Despite all the rhetoric about Bengaluru being the Silicon valley of India, the truth is that its growth has come at the expense of turning the garden city into a garbage city. It is also unfortunate that none of the IT (information technology) leaders has been able to do anything to bring about a transformation in the quality of life in the city. They have only added to the mayhem by ensuring that more and more people buy cars and run them on the road.
People dump garbage on any vacant space that they can see. The Bengaluru municipality recently faced unrest from the residents of neighbouring village Mandur where all the garbage was being dumped. This has been going on for more than a year now. When garbage trucks were turned back to the city, truck operators dumped the garbage on any vacant land that they could set their eyes on. At a place called Silk board junction, mounds and mounds of stinking garbage were seen piled up recently.
What is the state government doing about it? Nothing. A year ago, a bunch of politicians went to the US to study the garbage collection and disposal system. It was a fully paid vacation for the politicians at the cost of the exchequer. Nothing concrete came out of this visit. Despite the Congress Party taking over the reins in Karnataka, not a single problem has been addressed so far. It is no secret that politicians in Karnataka are highly corrupt. Even the BMTC (Bengaluru Metropolitan Transport Corporation) bus fares have hit the roof. It would be cheaper to travel by auto than by bus. Even the metro train system was implemented only in phases with no connectivity to the entire city. For instance, if one has to travel from Indira Nagar station to Ulsoor station, the ticket fare is around Rs12/-; while the bus fare is Rs15/-. Ulsoor is the station immediately next to Indira Nagar. Never-ending traffic jams have ruined the skyline of this city, once famously called the garden city or the pensioner’s paradise.
On the flip side, none can deny that Bengaluru’s prosperity as an IT hub has led to students flocking to the city to pursue higher education and new vocations have sprung up. So, you have a team calling themselves ‘nail cutters’ or ‘pedicure specialists’ who roam from one end to another on a two-wheeler. Recently, in some areas, a new service has been introduced called ‘barber services at your beck and call’. You have to give a missed call to a number and, within no time, a call-centre executive will text you the message confirming the time and the barber’s mobile number. With this newfound prosperity, cobblers are facing the risk of extinction as people prefer to discard chappals or shoes instead of getting them mended. In a city already facing problems of garbage disposal, discarded footwear is only adding to the problem of solid waste.
Cooks are in great demand in Bengaluru. Almost every second household now boasts a cook. Pre-schools have mushroomed in every nook and corner. Blame it on the El Nino effect; vegetable prices have sky-rocketed. Services in banks have reached an abysmal level. To cite an example, HDFC Bank proclaims that one can pay property tax online but the municipal authority claims otherwise. Many people have issued property tax cheques that have bounced. BBMP doesn’t have the wherewithal to handle cash and the online system doesn’t work. Not many have shown interest in issuing demand drafts for property tax payments.
The less said about drainagethe better. With the slightest trace of monsoon shower, gutters get clogged. What exacerbates the problem is the narrow roads in Bengaluru. On both sides of the road, are garbage heaps thrown by property–owners; additionally, one side of the road is blocked due to free parking of vehicles of residents of the area. Ironically, real estate developers keep enticing customers—never mind the severe scarcity of water in the city. Giant-sized transformers stare at you from every nook and corner. Frequent power cuts are now the order of the day.
Multiplexes have taken inspiration from Chambal valley dacoits in that the price of a cinema ticket is far less than the price of popcorn tub. Citizens belonging to the middle class have to fill their stomach before venturing into the movie hall; otherwise the price of eatables will end up giving them indigestion. Even as the population of human beings has swelled, the population of dogs has swelled too. Despite such phenomenal growth, 99.5% of the city population still relies on road transport. Cities like Chennai, Delhi and Mumbai have progressed far, far beyond Bengaluru.
One does not know where the scourge lies. But blatant mismanagement of public funds, unplanned growth of the city, mounting traffic congestion woes and a cavalier approach by politicians have led to the degeneration of this city. Even business barons, like Kiran Shaw or Narayana Murthy or Mohan Pai or Nandan Nilekani, have been able to do little to stem the rot in the civic system. As someone rightly put it, the growth of IT has resulted in two Bengalurus—one is the upmarket Bengaluru with swanky flats and posh recreation clubs. The other Bengaluru is the one which remains as it was years ago, if not worse.
V Ganapathy, by email
Corporate bond market
The National Stock Exchange (NSE) has put in some explanatory notes in the segment ‘LIVE MARKET Bonds in CM Segment’ (cross margin segment) on its website. This includes the explanatory statement that the traded price is inclusive of accrued interest from the last interest payment date till the date of trade and subsequent YTM (yield to maturity) calculation on the price net of the accrued interest.
But if you consider the G-Sec (government securities) market, the YTM is calculated on the traded price (which would also be inclusive of accrued interest). After all, cash that the investor is putting out is the traded price, whatever it may include. So YTM should be calculated on that price—similar to stock price being cum-dividend and ex-dividend. P/E (price to earnings ratio) or P/BV (price to book value) is calculated on the traded price. Pure and simple.
I do hope that the government reverses the recent Budget announcements on the holding period and taxation. In a manner of speaking, it leads to arbitrarily boosting the stock market indices as people with money will have no other option that gives returns higher than savings account/ fixed deposits. An investor should have equal freedom in his/ her decision to invest in equities or debt in the securities market as an asset class and, within that asset class, taxation norms should be the same. There are now only options that are at the extreme ends of the returns scale. FDs (fixed deposits) or equities. Nothing in the middle which was earlier populated by FMPs (fixed maturity plans)/ debentures. This may also drive up corporates’ cost of debt as investors would now like higher coupon to partially offset the higher capital gains tax.
Further, FMPs are products that invest in debt securities but still get indexation and LTCG (long term capital gains) benefit whereas regular debentures do not. If the objective was to remove this anomaly, the government should have specifically targeted FMPs and not the entire asset class.
The reason for doing away with arbitrage between deposits and bonds is like treating apples and oranges alike, even though both are liabilities on the balance sheet. Is the government going to stop banks from floating one-year deposits as those are also short-term in nature? A re-think on the entire taxation structure is urgently required.
Sameer Ranade, by email
Unfair Tax Regime
This is with regard to “Seven reasons why TDS provisions are draconian & flawed” by Ananthram Rao. Any purchaser of a home has been made responsible for TDS (tax deducted at source) of 1% (20% for a non-resident Indian seller) to be deposited online and issue certificate to seller or builder for each instalment paid to a builder/ seller. Also, there are penalties involved if TDS is not deposited.
(a) The income-tax (I-T) rules assume that every buyer of property has Internet, computer and full knowledge about the procedure for TDS payment. (b) How is any buyer to know whether a seller is a resident or non-resident? (c) The TDS of 1% (20% for NRIs) is on the sale consideration of property and not on income or capital gains arising out of a transaction. For example, let us consider the case of a person A who sells a property, which he had purchased for Rs1.8 crore, to person B for Rs2.1 crore, after three years of purchase. After indexation for inflation is taken into account at, say, 30% for three years on the purchase value, there is a capital loss equal to Rs54 lakh. The extra amount received by the seller over his purchase price is Rs30 lakh. The transaction has resulted in a net capital loss equal to Rs24 lakh. According to I-T rules, TDS of Rs2.1 lakh (1% of sale price) must be deposited if the seller is a resident and Rs42 lakh if the seller is an NRI even when there is no tax liability resulting from the transaction. This is the most ridiculous I-T rule and it also violates the fundamental rights, assuming that everyone is capable of paying taxes online.
Dr HS Chhabra, online comment
The government's idea to get people to voluntarily forgo their LPG subsidy as an exercise in "nation building" has raised peoples' hackles. The SMS from oil companies says, "Want to join Nation Building? It's simple - just give up LPG subsidy." Now if only the minister or the prime minister had said, "I am giving up my LPG subsidy. Join me in nation building"
The Union Government wants me to forgo my subsidy of around Rs500 per LPG cylinder. And it thinks that if I ignore the SMS, it will ‘expose’ the ‘rich’ who want to hang on to benefits meant for the poor. If all of us filthy rich people who save fortunes due to this subsidy on cooking gas decide to give it up, it will add up to a princely sum of Rs3,500 crore. Mr Narendra Modi, thank you. I have no guilt in enjoying this subsidy. In fact, I get a small vicarious pleasure in getting something back from a system that has only taken from me all my life. Why is it that the system favours those who are parasitical to the extreme?
Given the noise about the Gujarat model, I thought that the age of meritocracy had to come. Alas, the Modi government seems to be bent on pushing honest citizens against the wall. Encouraging parasites to thrive through subsidies is surely not the way Gujarat has reached where it has, but the message this time is all wrong. If the Modi government is serious about the “Gujarat model”, we should actually see all subsidies being banished and that there are rewards for honesty and merit.
The government’s estimate of ‘under recoveries' on LPG is around Rs450 per cylinder and a direct contribution by the government of around Rs23 per cylinder. So at worst, the ‘subsidy’ on LPG is around Rs500 per cylinder. (Source of above nos). The government could easily remove the subsidy on LPG cylinders and provide cash subsidy to the poor. In fact, the whole business of ‘under recoveries’ on petroleum products is a sleight of hand, if one takes in to account the taxes on petroleum products imposed by the central and the state governments.
We have read about Members of Parliament (MPs) ordering hundreds of cylinders. Why not have the MPs come forward and forgo a few of their perks first in the interest of 'nation building'? Instead, even while the government wants us to forgo the LPG subsidy, we have television channels reporting how MPs are demanding special perks for themselves at airports.
The fiscal deficit of the government for the current year is Rs5.31 lakh crore. If all the subsidy on LPG to the ‘rich’ were removed, it would perhaps reduce the deficit by Rs3,500 crore. So the government is attempting an emotional blackmail whose impact will be more negative than positive. Unless of course, the wise Finance Minister, Arun Jaitley, can cook up 35 more social impact schemes of Rs100 crore each.
The other thing I fail to understand is, why successive governments only keep milking honest taxpayers? If someone who pays no taxes, gets free electricity, free food and a subsidised gas cylinder, he is doing it at my expense. I am being penalised not because of my circumstances but because of my efficiency. And I spend more- so I also contribute more by way of indirect taxes. There is no stream of income or expenditure of a salaried tax payer, that escapes taxation.
The exhortation to give up the LPG subsidy is coming from a government in which the parliamentarians earn tax-free salaries and perquisites which are likely to shame a corporate CEO. Further, MPs get a pension for just being voted in once. It is neither fair nor equitable. I am sure that the freebies given to parliamentarians, including spends on their security, families, housing and what not, easily exceed Rs3,500 crore. During election time, the filing of returns showed eye-popping numbers as income and wealth for so many politicians! When the government does not do anything to limit its own executives, it has no right to tell me to tighten my belt.
As a tax payer, I contribute to the nation building. It is the tax payer who helps build the infrastructure that the subsidy eating citizen enjoys. Yes, I am being bloody minded, but it is the politicians who are coaxing this reaction from me. We all know that the problem of this beloved country is the burden of too many people. Why does the government not link subsidies to the smallness of a family and help solve a problem at its root rather than do something impulsive that only irks the taxpayer?
And there are so many who get away: Agricultural income is tax free. No issues with that, but when politicians and businessmen start claiming crores of rupees under this head, the objective has been lost. Fix these leakages first, before attacking the belaboured and salaried tax payer. As a consumer, I am paying high prices for agriculture produce. Fix the profiteer first, instead of parroting that the farmer does not benefit. When there are so many fires to be doused, why is the government creating a new one?
CBI arrested six people including the CMD of Syndicate Bank, SK Jain, for allegedly taking a bribe of Rs50 lakh, say media reports
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has registered a case of alleged bribery of Rs50 lakh against six people including Sudhir Kumar (SK) Jain, chairman and managing director of Syndicate Bank.
The allegations are related with Jain allegedly asking for a bribe to extend credit facilities to certain companies. According to initial reports, CBI also carried out raids at 20 places in four cities — Bangalore, Bhopal, Mumbai and Delhi. It has recovered a bribe amount of Rs50 lakh.
Searches, so far, have led to recovery of several asset papers and incriminating documents. The agency said further investigation is on.
Jain assumed charge as CMD of Syndicate Bank on 8 July 2013. Before becoming the CMD, he was executive director of Bank of Baroda.
In a statement on behalf of the All India Bank Employees' Association (AIBEA), General Secretary C H Venkatachalam has hit out at corruption among high-ranking officials in banks. “Earlier, way back in the 90s, one CMD of UCO Bank was arrested for his involvement in the Harshad Mehta Scam and he was jailed. There have been cases coming up now and then and many cases get hushed up,” he said.
The statement goes on to note that, cases of high level officials at the State Bank of India and the United Bank of India were either hushed up or buried. This is especially problematic when you consider that ordinary employees of these banks suffer swift action for much less serious misdeeds and misdemeanours.
“It is high time that the Government should frame a set of rules and conduct regulations applicable to the EDs and CMDs of the Banks,” he said. Venkatachalam goes on to add that, “In a context where Banks are facing huge bad loans, the accountability for the same at the top should be ensured.”