octant Interactive Technologies Ltd demerged its financial division business and vested in Five X Finance and Investment Ltd (with a whopping 80% of its capital) on 7 December 2010. Octant Interactive Technologies Ltd de-merged into Octant Industries and Five X Finance. Effectively, Octant Interactive Technologies Ltd is now called Octant Industries.

However, seven months after the de-merger, Five X Finance has not yet been listed, leaving investors stranded with the shares.

Even the market regulator seems to be not interested in investors' interest. Five X Finance has been waiting for SEBI (the Securities and Exchange Board of India) approval since January 2011, for listing.

As per the Scheme of Agreement, post the de-merger, Octant Interactive Technologies Ltd's shareholders got 4 shares in Five X Finance and Investment for every 5 shares in Octant Interactive which they held. For every 5 shares of Octant Interactive, the equity holder was to receive 1 share of Octant Industries, each share with face value of Rs10. In other words, the shareholders of Octant Interactive were given 80% of their current holding in Five X Finance and 20% in Octant Industries. This effectively reduced shareholder stake in Octant Industries.

The shareholding in Octant Industries—as on 30th September—was 2.56 crore equity shares, which was effectively reduced to 51.38 lakh equity shares.
"It is a really horrible experience for all of the investors, as our major capital and hard-earned money is stuck with Five X since the past 7 months and we are not getting a response from anywhere," an investor told Moneylife, preferring anonymity.

The listing of Octant Industries took place on 7 February 2011 at Rs12. The company informed investors through an update on the BSE (Bombay Stock Exchange) website on 19 April 2011 that Five X Finance is "under the process of obtaining listing approvals with the concerned exchanges for which the Company has applied for the permission of the respective authorities concerned." It has been almost three months since this announcement-and there are no signs of the new company being listed.

When Moneylife contacted Octant Industries, a spokesperson of the company said, "Five X Finance is now being looked after by a different management. Octant Industries has nothing to do with them."

Five X, on the other hand, said in an e-mail reply to Moneylife, "The demerged entity Five X Finance and Investment has moved the application with SEBI for Relaxation of Rule 19(2) (b) of the Securities Contracts Regulations Rules 1957, which is under the consideration of SEBI. (The) Company is following up with SEBI. Unless SEBI gives its approval, which is process driven, we will not be in a position to move the application for listing of Five X Finance and Investment Limited. We are waiting for the same. Any demerged entity prior to Listing after obtaining the Hon'ble High Court Approval, needs mandatory approval for Relaxation of Rule 19(2) (b) of the Securities Contracts Regulations Rules 1957. We have applied to SEBI through Stock Exchanges where the company got listed for the said relaxation in the month of January 24th 2011."

Mumbai-based First Call Equity, which was the merchant banker for the merger/demerger plan said, "The formalities required for listing the company are on. We have submitted all the necessary documents to SEBI. It's a totally new company and hence the delay. In about one month's time, the company should be listed."

This indicates that the listing procedure is pending with the SEBI, and investors are in a limbo.

Moneylife has pointed out earlier instances where companies, despite coming out with demerger plans, have not been not listed on the bourses for a long time. (SEBI keeps Innovassynth investors hanging as stock awaits listing approval for more than a year)

When they it was going in for the de-merger, Octant Interactive had stated, "Both companies have (the) potential to attract different set of investors, require different kind of investment and need to pursue different business strategies." The company said its "focus is on the IT industry" and therefore it considered separating the finance business. According to the statement, post de-merger, Octant Interactive would ostensibly be able to focus on its core business. However it is interesting to notice that despite being a software company, the company website "" is still under development.

According to the BSE website, Octant Interactive is into "Speciality Chemicals". Along with the de-merger, Octant Interactive merged with Swarnajyothi Agro & Exports Ltd, Indrabati Energies Pvt. Ltd. and Vanishekar Green Energy Pvt. Ltd. The only website running was that of "", where Octant Industries mentions it engaged into a greenfield project to manufacture castor oil derivatives.



Ninad Avasare

6 years ago

Now they already have got permission from SEBI on 2nd Sept 2011 for listing of Five X ...Today it is almost 45 days since they have got permission from SEBI but even after 45 days there are no signs of listing of Five X...It is really frustrating as company is not even taking care to reply email of investors..



In Reply to Ninad Avasare 6 years ago

SEBI should also be brought under JAN LOKPAL bill. All corruption organization needs revival.

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

To continue

Sign Up or Sign In


To continue

Sign Up or Sign In



The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)