BNP Paribas Mutual Fund new issue closes on 27th July
BNP Paribas Mutual Fund has launched BNP Paribas Fixed Term Fund-Series 22 C, a close-ended income scheme.
The investment objective of the scheme would be to achieve growth of capital through investments made in a basket of fixed income securities maturing on or before the maturity of the scheme. The tenure of the scheme is two years.
The new issue closes on 27th July. The minimum investment amount is Rs5,000.
CRISIL Short Term Bond Fund Index is the benchmark index. Alok Singh is the fund manager.
In a discussion paper, the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion has suggested creation of new service entities to which most of the statutory compliances, under the labour laws for SMEs, can be outsourced
The small and medium enterprises (SMEs) should be allowed to outsource their statutory obligations such as provident fund management, gratuity payments and insurance for workers to enable them to focus on their core business, Industry Ministry has proposed.
In a discussion paper, the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP) has suggested creation of new service entities to which most of the statutory compliances, under the labour laws for small and medium enterprises (SMEs), can be outsourced.
It said that the proposed entity could create a trust, as allowed under the Employee Provident Fund (EPF) Act.
The industry can have the option of asking the entity to provide pension in lieu of or in addition to the provident fund.
Similarly, the service entities could have its own medical facilities or could tie-up with other hospitals to guarantee the services required under the Employees State Insurance (ESI) Act. The move would not even need an amendment to the ESI Act since there is already a provision for such an option.
"The proposed concept implies that, short of assuming the criminal liabilities of the companies, most business related statutory liabilities can be assumed by this entity," it said.
Under the proposal, the outsourcing service entities can double up as insurance companies and provide a job loss policy cover in case of retrenchment.
Giving the rationale for the proposal, the paper said that while large industries can engage professionals to comply with the statutory obligations, SMEs are largely single-man or family-managed entities. They do not have resources to employ full-time professionals to manage the legal compliances.
The paper also raised questions such as whether the business model was capable of attracting private sector participation and if the existing players in the insurance sector will be willing to take up the activity in addition to their present mandate.
"The new service entity... is expected to be more efficient, economical and financially better equipped to serve the interests of both the employers and the employees. The industry can then concentrate more on their core activities like production and marketing," it added.
The paper said given the multiplicity of compliances, it becomes virtually impossible for SME units to fulfil all the obligations as required by law. The compliances range from remitting contributions to filing periodic returns besides maintenance of registers and records.
"As a result they are often forced to sidestep the burden of compliances by engaging casual/contract labour or resorting to more and more mechanisation," it said.
Seeking comments on its discussion paper, DIPP has raised questions like requirement of a regulator for such entities and whether the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) can be entrusted with the responsibility.
As an alternative to a policy for tackling job loss, the entity may opt for a sinking fund mechanism or operate a combination of a job loss policy plus a sinking fund on behalf of the industrial establishments, the paper said.
This entity could also take up the responsibility of other statutory payouts under other laws like disability compensation and compensations on account of accidents, injury or death, it said.
The paper said the proposed entity can constitute a profitable business model and can function on commercial lines.
"If a proper legal framework is put in place for such an entity, number of such entities can emerge which could provide competition and bring down the eventual cost to the industry, particularly the SMEs," it added.
Further, the workers will also be saved from approaching multiple agencies requiring complex paper work and bureaucratic hurdles for getting their legitimate dues. DIPP has sought stakeholders' comments till 16th August.
Things—as far as governance is concerned—cannot be worse in Delhi. It’s time to start asking questions now. The only way to fix things in the near future is to start asking questions now
When times are tough, the one-liners become even better, something I have seen in the old USSR and recently in Pakistan. These seldom, if ever, get picked up by the mainstream media. The two doing the selective rounds in Delhi in the context of the recent Cabinet reshuffle at the Centre are:
1) If you want to feel happy about the Prime Minister, just look at the President.
2) Premier President (a car) was designed in Italy. (It was known as the FIAT 1100.)
The simple question here, then, that needs an answer is this, "Are times bad in India?" The answer is simple: The times are terrible, especially in and around Delhi, where what looks like a total lack of governance is enhanced by a loot-as-much-as-you-can attitude. The recent Cabinet reshuffle, for example, is, in this writer's opinion, like re-arranging the soap dish and hand towels in a toilet which continues to remain as dirty and unsanitary as before.
But does that mean all of us sit back, fold our hands, and bemoan matters? Or can we do something?
The answer is a resounding YES; you and I can and should do something. Especially if we are educated and have access to the internet and have a basic minimal understanding of the Right to Information Act, 2005. Let me give a few examples of how it has, and can change, especially in the context of Moneylife and articles already published here.
1) The most famous episode, of course, has to do with how the RTI Act motivated and moved the search into the Commonwealth Games/Indian Olympics Association and telecom scams. It is not as though everybody involved in these two now well-documented episodes was corrupt. I know of officials who worked there who would even bring their own drinking water as well as coffee from home in their own flasks, travel by their own vehicles, and put their dissent in writing wherever it was required.
Some of us started asking questions as long ago as in 2005-2006, on issues here, and got the run around. Applications were not acknowledged. When they were finally "accepted", they were pushed around, and then all sorts of tricks were used to avoid answering them. However, the fact remains, at each point of correspondence, they (a) left a paper trail and (b) more interestingly, reached some person or the other who would quietly provide leads and information to take matters further.
Yes, it took 5-6 years, and it will take another long time to meander through the justice system, but so be it. At least it works.
2) A few months ago Moneylife carried some articles that I had written on what is increasingly being referred to as "Formula None", on the basis of some inputs I had received and enquiries I had made as a motoring enthusiast, and also as somebody who drives past the site frequently. These grew into full-fledged RTI enquiries with a variety of public authorities, and just around the same time, the Supreme Court judgment on land acquisition opened a Pandora's box of real estate scams nationally.
One of these RTI queries on the status of the national federation pertaining to motorsports, which claims on its website to be the official federation and recognised by the government as well as the Indian Olympics Association, received an amazing response from the ministry; the relevant part goes like this: "Although, Federation of Motor Sports Clubs of India (FMSCI) is recognised National Sports Federation, but it has not been granted annual recognition for 2010 and 2011".
While some babu in the Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports will probably be under the impression that he has squeezed out of a particularly troublesome RTI application with this double-speak nonsensical kind of response, the fact remains that this response is now engraved in stone, and will come back to demand due diligence every time even a single paisa of public funds are spent or subsidised on anything to do with the FMSCI. Which, in the very near future, means this Formula None race.
3) Basic corruption on the ground is something everybody complains about. And then, when it impacts us, we choose to keep quiet. So, ladies and feminists will talk about streets being unsafe for them, and then ride around without helmets, while the casualty wards of our hospitals fill up with head injury cases, especially during the monsoon. Cricketers and actors will talk about eradicating corruption, and then go right ahead and endorse products which we know are bad for our health.
A series of RTI applications, addressed to the relevant ministries, enquiring about the liability that a person endorsing a product carries, for example, will soon bring some form of sense and order here. No ministry will like to answer that the endorser has nil liability; that power they won't want to lose. So, by default, some liability will accrue on the person endorsing the product or the service. And that will kill multiple forms of corruption at its root.
An example is the real estate scam in Greater Noida Extension, where some projects were endorsed by national level cricketers, and who are now being sought out by people who booked properties there on the basis of those very advetisements. The matter is all the more complicated because a Supreme Court judgment is also involved, and is bound to see some interesting results, soon. It will be a test case, since the Supreme Court is taking all aspects into consideration, and that does not exempt endorsements.
In short, while my colleague Vinita Deshmukh has been doing sterling service writing on the subject here, it is time that more of us also started working on what can best be called 'Larger Interest RTIs'.
Go for it. Things-as far as governance is concerned-cannot be worse in Delhi. Believe me, I live here, and matters are pathetic. The only way to fix things in the near future is to start asking questions now. So that people in governance get worried about cleaning things now.