Boost Financial Literacy by Teaching Mathematics
Not just financial literacy but numeric skills are required for individuals to make informed...
Premium Content
Monthly Digital Access


Already A Subscriber?
Yearly Digital+Print Access


Moneylife Magazine Subscriber or MSSN member?

Yearly Subscriber Login

Enter the mail id that you want to use & click on Go. We will send you a link to your email for verficiation
Net Neutrality May Face an Uphill Battle If History Tells Us Anything

The FCC’s current net neutrality proposal is just its latest attempt at regulating Internet companies, but there have been others


The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) voted on a proposal Thursday that effectively bars Internet companies from prioritizing some Internet traffic over others. As John Oliver famously explained “ending net neutrality would allow big companies to buy their way into the fast lane, leaving everyone else in the slow lane.” 


The FCC’s proposal faces plenty of opposition from telecom companies and others, but it’s just the latest round in a long fight. Here is a brief history of attempts to enact net neutrality and the often successful push against it. 


The FCC votes to deregulate cable Internet services.


March 2002: The FCC, under the Bush administration and Republican Chairman Michael Powell, declares that cable modem services are “not subject to common carrier regulation,” meaning they aren’t bound by standards for nondiscrimination in service. Instead, cable Internet services fall under a separate light regulatory regime that gives the commission limited enforcement power. 


Tim Wu coins the phrase “net neutrality.”


Fall 2003: Tim Wu, then an associate professor at the University of Virginia Law School, first coins the term “net neutrality” in a paper for the Journal of Telecommunications and High Technology Law. He defines net neutrality to mean an Internet “that does not favor one application…over others.”


The FCC adopts a toothless net neutrality-like policy statement.


August 2005: The FCC adopts a policy statement to “preserve and promote the open and interconnected nature of public Internet,” which focuses on protecting consumer access to content online and competition among Internet service companies. The statement has no power of enforcement. 


The first net neutrality bill is introduced in Congress. It dies.


May 2006: Sen. Ed Markey, D-Mass., introduces a net neutrality bill that would keep Internet service companies from blocking, degrading or interfering with users’ access to their services. But the bill stalled in the House Committee on Energy and Commerce and never came to a vote.


The FCC tells Comcast to stop slowing down access to BitTorrent.


August 2008: The FCC, under Republican Chairman Kevin Martin, orders Comcast to stop slowing down user access to BitTorrent, a peer-to-peer sharing network often used to share music and videos. 


Comcast sues the FCC, and wins. 


September 2008 — April 2010: Comcast voluntary agrees to stop slowing down BitTorrent traffic. But it takes the FCC to court anyway, arguing that the agency is operating outside its authority. Specifically, the company points out that the FCC’s 2005 policy statement on neutrality doesn’t have the force of law. 


The FCC writes real rules on net neutrality. 


December 2010: Democratic FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski writes an order to impose net neutrality rules. Unlike the FCC’s 2005 policy statement, this new order is a real rule, not just a policy statement. 


Except Verizon sues the FCC, saying it has no authority to enforce the rules, and wins.


September 2011 — January 2014: The District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals rules the Federal Communications Commission can’t enforce net neutrality rules because broadband Internet services don’t fall under its regulatory authority.


Senator introduces net neutrality bill that would ban the FCC from enforcement.


January 2015: Sen. John Thune, R-S.D., introduces a net neutrality bill as a discussion draft that would ban Internet service companies from blocking or degrading services or access to certain content, but would also strip the FCC of authority to enforce any of these rules.


The FCC chairman proposes to reclassify broadband Internet services and enforce net neutrality.


February 2015: Democratic Chairman Tom Wheeler introduces the current net neutrality proposal. Internet service companies such as AT&T and Comcast would be banned from offering paid prioritization to content providers such as Amazon for faster access. But the proposal would also allow Internet service companies to prevent other companies from using their wires to connect homes to the Internet.


This almost certainly will result in another fight. 


The details of the new rules won’t be made public until after the vote. Experts expect challenges to the rules as soon as they are published. Michael Powell, a former FCC Chairman and current president and CEO of the National Cable & Telecommunications Association, told CNBC it could take “at least two and up to five years before the rules are fully and finally settled." 


Related coverage: Read about state laws that make it difficult for cities to provide cheap, fast Internet through municipal broadband networks.


Courtesy: ProPublica.org



9 Signs It May Be a Tax Refund Scam

Don’t file with fraudsters this tax season


You may hate to do your taxes, but some scammers eagerly await the season. And as we approach Tax Day this year, the IRS is warning of a surge in phone scams where fraudsters impersonating IRS agents aggressively threaten arrest, deportation, and other actions, if the person on the other end doesn’t immediately give up money or personal financial information. But that’s not the only way fraudsters are attempting to make hay on the season. Here’s what you should know so you don’t get fleeced when filing your claims: 
1. The IRS will never call to demand immediate payment. Period.
2. The IRS does not contact taxpayers by email, text, or through social media to request personal information. If you get a communication from someone purporting to be from the IRS, it may be someone trying to steal your identity by getting your personal information. Report such attempts to [email protected].
3. Promises of larger-than-normal tax returns should be a red flag that the tax preparer may not be above board.
4. Ethical tax preparers do not charge a percentage of the refund amount as a fee or require you to split the refund with them.
5. Some scammers pose as fake charities to attract donations from taxpayers. Look into the status of a charitable organization before you donate.
6. Every tax preparer has to have a PTIN (Preparer Tax Identification Number). Ask to see the number. (A list of IRS actions against preparers can be found here if you want to see if the preparer has had a problem before.)
7. Tax preparers who encourage you to place false information on your tax return are breaking the law.
8. Promises of “free money” from the IRS or Social Security refunds or rebates are part of scams known to lure low-income and elderly consumers to a fraudulent website or tax scam artist.
9. Fraudsters will try to attract taxpayers by promising that you can file a tax return with little or no documentation, which is untrue.
The IRS offers free assistance in preparing taxes. More information on how to pick a tax preparer and programs offered through the IRS can be found here.
This article was updated on 2/25/2015. 
Courtesy: TruthInAdvertising.org 



Shri Nivasan

2 years ago

What is the relevance of this to us in India ?

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

To continue

Sign Up or Sign In


To continue

Sign Up or Sign In



The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)